Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Other Publications
    • ijss

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
International Journal of Spine Surgery
  • My alerts
International Journal of Spine Surgery

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Follow ijss on Twitter
  • Visit ijss on Facebook
Research ArticleComplications

An Evidence-Based Algorithm for Determining Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis After Degenerative Spinal Surgery

JOSHUA A. SHAPIRO, MATTHEW R. STILLWAGON, ALEXANDER G. PADOVANO, STEPHAN MOLL and MOE R. LIM
International Journal of Spine Surgery July 2020, 7080; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/7080
JOSHUA A. SHAPIRO
1University of North Carolina, Department of Orthopaedics, Chapel Hill, North Carolina,
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MATTHEW R. STILLWAGON
1University of North Carolina, Department of Orthopaedics, Chapel Hill, North Carolina,
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ALEXANDER G. PADOVANO
1University of North Carolina, Department of Orthopaedics, Chapel Hill, North Carolina,
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
STEPHAN MOLL
2University of North Carolina, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MOE R. LIM
1University of North Carolina, Department of Orthopaedics, Chapel Hill, North Carolina,
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Background Although venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a potentially serious and life-threatening complication, there is no widely accepted protocol to guide VTE prophylaxis in adult degenerative spinal surgery, and pharmacologic overtreatment may result in hemorrhagic complications. Previously, we published the VTE Prophylaxis Risk/Benefit Score, an evidence-based algorithm that balances the risk and consequences of thrombotic versus hemorrhagic complications by taking consideration of patient-related risks, procedure-related risks, and the risk of neurological compromise to guide VTE prophylaxis. To objective of this study was to validate the VTE Prophylaxis Risk/Benefit Score.

Methods From January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2017, VTE Prophylaxis Risk/Benefit Scores and corresponding prophylaxes were prospectively assigned. When indicated, chemoprophylaxis was dosed 24 to 36 hours postoperatively to allow for adequate surgical hemostasis. Patients were retrospectively evaluated for immediate and short-term complications. The Fisher exact test compared incidence of complications by VTE prophylaxis. Multinomial logistic regression modeled the probability of complication by prophylaxis type, demographics, and comorbidities. Significance was set at P < .05.

Results Of the 266 patients who met inclusion criteria, 79.3% were given mechanical prophylaxis alone and 20.7% were given combined mechanical and chemical prophylaxis. Complications including VTE (0.38%), delayed wound healing or infection (2.26%), and hematoma (0.75%) were observed at rates similar to or lower than previously published studies with increased utilization of chemoprophylaxis. Use of chemoprophylaxis and continuation of perioperative aspirin were significantly associated with the development of a hemorrhagic complication. No patient developed persistent neurologic deficit from hematoma or pulmonary embolism.

Conclusions The VTE Prophylaxis Risk/Benefit Score comprehensively considers the risk of thrombotic, wound, and bleeding complications and is an effective tool for determining appropriate thromboprophylaxis in adult degenerative spinal surgery.

Level of Evidence 3.

  • venous thromboembolism
  • chemical thromboprophylaxis
  • mechanical thromboprophylaxis
  • algorithm
  • risk-benefit
  • hemorrhagic complication rate
  • wound complication rate
  • deep infection rate

Footnotes

  • Disclosures and COI: There are no conflicts of interest. Biostatistical analysis was grant funded by UNC–Chapel Hill's NC TraCS Institute CTSA—UL1TR002489. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained prior to the initiation of this study.

  • ©International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery
Next
Back to top

In this issue

International Journal of Spine Surgery: 19 (S2)
International Journal of Spine Surgery
Vol. 19, Issue S2
1 Apr 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on International Journal of Spine Surgery.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
An Evidence-Based Algorithm for Determining Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis After Degenerative Spinal Surgery
(Your Name) has sent you a message from International Journal of Spine Surgery
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the International Journal of Spine Surgery web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
An Evidence-Based Algorithm for Determining Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis After Degenerative Spinal Surgery
JOSHUA A. SHAPIRO, MATTHEW R. STILLWAGON, ALEXANDER G. PADOVANO, STEPHAN MOLL, MOE R. LIM
International Journal of Spine Surgery Jul 2020, 7080; DOI: 10.14444/7080

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
An Evidence-Based Algorithm for Determining Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis After Degenerative Spinal Surgery
JOSHUA A. SHAPIRO, MATTHEW R. STILLWAGON, ALEXANDER G. PADOVANO, STEPHAN MOLL, MOE R. LIM
International Journal of Spine Surgery Jul 2020, 7080; DOI: 10.14444/7080
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Postmyelography Acute Paraplegia in Patients With Spinal Cord Stimulators: Case Series and Review of Literature
  • Spinopelvic Fixation Using an Osseointegrative Implant: Analysis of Postmarket Surveillance to Determine the Failure Rate
  • Association of Elevated Perioperative Blood Glucose With Complications and Postoperative Outcomes Following Traumatic Spine Surgery
Show more Complications

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • venous thromboembolism
  • chemical thromboprophylaxis
  • mechanical thromboprophylaxis
  • algorithm
  • risk-benefit
  • hemorrhagic complication rate
  • wound complication rate
  • deep infection rate

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Content
  • Archive

More Information

  • About IJSS
  • About ISASS
  • Privacy Policy

More

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Feedback

Other Services

  • Author Instructions
  • Join ISASS
  • Reprints & Permissions

© 2025 International Journal of Spine Surgery

International Journal of Spine Surgery Online ISSN: 2211-4599

Powered by HighWire