Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Other Publications
    • ijss

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
International Journal of Spine Surgery
  • My alerts
International Journal of Spine Surgery

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Follow ijss on Twitter
  • Visit ijss on Facebook
Research ArticleOther & Special Categories

Preoperative and Postoperative Sagittal Alignment and Compensatory Mechanisms in Patients With Posttraumatic Thoracolumbar Deformities Who Undergo Corrective Surgeries

Oscar Bravo Olivares, Manuel Valencia Carrasco, Guillermo Izquierdo Pinto, Felipe Novoa Tonda, José Antonio Riera Martínez and Alvaro Silva González
International Journal of Spine Surgery June 2021, 15 (3) 585-590; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/8079
Oscar Bravo Olivares
1Mutual de Seguridad, Spine Surgical Unit, Santiago, Chile
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Manuel Valencia Carrasco
1Mutual de Seguridad, Spine Surgical Unit, Santiago, Chile
2Clínica Alemana – Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Guillermo Izquierdo Pinto
1Mutual de Seguridad, Spine Surgical Unit, Santiago, Chile
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Felipe Novoa Tonda
1Mutual de Seguridad, Spine Surgical Unit, Santiago, Chile
2Clínica Alemana – Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
José Antonio Riera Martínez
1Mutual de Seguridad, Spine Surgical Unit, Santiago, Chile
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alvaro Silva González
2Clínica Alemana – Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Background: Secondary posttraumatic spinal kyphosis is a fixed deformity that has an asymptomatic presentation in most patients, but in some, persistent pain and disability can develop refractory to conservative treatment, which may result in the need for corrective surgery. Our aim was to analyze the modification of sagittal alignment and the variation in compensation mechanisms of spinal-pelvic segments before and after surgical correction in a group of patients with symptomatic posttraumatic kyphosis.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study of 16 consecutive patients from the beginning of 2007 until the beginning of 2017 who underwent surgery due to thoracolumbar sagittal deformities was performed. Regional kyphosis (RK), thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), lower lumbar lordosis (LLL), lumbar lordosis under the deformity (LLUD), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and PI-LL were measured in preoperative and postoperative lateral full spine x rays. Statistical analysis was performed with the nonparametric Wilcoxon test to compare preoperative and postoperative radiologic variables.

Results: Sixteen patients were included with a median age of 47.5 years (32–62 years), the median time elapsed from the accident until corrective surgery was 7 months (2–33 months), the median follow-up time was 16.5 months (6–80 months), and the most used corrective strategy was pedicle subtraction osteotomy (11/16 patients). Statistically and radiologically significant improvements were observed in RK (33.5° versus 12°, P < .001) and LLUD (68.5° versus 61°, P = .017), with a noticeable decrease in PI-LL (15° versus 9.5°, P = .233). There were no statistically significant results regarding TK, LL, LLL, PI, PT, or SVA.

Conclusions: Osteotomies are an effective tool to correct angular deformities at a local level after spine trauma. Posttraumatic kyphosis results in the compensation of sagittal imbalance through modification of segmental alignment of the mobile spine under the deformity.

Level of Evidence: 3.

Clinical Relevance: This work shows the compensation mechanisms after post-traumatic kyphosis in patients with previously healthy spines.

  • posttraumatic deformity
  • compensatory mechanisms
  • sagittal imbalance

BACKGROUND

Posttraumatic spinal kyphosis is often a consequence of an untimely diagnosis or the inappropriate treatment of vertebral fractures. Although these deformities have an asymptomatic presentation in most patients, in some, the deformity may have clinical relevance due to pain, incapacity, and impaired quality of life, which may result in the need for corrective surgery.

Posttraumatic kyphosis is often a fixed deformity that habitually results in compensated misalignment, characterized by maintenance of the physiological mechanical axis due to compensatory mechanisms such as lumbar hyperlordosis and spinal dorsal hypokyphosis.1,2

Unlike kyphotic deformities caused by degenerative pathology in adults, who have poor bone quality and in whom correction is performed in the lower lumbar spine, posttraumatic deformities tend to present in young patients with no comorbidities and very good bone quality, in whom corrective osteotomies are performed at the same level as the deformity.3

Unlike the literature in older patients, there is little literature regarding these patients with posttraumatic deformities.

The objective of our study was to analyze the modification of sagittal alignment and the variation in compensation mechanisms of spinal-pelvic segments before and after surgical correction in a group of patients with symptomatic posttraumatic kyphosis.

