Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Other Publications
    • ijss

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
International Journal of Spine Surgery
  • My alerts
International Journal of Spine Surgery

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Follow ijss on Twitter
  • Visit ijss on Facebook
Research ArticleOther and Special Categories

Risk Factors for Postoperative Urinary Tract Infection in Patients Undergoing Arthrodesis for Spinal Deformity of Different Levels

Hannah Shelby, Tara Shelby, Zoe Fresquez, Jeffrey C. Wang and Raymond Hah
International Journal of Spine Surgery February 2025, 8724; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/8724
Hannah Shelby
1 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tara Shelby
1 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: tshelby@usc.edu
Zoe Fresquez
1 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
BA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeffrey C. Wang
1 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Raymond Hah
1 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background While studies have identified urinary tract infection (UTI) as a complication after spine fusion, UTI is understudied in the context of fusion for spinal deformity. This study sought to determine both UTI incidence after multilevel posterior fusion for spinal deformity and whether pooled risk factors (RFs) increased UTI risk.

Methods Patients who had posterior fusion for spinal deformities between 2010 to 2019 were queried from the PearlDiver database, separated by the number of levels operated on (<7, 7–12, and >12), matched for age/gender, and analyzed for UTI incidence within 1 week and 1, 2, and 3 months. Any patient with a note of diabetes, obesity, rheumatoid arthritis, or coronary artery disease within 1-year prior to surgery and who contracted UTI within 1 month after fusion was included in the RF group for each level span. Patients of each level span with any RF were compared with those without any RFs. χ 2 tests were used for statistical analyses.

Results A total of 20,893 patients underwent posterior fusion for spinal deformities from 2010 to 2019. After matching, each level set had 2239 patients. At 1, 2, and 3 months, the >12 levels subgroup showed statistically higher UTI incidence than the 7 to 12 and <7 levels subgroups. At 3 months, UTI was similar between the <7 and 7 to 12 subgroups, with 3.8% and 3.9%, respectively (P = 0.41), and UTI was statistically higher in the >12 subgroup at 4.6% (<7 vs 7–12: P = 0.005; <7 vs >12: P < 0.001). For each level group, the RF groups had significantly higher UTI rates at 1, 2, and 3 months. ORs were significantly greater than 1 for RF groups across all level subgroups (<7 OR = 2.8, P < 0.001; 7–12 OR = 2.1, P < 0.001; >12 OR = 2.3, P < 0.001).

Conclusions Diabetes, obesity, rheumatoid arthritis, and coronary artery disease were associated with a higher risk of UTI after posterior fusion for spinal deformity for all level sets. patients who underwent procedures for more than 12 levels had the highest rate of UTI. This is the first study to analyze and compare UTI incidence following fusion for spinal deformity.

Level of Evidence 3.

  • spinal deformity
  • spinal arthrodesis
  • UTI
  • risk factors

Introduction

Scoliosis and kyphosis, an increase in lateral and forward curvature respectively, are spinal deformities that commonly affect the thoracic region.1 Scoliosis, the most common spinal deformity, usually affects a younger population, with 3% of 10 to 16 years old—an estimated 6 to 9 million people—affected in the United States.2–4 Kyphosis incidence, on the other hand, commonly increases with age, with 20% to 40% of adults aged 60 years or older affected and women having a greater rate of increase predominantly during menopause.1,5 Kyphosis and scoliosis both vary in the number of levels affected depending on disease severity.

While initial treatment of spinal deformity is conservative, arthrodesis procedures are indicated dependent on age, extent of curvature, and progression rate. Aims of surgery include stopping curvature progressing into adulthood, cosmetic improvement, and addressing long-term cardiorespiratory complications and/or back pain.4,6–9 The choice of fusion technique—anterior, posterior, or a combined approach—depends on many factors, including spinal deformity type, age, extent of curvature, and surgeon preference.4,7,10,11 Various studies have addressed risk factors (RFs) and complications affecting surgery outcome, focusing on either a certain subset of spinal deformity3,12–16 or a specific postoperative complication.15,17–19 A common postoperative complication is the presence of urinary tract infections (UTIs).12,13,15,16,19–21

UTIs are the most common type of nosocomial infections contracted after surgery, accounting for 23% of infections in the intensive care unit and 12.9% of health care–associated infections.22,23 UTI has been shown to significantly affect sepsis, morbidity, mortality, and cost of care.24 Indwelling catheters and surgeries with long procedure times have been proposed as RFs contributing to UTI development in previous studies.

