Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Other Publications
    • ijss

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
International Journal of Spine Surgery
  • My alerts
International Journal of Spine Surgery

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Follow ijss on Twitter
  • Visit ijss on Facebook
Research ArticleFull Length Article
Open Access

Do presence and location of annular tear influence clinical outcome after lumbar total disc arthroplasty? A prospective 1-year follow-up study

James J. Yue, Connor Telles, Thomas P. Schlösser, Shawn Hermenau, Ravi Ramachandran and William D. Long
International Journal of Spine Surgery January 2012, 6 13-17; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsp.2011.09.001
James J. Yue
aDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Yale University School of Medicine/New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: james.yue@yale.edu
Connor Telles
aDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Yale University School of Medicine/New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas P. Schlösser
aDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Yale University School of Medicine/New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT
bDepartment of Orthopedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shawn Hermenau
aDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Yale University School of Medicine/New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ravi Ramachandran
aDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Yale University School of Medicine/New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
William D. Long III
aDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Yale University School of Medicine/New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Fig. 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1

    Examples of 3 different anatomic locations of annular tears on MRI: central, paracentral, and lateral. The location of annular tears was defined in the same way herniations of the intervertebral disc are defined.

  • Fig. 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2

    Mean ODI scores (shown as percentages) in patients with annular tears (divided into 3 cohorts based on tear location) and patients without annular tears. Data were prospectively compiled before and 12 months after total lumbar disc replacement.

  • Fig. 3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3

    Mean VAS scores for back pain in patients with annular tears (divided into 3 cohorts based on tear location) and patients without annular tears. Data were prospectively compiled before and 12 months after total lumbar disc replacement.

  • Fig. 4
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4

    Mean VAS scores for leg pain in patients with annular tears (divided into 3 cohorts based on tear location) and patients without annular tears. Data were prospectively compiled before and 12 months after total lumbar disc replacement.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

International Journal of Spine Surgery
Vol. 6
1 Jan 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on International Journal of Spine Surgery.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Do presence and location of annular tear influence clinical outcome after lumbar total disc arthroplasty? A prospective 1-year follow-up study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from International Journal of Spine Surgery
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the International Journal of Spine Surgery web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Do presence and location of annular tear influence clinical outcome after lumbar total disc arthroplasty? A prospective 1-year follow-up study
James J. Yue, Connor Telles, Thomas P. Schlösser, Shawn Hermenau, Ravi Ramachandran, William D. Long
International Journal of Spine Surgery Jan 2012, 6 13-17; DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsp.2011.09.001

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Do presence and location of annular tear influence clinical outcome after lumbar total disc arthroplasty? A prospective 1-year follow-up study
James J. Yue, Connor Telles, Thomas P. Schlösser, Shawn Hermenau, Ravi Ramachandran, William D. Long
International Journal of Spine Surgery Jan 2012, 6 13-17; DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsp.2011.09.001
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • We Need to Talk about Lumbar Total Disc Replacement
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion rates in patients using a novel titanium implant and demineralized cancellous allograft bone sponge
  • Kyphoplasty versus vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures—which one is better? A systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Overtightening of halo pins resulting in intracranial penetration, pneumocephalus, and epileptic seizure
Show more Full Length Article

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • lumbar disc arthroplasty
  • annular tear
  • High intensity zone (HIZ)

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Content
  • Archive

More Information

  • About IJSS
  • About ISASS
  • Privacy Policy

More

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Feedback

Other Services

  • Author Instructions
  • Join ISASS
  • Reprints & Permissions

© 2025 International Journal of Spine Surgery

International Journal of Spine Surgery Online ISSN: 2211-4599

Powered by HighWire