METHODS

This was an observational, analytic, retrospective cohort study that included patients from the beginning of 2007 until the beginning of 2017.

The inclusion criteria were patients older than 18 years presenting with symptomatic posttraumatic kyphosis in thoracolumbar segments that prompted surgical correction and who had undergone at least 1 postsurgical follow-up period of 6 months or more. The exclusion criteria included incomplete or poor quality clinical and radiological records, which could hinder radiologic measurements.

Data were collected from the electronic records of each patient. The following variables were recorded: age, sex, trauma mechanism, fracture type, neurological state, initial treatment, time elapsed between fracture and surgery, osteotomy spinal level, and surgical correction type.

Preoperative and postoperative lateral full spine x rays were measured using the program Impax Results Viewer (AGFA HealthCare N.V., Belgium), which registered the following: regional kyphosis (RK) from the superior vertebral endplate of the cranial vertebra to the inferior vertebral endplate of the caudal vertebra adjacent to the fractured vertebra; thoracic kyphosis (TK) from T4 to T12; lumbar lordosis (LL) from L1 to S1; lower lumbar lordosis (LLL) of the superior vertebral endplate from L4 to the superior vertebral endplate of S1; lumbar lordosis under the deformity (LLUD) from the superior vertebral endplate of the caudal vertebra adjacent to the fractured vertebra to the superior vertebral endplate of S1 in preoperative images and from the superior vertebral endplate of the caudal vertebra adjacent to the instrumentation to the superior vertebral endplate of S1 in postoperative images; pelvic incidence (PI); pelvic tilt (PT); sagittal vertical axis (SVA); and PI-LL (Figure 1).

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1

The spinopelvic parameters measured in our study.

Descriptions of the data were made for the central tendency and dispersion of each variable by a statistician. Statistical analysis was performed with the nonparametric Wilcoxon test to compare preoperative and postoperative radiologic variables. The analysis was performed using the program StataSE 14.0 (StataCorp, College Station, TX).

The research protocol was approved by the institutional ethics committee.

RESULTS

During the study period, 16 patients underwent operations: 14 men (87.5%) and 2 women, with a median age of 47.5 years (32–62 years).

A total of 100% of the patients suffered from high-energy trauma, with 56.3% due to traffic accidents.

Eleven fractures were type A, and 5 were type B according to the AO classification. A total of 75% (12/16) of patients were initially managed conservatively, and the deformity progressed due to failure of the anterior column. The other 4 patients previously underwent operations but progressed to postsurgical kyphosis due to vertebral collapse, posterior ligament apparatus failure, or implant loosening (Figure 2).

Figure 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2

The case of a patient who had a car accident, which resulted in a misdiagnosed type B fracture that progressed to a fixed kyphosis. (A) Computed tomography showing the kyphotic deformity. (B) Lateral full spine x ray showing an unbalanced spine with a +61 mm sagittal vertical axis.

The median time elapsed from the accident until corrective surgery was 7 months (2–33 months).

The most frequently operated levels were T12 and L1 (62.5%), and the most used corrective strategy was pedicle subtraction osteotomy (11/16). There were 3 vertebrectomies and 2 discovertebral osteotomies with intersomatic fusion performed, 1 of which was associated with a Smith-Petersen osteotomy (Table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 1

Preoperative and intraoperative variables.

Regarding the radiologic parameters (Table 2), preoperative RK was 33.5°, and postcorrection RK was 12° (P < .001); furthermore, preoperative LLUD was 68.5°, and postcorrection LLUD was 61° (P = .017). There were no statistically significant results regarding TK, LL, LLL, PI, PT, or SVA; however, there was a noticeable decrease in PI-LL from 15° preoperatively to 9.5° postoperatively (P = .233).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 2

Preoperative and postoperative radiologic parameters.

DISCUSSION

Over the last few decades, the importance of sagittal alignment has been strongly emphasized as well as the relevance of pelvic parameters and the clinical repercussions of spinal imbalance.4–9 Most studies allude to imbalance in elderly patients with degenerative changes and significant comorbidities.7,9–11 Few studies have addressed posttraumatic kyphosis and the subsequent spinal imbalance.

Our group of patients was younger than those included in most papers published regarding degenerative deformities, in which the average age tended to be older than 70 years.

The high-energy injury mechanism and the thoracolumbar location of fractures have been habitually described for these types of acute and subacute kyphotic deformities.