While postoperative UTI is uncharacterized and understudied for fusion procedures specifically for spinal deformity, some studies have focused on anterior and posterior lumbar fusion, which have identified RFs significantly associated with UTI, such as older age, the female gender, alcohol use, and diabetes.25,26 Utilizing the PearlDiver Database, the aim of the current study was to identify RFs and the incidence of postoperative UTI in patients undergoing spinal fusion for spinal deformities.

Materials and Methods

Patient data from 2010 to 2019 were accessed from the PearlDiver Database (www.pearldiverinc.com; PearlDiver Inc, Fort Wayne, Indiana). PearlDiver is a national insurance database consisting of Medicare and multiple private insurance agencies. For the purpose of our study, the MSpine subset was queried using ICD-9 (International Classification of Diseases 9), ICD-10 (International Classification of Diseases 10), and/or Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes from quarter 1 in 2010 to quarter 3 of 2019 (Supplemental Table 1).

TABLE S1.

[8724supp001.docx]

Patients were first separated based on CPT code into the anterior or posterior subcategories. Each subcategory was then split into 3 groups based on the number of levels fused. The anterior group was split into 2 to 3, 4 to 7, and >7 levels fused, and the posterior group was split into <7, 7 to 12, and >12 levels fused (Figure). Queries were structured to ensure that the 3 groups were mutually exclusive, and the pathology of neuromuscular scoliosis was excluded. Patients in each level group that contracted a UTI within 1 week, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months were then identified using ICD-9-D codes and ICD-10-D codes. Level subgroups were matched to account for differences in the demographic characteristics of age and gender.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure

Query algorithm looking at subgroups of anterior and posterior fusion and then further dividing based on a number of levels fused during surgery. Abbreviations: RF: patients with set of risk factors; no = patients without set of risk factors.

Patients who contracted a UTI within 1 month postoperatively were then analyzed for the presence of various RFs existent within 1 year prior to surgery. The RFs of diabetes, obesity, rheumatoid arthritis, and coronary artery disease were identified using ICD-9-D and ICD-10-D codes (Supplemental Table 1).

An R package within PearlDiver was used to perform statistical analysis. χ 2 analysis was used to identify significant differences in UTI incidence among the 3-level subgroups and to perform further subanalysis on the effect of the chosen RFs on each cohort. A P value of 0.017 according to the Bonferroni correction was used to prevent Type 1 error.

Results

A total of 11,827 patients underwent arthrodesis procedures for spinal deformities from 2010 to 2019, with 1442 anterior and 10,385 posterior arthrodesis procedures. Matching anterior procedures gave inappropriately low sample sizes among the 3 fusion level groups. Thus, we excluded anterior procedures from our analysis and instead focused on matching and performing the initial pairwise statistics on the posterior group.

After matching for age and gender, there were 1787 patients in each of the posterior level groups. The highest incidence age range was 15 to 19 years, and the gender split was 73.4% women.

After 1 week, there was an incidence of 1.2%, 1.1%, and 0.7% for <7, 7–12, and >12 levels, respectively. No significant difference was observed in the 3 fusion level subgroups after both 1 week (<7 vs 7–12: P = 0.876; <7 vs >12: P = 0.1209; 7–12 vs >12: P = 0.21) and 1 month (<7 vs 7–12: 0.62; <7 vs >12: P = 0.3; 7–12 vs >12: P = 0.09). The >12 levels subgroup showed significantly higher UTI incidence when compared with 7 to 12 levels at 2 months at 2.2% and 3.6%, respectively (P = 0.04), and at 3 months at 2.7% and 3.9%, respectively (P = 0.04; Table 1). At the final time point of 3 months, UTI rate was similar between the <7 and 7 to 12 level groups, with rates of 3.6% and 2.9%, respectively (P = 0.15), and statistically higher in the >12 levels group, with a rate of 3.9% (7–12 vs >12: P < 0.04). The highest UTI incidence increase occurred within the first 7 days for the <7 and 7–12 levels groups, and from 1 week to 1 month for the >12 levels group.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

UTI incidence in patients undergoing posterior arthrodesis with either <7, 7–12, or >12 levels fused.

