Article Figures & Data
Figures
- Fig. 1
Illustration of Anterior-Posterior Position of the Spacer within the Interbody Space (Vertebral Landmarks = points 1-4; Spacer Landmarks = points 5-7; X-axis – parallel to dashed line connecting points 3 and 4; Center of Interbody Space = Red Dot; Center of Spacer = Blue Dot; Measured distance along X-axis is indicated by the arrows).
- Fig. 2
Standing FE ROM vs. Sagittal Cage Position (r = -0.542, p = 0.055).
- Fig. 3
Lying LB ROM vs. Sagittal Cage Position (r = -0.583, p = 0.047).
- Fig. 4
Standing LB ROM vs. Coronal Cage Position (r = 0.672, p = 0.012).
- Fig. 5
Lying LB ROM vs. Coronal Cage Position (r = 0.632, p = 0.027).
Tables
Patient Intervertebral Level Sagittal Position Coronal Position Days Post-Op 1 L4-L5 -1.85% -6.83% 143 2 L4-L5 -2.77% 11.93% 143 3 L4-L5 -8.48% 10.94% 172 4 L4-L5 -0.52% -1.28% 152 5 L5-S1 9.80% 8.78% 66 6 L4-L5 -2.49% -7.04% 159 7 L2-L3 -3.14% 11.67% 148 8 L4-L5 -8.20% 3.90% 66 9 L4-L5 -4.01% -10.42% 256 10 L4-L5 2.04% 6.15% 337 11 L3-L4 -4.58% 20.39% 192 12 L4-L5 -3.52% 3.75% 295 13 L5-S1 -2.11% 3.42% 913 Sagittal Position Coronal Position Mean -2.29% 8.19% Median -2.77% 7.04% Percentiles 25 -4.29% 3.83% 50 -2.77% 7.04% 75 -1.18% 11.31% Sagittal Position Coronal Position Standing FE Pearson Correlation -0.542 0.319 2-Tailed Significance 0.055 0.289 N 13 13 Lying FE Pearson Correlation 0.439 -0.191 2-Tailed Significance 0.134 0.533 N 13 13 Standing LB Pearson Correlation -0.324 0.672* 0.280 0.012 13 13 Lying LB Pearson Correlation -0.583* 0.632* 2-Tailed Significance 0.047 0.027 N 12 12 ↵* Denotes significant correlation.
In this issue
