Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Other Publications
    • ijss

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
International Journal of Spine Surgery
  • My alerts
International Journal of Spine Surgery

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Follow ijss on Twitter
  • Visit ijss on Facebook
Research ArticleEndoscopic Minimally Invasive Surgery

Redefining Surgical Boundaries for Obese Patients? Full Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Proves Equally Effective With Shorter Hospital Stay in Obese Patients

Xavier Castel, Henri d'Astorg, Mohammad Allaji, Vincent Fiere and Marc Szadkowski
International Journal of Spine Surgery February 2025, 19 (1) 2-10; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/8654
Xavier Castel
1 Hopital Privé Jean Mermoz, Ramsay-Générale de Santé, Lyon, France
2 Santy Orthopedic Center, Spine Unit, Center Orthopédique Santy, Lyon, France
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: xavier.castel@neurochirurgie.fr
Henri d'Astorg
1 Hopital Privé Jean Mermoz, Ramsay-Générale de Santé, Lyon, France
2 Santy Orthopedic Center, Spine Unit, Center Orthopédique Santy, Lyon, France
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mohammad Allaji
1 Hopital Privé Jean Mermoz, Ramsay-Générale de Santé, Lyon, France
MD(c)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vincent Fiere
1 Hopital Privé Jean Mermoz, Ramsay-Générale de Santé, Lyon, France
2 Santy Orthopedic Center, Spine Unit, Center Orthopédique Santy, Lyon, France
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marc Szadkowski
1 Hopital Privé Jean Mermoz, Ramsay-Générale de Santé, Lyon, France
2 Santy Orthopedic Center, Spine Unit, Center Orthopédique Santy, Lyon, France
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure

    Pre- and postoperative radicular pain box plot.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Demographic characteristics endoscopic group.

    CharacteristicObese Endoscopic Patient (N = 71)Nonobese Endoscopic Patient (N = 54)Total Endoscopic Population (N = 125) P
    Age, y, mean (min; max)49.1 (20; 78)47.2 (24; 74)48.3 (20; 78)0.4474
    Sex, N (%)0.0521
     Men36 (50.7)27 (50.0)63 (50.4)
     Women35 (49.3)27 (50.0)62 (49.6)
    BMI, mean (min; max)33.6 (30.0; 45.1)24.5 (17.0; 29.7)29.7 (17.0; 45.1)0.0032
    Duration of pain before surgery,a mo, mean (min; max)8.8 (0.50; 120.00)5.8 (0.15; 24.00)7.5 (0.15; 120.00)0.1134
    Operative herniation localization, N (%)0.0579
     Posterolateral54 (76.1)34 (63.0)88 (70.4)
     Far lateral14 (19.7)11 (20.4)25 (20.0)
     Migrated3 (4.2)9 (16.7)12 (9.6)
    Operative level, N (%)0.2224
     L1-L2, L2-L3, or L3-L414 (19.7)5 (9.3)19 (15.2)
     L4-L536 (50.7)28 (51.9)64 (51.2)
     L5-S121 (29.6)21 (38.9)42 (33.6)
    • Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; max, maximum; min, minimum.

    • ↵a Data were missing for 1 patient in the obese endoscopic group.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Preoperative assessment endoscopic group.

    Outcome MeasureObese Endoscopic Patient (N = 71)Nonobese Endoscopic Patient (N = 54)Total Endoscopic Population (N = 125) P
    VAS-BP,a mean (min; max)4.6 (0.0; 10.0)3.6 (0.0; 9.2)4.1 (0.0; 10.0)0.0078
    VAS-L, mean (min; max)6.9 (2.1; 10.0)6.6 (2.0; 10.0)6.7 (2.0; 10.0)0.3746
    ODI,b mean (median) (min; max)50.7 (53.5) (10; 96)47.1 (46.0) (10; 78)49.1 (50.0) (10; 96)0.2900
     Mean50.747.149.1 
     Median53.546.050.0 
     Min; Max(10; 96)(10; 78)(10; 96) 
    • Abbreviations: ODI, Oswestry Disability Index; VAS-BP, visual analog scale for back pain; VAS-L, visual analog scale for leg pain.

    • ↵a Data were missing for 1 patient in the nonobese endoscopic group.

    • ↵b Data were missing for 1 patient in the obese endoscopic group.

    • View popup
    Table 3

    Operative and hospital data endoscopic group.

    Outcome MeasureObese Endoscopic Patient (N = 71)Nonobese Endoscopic Patient (N = 54)Total Endoscopic Population (N = 125) P
    Operative duration, min, mean (min; max)70.2 (27; 135)63.1 (29; 139)67.1 (27; 139)0.0971
    Approach, n (%)0.0225
     Transforaminal34 (47.9)15 (27.8)49 (39.2) 
     Interlaminar37 (52.1)39 (72.2)76 (60.8) 
    Length of hospital stay (night), mean (min; max)1.7 (1; 7)1.4 (1; 12)1.6 (1; 12)0.0244
    3 nights or more, n 10111 
    • View popup
    Table 4

    Complications and reoperation endoscopic group.

    Outcome MeasureObese Endoscopic Patient (N = 71)Nonobese Endoscopic Patient (N = 54)Total Endoscopic Population (N = 125) P
    Surgical complications, n (%)>0.99
     Yes1 (1.4)1 (1.9)2 (1.6) 
     No70 (98.6)53 (98.1)123 (98.4) 
    Nonsurgical complications, n (%)0.4320
     Yes0 (0.0)1 (1.9)1 (0.8) 
     No71 (100.0)53 (98.1)124 (99.2) 
    Re-operation, n (%)0.6978
     Yes5 (7.0)2 (3.7)7 (5.6) 
     No66 (93.0)52 (96.3)118 (94.4) 
    Disc herniation recurrence, n (%)0.2338
     Yes5 (7.0)1 (1.9)6 (4.8) 
     No66 (93.0)53 (98.1)119 (95.2) 
    • View popup
    Table 5

    Clinical results last follow-up in the endoscopic group.

