Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Other Publications
    • ijss

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
International Journal of Spine Surgery
  • My alerts
International Journal of Spine Surgery

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Follow ijss on Twitter
  • Visit ijss on Facebook
Research ArticleLumbar Spine

Predictability in Achieving Target Intervertebral Lordosis Using Personalized Interbody Implants

Saeed S. Sadrameli, Donald J. Blaskiewicz, Jahangir Asghar, Christopher P. Ames, Gregory M. Mundis, Joseph A. Osorio, Justin S. Smith, Chun-Po Yen, Sigurd H. Berven, Ashvin I. Patel, Michele Temple-Wong, Rodrigo J. Nicolau and Roland S. Kent
International Journal of Spine Surgery August 2024, 18 (S1) S16-S23; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/8637
Saeed S. Sadrameli
1 AdventHealth Celebration, Celebration, FL, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Dr.Sadrameli@orlandoneurosurgery.com
Donald J. Blaskiewicz
2 St. Luke’s Boise Medical Center, Boise, ID, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jahangir Asghar
3 Elite Spine Health and Wellness, Plantation, FL, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher P. Ames
4 Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gregory M. Mundis
5 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, CA, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joseph A. Osorio
6 Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
MD, PHD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Justin S. Smith
7 Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
MD, PHD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chun-Po Yen
7 Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sigurd H. Berven
8 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ashvin I. Patel
9 Kennedy-White Orthopedic Center, Sarasota, FL, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michele Temple-Wong
10 Carlsmed, Carlsbad, CA, USA
PHD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rodrigo J. Nicolau
10 Carlsmed, Carlsbad, CA, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roland S. Kent
11 Axis Spine Center, Coeur d’Alene, ID, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Lumbar lordosis distribution has become a pivotal factor in re-establishing the foundational alignment of the lumbar spine. This can directly influence overall sagittal alignment, leading to improved long-term outcomes for patients. Despite the wide availability of hyperlordotic stock cages intended to achieve optimal postoperative alignment, there is a lack of correlation between the lordotic shape of a cage and the resultant intervertebral alignment. Recently, personalized spine surgery has witnessed significant advancements, including 3D-printed personalized interbody implants, which are customized to the surgeon’s treatment and alignment goals. This study evaluates the reliability of 3D-printed patient-specific interbody implants to achieve the planned postoperative intervertebral alignment.

Methods This is a retrospective study of 217 patients with spinal deformity or degenerative conditions. Patients were included if they received 3D-printed personalized interbody implants. The desired intervertebral lordosis (IVL) angle was prescribed into the device design for each personalized interbody (IVL goal). Standing postoperative radiographs were measured, and the IVL offset was calculated as IVL achieved minus IVL goal.

Results In this patient population, 365 personalized interbodies were implanted, including 145 anterior lumbar interbody fusions (ALIFs), 99 lateral lumbar interbody fusions (LLIFs), and 121 transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions. Among the 365 treated levels, IVL offset was 1.1° ± 4.4° (mean ± SD). IVL was achieved within 5° of the plan in 299 levels (81.9%). IVL offset depended on the approach of the lumbar interbody fusion and was achieved within 5° for 85.9% of LLIF, 82.6% of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions and 78.6% of ALIFs. Ten levels (2.7%) missed the planned IVL by >10°. ALIF and LLIF levels in which the plan was missed by more than 5° tended to be overcorrected.

Conclusions This study supports the use of 3D-printed personalized interbody implants to achieve planned sagittal intervertebral alignment.

Clinical Relevance Personalized interbody implants can consistently achieve IVL goals and potentially impact foundational lumbar alignment.

Level of Evidence 4.

  • intervertebral
  • lordosis
  • lumbar fusion
  • personalized
  • interbody
  • cage
  • device
  • pre-operative planning

Footnotes

  • Funding This work was supported by funding from Carlsmed.

  • Declaration of Conflicting Interests Saeed S. Sadrameli discloses that he receives consulting fees from Carlsmed. Donald J. Blaskiewicz discloses that he is a clinical research investigator and receives consulting fees from Carlsmed. Christopher P. Ames discloses that he is a clinical research investigator and receives consulting fees from Carlsmed. Jahangir Asghar discloses that he is a clinical research investigator and receives consulting fees from Carlsmed. Gregory M. Mundis discloses that he receives consulting fees from Carlsmed. Joseph A. Osorio discloses that he is a clinical research investigator and receives consulting fees from Carlsmed. Justin S. Smith discloses that he is a shareholder and receives consulting fees from Carlsmed. Sigurd H. Berven discloses that he receives consulting fees from Carlsmed. Chun-Po Yen discloses that he is a clinical research investigator and receives consulting fees from Carlsmed. Ashvin I. Patel discloses that he is a clinical investigator and receives consulting fees from Carlsmed. Michele Temple-Wong discloses that she is an employee of Carlsmed. Rodrigo J. Nicolau discloses that he is an employee of Carlsmed. Roland S. Kent discloses that he is a clinical research investigator and receives consulting fees from Carlsmed.

