Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Other Publications
    • ijss

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
International Journal of Spine Surgery
  • My alerts
International Journal of Spine Surgery

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Follow ijss on Twitter
  • Visit ijss on Facebook
Research ArticleTotal Disc Replacement

Single-Level Total Disc Replacement: Mid- to Long-Term Outcomes

Matthew Scott-Young, Laurence McEntee, Evelyne Rathbone, David Nielsen, Lauren Grierson and Wayne Hing
International Journal of Spine Surgery July 2022, 8330; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/8330
Matthew Scott-Young
1 Gold Coast Spine, Gold Coast, Australia
2 Faculty of Health Science & Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia
MBBS, FRACS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laurence McEntee
2 Faculty of Health Science & Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia
3 Gold Coast Private Hospital, Gold Coast, Australia
BHB, MBChB, FRACS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Evelyne Rathbone
2 Faculty of Health Science & Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia
MSᴄ, CSᴛᴀᴛ
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Nielsen
1 Gold Coast Spine, Gold Coast, Australia
4 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cairns Hospital, Cairns North, Australia
MBBS, BBiᴏᴍᴇᴅSᴄ, FRACS, FAOrᴛhA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lauren Grierson
1 Gold Coast Spine, Gold Coast, Australia
BSᴄ
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wayne Hing
2 Faculty of Health Science & Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    Profile of the mean reduction from baseline and 95% CIs for visual analog scale (VAS) back and leg pain scores. All improvements from baseline were statistically significant (P < 0.001).

  • Figure 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2

    Profile of the mean reduction from baseline and 95% CIs for Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) disability scores. All improvements from baseline were statistically significant (P < 0.001).

  • Figure 3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3

    X-ray images of a Charité Artificial Disc at 183 mo after surgery: (a) flexion, (b) extension, (c) anteroposterior, and (d) lateral.

  • Figure 4
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4

    Patient satisfaction levels over the duration of postsurgery follow-up (N = 211).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Baseline characteristics of surgery patients (N = 211).

    Characteristic n (%)
    Gender
     Female93 (44.1)
     Male118 (55.9)
    Age at time of surgery (y), mean (SD)42.2 (11.1)
    Age group
      <35 y47 (22.3)
     35–45 y83 (39.3)
      >45 y81 (38.4)
    Level
     L4-L551 (24.2)
     L5-S1160 (75.8)
    Pain, median (IQR)
     VAS-backa 75.0 (55.0–89.0)
     VAS-leg60.0 (17.0–83.0)
    Disability, median (IQR)
     ODIb 46.0 (34.0–56.0)
     RMDQc 16.0 (12.0–19.0)
    • Abbreviations: IQR, interquartile range; ODI, Oswestry Disability Index; RMDQ, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire; VAS, visual analog scale.

    • Note: Data are presented as n (%) unless otherwise indicated.

    • ↵a The VAS is scored on a 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain) scale.

    • ↵b The ODI is scored on a 0 (none) to 100 (worst) disability scale.

    • ↵c The RMDQ is scored on a 0 (none) to 24 (worst) disability scale.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Summary statistics for VAS, ODI, and RMDQ outcomes over 13 y in 211 patients.

    Time After SurgeryVAS-BackVAS-Leg
    nMedianIQRnMedianIQR
    0 (baseline)21175.055.0–89.021160.017.0–83.0
    6 mo1979.02.0–20.01931.00.0–13.0
    1 y1965.00.0–20.01921.00.0–10.0
    2 y1873.00.0–17.01881.00.0–11.0
    4 y1845.50.0–22.01831.00.0–14.5
    5 y1586.00.0–19.81581.00.0–7.0
    8 y966.51.0–20.0972.00.0–7.0
    10 y625.01.0–21.0621.00.0–4.8
    13 y2412.01.0–45.3243.50.8–19.0
    Time After SurgeryODIRMDQ
    nMedianIQRnMedianIQR
    0 (baseline)21146.034.0–56.021116.012.0–19.0
    6 mo1986.00.0–18.01931.00.0–3.0
    1 y1974.00.0–14.01950.00.0–2.0
    2 y1882.00.0–14.01860.00.0–2.0
    4 y1826.00.0–14.01820.00.0–3.0
    5 y1574.00.0–14.01570.00.0–4.0
    8 y974.00.0–14.0950.00.0–3.0
    10 y624.00.0–13.5620.00.0–3.0
    13 y244.00.0–19.0230.00.0–4.5
    • Abbreviations: IQR, interquartile range; ODI, Oswestry Disability Index; RMDQ, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire; VAS, visual analog scale.