As expected, the RF group had significantly higher UTI rates at 1, 2, and 3 months for all fusion level groups (Table 2). The largest risk difference was seen at 1 month for <7 levels, 3 months for 7–12 levels, and 2 months for >12 levels. Patients who underwent <7 levels fusion were 2.73 times more likely to contract a UTI if they had a RF (P = 0.01); patients who underwent 7 to 12 levels fusion were 2 times more likely (P = 0.01); and patients who underwent more than 12 levels fusion were 2.8 times more likely (P < 0.001). The largest difference in UTI incidence between patients with and without RFs was at 3 months in all level groups: <7: 5.5% vs 2.4% (OR = 2.4; P = 0.004); 7–12: 3.8% vs 2.0% (OR = 2.0; P = 0.01); >12: 6.4% vs 2.8% (OR = 2.4; P = 0.002). Significance and OR comparing the time point of 7 days are not included because patients within the RF and non-RF groups totaled future than 11 patients within all 3 fusion level subgroups.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2

UTI rate of patients who underwent posterior spine fusion and who either had or did not have RFs.

Discussion

The current study showed that patients with diabetes, obesity, rheumatoid arthritis, and coronary artery disease had a significantly higher risk of contracting UTI than patients without, regardless of the type of procedure or number of levels fused. In addition, within the posterior group, a greater number of levels fused had significantly more UTI cases. Spinal deformities, such as scoliosis and kyphosis, are disorders that can appear in all age ranges, most commonly arising during adolescence or progressively worsening due to age.2–4 Fusion may be indicated when curvatures exceed 45° or more than 70° with pain in the cases of scoliosis and kyphosis, respectively.4,6,7 Multiple previous studies have demonstrated UTI as a common postoperative complication affecting surgery success.12,13,15,16

UTI incidences 1 month after either anterior or posterior procedures were higher than previously reported. Bekelis et al reported a 1.37% incidence in general spinal surgery patients (including anterior surgery, corpectomy, and fusion).27 Similarly, 2 separate studies reported UTI contraction in 1.41% of patients who underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion and 1.77% of patients who underwent anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF).25,26 In contrast, a study analyzing elective spinal surgery reported an even lower UTI incidence rate of 0.88% in ALIF patients.23 The higher incidences of UTI demonstrated in our study are consistent across the different spinal deformity levels. This may be due to the higher number of female patients in the cohort, as young women have been shown to have high incidences of UTI contraction.

Patients who had spinal fusion with >12 levels showed a statically greater percentage of UTI cases than patients who had spinal fusion for 7 to 12 levels. This distinction may be due to the fact that procedures requiring more levels fused are more involved, longer, and require longer recovery length of stay in the hospital, increasing the opportunity of bacterial exposure.16,25,28,29 Procedure length is an identified RF for UTI, characterized in both spinal and nonspinal surgery-related settings.28,30 A comprehensive retrospective study of 1,452,369 patients who received general anesthesia for unspecified surgery was identified using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. The 2 highest quintiles for procedure length showed an increased risk with OR of 1.156 and 1.758, as compared with the third quintile for reference.30 In addition, in the context of spinal surgery, analyses of UTI incidence in ALIF and posterior lumbar interbody fusion patients also recognized longer operative time as an associated RF.25,26

In our dataset, the highest number of UTI cases appear within the first 7 days postoperatively for all level groups except for <12 levels fused during the posterior procedure, which has the highest number from 1 week to 1 month. While there are cases that appear after 1 month, there is a sharp decline of cases after this point, at both the 2- and 3-month time points. This timing of UTI onset is consistent with values previously reported for spinal surgeries. Median postoperative day of UTI occurrence in previous studies range from 2 weeks to 1 month.23,26

The current analysis included prospective matching for age and gender in the posterior arthrodesis group. Female gender and sexual activity have been shown to be RFs of UTI. Both factors are well described in existing literature. Women have shorter urethras, allowing for shorter distances that bacteria must travel to infect the bladder.31,32 Displacement of pre-existing vaginal uropathogens to the bladder during sex has been proposed as an additional contributor to increased UTI risk in women.33 Multiple studies have shown a strong association between sexual intercourse frequency and UTI, with a pronounced rise in cases in women beginning sexual activity as opposed to children and adolescents.31,33–37 Our cohort of arthrodesis patients retrospectively analyzed were younger, in the postadolescent age range of 15 to 19, and were more than 2/3 women. Again, the large ratio of young women in our cohort may have contributed to the noted high rate of UTI.

As anticipated, the included RFs led to a significantly higher incidence of UTI at each of the time points in each of the 3 groups.

Diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, and obesity are all well-characterized RFs for UTI in both spinal and nonspinal surgeries. Patients with diabetes have been shown to be more susceptible due to their impaired immune system and the common complication of diabetic neuropathy, leading to delayed and incomplete bladder emptying.38,39 In addition, obesity and coronary artery disease have been shown to be comorbidities associated with infection as well.40–43 While the link to obesity is largely unknown, it is believed that systemic metabolic dysfunction may encourage UTI occurrence.43

The RF of the underlying disease of rheumatoid arthritis, while described in nonspinal surgeries, has not been included in UTI contraction postspinal surgery studies. Rheumatoid arthritis patients have been shown to have increased susceptibility to many serious infections due to impaired adaptive cellular immunity, neutropenia, and other interruptions to the immune system.44–46

While the present study is the first to our knowledge to characterize UTI in the context of surgery for spinal deformities, the present study has some limitations, with the main limitation being isolating the spinal location of the actual procedure. Despite the CPT codes grouping the thoracic procedures, it is unclear whether the surgery spanned the cervicothoracic or thoracolumbar spine, especially given the large number of levels operated on. Furthermore, it is important to note that while we did not separate our cohort based on each pathology due to the limitation of sample size, most of the population was in the idiopathic rather than the de novo cohort. In addition, while our initial intention was to separate individual RFs, small sample size led to the decision to pool all RFs together. Lastly, there are other comorbidities and complications that may not have been accounted for, despite being associated with UTI.

Conclusion

Diabetes, obesity, rheumatoid arthritis, and coronary artery disease were associated with an increased risk of UTI following arthrodesis for spinal deformity, regardless of the number of levels. In addition, fusion procedures with more than 12 levels had the highest rate of UTI. This is the first study to analyze and compare UTI incidence following arthrodesis on different level lengths for spinal deformity.

Footnotes

  • Funding The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

  • Declaration of Conflicting Interests The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

  • Disclosures Jeffrey C. Wang reports royalties or licenses from Zimmer-Biomet, DePuy Synthes, and Seaspine; consulting for PrecisionOS (no financial payments); payment for expert testimonial from various law firms; support for attending meetings/travel and leadership role with honorarium from the AO Foundation Board; stock/stock options from Bone Biologics, PearlDiver, and electroCore; fellowship funding from AO Spine North America (paid to institution); and serving as the editor in chief of Global Spine Journal (no payment). Raymond Hah reports grants or contracts from A-TEC and SI-Bone (paid to institution); royalties/licenses and consulting fees from NuVasive; and serving in leadership role for the North American Spine Society, Lumbar Spine Research Society, and Korean American Spine Society. The remaining authors have no disclosures.

