Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Other Publications
    • ijss

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
International Journal of Spine Surgery
  • My alerts
International Journal of Spine Surgery

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Follow ijss on Twitter
  • Visit ijss on Facebook
Research ArticleBiomechanics

Stability and Instrumentation Stresses Among Sacropelvic Fixation Techniques With Novel Porous Fusion/Fixation Implants: A Finite Element Study

Matteo Panico, Ruchi D. Chande, Derek P. Lindsey, Ali Mesiwala, David W. Polly, Tomaso Villa, Scott A. Yerby, Marco Brayda-Bruno and Fabio Galbusera
International Journal of Spine Surgery July 2023, 8481; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/8481
Matteo Panico
1IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy
2Department of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering "Giulio Natta", Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ruchi D. Chande
3SI-BONE, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Derek P. Lindsey
3SI-BONE, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ali Mesiwala
4DISC Sports and Spine Center, Newport Beach, CA, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David W. Polly
5Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tomaso Villa
1IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy
2Department of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering "Giulio Natta", Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Scott A. Yerby
3SI-BONE, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marco Brayda-Bruno
1IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fabio Galbusera
6Spine Center, Schulthess Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: fabio.galbusera@kws.ch
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    The five configurations of the instrumentation in the sacropelvic region (left—posterior view of sacropelvis; right—lateral view of sacropelvis): (a) pedicle screw fixation (PED); (b) PED bilaterally supplemented with S2 alar-iliac (S2AI) screws; (c) PED bilaterally supplemented by a porous fusion/fixation implant (PFFI) in an S2AI trajectory; (d) PED bilaterally supplemented with a triangular titanium implant placed in a sacro-alar-iliac trajectory and by a PFFI in an S2AI trajectory (PFFI-IFSAI); (e) PED bilaterally supplemented by a PFFI placed in an S2AI trajectory and a second PFFI in an SAI trajectory stacked cephalad to that in the S2AI position (2-PFFI). Rods are not shown.

  • Figure 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2

    Predicted ranges of motion with respect to pedicle screw of L5-S1 and sacroiliac joints in flexion-extension (left), lateral bending (middle), and axial rotation (right) for the 4 instrumented configurations (S2AI, PFFI, PFFI-IFSAI, and 2-PFFI). Refer to Table 1 for model descriptions and abbreviations.

  • Figure 3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3

    Maximal stresses in the left S1 pedicle screw predicted for the 5 instrumented configurations (PED, S2AI, PFFI, PFFI-IFSAI, and 2-PFFI). “flex”: flexion; “ext”: extension; “lb (ipsi)”: lateral bending in the ipsilateral direction (the same side of the implant of interest); “lb (contra)”: lateral bending in the contralateral direction; “ar (ipsi)”: axial rotation in the ipsilateral direction (the same side of the implant of interest); “ar (contra)”: axial rotation in the contralateral direction. Refer to Table 1 for model descriptions and abbreviations.

  • Figure 4
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4

    Maximal stresses in the left implants placed in an S2 alar-iliac (S2AI), trajectory predicted for 4 instrumented configurations (S2AI, PFFI, PFFI-IFSAI, and 2-PFFI). “flex”: flexion; “ext”: extension; “lb (ipsi)”: lateral bending in the ipsilateral direction (the same side of the implant of interest); “lb (contra)”: lateral bending in the contralateral direction; “ar (ipsi)”: axial rotation in the ipsilateral direction (the same side of the implant of interest); “ar (contra)”: axial rotation in the contralateral direction. Refer to Table 1 for model descriptions and abbreviations.

  • Figure 5
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5

    Maximal stresses in the left posterior rods in the portion between the L5 and the S1 pedicle screws (PED) predicted for the 5 instrumented configurations (PED, S2AI, PFFI, PFFI-IFSAI, and 2-PFFI). “flex”: flexion; “ext”: extension; “lb (ipsi)”: lateral bending in the ipsilateral direction (the same side of the implant of interest); “lb (contra)”: lateral bending in the contralateral direction; “ar (ipsi)”: axial rotation in the ipsilateral direction (the same side of the implant of interest); “ar (contra)”: axial rotation in the contralateral direction. Refer to Table 1 for model descriptions and abbreviations.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Study configurations (refer to Figure 1 for corresponding images).

    Model NameModel Description
    Pedicle screwsPedicle screws, T10 to S1
    S2 alar-iliacPED + S2 AI screws
    Porous fusion/fixation implantPED + porous fusion/fixation implants
    PFFI-IFSAIPED + porous fusion/fixation implants + triangular titanium implants
    2-PFFIPED + stacked porous fusion/fixation implants
    • View popup
    Table 2

    Ranges of motion of L5-S1 and of the SIJ for the various configurations.

    ConfigurationFlexion-ExtensionLateral BendingAxial Rotation
    L5-S1SIJL5-S1SIJL5-S1SIJ
    S2AI0.90.60.90.40.80.3
    PFFI0.90.20.90.20.70.1
    PFFI-IFSAI0.90.60.80.40.70.3
    2-PPFI0.60.20.40.20.60.1
    • Abbreviations: PFFI, porous fusion/fixation implant; 2-PFFI, S2AI position PFFI; S2AI, S2 alar-iliac; SIJ, sacroiliac joint.

    • Note: All values are in degrees (°).

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

International Journal of Spine Surgery: 19 (S2)
International Journal of Spine Surgery
Vol. 19, Issue S2
1 Apr 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on International Journal of Spine Surgery.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Stability and Instrumentation Stresses Among Sacropelvic Fixation Techniques With Novel Porous Fusion/Fixation Implants: A Finite Element Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from International Journal of Spine Surgery
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the International Journal of Spine Surgery web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Stability and Instrumentation Stresses Among Sacropelvic Fixation Techniques With Novel Porous Fusion/Fixation Implants: A Finite Element Study
Matteo Panico, Ruchi D. Chande, Derek P. Lindsey, Ali Mesiwala, David W. Polly, Tomaso Villa, Scott A. Yerby, Marco Brayda-Bruno, Fabio Galbusera
International Journal of Spine Surgery Jul 2023, 8481; DOI: 10.14444/8481

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Stability and Instrumentation Stresses Among Sacropelvic Fixation Techniques With Novel Porous Fusion/Fixation Implants: A Finite Element Study
Matteo Panico, Ruchi D. Chande, Derek P. Lindsey, Ali Mesiwala, David W. Polly, Tomaso Villa, Scott A. Yerby, Marco Brayda-Bruno, Fabio Galbusera
International Journal of Spine Surgery Jul 2023, 8481; DOI: 10.14444/8481
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Corrections
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Spinopelvic Fixation Using an Osseointegrative Implant: Analysis of Postmarket Surveillance to Determine the Failure Rate
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Sequential Anterior Longitudinal Ligament Release With Expandable Spacers for Lordosis Correction in Anterior-to-Psoas Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Radiographic and Biomechanical Study
  • Comparative Biomechanical Analysis of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Bilateral Expandable Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cages: A Finite Element Analysis Study
  • Impact of Different Operative Techniques for Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis on Frontal Curve Correction and Sagittal Balance
Show more Biomechanics

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • sacropelvic fixation
  • porous fusion/fixation implants
  • triangular implants
  • S2 alar-iliac screws

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Content
  • Archive

More Information

  • About IJSS
  • About ISASS
  • Privacy Policy

More

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Feedback

Other Services

  • Author Instructions
  • Join ISASS
  • Reprints & Permissions

© 2025 International Journal of Spine Surgery

International Journal of Spine Surgery Online ISSN: 2211-4599

Powered by HighWire