  • Disclosures In addition to the relationships listed in the Declaration of Conflicting Interests, Christopher Ames reports grants/contracts from SRS; royalties/licenses from DePuy Synthes, K2M, Next Orthosurgical, Stryker, Biomet Zimmer Spine, Medicrea, and NuVasive; consulting fees from DePuy Synthes, Medicrea, Agada Medical, Medtronic, and K2M; is the chair of the SRS Safety and Value Committee and serves on the executive committee of ISSG; serves on the editorial board for Operative Neurosurgery and Neurospine; is the director of Global Spinal Analytics, and has research interests with Titan Spine, ISSG, and DePuy Synthes. Sigurd Berven reports royalties/licenses from Elsevier, Medtronic, and Stryker; consulting fees from Medtronic, SI Bone, Innovasis, Globus, and Camber Spine; and stock/stock options from Globus, Green Sun Medical, and Novapproach. Roland Kent reports consulting fees from SI Bone and Globus Medical; payment/honoraria from SI Bone, Globus Medical, and Premia Spine; and patents pending for SI Bone. Gregory Mundis reports royalties/licenses from NuVasive, Seaspine, and Stryker; consulting fees from Seaspine and SI Bone; participating on data safety monitory board or advisory board from NuVasive and Seaspine; leadership role in Global Spine Outreach, San Diego Spine Foundation, and San Diego Orthopaedic Society; and stock/stock options with Alphatec Seaspine, NuVasive, and Orthofix. Joseph Osorio reports grants/contracts from Medtronic; royalties/licenses from Alphatec; and consulting fees from Alphatec, Medtronic, and DePuy. Justin Smith reports grants/contracts from SeaSpine/Orthofix, NREF, AO Spine, and DePuy Synthes/ISSGF; royalties/licenses from Highridge and Globus/NuVasive; consulting fees from Highridge, SeaSpine/Orthofix, Medtronic, Cerapedics, and Globus/NuVasive; support for attending meetings/travel from AO Spine; serving on the SRS Board of Directors and ISSGF Executive Committee; and stock/stock options from Alphatec and Globus/NuVasive. Chun-Po Yen reports consulting fees from Life Spine and Medtronic and support for teaching a cadaveric course from Life Spine.

  • Ethics Approval This study utilized secondary research consisting of de-identified data for which consent is not required and was therefore exempt from institutional review board review under 45 CFR §46.104 (d)(4)(ii). No direct patient involvement occurred.

  • This manuscript is generously published free of charge by ISASS, the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery. Copyright © 2024 ISASS. To see more or order reprints or permissions, see http://ijssurgery.com.
View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

International Journal of Spine Surgery
Vol. 18, Issue S1
1 Aug 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on International Journal of Spine Surgery.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Predictability in Achieving Target Intervertebral Lordosis Using Personalized Interbody Implants
(Your Name) has sent you a message from International Journal of Spine Surgery
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the International Journal of Spine Surgery web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Predictability in Achieving Target Intervertebral Lordosis Using Personalized Interbody Implants
Saeed S. Sadrameli, Donald J. Blaskiewicz, Jahangir Asghar, Christopher P. Ames, Gregory M. Mundis, Joseph A. Osorio, Justin S. Smith, Chun-Po Yen, Sigurd H. Berven, Ashvin I. Patel, Michele Temple-Wong, Rodrigo J. Nicolau, Roland S. Kent
International Journal of Spine Surgery Aug 2024, 18 (S1) S16-S23; DOI: 10.14444/8637

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Predictability in Achieving Target Intervertebral Lordosis Using Personalized Interbody Implants
Saeed S. Sadrameli, Donald J. Blaskiewicz, Jahangir Asghar, Christopher P. Ames, Gregory M. Mundis, Joseph A. Osorio, Justin S. Smith, Chun-Po Yen, Sigurd H. Berven, Ashvin I. Patel, Michele Temple-Wong, Rodrigo J. Nicolau, Roland S. Kent
International Journal of Spine Surgery Aug 2024, 18 (S1) S16-S23; DOI: 10.14444/8637
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Radiographic Alignment in Deformity Patients Treated With Personalized Interbody Devices: Early Experience From the COMPASS Registry
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Comparison of Stand-Alone Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion, 360° Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion, and Arthroplasty for Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation: Focus on Nerve Decompression and Painful Spinal Instability Resolution
  • Safety and Viability of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Complex Revision Lumbar Spine Surgeries: Insights From a Case Series of 135 Patients on Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion/Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cage Removal
  • Canal Bone Ratio for Predicting Bone Mineral Density in Lumbar Degenerative Diseases
Show more Lumbar Spine

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • intervertebral
  • lordosis
  • lumbar fusion
  • personalized
  • interbody
  • cage
  • device
  • pre-operative planning

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Content
  • Archive

More Information

  • About IJSS
  • About ISASS
  • Privacy Policy

More

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Feedback

Other Services

  • Author Instructions
  • Join ISASS
  • Reprints & Permissions

© 2025 International Journal of Spine Surgery

International Journal of Spine Surgery Online ISSN: 2211-4599

Powered by HighWire