Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Other Publications
    • ijss

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
International Journal of Spine Surgery
  • My alerts
International Journal of Spine Surgery

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Follow ijss on Twitter
  • Visit ijss on Facebook
Research ArticleCervical Spine

Titanium-Coated Polyetheretherketone Cages Vs Full Titanium Cages for Stand-Alone 1- or 2-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Comparative Study

Franziska C.S. Altorfer, Christoph J. Laux, Dimitri Graf, Tobias Götschi, Frederik Abel, Mazda Farshad and José M. Spirig
International Journal of Spine Surgery July 2024, 8610; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/8610
Franziska C.S. Altorfer
1 University Spine Center Zurich, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: franziska.altorfer@gmx.net
Christoph J. Laux
1 University Spine Center Zurich, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dimitri Graf
2 Department of Radiology, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse, Zurich, Switzerland
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tobias Götschi
3 Department of Orthopedics, Unit for clinical and applied research, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse, Zurich, Switzerland
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frederik Abel
2 Department of Radiology, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse, Zurich, Switzerland
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mazda Farshad
1 University Spine Center Zurich, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
José M. Spirig
1 University Spine Center Zurich, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure

    Immediate postoperative lateral x-ray image (A) depicts single-level surgery with a titanium cage. The same image at the last follow-up (B) shows slight subsidence; however, successful osseous fusion posterior to the cage is evident. The lateral x-ray image of a 2-level surgery with titanium-coated polyether-ether-ketone cages (C) also demonstrates successful osseous fusion at the last follow-up, both within and posterior to the cage (D). Abbreviation: FU, follow-up.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Patient demographics and operative variables by implant type.

    VariableTTN (N = 16)TCPEEK (N = 29)
    Demographics
     Age, y, mean (range)56.0 (47–79)56.9 (38–83)
     Sex, F:M7:912:17
     Smoker, n (mean PY)3 (15)4 (36)
     Regular alcohol use, n (mean dL/d)1 (2)1 (5)
    Levels operated, n
     Total operated levels2137
     Levels in 2-level ACDF1016
     Levels in 1-level ACDF1121
    Operated Level, n
     C3-422
     C4-541
     C5-61220
     C6-7314
    • Abbreviations: ACDF, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; F, female; M, male; PY, pack years; TCPEEK, titanium-coated polyether-ether-ketone; TTN, titanium.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Overall changes in radiographic parameters from pre- to postoperative.

    Radiological ParametersChange Pre- to Postoperative, median (IQR) P
    Cervical lordosis (°)2.2 (0.20; 5.2)<0.001
    Segmental lordosis (°)1.0 (0.4; 2.1)<0.001
    C2–C7 SVA, mm2.8 (-2.1; 7.7)0.018
    Disc height operated level, mm2.0 (0.8; 3.3)<0.001
    Disc height adjacent level above, mm-0.1 (-0.3; 0.0)<0.001
    Disc height adjacent level below, mm-0.1 (-0.3; 0.0)< 0.001
    • Abbreviations: IQR, interquartile range; SVA, sagittal vertical axis.

    • View popup
    Table 3

    Radiographic parameters from pre- to postoperative by implant type.

    Radiological ParametersTTN, median (IQR)% ChangeTCPEEK, median (IQR)% Change P
    Cervical Lordosis (°)
     Preoperative14.0 (5.6; 23.3) 14.9 (7.1; 19.4) 0.94
     Postoperative15.3 (7.8; 27.4) 16.0 (9.6; 26.1) 0.70
     Change2 (0.3; 4.4)+14.32.3 (0; 5.8)+15.40.49
    Segmental Lordosis (°)
     Preoperative1.6 (1.2; 2.4)1.8 (-0.6; 3.4)0.72
     Postoperative2.2 (1.8; 3.4) 2.8 (0.7; 6.3) 0.92
     Change0.6 (0.4; 1.1)+37.51.4 (0.3; 2.9)+77.80.10
    C2-C7 SVA, mm
     Preoperative29.4 (15.2; 31.5) 26.3 (17.7; 30) 0.83
     Postoperative25 (20.1; 31.5) 29.1 (21.5; 33.3) 0.19
     Change3.8 (-3.2; 9.2)+12.92.7 (-2; 6.6)+10.30.77
    Disc Height Operated Level, mm
     Preoperative3.3 (2.0; 4.1) 3.2 (2.5; 3.8) 0.90
     Postoperative5.2 (4.0; 5.8)5.8 (4.6; 6.6)0.18
     Change1.4 (0.2; 3.3)+42.42.4 (1.3; 3.2)+75.00.90
    Disc Height Adjacent Level Above, mm
     Preoperative4.8 (3.6; 5.1)3.9 (3.4; 4.3)0.04
     Postoperative4.5 (3.4; 5.1)3.7 (3.3; 4.3)0.03
     Change-0.1 (-0.3; 0.0)-2.1-0.1 (-0.3; 0.0)-2.60.70
    Disc Height Adjacent Level Below, mm
     Preoperative4.2 (2.9; 5.9)4.3 (3.5; 4.9)0.80
     Postoperative4.1 (2.8; 5.6)4.3 (3.5; 4.9)0.69
     Change-0.1 (-0.3; 0)-2.4-0.1 (-0.2; 0)-2.30.87
    • Abbreviations: IQR, interquartile range; SVA, sagittal vertical axis; TCPEEK, Titanium-coated polyether-ether-ketone; TTN, Titanium.