    • View popup
    Table 3

    Estimates of the fixed effects in the mixed-effects regression modeling of pain and disability change scores over 13 y.

    ParameterCoefficient β95% CIP Value
    VAS-B
     Intercept60.3(58.3, 62.3)<0.001b
     Baseline score (centered on 75)0.9(0.9, 1.0)<0.001b
     Time, y−0.6(−1.0, −0.2)0.002b
    VAS-L
     Intercept53.1(49.0, 57.3)<0.001b
     Baseline score (centered on 60)0.9(0.9, 1.0) <0.001b
     Time, y−0.2(−0.5, 0.1)0.27
     Age groupa coded 1 (35–45 y)−3.1(−8.3, 2.1)0.24
     Age groupa coded 2 (>45 y)−7.2(−12.3, −2.0)0.007b
    ODI
     Intercept35.0(33.5, 36.5)<0.001b
     Baseline score (centered on 46)0.9(0.8, 1.0)<0.001b
     Time, y0.1(−0.1, 0.4)0.22
    RMDQ
     Intercept13.7(13.2, 14.1)<0.001b
     Baseline score (centered on 16)1.0(0.9, 1.1)<0.001b
     Time, y−0.03(−0.11, 0.05)0.45
    • Abbreviations: ODI, Oswestry Disability Index; RMDQ, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire; VAS-B, visual analog scale for back pain; VAS-L, visual analog scale for leg pain.

    • ↵a Reference age group coded 0: <35 y.

    • ↵b Statistically significant P < 0.0125. A negative coefficient signifies a decrease in improvement. The intercept coefficient represents the mean change score at year 1 for patients with median baseline for VAS-B, ODI, and RMDQ and for the <35 y age group for VAS-L.

    • View popup
    Table 4

    Patient satisfaction ratings (excellent/good) over a postsurgical period of 10 y.

    Time After Surgery (in mo)Total n Excellent/Good,
    n (%)
    3184171 (92.9)
    6180169 (93.9)
    12178164 (92.1)
    24179167 (93.3)
    36174161 (92.5)
    48181165 (91.2)
    60157146 (93.0)
    72138129 (93.5)
    84121115 (95.0)
    969289 (96.7)
    1088175 (92.6)
    1206159 (96.7)
Next
Back to top

In this issue

International Journal of Spine Surgery: 19 (S2)
International Journal of Spine Surgery
Vol. 19, Issue S2
1 Apr 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on International Journal of Spine Surgery.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Single-Level Total Disc Replacement: Mid- to Long-Term Outcomes
(Your Name) has sent you a message from International Journal of Spine Surgery
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the International Journal of Spine Surgery web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Single-Level Total Disc Replacement: Mid- to Long-Term Outcomes
Matthew Scott-Young, Laurence McEntee, Evelyne Rathbone, David Nielsen, Lauren Grierson, Wayne Hing
International Journal of Spine Surgery Jul 2022, 8330; DOI: 10.14444/8330

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Single-Level Total Disc Replacement: Mid- to Long-Term Outcomes
Matthew Scott-Young, Laurence McEntee, Evelyne Rathbone, David Nielsen, Lauren Grierson, Wayne Hing
International Journal of Spine Surgery Jul 2022, 8330; DOI: 10.14444/8330
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • The Future of Arthroplasty in the Spine
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Single-Level Total Disc Replacement: Index-Level and Adjacent-Level Revision Surgery Incidence, Characteristics, and Outcomes
  • Anterior Cervical Foraminotomy for Radiculopathy After Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement: Technique Description and Case Report
Show more Total Disc Replacement

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • degenerative disc disease
  • total disc arthroplasty
  • single level
  • total disc replacement
  • back pain
  • motion preservation
  • lumbar spine
  • long-term outcomes

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Content
  • Archive

More Information

  • About IJSS
  • About ISASS
  • Privacy Policy

More

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Feedback

Other Services

  • Author Instructions
  • Join ISASS
  • Reprints & Permissions

© 2025 International Journal of Spine Surgery

International Journal of Spine Surgery Online ISSN: 2211-4599

Powered by HighWire