Research ArticleMIS
Open Access

Cost-utility analysis of posterior minimally invasive fusion compared with conventional open fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis

Y. Raja Rampersaud, Randolph Gray, Steven J. Lewis, Eric M. Massicotte and Michael G. Fehlings
International Journal of Spine Surgery January 2011, 5 (2) 29-35; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esas.2011.02.001

Article Information

vol. 5 no. 2 29-35
DOI 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esas.2011.02.001
Published By 
International Journal of Spine Surgery
Online ISSN 
2211-4599
History 
  • Published online January 1, 2011.
Copyright & Usage 
© 2011 SAS - The International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Author Information

  1. Y. Raja Rampersaud, MDa,b,*,
  2. Randolph Gray, MDb,
  3. Steven J. Lewis, MDa,b,
  4. Eric M. Massicotte, MDb,c and
  5. Michael G. Fehlings, MD, PhDb,c
  1. aDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  2. bSpinal Program, Krembil Neuroscience Center, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  3. cDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  1. ↵* Corresponding author: Y. Raja Rampersaud, MD, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, 399 Bathurst St. East Wing, 1-441, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5T-2S8; Tel: 416-603-5399; Fax: 416-603- 3437. E-mail address: raja.rampersaud{at}uhn.on.ca
View Full Text

Article usage

Article usage: April 2018 to May 2025

AbstractFullPdf
Apr 2018020
May 2018010
Jun 2018011
Jul 2018020
Aug 2018620
Sep 2018001
Oct 2018024
Nov 2018162
Dec 2018120
Jan 2019341
Feb 2019121
Mar 2019201
Apr 2019001
May 2019132
Jun 2019110
Jul 2019001
Aug 2019466
Sep 2019330
Oct 2019011
Nov 2019041
Dec 2019232
Jan 2020011
Feb 2020021
Mar 2020111
Apr 2020113
May 2020011
Jun 2020001
Jul 2020210
Aug 2020115
Sep 2020122
Oct 2020272
Nov 2020033
Dec 2020020
Feb 2021031
Mar 2021010
Apr 2021030
May 2021020
Jun 2021030
Jul 2021013
Aug 2021050
Sep 2021031
Oct 2021031
Nov 2021079
Dec 2021074
Jan 2022168
Feb 2022032
Mar 2022010
Apr 2022231
May 2022042
Jun 2022121
Jul 2022110
Aug 2022242
Sep 2022130
Oct 2022021
Nov 2022111
Dec 2022042
Jan 2023293
Feb 2023120
Apr 2023022
May 2023003
Jun 2023031
Jul 2023019
Aug 20230410
Sep 2023021
Oct 2023010
Nov 20231247
Dec 20231115
Jan 20240100
Feb 20240200
Mar 2024143
Apr 2024084
May 202411427
Jun 2024272
Jul 2024081
Aug 2024036
Sep 2024053
Oct 2024245
Nov 2024050
Dec 2024046
Jan 20250116
Feb 202522412
Mar 2025095
Apr 2025067
May 2025163

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Cited By...

Back to top

In this issue

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
Cost-utility analysis of posterior minimally invasive fusion compared with conventional open fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis
Y. Raja Rampersaud, Randolph Gray, Steven J. Lewis, Eric M. Massicotte, Michael G. Fehlings
International Journal of Spine Surgery Jan 2011, 5 (2) 29-35; DOI: 10.1016/j.esas.2011.02.001
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo

Jump to section

Keywords