Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Other Publications
    • ijss

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
International Journal of Spine Surgery
  • My alerts
International Journal of Spine Surgery

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Follow ijss on Twitter
  • Visit ijss on Facebook
Research ArticleArticle

Nonmetallic Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polyetheretherketone Implants Vs Titanium Implants: Analysis of Clinical Outcomes and Influence on Postoperative Radiotherapy Planning in Metastatic Spine Tumor Surgery

Naresh Kumar, Priyambada Kumar, Gabriel Leow Zihui, Leon Seow, Shen Liang, Si Jian Hui, Rohan Parihar, James Hallinan, Balamurugan Vellayappan and Jiong Hao Jonathan Tan
International Journal of Spine Surgery October 2024, 18 (5) 603-610; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/8685
Naresh Kumar
1 Department of Orthopedic Surgery (Spine division), National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
MBBS, MS(Orth), DNB
Roles: Senior Consultant
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: dosksn@nus.edu.sg
Priyambada Kumar
1 Department of Orthopedic Surgery (Spine division), National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
MBBS, MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gabriel Leow Zihui
2 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
MBBS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Leon Seow
3 Department of Radiation Oncology, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
MBBS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shen Liang
4 Biostatistics Unit, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Si Jian Hui
2 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
MBBS, MRCS(Edin)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rohan Parihar
1 Department of Orthopedic Surgery (Spine division), National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
MBBS, MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James Hallinan
5 Department of Diagnostic Imaging, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
MBChB
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Balamurugan Vellayappan
3 Department of Radiation Oncology, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
MBBS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jiong Hao Jonathan Tan
1 Department of Orthopedic Surgery (Spine division), National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
MBBS, MRCS, MMED, FRCSEd
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    Overall survival results.

  • Figure 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2

    Sample computed tomography imaging. (a) Axial CT section at the T7 vertebra with bilateral titanium pedicle screw instrumentation. Note the increased artifact generated. (b) Axial CT section at L1 vertebra with carbon fiber–reinforced polyetheretherketone pedicle screws. Note minimal artifact generated.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Demographic and clinical characteristics by study group.

    CharacteristicTitaniumCFR-PEEK P
    Number of patients, n (%)42 (67.7%)20 (32.3%)-
    Age at surgery, y, mean ± SD63.0 ± 10.363.8 ± 15.20.813
    Sex, n (%)-
     Man26 (61.9%)9 (45.0%)
     Woman16 (30.10%)11 (55.0%)
    Primary tumor,a n (%)0.089c
     Lung, osteosarcoma, stomach, and bladder13 (31.0)5 (25.0)
     Esophagus and pancreas1 (2.38)0 (0)
     Liver, gallbladder, and unidentified1 (2.38)2 (10.0)
     Kidney and uterus1 (2.38)4 (20.0)
     Rectum15 (35.7)3 (15.0)
     Thyroid, breast, prostate, and carcinoid tumor11 (26.2)6 (30.0)
    SINS, n (%)0.509c
     0–62 (4.80)0 (0)
     7–1227 (64.2)15 (75.0)
     13–1813 (31.0)5 (25.0)
    SINS, mean ± SD11.45 ± 2.3611.50 ± 1.240.933
    CCI score, median (range)9.00 (3.00–11.00)9.00 (2.00–13.00)0.106d
    Modified Tokuhashi score, mean ± SD8.62 ± 2.458.40 ± 2.700.376
    Predicted survivability,a n (%)0.259c
     0–6 mo14 (54.5)8 (40.0)
     9–11 mo19 (27.3)11 (50.0)
     >11 mo9 (18.2)1 (10.0)
    ECOG score, n (%)
     023 (54.8)10 (50.0)0.230c
     113 (31.0)3 (15.0)
     23 (7.14)4 (20.0)
     33 (7.14)2 (10.0)
     40 (0)1 (5.0)
    Independence,b n (%)0.328c
     Independent39 (92.9)17 (85.0)
     Dependent3 (7.14)3 (15.0)
    • Abbreviations: CCI, Charlson Comorbidity Index; CFR-PEEK, carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; SINS, spinal instability neoplastic score.

    • ↵a Based on modified Tokuhashi scoring system.

    • ↵b Based on ECOG score.

    • ↵c χ 2 test was performed.

    • ↵d Mann-Whitney U test was performed.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Surgical and operative results.

