Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Other Publications
    • ijss

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
International Journal of Spine Surgery
  • My alerts
International Journal of Spine Surgery

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Follow ijss on Twitter
  • Visit ijss on Facebook
Research ArticleLumbar Spine

Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis Classification That Guides Surgical Treatment

Ali Fahir Özer, Göktuğ Akyoldaş, Orhun Mete Çevik, Ahmet Levent Aydın, Mehdi Hekimoğlu, Mehdi Sasani, Tunç Öktenoğlu, Önder Çerezci and Tuncer Süzer
International Journal of Spine Surgery June 2022, 8311; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/8311
Ali Fahir Özer
1 Koç University School of Medicine, Neurosurgery Department, Istanbul, Turkey
2 Neurosurgery Department, American Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Göktuğ Akyoldaş
1 Koç University School of Medicine, Neurosurgery Department, Istanbul, Turkey
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Orhun Mete Çevik
3 Neurosurgery Department, Bakırköy Training and Research Hospital for Psychiatric and Nervous Diseases, Istanbul, Turkey
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ahmet Levent Aydın
1 Koç University School of Medicine, Neurosurgery Department, Istanbul, Turkey
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mehdi Hekimoğlu
2 Neurosurgery Department, American Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mehdi Sasani
1 Koç University School of Medicine, Neurosurgery Department, Istanbul, Turkey
2 Neurosurgery Department, American Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tunç Öktenoğlu
1 Koç University School of Medicine, Neurosurgery Department, Istanbul, Turkey
2 Neurosurgery Department, American Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Önder Çerezci
4 Physical Treatment and Rehabilitation Department, American Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tuncer Süzer
1 Koç University School of Medicine, Neurosurgery Department, Istanbul, Turkey
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    Normal foramen.

  • Figure 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2

    (a) Type I stable foraminal stenosis. The disc has completely degenerated; the root is squeezed between the upper and lower pedicles. (b) Type II stable foraminal stenosis. The disc has completely degenerated at the base of degenerative spondylolisthesis. The root is squeezed between the upper pedicles and lower vertebral corpus. (c) Type III stable foraminal stenosis. The disc has completely degenerated; the root is squeezed between the calcified facet joint and the corner of the upper pedicles and posterior wall of upper vertebrae. (d) Type IV stable foraminal stenosis. The disc is calcified in some areas and fused in some areas to the upper and lower vertebral corpus, with bulging of the posterior annulus. The root is squeezed between the calcified bulging of the posterior annulus, calcified facet joint, and upper pedicles. For all images, the red areas on the nerve root indicate dense areas where the nerve is squeezed.

  • Figure 3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3

    (a) Type I unstable foraminal stenosis. There is a mobile degenerative bulged disc, and the root is squeezed mainly between the bulging of the disc and upper pedicles. (b) Type II unstable foraminal stenosis. The disc is degenerative and mobile, but there are degenerative spondylolisthesis and pseudobulging. The root is squeezed between the pseudobulbed disc and the superior pedicle. (c) Type III unstable foraminal stenosis. The disc is degenerative and mobile, and there is no bulging. The root is squeezed between the posterior degenerative facet joint, the corner between the pedicle and the posterior wall, and the vertebral corpus of upper vertebrae. (d) Type IV unstable foraminal stenosis. The disc is degenerative and mobile; the root is squeezed between the posterior degenerative facet joint and synovial cyst of the facet joint, and the only difference from unstable type III is bulging of the disc, which can be related to compression over the nerve root. For all images, the red areas on the nerve root indicate dense areas where the nerve is squeezed.

  • Figure 4
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4

    Illustration of a patient with unstable stenosis treated with decompression and stabilization. (a) Compressed nerve root under the pedicle. (b, c) Removal of pedicle with a high-speed drill. (d) The decompressed nerve root and screw stabilization.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Treatment options for stable foraminal stenosis.

    TypeFirst-Line TreatmentSecond-Line Treatment
    Type IPediculectomyUnroofing
    Type IIPediculectomyUnroofing
    Type IIIUnroofing 
    Type IVUnroofing 
    • View popup
    Table 2

    Treatment options for unstable foraminal stenosis.

    TypeTreatment
    Type IFar lateral discectomy
    Type IIDecompression + transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion/posterior lumbar interbody fusion + rigid instrumentation
    Type IIIRemoval of facet + dynamic stabilization
    Type IVa) Synovial cyst resection + dynamic stabilization
    b) Facet resection + dynamic stabilization
    • View popup
    Table 3

    Demographic data and distribution of the foraminal stenosis cases.

    Foraminal Stenosis TypePatients, nMean Age, yGender
    WomenMen
    Stable type I1266.284
    Stable type II1053.973
    Stable type III869.444
    Stable type IV637.024
    Unstable type I4551.71827
    Unstable type II1561.496
    Unstable type III955.863
    Unstable type IV1059.455
    Total 115 56.1 59 56
    • View popup
    Table 4

    Patient VAS-LP scores by timepoint.