    Outcome MeasureObese Endoscopic Patient (N = 71)Nonobese Endoscopic Patient (N = 54)Total Endoscopic Population (N = 125) P
    Delta VAS-BP, N 70491190.5978
     Mean−1.5−1.2−1.4
     Median−1.2−1.0−1.2
     Min; Max(−10.0; 3.0)(−8.2; 5.0)(−10.0; 5.0)
    Delta VAS-L, N 70491190.2958
     Mean−4.8−4.2−4.5
     Median−4.9−4.8−4.8
     Min; Max(−10.0; 6.0)(−10.0; 4.1)(−10.0; 6.0)
    Delta ODI, N 69451140.8573
     Mean−32.3−31.0−31.8
     Median−32.0−32.0−32.0
     Min; Max(−80; 10)(−66; 16)(−80; 16)
    Satisfaction, N (%)70481180.5009
     Poor2 (2.9)1 (2.1)3 (2.5)
     Fair8 (11.4)5 (10.4)13 (11.0)
     Good24 (34.3)23 (47.9)47 (39.8)
     Excellent36 (51.4)19 (39.6)55 (46.6)
    • Abbreviations: ODI, Oswestry Disability Index; VAS-BP, visual analog scale for measuring back pain; VAS-L, visual analog scale for measuring leg pain.

    • View popup
    Table 6

    Obese endoscopic vs obese open surgery.

    Outcome MeasureObese Endoscopic Patient (N = 71)Obese Open Patients (N = 31)Total Obese Population (N = 102) P
    Age, y, N 71311020.0063
     Mean49.141.146.6
     Min; Max(20; 78)(23; 68)(20; 78)
    Sex, N 7131102
     Men, n (%)36 (50.7)23 (74.2)59 (57.8)
     Women, n (%)35 (49.3)8 (25.8)43 (42.2)
    BMI (kg/m²), N 71311020.0341
     Mean33.632,533,2
     Min; Max(30.0; 45.1)(30.1; 40.8](30.0; 45.1)
    Duration of pain before surgery, no, N 70311010.6796
     Mean8.87,68,5
     Min; Max(0.50; 120.00)(0.50; 60.0)(0.50; 120.00)
    Operative time, min, N 71311020.0087
     Mean70.259,867,0
     Min; Max(27; 135)(40; 90)(27; 135)
    Hospital stay (nights), N 71311020.0006
     Mean1.7 (1.2)2.4 (1.1)1.9 (1.2)
     Min; Max(1; 7)(1; 4)(1; 7)
    Satisfaction, N 70311010.6659
     Poor, n (%)2 (2.9)0 (0.0)2 (2.0)
     Fair, n (%)8 (11.4)4 (12.9)12 (11.9)
     Good, n (%)24 (34.3)14 (45.2)38 (37.6)
     Excellent, n (%)36 (51.4)13 (41.9)49 (48.5)
    Complications, N 71311020.51176
     Yes, n (%)1 (1.4)1 (1.3)2 (2.0)
     No, n (%)70 (98.6)30 (96.8)100 (98.0)
    Reoperation, N 71311020.4489
     Yes, n (%)5 (7.0)4 (12.9)9 (8.8)
     No, n (%)66 (93.0)27 (87.1)93 (91.2)
    • Abbreviation: BMI, body mass index.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

International Journal of Spine Surgery
Vol. 19, Issue 1
1 Feb 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on International Journal of Spine Surgery.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Redefining Surgical Boundaries for Obese Patients? Full Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Proves Equally Effective With Shorter Hospital Stay in Obese Patients
(Your Name) has sent you a message from International Journal of Spine Surgery
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the International Journal of Spine Surgery web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Redefining Surgical Boundaries for Obese Patients? Full Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Proves Equally Effective With Shorter Hospital Stay in Obese Patients
Xavier Castel, Henri d'Astorg, Mohammad Allaji, Vincent Fiere, Marc Szadkowski
International Journal of Spine Surgery Feb 2025, 19 (1) 2-10; DOI: 10.14444/8654

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Redefining Surgical Boundaries for Obese Patients? Full Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Proves Equally Effective With Shorter Hospital Stay in Obese Patients
Xavier Castel, Henri d'Astorg, Mohammad Allaji, Vincent Fiere, Marc Szadkowski
International Journal of Spine Surgery Feb 2025, 19 (1) 2-10; DOI: 10.14444/8654
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Effective Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery Technique With Better Facet Joint Preserving for Lumbar Lateral Recess Stenosis
  • Risk Analysis of Neurological Deterioration Associated With Fluid Insufflation in Uniportal Spine Endoscopy: A Case Series and Literature Review
  • Comparison of Pain and Functional Outcomes Among Geriatric and Nongeriatric Adults Following Full Endoscopic Spine Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Pathology
Show more Endoscopic Minimally Invasive Surgery

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • full endoscopy
  • spine surgery
  • obesity
  • lumbar discectomy

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Content
  • Archive

More Information

  • About IJSS
  • About ISASS
  • Privacy Policy

More

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Feedback

Other Services

  • Author Instructions
  • Join ISASS
  • Reprints & Permissions

© 2025 International Journal of Spine Surgery

International Journal of Spine Surgery Online ISSN: 2211-4599

Powered by HighWire