Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Other Publications
    • ijss

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
International Journal of Spine Surgery
  • My alerts
International Journal of Spine Surgery

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Follow ijss on Twitter
  • Visit ijss on Facebook
Research ArticleLUMBAR ARTHROPLASTY
Open Access

The Parallax Effect in the Evaluation of Range of Motion in Lumbar Total Disc Replacement

Joshua D. Auerbach, Surena Namdari, Andrew H. Milby, Andrew P. White, Sudheer C. Reddy, Baron S. Lonner and Richard A. Balderston
International Journal of Spine Surgery January 2008, 2 (4) 184-188; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/SASJ-2008-0020-RR
Joshua D. Auerbach
aThe Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Surena Namdari
bThe Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew H. Milby
cThe University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
BA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew P. White
dThe Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sudheer C. Reddy
bThe Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Baron S. Lonner
eDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU-Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, New York
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard A. Balderston
f3B Orthopaedics, Pennsylvania Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    Figure 1 is a schematic of the technique used for variable X-ray beam acquisition. With the X-ray tube aiming parallel to the floor, the angle subtended between the X-ray beam and the device center was decreased from 15°, 10°, 5°, and 0° in the sagittal plane by sequentially lowering the X-ray beam without changing the distance between the tube and the device (black arrow).

  • Figure 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2

    Sawbones model (Pacific Research Laboratories, Inc., Vashon, Washington) with lumbar total disc replacement (ProDisc-L, Synthes Spine, West Chester, Pennsylvania) implanted at the L4-5 interbody space in flexion. With the X-ray beam in the neutral position (A), the edges of the endplates are clearly identifiable. With increasing superior movement of the X-ray beam at 5° (B), 10° (C), and 15° (D), notice the increasingly distorted projection of the footplates. The keel method, using lines drawn along the superior and inferior aspects of the keels, was used to determine Cobb measurements from which range of measurements were calculated.8 A comparison of (A: neutral beam angle) and (D: 15° beam angle) reveals a difference of only 0.3° despite an X-ray beam angle of 15°.

    ILA: index level angle

  • Figure 3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3

    Minimal variation in mean ROM measurement as beam angle increases.

  • Figure 4
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4

    Minimal variation in median intra-observer ROM error as beam angle increases.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Inter- and Intraobserver Precision and Accuracy of Radiographic Range of Motion Measurement Using the Keel Method at Increasing Beam Angles

    ComparisonCalculationn0°5°10°15°P
    Interobserver precisionaROM observations 1 and 2 combined1624.7 ± 4.623.8 ± 3.424.1 ± 3.324.2 ± 3.9.92
    Intraobserver accuracyaROM error observations 1 and 2 combined164.3 ± 4.63.2 ± 3.33.8 ± 3.33.3 ± 3.9.86
    Interobserver precisionbROM observation 1 - ROM observation 282.0 (0.0 - 10.0)3.0 (1.0 - 10.0)1.5 (0.0 - 10.0)1.0 (0.0 - 3.0).09
    Intraobserver accuracybROM error observation 1 - ROM error observation 282.0 (0.0 - 10.0)3.0 (0.2 - 10.0)1.5 (0.0 - 9.4)1.0 (0.0 - 3.0).07
    • ↵a ROM Values are means ± SD. P values are calculated by one-way ANOVA.

    • ↵b ROM Values are medians (low-high). P values calculated by the Friedman test.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

International Journal of Spine Surgery
Vol. 2, Issue 4
1 Jan 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on International Journal of Spine Surgery.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Parallax Effect in the Evaluation of Range of Motion in Lumbar Total Disc Replacement
(Your Name) has sent you a message from International Journal of Spine Surgery
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the International Journal of Spine Surgery web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The Parallax Effect in the Evaluation of Range of Motion in Lumbar Total Disc Replacement
Joshua D. Auerbach, Surena Namdari, Andrew H. Milby, Andrew P. White, Sudheer C. Reddy, Baron S. Lonner, Richard A. Balderston
International Journal of Spine Surgery Jan 2008, 2 (4) 184-188; DOI: 10.1016/SASJ-2008-0020-RR

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The Parallax Effect in the Evaluation of Range of Motion in Lumbar Total Disc Replacement
Joshua D. Auerbach, Surena Namdari, Andrew H. Milby, Andrew P. White, Sudheer C. Reddy, Baron S. Lonner, Richard A. Balderston
International Journal of Spine Surgery Jan 2008, 2 (4) 184-188; DOI: 10.1016/SASJ-2008-0020-RR
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIAL AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Motion-preserving technologies for degenerative lumbar spine: The past, present, and future horizons
  • Preclinical and clinical experience with a viscoelastic total disc replacement
  • Clinical performance of an elastomeric lumbar disc replacement: Minimum 12 months follow-up
Show more Lumbar arthroplasty

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • lumbar
  • disc replacement
  • parallax
  • range of motion

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Content
  • Archive

More Information

  • About IJSS
  • About ISASS
  • Privacy Policy

More

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Feedback

Other Services

  • Author Instructions
  • Join ISASS
  • Reprints & Permissions

© 2025 International Journal of Spine Surgery

International Journal of Spine Surgery Online ISSN: 2211-4599

Powered by HighWire