Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Other Publications
    • ijss

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
International Journal of Spine Surgery
  • My alerts
International Journal of Spine Surgery

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Follow ijss on Twitter
  • Visit ijss on Facebook
Research ArticleBiomechanics
Open Access

Biomechanical evaluation of a spherical lumbar interbody device at varying levels of subsidence

Steven A. Rundell, Jorge E. Isaza and Steven M. Kurtz
International Journal of Spine Surgery January 2011, 5 (1) 16-25; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esas.2010.12.001
Steven A. Rundell
aExponent, Inc, Philadelphia, PA
bDrexel University, Philadelphia, PA
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: srundell@exponent.com
Jorge E. Isaza
cTulane University, New Orleans, LA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steven M. Kurtz
aExponent, Inc, Philadelphia, PA
bDrexel University, Philadelphia, PA
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig. 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1

    Three-dimensional FEM of ligamentous L3-4 motion segment. A sagittal cross section depicts the contours of Hounsfield units (HU), which were used as a surrogate for BMD.

  • Fig. 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2

    Fernström spheres were virtually implanted to depict 3 levels of subsidence. Sagittal cross-sections of the 3 models are shown: 0 mm of implant subsidence (left), 2 mm of implant subsidence (center), and 4 mm of implant subsidence (right).

  • Fig. 3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3

    Graphs depicting first principal strains at various locations along endplate and cortical rim between previously published experimental (Frei et al39) and FEM results.

  • Fig. 4
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4

    A, Bar graph depicting comparison of angular ROM between FEM versus several previously published values (Heuer et al37, Yamamoto et al40, Mimura et al41, Panjabi et al42, Fujiwara at al43, Schmoelz et al44, Niosi et al45). B, Bar graph showing comparison between FEM and a specific set of experimental data (Niosi et al45), which also includes ranges for the SDs.

  • Fig. 5
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5

    Effective (von Mises) strain contour plots of L3-4 vertebral bodies at sagittal cut plane for 3 levels of implant subsidence in models implanted with CoCr sphere (top) and models implanted with PEEK implant (bottom).

  • Fig. 6
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6

    Bar graphs depicting total angular ROM (A) and total FCF (B) for all loading modes and models.

  • Fig. 7
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7

    Effective (von Mises) strain contour plots of L3-4 vertebral bodies at sagittal or coronal cut plane for all modes of loading and models.

  • Fig. 8
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 8

    Coronal computed tomography image of spherical CoCr interbody device implanted at L5-S1. Vertebral bodies show high signal intensity around the implant at 9 months.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Summary of element type and material properties used in FEM

    ComponentElement typeThickness or cross-sectional areaYoung modulus (MPa)/Stiffness ParameterPoisson ratio
    Cortical bone31 Shell0.4 mm12,0000.3
    Vertebral endplate32 Shell0.25 mm1,0000.2
    Cancellous bone29 , 30 TetN/A4,730ρ1.56/1,987ρ1.56/1,357ρ1.56 0.2
    Posterior elements33 TetN/A3,5000.25
    Annulus fibrosus ground substance34 HexN/A1.360.45
    Annulus fibrosus collagen fibers35 FabricN/AStress-strain curve
    Nucleus pulposus31 HexN/AK 1,666.7Incompressible
    Ligaments36, 37 SpringN/AHyperelasticN/A
    Cartilage endplate38 8-Noded hexN/A240.4
    • Abbervations: Tet, Tetrahedron; Hex, hexahedron; NA, not available.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Percent change in ROM for implanted models compared with intact model

    Axial rotationExtensionLateral bendingFlexion
    0 mm80%70%50%10%
    2 mm8%31%12%−4%
    4 mm−32%−3%−6%−9%
    • View popup
    Table 3

    Percent change in FCF for implanted models compared with intact model

    Axial rotationExtensionLateral bending
    0 mm−16%−41%−48%
    2 mm3%−35%−37%
    4 mm9%34%14%
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

International Journal of Spine Surgery
Vol. 5, Issue 1
1 Jan 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on International Journal of Spine Surgery.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Biomechanical evaluation of a spherical lumbar interbody device at varying levels of subsidence
(Your Name) has sent you a message from International Journal of Spine Surgery
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the International Journal of Spine Surgery web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Biomechanical evaluation of a spherical lumbar interbody device at varying levels of subsidence
Steven A. Rundell, Jorge E. Isaza, Steven M. Kurtz
International Journal of Spine Surgery Jan 2011, 5 (1) 16-25; DOI: 10.1016/j.esas.2010.12.001

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Biomechanical evaluation of a spherical lumbar interbody device at varying levels of subsidence
Steven A. Rundell, Jorge E. Isaza, Steven M. Kurtz
International Journal of Spine Surgery Jan 2011, 5 (1) 16-25; DOI: 10.1016/j.esas.2010.12.001
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Sequential Anterior Longitudinal Ligament Release With Expandable Spacers for Lordosis Correction in Anterior-to-Psoas Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Radiographic and Biomechanical Study
  • Comparative Biomechanical Analysis of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Bilateral Expandable Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cages: A Finite Element Analysis Study
  • Impact of Different Operative Techniques for Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis on Frontal Curve Correction and Sagittal Balance
Show more Biomechanics

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • lumbar
  • finite element
  • Spine biomechanics
  • arthroplasty
  • subsidence
  • Facet contact

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Content
  • Archive

More Information

  • About IJSS
  • About ISASS
  • Privacy Policy

More

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Feedback

Other Services

  • Author Instructions
  • Join ISASS
  • Reprints & Permissions

© 2025 International Journal of Spine Surgery

International Journal of Spine Surgery Online ISSN: 2211-4599

Powered by HighWire