Although the objective of this study was not to identify the causes leading to thoracolumbar kyphosis, we can mention that most cases were caused by failure of the anterior column or loss of surgical correction due to collapse and loosening of the implants; additionally, the time of surgery from 2 to 33 months was due to a combination of kyphotic angulation and painful lumbar symptoms that were intolerable by the patients.

Posttraumatic deformities are fixed or rigid deformities of a short segment of the spine. Pedicle subtraction osteotomy has significant corrective power and requires a single posterior approach. Osteotomy is the most recommended and used procedure in the literature.3,12–15 Coinciding with these observations, pedicle subtraction osteotomy was the most used method in our study group (11 out of 16 patients). Together with the results of 5 patients in whom a double corrective approach was used, the median difference in the correction of RK was significant (21.5°) between preoperative and postoperative values. In our group, global balance was maintained as measured by SVA in 13 out of 16 patients, and in 2 patients demonstrating negative imbalance, global balance was restored. Altogether, these corrective techniques had a success rate of 93.75% (correction range between −3° and 44°) in terms of the level of kyphotic deformity in our group, and they maintained and/or restored global sagittal balance, agreeing with what has been described in the literature16; additionally, despite demonstrating a higher risk of major complications,17–19 particularly neurological complications, due to the location being at the same level of the conus medullaris,20 these osteotomies at the level of the deformity achieved effective correction and better restored the original shape of the spine. In a series by Kim et al21 of 140 patients with fixed sagittal deformities due to multiple etiologies who underwent pedicle subtraction osteotomies, 17 presented with posttraumatic deformities (average age 62.3 years); a segmental correction of 37.6 ± 4° was reported in this subgroup, and a correction of 86 mm in SVA and 34.8° in LL was reported in the whole series. In a series by Gao et al22 of 89 patients with posttraumatic deformities and an average age of 46.9 years, 42 underwent discovertebral osteotomy, and 44 underwent pedicle subtraction osteotomy and obtained similar clinical and radiologic results with a correction of the regional deformity from 39.6° ± 3.9° to 5.6° ± 3.7° in the discovertebral osteotomy group and from 39.1° ± 3.8° to 4.8° ± 4.2° in the pedicle subtraction group. Finally, Zeng et al,23 in a series of 34 patients with an average age of 48.9 years who underwent a posterior approach and posterior osteotomy, reported a decrease in the regional deformity from 32.3° to 0.9° in the deformity group with less than or equal to 45° of kyphosis and from 61.3° to 12.3° in the group with more than 45° of kyphosis.

Unlike elderly patients with imbalance due to degenerative pathology, where compensation mechanisms such as pelvic retroversion and flexion of the lower extremities predominate, in young patients with posttraumatic thoracolumbar kyphosis, the reported compensation mechanisms are spinal hypokyphosis and lumbar hyperlordosis.2,11,24 In our cohort, we found no differences in spinal kyphosis, but there was a significant reduction in lumbar lordosis under the deformity with conservation of the lumbopelvic parameters and SVA. This can probably be explained by the fact that young patients have a healthy and flexible spine that allows them to rebalance before changing the position of the pelvis; in fact, these flexible spines may even demonstrate overcorrection of hyperlordosis and may generate negative sagittal balance and overload of the lumbar facet joints. This fact may be a probable cause of the back pain observed in 2 patients in this study (Figure 3).

Figure 3
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3

The case of a burst fracture initially treated with in situ fixation that evolved to local kyphosis. (A) Lateral full spine x ray before the correction of kyphosis; we observed severe negative imbalance (sagittal vertical axis [SVA] −80 mm, regional kyphosis [RK] 20°, and lumbar lordosis [LL] −70°). (B) Lateral full spine x ray after the correction of kyphosis, showing normalization of the spinal parameters (SVA +25 mm, RK 5°, and LL −50°).

The main limitation of our work is its retrospective nature, which significantly restricted the inclusion of patients in the study due to the lack of comprehensive clinical and imaging records. This generated a limited number of patients, which affected the power of our results, as some of the results, such as LL and LLL, reached radiologically significant corrections (difference in medians of 6° and 4.5°, respectively) but no statistical significance, which reinforces the idea that, in young patients with rigid thoracolumbar deformities, the main compensating mechanism is at the lumbar level.

CONCLUSIONS

Posttraumatic kyphosis results in the compensation of sagittal imbalance through the modification of segmental alignment of the mobile spine under the deformity. Other compensatory mechanisms, such as pelvic retroversion, do not seem to be involved.

Osteotomies are an effective tool to correct angular deformities at a local level after spine trauma.

