Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Other Publications
    • ijss

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
International Journal of Spine Surgery
  • My alerts
International Journal of Spine Surgery

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Follow ijss on Twitter
  • Visit ijss on Facebook
Research ArticleOther & Special Categories

The Assessment of Clinically Significant Differences in Treating Spinal Deformity Using the SRS Questionnaire: What Is the Threshold of Change That Is Meaningful to Patients?

Sigurd Berven, Matthew Baron, Vedat Deviren, Steven Glassman, Keith Bridwell and Kushagra Verma
International Journal of Spine Surgery April 2019, 6020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/6020
Sigurd Berven
1University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew Baron
2University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vedat Deviren
1University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steven Glassman
3Norton Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, Kentucky
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Keith Bridwell
4Washington University, St Louis, Missouri
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kushagra Verma
2University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Background The measurement of health-related quality of life is important in spinal deformity surgery. The Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire has allowed disease-specific research in this area, and determining the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is as important as it is elusive. We seek to further refine our estimations of clinically perceived improvements by the patient.

Methods We used an anchor-based approach for each domain of the SRS questionnaire to compare changes at 1 year after treatment. We set the MCID as the upper 95% boundary of the “no change” group bordering the “improvement” arm, where the patients may start to perceive their own change toward the better. We compared this with the mean change.

Results The threshold value for the MCID was 0.54 for the pain domain, 0.31 for function, 0.62 for self-image, and 0.5 for mental health. The mean changes in our group's pain and self-image exceeded their MCID.

Conclusions Compared with our previous work, we further attempted to refine our assessment of the MCID in spinal deformity. Pain continues to show clinically significant improvement, and self-image also demonstrated mean improvement over its estimated MCID.

Level of Evidence 2

Clinical Relevance This result in self-image is an important addition to the MCID literature, given its lack of consistency in previous work.

  • MCID
  • adult deformity
  • SRS-22R
  • outcomes

Footnotes

  • Disclosures and COI: The authors received no funding for this study and report no conflicts of interest. The Institutional Review Board was through the Spinal Deformity Study Group and each center: University of California San Francisco, Norton Leatherman Spine Center, Washington University

  • ©International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery
Next
Back to top

In this issue

International Journal of Spine Surgery: 19 (S2)
International Journal of Spine Surgery
Vol. 19, Issue S2
1 Apr 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on International Journal of Spine Surgery.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Assessment of Clinically Significant Differences in Treating Spinal Deformity Using the SRS Questionnaire: What Is the Threshold of Change That Is Meaningful to Patients?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from International Journal of Spine Surgery
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the International Journal of Spine Surgery web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The Assessment of Clinically Significant Differences in Treating Spinal Deformity Using the SRS Questionnaire: What Is the Threshold of Change That Is Meaningful to Patients?
Sigurd Berven, Matthew Baron, Vedat Deviren, Steven Glassman, Keith Bridwell, Kushagra Verma
International Journal of Spine Surgery Apr 2019, 6020; DOI: 10.14444/6020

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The Assessment of Clinically Significant Differences in Treating Spinal Deformity Using the SRS Questionnaire: What Is the Threshold of Change That Is Meaningful to Patients?
Sigurd Berven, Matthew Baron, Vedat Deviren, Steven Glassman, Keith Bridwell, Kushagra Verma
International Journal of Spine Surgery Apr 2019, 6020; DOI: 10.14444/6020
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Fundamentals of Mechanobiology and Potential Applications in Spinal Fusion
  • Adult Congenital Spine Deformity: Clinical Features and Motivations for Surgical Treatment
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Hemivertebra Resection and Spinal Arthrodesis by Single-Stage Posterior Approach in Congenital Scoliosis and Kyphoscoliosis: Results at 9.6 Years Mean Follow-up
  • Prevalence and Significance of Vitamin D Deficiency in Patients Undergoing Corrective Surgery for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
  • Adult Congenital Spine Deformity: Clinical Features and Motivations for Surgical Treatment
Show more Other & Special Categories

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • MCID
  • adult deformity
  • SRS-22R
  • outcomes

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Content
  • Archive

More Information

  • About IJSS
  • About ISASS
  • Privacy Policy

More

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Feedback

Other Services

  • Author Instructions
  • Join ISASS
  • Reprints & Permissions

© 2025 International Journal of Spine Surgery

International Journal of Spine Surgery Online ISSN: 2211-4599

Powered by HighWire