    Outcome MeasureTitaniumCFR-PEEK P
    Duration of operation, min, median (range)286 (94–726)270 (154–468)0.243b
    Total length of stay, d, median (range)17 (5–62)10 (3–33)0.093b
    Estimated blood loss, mL, median (range)500 (50–3500)275 (40–600)0.050b
    No. of levels instrumented, median (range)5.00 (1.00–15.00)4.00 (2.00–7.00)0.007b
    Cases where decompression was performed, n (%)32 (76.2)10 (50.0)-
    Number of levels decompressed, n (%)0.108a
     010 (23.8)10 (50.0)
     19 (21.4)6 (30.0)
     213 (31.0)2 (10.0)
     37 (16.7)2 (10.0)
     43 (7.1)0 (0)
    Number of levels decompressed, n (%)0.009
     <219 (45.2)16 (80.0)
     ≥223 (54.8)4 (20.0)
    Area of decompression, n (%)-
     Thoracic14 (33.3)6 (30.0)
     Thoracolumbar8 (19.0)1 (5.0)
     Lumbar6 (14.3)1 (5.0)
     Lumbosacral1 (2.4)1 (5.0)
     Sacral0 (0)0 (0)
     None13 (31.0)11 (55.0)
    Surgical complications, n (%)5 (22.7)3 (15)-
     Intraoperative incidental durotomy21
     Delayed wound healing20
     Superficial skin infection10
     Deep surgical infection01
     Hardware breakage (screw/rod)00
     Screw loosening01
    Medical complications, n (%)14 (33.3)2 (10.5)0.029a
    Change in ASIA score, n (%)0.846a
     Worsened0 (0)0 (0)
     No change8 (19.0)3 (15.0)
     Improved34 (81.0)17 (85.0)
    • Abbreviations: ASIA, American Spinal Injury Association; CFR-PEEK, carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone.

    • ↵a χ 2 test was performed.

    • ↵b Mann-Whitney U test was performed.

    • View popup
    Table 3

    Radiotherapy data by study group.

    ParameterTitaniumCFR-PEEK P
    Artifact volume, mm3 73.4 ± 50.320.0 ± 20.7<0.001 a
    Artifact volume per level, mm3 13.2 ± 8.813.35 ± 3.24<0.001 a
    Time taken to contour artifacts, min17.3 ± 5.849.60 ± 7.170.049 a
    No. of spinal levels covered for radiotherapy5.97 ± 2.405.50 ± 2.420.559a
    • Abbreviation: CFR-PEEK, carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone.

    • Note: Data presented as mean ± SD.

    • ↵a Mann-Whitney U test was performed.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

International Journal of Spine Surgery
Vol. 18, Issue 5
1 Oct 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on International Journal of Spine Surgery.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Nonmetallic Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polyetheretherketone Implants Vs Titanium Implants: Analysis of Clinical Outcomes and Influence on Postoperative Radiotherapy Planning in Metastatic Spine Tumor Surgery
(Your Name) has sent you a message from International Journal of Spine Surgery
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the International Journal of Spine Surgery web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Nonmetallic Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polyetheretherketone Implants Vs Titanium Implants: Analysis of Clinical Outcomes and Influence on Postoperative Radiotherapy Planning in Metastatic Spine Tumor Surgery
Naresh Kumar, Priyambada Kumar, Gabriel Leow Zihui, Leon Seow, Shen Liang, Si Jian Hui, Rohan Parihar, James Hallinan, Balamurugan Vellayappan, Jiong Hao Jonathan Tan
International Journal of Spine Surgery Oct 2024, 18 (5) 603-610; DOI: 10.14444/8685

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Nonmetallic Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polyetheretherketone Implants Vs Titanium Implants: Analysis of Clinical Outcomes and Influence on Postoperative Radiotherapy Planning in Metastatic Spine Tumor Surgery
Naresh Kumar, Priyambada Kumar, Gabriel Leow Zihui, Leon Seow, Shen Liang, Si Jian Hui, Rohan Parihar, James Hallinan, Balamurugan Vellayappan, Jiong Hao Jonathan Tan
International Journal of Spine Surgery Oct 2024, 18 (5) 603-610; DOI: 10.14444/8685
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Placement Using the ExcelsiusGPS Robotic Navigation Platform: An Analysis of 728 Screws
  • Management of Spinal Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis in Children: A Systematic Review
  • Meta-Analysis Investigating Optimal Timing of Chemoprophylaxis for Venous Thromboembolism in Operatively Managed Blunt Spinal Injuries
Show more Article

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • metastatic spine tumour surgery
  • CFR-PEEK
  • adjuvant radiotherapy

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Content
  • Archive

More Information

  • About IJSS
  • About ISASS
  • Privacy Policy

More

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Feedback

Other Services

  • Author Instructions
  • Join ISASS
  • Reprints & Permissions

© 2025 International Journal of Spine Surgery

International Journal of Spine Surgery Online ISSN: 2211-4599

Powered by HighWire