  • This manuscript is generously published free of charge by ISASS, the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery. Copyright © 2025 ISASS. To see more or order reprints or permissions, see http://ijssurgery.com.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Lam JC ,
    2. Mukhdomi T
    . Kyphosis. StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; 2021.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Minhas SV ,
    2. Chow I ,
    3. Feldman DS ,
    4. Bosco J ,
    5. Otsuka NY
    . A predictive risk index for 30-day readmissions following surgical treatment of pediatric scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2016;36(2):187–192. doi:10.1097/BPO.0000000000000423
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Martin CT ,
    2. Pugely AJ ,
    3. Gao Y ,
    4. Weinstein SL
    . Causes and risk factors for 30-day unplanned readmissions after pediatric spinal deformity surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1986). 2015;40(4):238–246. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000730
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. 4.↵
    1. Pourfeizi HH ,
    2. Sales JG ,
    3. Tabrizi A ,
    4. Borran G ,
    5. Alavi S
    . Comparison of the combined anterior-posterior approach versus posterior-only approach in scoliosis treatment. Asian Spine J. 2014;8(1):8–12. doi:10.4184/asj.2014.8.1.8
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. 5.↵
    1. Roghani T ,
    2. Zavieh MK ,
    3. Manshadi FD ,
    4. King N ,
    5. Katzman W
    . Age-related hyperkyphosis: update of its potential causes and clinical impacts-narrative review. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2017;29(4):567–577. doi:10.1007/s40520-016-0617-3
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. 6.↵
    1. Katzman WB ,
    2. Wanek L ,
    3. Shepherd JA ,
    4. Sellmeyer DE
    . Age-related hyperkyphosis: its causes, consequences, and management. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010;40(6):352–360. doi:10.2519/jospt.2010.3099
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Ogura Y ,
    2. Gum JL ,
    3. Hostin RA , et al
    . Cost-effectiveness of surgical treatment of adult spinal deformity: comparison of posterior-only versus anteroposterior approach. Spine J. 2020;20(9):1464–1470. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2020.03.018
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. 8.↵
    1. Sheehan DD ,
    2. Grayhack J
    . Pediatric scoliosis and kyphosis: an overview of diagnosis, management, and surgical treatment. Pediatr Ann. 2017;46(12):e472–e480. doi:10.3928/19382359-20171113-01
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. 9.↵
    1. Lin Y ,
    2. Chen W ,
    3. Chen A ,
    4. Li F ,
    5. Xiong W
    . Anterior versus posterior selective fusion in treating adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of radiologic parameters. World Neurosurg. 2018;111:e830–e844. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2017.12.161
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. 10.↵
    1. Shao Z-X ,
    2. Fang X ,
    3. Lv Q-B , et al
    . Comparison of combined anterior-posterior approach versus posterior-only approach in neuromuscular scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J. 2018;27(9):2213–2222. doi:10.1007/s00586-018-5702-1
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. 11.↵
    1. El-Hawary R ,
    2. Chukwunyerenwa C
    . Update on evaluation and treatment of scoliosis. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2014;61(6):1223–1241. doi:10.1016/j.pcl.2014.08.007
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Abu-Bonsrah N ,
    2. Goodwin CR ,
    3. Ortega G , et al
    . Risk factors associated with short-term complications and mortality after pediatric spinal arthrodesis. Neurosurg Focus. 2017;43(4):E7. doi:10.3171/2017.7.FOCUS17313
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. 13.↵
    1. Soroceanu A , et al
    . Medical complications after adult spinal deformity surgery: incidence, risk factors, and clinical impact. Spine (Phila Pa 1986). 1976;41:1718–1723. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000001636
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. 14.↵
    1. Bhagat S ,
    2. Vozar V ,
    3. Lutchman L ,
    4. Crawford RJ ,
    5. Rai AS
    . Morbidity and mortality in adult spinal deformity surgery: Norwich spinal unit experience. Eur Spine J. 2013;22(Suppl 1):S42–S46. doi:10.1007/s00586-012-2627-y
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Carreon LY ,
    2. Puno RM ,
    3. Lenke LG , et al
    . Non-neurologic complications following surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(11):2427–2432. doi:10.2106/JBJS.F.00995
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Basques BA ,
    2. Bohl DD ,
    3. Golinvaux NS ,
    4. Smith BG ,
    5. Grauer JN
    . Patient factors are associated with poor short-term outcomes after posterior fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(1):286–294. doi:10.1007/s11999-014-3911-4
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. 17.↵
    1. Croft LD ,
    2. Pottinger JM ,
    3. Chiang H-Y ,
    4. Ziebold CS ,
    5. Weinstein SL ,
    6. Herwaldt LA
    . Risk factors for surgical site infections after pediatric spine operations. Spine (Phila Pa 1986). 2015;40(2):E112–E119. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000693
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. 18.↵
    1. Martin CT ,
    2. Pugely AJ ,
    3. Gao Y ,
    4. Ilgenfritz RM ,
    5. Weinstein SL
    . Incidence and risk factors for early wound complications after spinal arthrodesis in children: analysis of 30-day follow-up data from the ACS-NSQIP. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39(18):1463–1470. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000446
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Khoshbin A ,
    2. Lysenko M ,
    3. Law P ,
    4. Wright JG
    . Outcomes of infection following pediatric spinal fusion. Can J Surg. 2015;58(1):006014. doi:10.1503/cjs.006014
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. 20.↵
    1. Cho K-J ,
    2. Suk S-I ,
    3. Park S-R , et al
    . Complications in posterior fusion and instrumentation for degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1986). 2007;32(20):2232–2237. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31814b2d3c
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  21. 21.↵
    1. Schoenfeld AJ ,
    2. Carey PA ,
    3. Cleveland AW ,
    4. Bader JO ,
    5. Bono CM
    . Patient factors, comorbidities, and surgical characteristics that increase mortality and complication risk after spinal arthrodesis: a prognostic study based on 5,887 patients. Spine J. 2013;13(10):1171–1179. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2013.02.071
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Chenoweth CE ,
    2. Saint S
    . Urinary tract infections. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2016;30(4):869–885. doi:10.1016/j.idc.2016.07.007
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. 23.↵
    1. Pertsch NJ ,
    2. Darveau SC ,
    3. Tang OY ,
    4. Toms SA ,
    5. Weil RJ