Footnotes

  • Disclosures and COI: The views expressed in the submitted article are our own and not an official position of the involved institutions. We did not use grants, equipment, drugs, and/or any other support that facilitated conducting the work described in the article or the writing of the article itself. Dr. Silva is a Medtronic speaker with personal fees. The rest of the authors declare no conflicts of interest. The research protocol was approved by the institutional ethics committee.

  • This manuscript is generously published free of charge by ISASS, the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery. Copyright © 2021 ISASS

REFERENCES

  1. 1 .↵
    1. Roussouly P,
    2. Pinheiro-Franco J.
    Biomechanical analysis of the spino-pelvic organization and adaptation in pathology. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(suppl 5):S609–S618. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-1928-x
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. 2 .↵
    1. Lamartina C,
    2. Berjano P.
    Classification of sagittal imbalance based on spinal alignment and compensatory mechanisms. Eur Spine J. 2014;236):1177–1189. doi:10.1007/s00586-014-3227-9
  3. 3 .↵
    1. Vaccaro A,
    2. Silber J.
    Post-traumatic spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26(24):S111–S118. doi:10.1097/00007632-200112151-00019
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. 4 .↵
    1. Weinstein S,
    1. Dubousset J.
    Three-dimensional analysis of the scoliotic deformity. In: Weinstein S, editor. Pediatric Spine: Principles and Practice. New York: Raven Press; 1994:479–496.
  5. 5 .
    1. Legaye J,
    2. Duval-Beaupère G,
    3. Hecquet J,
    4. Marty C.
    Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. Eur Spine J. 1998;7(2):99–103. doi:10.1007/s005860050038
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6 .
    1. Lafage V,
    2. Schwab F,
    3. Patel A,
    4. Hawkinson N,
    5. Farcy JP.
    Pelvic tilt and truncal inclination: two key radiographic parameters in the setting of adults with spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(17): 599–606. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181aad219
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. 7 .↵
    1. Glassman S,
    2. Bridwell K,
    3. Dimar JR,
    4. Horton W,
    5. Berven S,
    6. Schwab F.
    The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(18):2024–2029. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000179086.30449.96
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8 .
    1. Schwab F,
    2. Patel A,
    3. Ungar B,
    4. Farcy JP,
    5. Lafage V.
    Adult spinal deformity-postoperative standing imbalance: how much can you tolerate? An overview of key parameters in assessing alignment and planning corrective surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(25):2224–2231. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ee6bd4
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. 9 .↵
    1. Schwab F,
    2. Blondel B,
    3. Bess S, et al.
    Radiographic spinopelvic parameters and disability in the setting of adult spinal deformity: a prospective multicenter analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(13):803–812. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e318292b7b9
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. 10 .
    1. Savage J,
    2. Patel A.
    Fixed sagittal plane imbalance. Global Spine J. 2014;4:287–296. doi:10.1055/s-0034-1394126
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. 11 .↵
    1. Diebo B,
    2. Ferrero E,
    3. Lafage R, et al.
    Recruitment of compensatory mechanisms in sagittal spinal malalignment is age and regional deformity dependent: a full-standing axis analysis of key radiographical parameters. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40:642–649. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000844
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. 12 .↵
    1. Munting E.
    Surgical treatment of post-traumatic kyphosis in the thoracolumbar spine: indications and technical aspects. Eur Spine J. 2010;19(suppl 1):S69–S73. doi:10.1007/s00586-009-1117-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13 .
    1. Bridwell K.
    Decision making regarding Smith-Petersen vs. pedicle subtraction osteotomy vs. vertebral column resection for spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31:S171–S178. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000231963.72810.38
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14 .
    1. Buchowski J,
    2. Kuhns CA,
    3. Bridwell K,
    4. Lenke L.
    Surgical management of posttraumatic thoracolumbar kyphosis. Spine J. 2008;8(4):666–677. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2007.03.006
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15 .↵
    1. Heary R,
    2. Bono C.
    Pedicle subtraction osteotomy in the treatment of chronic, posttraumatic kyphotic deformity. J Neurosurg Spine. 2006;5:1–8. doi:10.3171/spi.2006.5.1.1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16 .↵
    1. Kose K,
    2. Bozduman O,
    3. Yenigul A,
    4. Igrek S.
    Spinal osteotomies: indications, limits and pitfalls. EFORT Open Rev. 2017;2:73–82. doi:10.1302/2058-5241.2.160069
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17 .↵
    1. Smith J,
    2. Sansur C,
    3. Donaldson W, et al.
    Short-term morbidity and mortality associated with correction of thoracolumbar fixed sagittal plane deformity: a report from the Scoliosis Research Society Morbidity and Mortality Committee. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36(12):958–64. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181eabb26
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. 18 .
    1. Smith J,
    2. Klineberg E,
    3. Lafage V, et al.
    Prospective multicenter assessment of perioperative and minimum 2-year postoperative complication rates associated with adult spinal deformity surgery. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016;25(1):1–14. doi:10.3171/2015.11.SPINE151036
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. 19 .↵
    1. Bridwell K,
    2. Lewis S,
    3. Edwards C, et al.
    Complications and outcomes of pedicle subtraction osteotomies for fixed sagittal imbalance. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28(18):2093–101. doi:10.1097/01.BRS.0000090891.60232.70
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20 .↵
    1. Buchowski J,
    2. Bridwell K,
    3. Lenke L, et al.
    Neurologic complications of lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a 10-year assessment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32(20):2245–2252. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31814b2d52
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  21. 21 .↵
    1. Kim K,
    2. Lee S,
    3. Suk K,
    4. Lee J,
    5. Jeong B.
    Outcome of pedicle subtraction osteotomies for fixed sagittal imbalance of multiple etiologies: a retrospective review of 140 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012;37(19):1667–1675. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182552fd0
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. 22 .↵
    1. Gao R,
    2. Wu J,
    3. Yuan W,
    4. Yang C,
    5. Pan F,
    6. Zhou X.
    Modified partial pedicle subtraction osteotomy for the correction of post-traumatic thoracolumbar kyphosis. Spine J. 2015;15(9):2009–2015. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2015.04.047
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. 23 .↵
    1. Zeng Y,
    2. Chen Z,
    3. Sun C, et al.
    Posterior surgical correction of posttraumatic kyphosis of the thoracolumbar segment. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2013;26:37–41. doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e318231d6a3
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. 24 .↵
    1. Barrey C,
    2. Roussouly P,
    3. Perrin G,
    4. Le Huec J.
    Sagittal balance disorders in severe degenerative spine. Can we identify the compensatory mechanisms? Eur Spine J. 2011;20(suppl 5):626–633. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-1930-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

