Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Other Publications
    • ijss

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
International Journal of Spine Surgery
  • My alerts
International Journal of Spine Surgery

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Follow ijss on Twitter
  • Visit ijss on Facebook
Research ArticleEndoscopic Minimally Invasive Surgery

Biportal Endoscopic Approach for Lumbar Degenerative Disease in the Ambulatory Outpatient vs Inpatient Setting: A Comparative Study

Don Young Park, Thomas E. Olson, Alexander Upfill-Brown, Babapelumi Adejuyigbe, Akash A. Shah, William L. Sheppard, Cheol Wung Park and Dong Hwa Heo
International Journal of Spine Surgery October 2023, 8545; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/8545
Don Young Park
1 UCLA Department of Orthopedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: dypark@mednet.ucla.edu
Thomas E. Olson
1 UCLA Department of Orthopedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexander Upfill-Brown
1 UCLA Department of Orthopedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Babapelumi Adejuyigbe
1 UCLA Department of Orthopedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Akash A. Shah
1 UCLA Department of Orthopedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
William L. Sheppard
1 UCLA Department of Orthopedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cheol Wung Park
2 Department of Neurosurgery, Woori Hospital, Daejeon, South Korea
MD, PHD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dong Hwa Heo
3 Department of Neurosurgery, Harrison Spinartus Hospital Chungdam, Seoul, South Korea
MD, PHD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    Trend in patient-reported outcomes across different perioperative time points for (A) Oswestry Disability Index score, (B) visual analog scale (VAS) back pain score, and (C) VAS leg pain score. Figures represent box plots with median and interquartile range highlighted. Star (*) indicates statistically significant difference between inpatient and outpatient scores at a particular time point after adjusting for multiple testing (P < 0.01). Nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test performed at all time points after confirming non-normal distribution.

  • Figure 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2

    Absolute difference in patient-reported outcomes between preoperative and most recent follow-up for (A) Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, (B) visual analog scale (VAS) back pain score, and (C) VAS leg pain score. No differences between change in inpatient and outpatient scores after adjusting for multiple testing were significant (P < 0.017). Bars represent 95% CIs.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Demographic characteristics of patients undergoing biportal endoscopic lumbar surgery.

    VariableStatisticOutpatientInpatientTotal P Valuea
    (n = 58)(n = 26)(N = 84)
    FemaleN (%)14 (24%)11 (42%)25 (30%)0.15
    Age (yrs)Mean (SD)53.9 (15.5)73.6 (8.2)60.0 (16.4)< 0.0001
    Median (Range)57.5 (24–81)71.5 (57–89)65 (24–89)
    BMI (kg/m2)Mean (SD)27.6 (5.0)27.7 (3.6)27.6 (4.6)0.92
    Median (Range)26.7 (19.8–38.5)27.4 (22.0–36.9)27 (19.8–38.5)
    ASA scoreN > 2 (%)13 (22%)19 (73%)2.3 (0.6)< 0.0001
    Median (Range)2 (1–3)3 (2–3)2 (1–3)
    Charlson Comorbity IndexMean (SD)1.5 (1.5)3.9 (1.7)2.2 (1.9)< 0.0001
    Median (Range)1.5 (0–6)3.5 (1-8)2 (0–8)
    Surgery Duration (min)Mean (SD)116 (42)146 (51)125 (47)0.012
    Median (Range)105 (63-253)135 (66-227)108 (63-253)
    Length of Stay (days)Mean (SD)0.1±0.31.6±0.90.5±0.9< 0.0001
    Range0–11–40–4
    Estimated Blood Loss (mL)Median (IQR)0 (0–0)0 (0–8)0 (0–0)0.21
    Median (Range)0 (0–35)0 (0–30)0 (0–35)
    Total Drain Output (mL)Median (IQR)30 (14-51)80 (50-134)35 (25-80)< 0.0001
    Median (Range)30 (0–235)80 (30-505)35 (0–505)
    • Abbreviations: ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists; IQR, interquartile range.

    • ↵a Adjusted threshold for statistical significance P < 0.0063.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Surgical features of patients undergoing biportal endoscopic lumbar surgery.