    . Urinary tract infection after elective spine surgery: timing, predictive factors, and outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1986). 2021;46(5):337–346. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000003794
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. 24.↵
    1. Schuller K ,
    2. Probst J ,
    3. Hardin J ,
    4. Bennett K ,
    5. Martin A
    . Initial impact of medicare’s nonpayment policy on catheter-associated urinary tract infections by hospital characteristics. Health Policy. 2014;115(2–3):165–171. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.11.013
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. 25.↵
    1. Lee D ,
    2. Lee R ,
    3. Cross MT , et al
    . Risk factors for postoperative urinary tract infections following anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Int J Spine Surg. 2020;14(4):493–501. doi:10.14444/7065
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Bohl DD , et al
    . Urinary tract infection following posterior lumbar fusion procedures: an American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program study. Spine (Phila Pa 1986). 1976;40:1785–179C. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000001003
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  27. 27.↵
    1. Bekelis K ,
    2. Desai A ,
    3. Bakhoum SF ,
    4. Missios S
    . A predictive model of complications after spine surgery: the national surgical quality improvement program (NSQIP) 2005-2010. Spine J. 2014;14(7):1247–1255. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2013.08.009
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Procter LD ,
    2. Davenport DL ,
    3. Bernard AC ,
    4. Zwischenberger JB
    . General surgical operative duration is associated with increased risk-adjusted infectious complication rates and length of hospital stay. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;210(1):60–65. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.09.034
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Yoshihara H ,
    2. Paulino C ,
    3. Yoneoka D
    . Predictors of increased hospital stay in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion: analysis of national database. Spine Deform. 2018;6(3):226–230. doi:10.1016/j.jspd.2017.09.053
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  30. 30.↵
    1. Qin C ,
    2. de Oliveira G ,
    3. Hackett N ,
    4. Kim JYS
    . Surgical duration and risk of urinary tract infection: an analysis of 1,452,369 patients using the national surgical quality improvement program (NSQIP). Int J Surg. 2015;20:107–112. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.05.051
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  31. 31.↵
    1. Foxman B
    . Epidemiology of urinary tract infections: incidence, morbidity, and economic costs. Am J Med. 2002;113 Suppl 1A:5S–13S. doi:10.1016/s0002-9343(02)01054-9
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  32. 32.↵
    1. Schappert SM
    . Ambulatory care visits to physician offices, hospital outpatient departments, and emergency departments: United States, 1997. Vital Health Stat. 1999;13:1–39.
    OpenUrl
  33. 33.↵
    1. Vm L
    . Sexual activity and the risk of acute uncomplicated urinary tract infection in premenopausal women: implicationsfor reproductive health programming. OGIJ. 2018;9(1). http://medcraveonline.com/OGIJ/volume_issues?issueId=1946&volumeId=538. doi:10.15406/ogij.2018.09.00303
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  34. 34.↵
    1. Remis RS ,
    2. Gurwith MJ ,
    3. Gurwith D ,
    4. Hargrett-Bean NT ,
    5. Layde PM
    . Risk factors for urinary tract infection. Am J Epidemiol. 1987;126(4):685–694. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114708
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Strom BL ,
    2. Collins M ,
    3. West SL ,
    4. Kreisberg J ,
    5. Weller S
    . Sexual activity, contraceptive use, and other risk factors for symptomatic and asymptomatic bacteriuria. A case-control study. Ann Intern Med. 1987;107(6):816–823. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-107-6-816
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Nicolle LE ,
    2. Harding GK ,
    3. Preiksaitis J ,
    4. Ronald AR
    . The association of urinary tract infection with sexual intercourse. J Infect Dis. 1982;146(5):579–583. doi:10.1093/infdis/146.5.579
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Foxman B ,
    2. Barlow R ,
    3. D’Arcy H ,
    4. Gillespie B ,
    5. Sobel JD
    . Urinary tract infection: self-reported incidence and associated costs. Ann Epidemiol. 2000;10(8):509–515. doi:10.1016/s1047-2797(00)00072-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Boyko EJ ,
    2. Fihn SD ,
    3. Scholes D ,
    4. Chen C-L ,
    5. Normand EH ,
    6. Yarbro P
    . Diabetes and the risk of acute urinary tract infection among postmenopausal women. Diabetes Care. 2002;25(10):1778–1783. doi:10.2337/diacare.25.10.1778
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    1. Shah BR ,
    2. Hux JE
    . Quantifying the risk of infectious diseases for people with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(2):510–513. doi:10.2337/diacare.26.2.510
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    1. Ilyas H ,
    2. Golubovsky JL ,
    3. Chen J ,
    4. Winkelman RD ,
    5. Mroz TE ,
    6. Steinmetz MP
    . Risk factors for 90-day reoperation and readmission after lumbar surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019;31(1):20–26. doi:10.3171/2019.1.SPINE18878
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  41. 41.↵
    1. Shih W-Y ,
    2. Chang C-C ,
    3. Tsou M-T ,
    4. Chan H-L ,
    5. Chen Y-J ,
    6. Hwang L-C
    . Incidence and risk factors for urinary tract infection in an elder home care population in Taiwan: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(4):566. doi:10.3390/ijerph16040566
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  42. 42.↵
    1. Mahyar A ,
    2. Ayazi P ,
    3. Gholmohammadi P ,
    4. Moshiri SA ,
    5. Oveisi S ,
    6. Esmaeily S
    . The role of overweight and obesity in urinary tract infection in children. Infez Med. 2016;24(1):38–42.
    OpenUrl
  43. 43.↵
    1. Saliba W ,
    2. Barnett-Griness O ,
    3. Rennert G
    . The association between obesity and urinary tract infection. Eur J Intern Med. 2013;24(2):127–131. doi:10.1016/j.ejim.2012.11.006
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    1. Doran MF ,
    2. Crowson CS ,
    3. Pond GR ,
    4. O’Fallon WM ,
    5. Gabriel SE
    . Frequency of infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis compared with controls: a population-based study. Arthritis Rheum. 2002;46(9):2287–2293. doi:10.1002/art.10524
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. 45.↵
    1. Franklin J ,
    2. Lunt M ,
    3. Bunn D ,
    4. Symmons D ,
    5. Silman A
    . Risk and predictors of infection leading to hospitalisation in a large primary-care-derived cohort of patients with inflammatory polyarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2007;66(3):308–312. doi:10.1136/ard.2006.057265
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. 46.↵
    1. Puntis D ,
    2. Malik S ,
    3. Saravanan V , et al
    . Urinary tract infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2013;32(3):355–360. doi:10.1007/s10067-012-2129-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