    Foraminal Stenosis TypeVAS-LP
    PreoperativePostoperative 1 moPostoperative 6 moPostoperative 12 moPostoperative 24 moP
    Stable type I7.35 ± 2.161.65 ± 0.641.35 ± 0.441.12 ± 0.401.00 ± 0.38<0.001
    Stable type II7.70 ± 2.022.40 ± 0.682.05 ± 0.551.35 ± 0.481.33 ± 0.42<0.001
    Stable type III6.52 ± 1.923.53 ± 1.022.00 ± 0.761.11 ± 0.360.50 ± 0.28<0.001
    Stable type IV7.65 ± 1.982.05 ± 0.821.05 ± 0.641.02 ± 0.601.00 ± 0.52<0.001
    Unstable type I7.50 ± 1.782.16 ± 0.661.40 ± 0.760.99 ± 0.580.87 ± 0.56<0.001
    Unstable type II8.05 ± 1.802.42 ± 0.542.10 ± 0.821.35 ± 0.741.09 ± 0.44<0.001
    Unstable type III6.45 ± 1.641.02 ± 0.481.33 ± 0.540.70 ± 0.320.67 ± 0.26<0.001
    Unstable type IV7.10 ± 2.362.22 ± 0.722.02 ± 0.680.75 ± 0.520.73 ± 0.38<0.001
    • Note: Data provided as mean ± SD. P value shows statistical significance between preoperative VAS-LP and VAS-LP 24 mo after surgery.

    • VAS-LP, visual analog scale leg pain.

    • View popup
    Table 5

    Patient ODI scores by timepoint.

    ODI
    Foraminal Stenosis TypePreoperativePostoperative 1 moPostoperative 6 moPostoperative 12 moPostoperative 24 mo P
    Stable type I64.20 ± 13.1039.90 ± 10.0835.52 ± 8.3814.20 ± 5.427.12 ± 3.54<0.001
    Stable type II56.50 ± 15.2044.13 ± 12.0435.90 ± 7.4015.2 ± 4.688.22 ± 3.58<0.001
    Stable type III62.10 ± 12.1632.16 ± 9.2624.12 ± 6.6013.90 ± 5.046.80 ± 2.98<0.001
    Stable type IV55.40 ± 14.8043.20 ± 10.8032.10 ± 7.9216.10 ± 4.988.60 ± 2.50<0.001
    Unstable type I59.60 ± 11.9242.25 ± 8.8427.10 ± 7.8814.05 ± 5.168.12 ± 3.24<0.001
    Unstable type II62.7 ± 16.2635.32 ± 9.6832.16 ± 7.5411.90 ± 4.308.80 ± 3.02<0.001
    Unstable type III54.10 ± 13.8439.15 ± 8.2633.95 ± 6.128.62 ± 4.7212.25 ± 3.90<0.001
    Unstable type IV73.00 ± 6.1237.25 ± 9.0228.60 ± 7.9614.20 ± 6.548.50 ± 4.00<0.001
    • Note: Data provided as mean ± SD. P value shows statistical significance between preoperative ODI and ODI 24 mo after surgery.

    • ODI, Oswestry Disability Index.

Next
Back to top

In this issue

International Journal of Spine Surgery: 19 (S2)
International Journal of Spine Surgery
Vol. 19, Issue S2
1 Apr 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on International Journal of Spine Surgery.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis Classification That Guides Surgical Treatment
(Your Name) has sent you a message from International Journal of Spine Surgery
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the International Journal of Spine Surgery web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis Classification That Guides Surgical Treatment
Ali Fahir Özer, Göktuğ Akyoldaş, Orhun Mete Çevik, Ahmet Levent Aydın, Mehdi Hekimoğlu, Mehdi Sasani, Tunç Öktenoğlu, Önder Çerezci, Tuncer Süzer
International Journal of Spine Surgery Jun 2022, 8311; DOI: 10.14444/8311

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis Classification That Guides Surgical Treatment
Ali Fahir Özer, Göktuğ Akyoldaş, Orhun Mete Çevik, Ahmet Levent Aydın, Mehdi Hekimoğlu, Mehdi Sasani, Tunç Öktenoğlu, Önder Çerezci, Tuncer Süzer
International Journal of Spine Surgery Jun 2022, 8311; DOI: 10.14444/8311
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Recovery Trajectories After Lumbar Fusion Stratified by Baseline Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Disability Levels
  • Safety and Viability of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Complex Revision Lumbar Spine Surgeries: Insights From a Case Series of 135 Patients on Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion/Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cage Removal
  • Effects of Body Mass Index on Spondylolisthesis Surgery and Associated Patient-Reported Outcomes: A Retrospective Review
Show more Lumbar Spine

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • foraminal stenosis
  • lumbar spine
  • lumbar instability
  • pedicle removal

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Content
  • Archive

More Information

  • About IJSS
  • About ISASS
  • Privacy Policy

More

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Feedback

Other Services

  • Author Instructions
  • Join ISASS
  • Reprints & Permissions

© 2025 International Journal of Spine Surgery

International Journal of Spine Surgery Online ISSN: 2211-4599

Powered by HighWire