    • Level of significance p<0.05

    • View popup
    Table 4

    Subsidence, fusion, and ASD compared between both cage groups.

    Radiological ParametersTTNTCPEEK P
    Subsidence
     Subsidence >1 mm, No. of subsided levels/total subsided levels (%)11/21 (52.4)21/37 (56.8)0.79
     Subsidence, mm, median (IQR)1.3 (0.3; 2.3)1.2 (0.6; 1.7)0.51
    Fusion
     Radiologically fused, No. of fused levels/total operated levels (%)19/21 (90.5)32/37 (86.5)0.89
     Fused single-level surgeries, No. of fused levels/total single-level operated levels (%)9/11 (81.8)19/21 (90.5)0.59
     Fused double-level surgeries, No. of fused levels/total double-level operated levels (%)10/10 (100)13/16 (81.3)0.26
    Adjacent Segment Degeneration0/21 (0)2/37 (5.4)0.53
    • Abbreviations: ASD, adjacent segment degeneration; IQR, interquartile range; TCPEEK, titanium-coated polyether-ether-ketone; TTN, titanium.

    • View popup
    Table 5

    Pre- and postoperative NDI scores by cage type.

    NDITTNTCPEEK P
    Preoperative, mean38.442.60.24
    Postoperative, mean28.328.10.12
    Change, mean (%)-10.0 (26)-14.1 (33)0.37
    • Abbreviations: NDI, Neck Disability Index; TCPEEK , titanium-coated polyether-ether-ketone; TTN, titanium.

    • Level of significane p<0.05.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

International Journal of Spine Surgery: 19 (S2)
International Journal of Spine Surgery
Vol. 19, Issue S2
1 Apr 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on International Journal of Spine Surgery.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Titanium-Coated Polyetheretherketone Cages Vs Full Titanium Cages for Stand-Alone 1- or 2-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Comparative Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from International Journal of Spine Surgery
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the International Journal of Spine Surgery web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Titanium-Coated Polyetheretherketone Cages Vs Full Titanium Cages for Stand-Alone 1- or 2-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Comparative Study
Franziska C.S. Altorfer, Christoph J. Laux, Dimitri Graf, Tobias Götschi, Frederik Abel, Mazda Farshad, José M. Spirig
International Journal of Spine Surgery Jul 2024, 8610; DOI: 10.14444/8610

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Titanium-Coated Polyetheretherketone Cages Vs Full Titanium Cages for Stand-Alone 1- or 2-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Comparative Study
Franziska C.S. Altorfer, Christoph J. Laux, Dimitri Graf, Tobias Götschi, Frederik Abel, Mazda Farshad, José M. Spirig
International Journal of Spine Surgery Jul 2024, 8610; DOI: 10.14444/8610
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Innovation and Adversity in Spine Surgery: A Retrospective
  • Cervical Myelopathy Secondary to Bilateral Atlantoaxial Pseudoarticulations in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Case Report
  • Incidence of Traumatic Spinal Injury Following Public Policy Update on Moped Usage in South Carolina
Show more Cervical Spine

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • ACDF
  • PEEK
  • TCPEEK
  • Titanium-coated
  • NDI

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Content
  • Archive

More Information

  • About IJSS
  • About ISASS
  • Privacy Policy

More

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Feedback

Other Services

  • Author Instructions
  • Join ISASS
  • Reprints & Permissions

© 2025 International Journal of Spine Surgery

International Journal of Spine Surgery Online ISSN: 2211-4599

Powered by HighWire