International Journal of Spine Surgery: 19 (S2)
International Journal of Spine Surgery
Vol. 19, Issue S2
1 Apr 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on International Journal of Spine Surgery.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Risk Factors for Postoperative Urinary Tract Infection in Patients Undergoing Arthrodesis for Spinal Deformity of Different Levels
(Your Name) has sent you a message from International Journal of Spine Surgery
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the International Journal of Spine Surgery web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Risk Factors for Postoperative Urinary Tract Infection in Patients Undergoing Arthrodesis for Spinal Deformity of Different Levels
Hannah Shelby, Tara Shelby, Zoe Fresquez, Jeffrey C. Wang, Raymond Hah
International Journal of Spine Surgery Feb 2025, 8724; DOI: 10.14444/8724

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Risk Factors for Postoperative Urinary Tract Infection in Patients Undergoing Arthrodesis for Spinal Deformity of Different Levels
Hannah Shelby, Tara Shelby, Zoe Fresquez, Jeffrey C. Wang, Raymond Hah
International Journal of Spine Surgery Feb 2025, 8724; DOI: 10.14444/8724
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Patient Satisfaction Following Lumbar Fusion Is Associated With Functional Status and Pain More Than the Attainment of Minimal Clinically Important Difference: Implications for Value-Based Medicine
  • Prone Position for Preoperative Planning in Lumbar Endoscopic and Minimally Invasive Fusion Procedures: Insights From a Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study
  • Selective Direct Vertebral Rotation Instrumentation for the Correction of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Lenke 5 Curve
Show more Other and Special Categories

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • spinal deformity
  • spinal arthrodesis
  • UTI
  • risk factors

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Content
  • Archive

More Information

  • About IJSS
  • About ISASS
  • Privacy Policy

More

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Feedback

Other Services

  • Author Instructions
  • Join ISASS
  • Reprints & Permissions

© 2025 International Journal of Spine Surgery

International Journal of Spine Surgery Online ISSN: 2211-4599

Powered by HighWire