International Journal of Spine Surgery
Vol. 15, Issue 3
1 Jun 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on International Journal of Spine Surgery.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Preoperative and Postoperative Sagittal Alignment and Compensatory Mechanisms in Patients With Posttraumatic Thoracolumbar Deformities Who Undergo Corrective Surgeries
(Your Name) has sent you a message from International Journal of Spine Surgery
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the International Journal of Spine Surgery web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Preoperative and Postoperative Sagittal Alignment and Compensatory Mechanisms in Patients With Posttraumatic Thoracolumbar Deformities Who Undergo Corrective Surgeries
Oscar Bravo Olivares, Manuel Valencia Carrasco, Guillermo Izquierdo Pinto, Felipe Novoa Tonda, José Antonio Riera Martínez, Alvaro Silva González
International Journal of Spine Surgery Jun 2021, 15 (3) 585-590; DOI: 10.14444/8079

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Preoperative and Postoperative Sagittal Alignment and Compensatory Mechanisms in Patients With Posttraumatic Thoracolumbar Deformities Who Undergo Corrective Surgeries
Oscar Bravo Olivares, Manuel Valencia Carrasco, Guillermo Izquierdo Pinto, Felipe Novoa Tonda, José Antonio Riera Martínez, Alvaro Silva González
International Journal of Spine Surgery Jun 2021, 15 (3) 585-590; DOI: 10.14444/8079
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • BACKGROUND
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Hemivertebra Resection and Spinal Arthrodesis by Single-Stage Posterior Approach in Congenital Scoliosis and Kyphoscoliosis: Results at 9.6 Years Mean Follow-up
  • Prevalence and Significance of Vitamin D Deficiency in Patients Undergoing Corrective Surgery for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
  • Adult Congenital Spine Deformity: Clinical Features and Motivations for Surgical Treatment
Show more Other & Special Categories

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • posttraumatic deformity
  • compensatory mechanisms
  • sagittal imbalance

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Content
  • Archive

More Information

  • About IJSS
  • About ISASS
  • Privacy Policy

More

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Feedback

Other Services

  • Author Instructions
  • Join ISASS
  • Reprints & Permissions

© 2025 International Journal of Spine Surgery

International Journal of Spine Surgery Online ISSN: 2211-4599

Powered by HighWire