    VariableOutpatientInpatientTotal P Valuea
    n = 58 n = 26 N = 84
    Number of levels    
     1 Level51 (88%)16 (62%)67 (80%)0.013
     2 Levels7 (12%)10 (38%)17 (20%)
    Levels addressedb
     L1–21 (2%)1 (3%)2 (2%)0.170
     L2–36 (9%)2 (6%)8 (8%)
     L3–49 (14%)11 (31%)20 (20%)
     L4–532 (49%)18 (50%)50 (50%)
     L5–S117 (26%)4 (11%)21 (21%)
    Primary diagnosis
     Stenosis26 (45%)24 (92%)50 (60%)0.0001
     Disc herniation32 (55%)2 (8%)34 (40%)
    Primary procedure
     Discectomy32 (55%)2 (8%)34 (40%)0.0001
     Laminotomy/decompression26 (45%)24 (92%)50 (60%) 
    • ↵a Adjusted threshold for statistical significance, P < 0.0125.

    • ↵b Total number of levels addressed was 65 for outpatients, 36 for inpatients, and 101 for all patients.

    • View popup
    Table 3

    Complications following biportal endoscopic lumbar surgery.

    ComplicationOutpatientInpatientTotal P Value
    (n = 58)(n = 26)(N = 84)
    Postoperative radiculitis10 (17%)5 (19%)15 (17.9%)>0.99
    Postoperative weakness1 (1.7%)1 (3.8%)2 (2.4%)>0.99
    Wound drainage1 (1.7%)0 (0.0%)1 (1.2%)>0.99
    Reherniation1 (1.7%)1 (3.8%)2 (2.4%)>0.99
    • View popup
    Table 4

    Patient-reported outcomes before and after surgery for patients undergoing biportal endoscopic surgery, median values (range).

    MeasureOutpatientInpatientTotal P Valuea
    (n = 58)(n = 26)(N = 84)
    Preoperative
     ODI18.5 (9–36)23 (5–41)20 (5–41)0.021
     VAS back5 (0–10)5 (0–8)5 (0–10)0.99
     VAS leg7 (0–10)7 (0–10)7 (0–10)0.42
    Postoperative
     ODI2 (0–28)6 (0–25.5)4 (0–28)0.044
     VAS back0 (0–8)2 (0–8)0 (0–8)0.020
     VAS leg0 (0–8)0 (0–10)0 (0–10)0.42
    Change
     ODI14.5 (−14–36)16.0 (−3.5–35)15 (−14–36)0.88
     VAS back4 (−4–10)3 (−2–8)4 (−4–10)0.046
     VAS leg6 (0–9)6 (−3–9)6 (−3–9)0.41
    • Abbreviations: ODI, Oswestry Disability Index; VAS, visual analog scale.

    • ↵a Adjusted threshold for statistical significance P < 0.0167

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

International Journal of Spine Surgery: 19 (S2)
International Journal of Spine Surgery
Vol. 19, Issue S2
1 Apr 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on International Journal of Spine Surgery.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Biportal Endoscopic Approach for Lumbar Degenerative Disease in the Ambulatory Outpatient vs Inpatient Setting: A Comparative Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from International Journal of Spine Surgery
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the International Journal of Spine Surgery web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Biportal Endoscopic Approach for Lumbar Degenerative Disease in the Ambulatory Outpatient vs Inpatient Setting: A Comparative Study
Don Young Park, Thomas E. Olson, Alexander Upfill-Brown, Babapelumi Adejuyigbe, Akash A. Shah, William L. Sheppard, Cheol Wung Park, Dong Hwa Heo
International Journal of Spine Surgery Oct 2023, 8545; DOI: 10.14444/8545

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Biportal Endoscopic Approach for Lumbar Degenerative Disease in the Ambulatory Outpatient vs Inpatient Setting: A Comparative Study
Don Young Park, Thomas E. Olson, Alexander Upfill-Brown, Babapelumi Adejuyigbe, Akash A. Shah, William L. Sheppard, Cheol Wung Park, Dong Hwa Heo
International Journal of Spine Surgery Oct 2023, 8545; DOI: 10.14444/8545
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Effective Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery Technique With Better Facet Joint Preserving for Lumbar Lateral Recess Stenosis
  • Risk Analysis of Neurological Deterioration Associated With Fluid Insufflation in Uniportal Spine Endoscopy: A Case Series and Literature Review
  • Clinical Outcomes Following Treatment of Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy With Cervical Posterior Decompression Using Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Technique: A Single Center Retrospective Series of 20 Patients
Show more Endoscopic Minimally Invasive Surgery

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • biportal spinal endoscopy
  • endoscopic spine surgery
  • minimally invasive spine surgery
  • outpatient
  • inpatient
  • ambulatory surgery center

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Content
  • Archive

More Information

  • About IJSS
  • About ISASS
  • Privacy Policy

More

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Feedback

Other Services

  • Author Instructions
  • Join ISASS
  • Reprints & Permissions

© 2025 International Journal of Spine Surgery

International Journal of Spine Surgery Online ISSN: 2211-4599

Powered by HighWire