Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Other Publications
    • ijss

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
International Journal of Spine Surgery
  • My alerts
International Journal of Spine Surgery

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Follow ijss on Twitter
  • Visit ijss on Facebook
Research ArticleMinimally Invasive Surgery

Minimally Invasive, Stereotactic, Wireless, Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement in the Lumbar Spine: Accuracy Rates With 182 Consecutive Screws

SAEED S. SADRAMELI, RYAN JAFRANI, BLAKE N. STAUB, MAJDI RADAIDEH and PAUL J. HOLMAN
International Journal of Spine Surgery December 2018, 12 (6) 650-658; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/5081
SAEED S. SADRAMELI
Houston Methodist Neurosurgical Spine Center, Houston Methodist Neurological Institute, Houston, Texas
MD, MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
RYAN JAFRANI
Houston Methodist Neurosurgical Spine Center, Houston Methodist Neurological Institute, Houston, Texas
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
BLAKE N. STAUB
Houston Methodist Neurosurgical Spine Center, Houston Methodist Neurological Institute, Houston, Texas
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MAJDI RADAIDEH
Houston Methodist Neurosurgical Spine Center, Houston Methodist Neurological Institute, Houston, Texas
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PAUL J. HOLMAN
Houston Methodist Neurosurgical Spine Center, Houston Methodist Neurological Institute, Houston, Texas
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    Schematic and equipment for “K-wireless” navigated minimally invasive pedicle screw placement: “awl-tipped tap” that allows for penetration of the cortical bone at the screw entry site, initial passage into the pedicle, and tapping through the pedicle into the vertebral body. This tap changes from a small to larger diameter along its shaft, and we prefer the 4.5- to 5.5-mm option for lumbar pedicle screws. This instrument is inserted with a low-speed/high-torque Powerase driver. All cases were performed using the O-arm cone beam computed tomography intraoperative imaging system integrated with the StealthStation navigation system and Medtronic instrumentation. Registration is automatic with this system.

  • Figure 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2

    Intraoperative pictures and with corresponding neuronavigation for “K-wireless” navigated pedicle screw placement. (A) Navigation is used to mark the incision providing the desired convergent trajectory through the pedicle, minimizing the size of the incision needed. (B) The “awl-tipped tap” is used to make a trajectory plan or “virtual K-wire,” followed by tapping of the pedicle, aided by the saved trajectory plan, without the need for pilot holes. (C) Screw placement is aided by the saved trajectory plan. (D) This is repeated for each subsequent pedicle screw. (E) Percutaneous rod placement.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Table 1
  • Table 2
  • Table 3
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

International Journal of Spine Surgery
Vol. 12, Issue 6
1 Dec 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on International Journal of Spine Surgery.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Minimally Invasive, Stereotactic, Wireless, Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement in the Lumbar Spine: Accuracy Rates With 182 Consecutive Screws
(Your Name) has sent you a message from International Journal of Spine Surgery
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the International Journal of Spine Surgery web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Minimally Invasive, Stereotactic, Wireless, Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement in the Lumbar Spine: Accuracy Rates With 182 Consecutive Screws
SAEED S. SADRAMELI, RYAN JAFRANI, BLAKE N. STAUB, MAJDI RADAIDEH, PAUL J. HOLMAN
International Journal of Spine Surgery Dec 2018, 12 (6) 650-658; DOI: 10.14444/5081

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Minimally Invasive, Stereotactic, Wireless, Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement in the Lumbar Spine: Accuracy Rates With 182 Consecutive Screws
SAEED S. SADRAMELI, RYAN JAFRANI, BLAKE N. STAUB, MAJDI RADAIDEH, PAUL J. HOLMAN
International Journal of Spine Surgery Dec 2018, 12 (6) 650-658; DOI: 10.14444/5081
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Biomechanical Assessment of a Novel Sharp-Tipped Screw for 1-Step Minimally Invasive Pedicle Screw Placement Under Navigation
  • Biomechanical Assessment of a Novel Sharp-Tipped Screw for 1-Step Minimally Invasive Pedicle Screw Placement Under Navigation
  • Comparative Radiographic Analyses and Clinical Outcomes Between O-Arm Navigated and Fluoroscopic-Guided Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Comparative Review of Lateral and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technique, Outcomes, and Complications
  • Key Considerations in Surgical Decision-Making on the Side of Approach for Lumbar Lateral Transpsoas Interbody Fusion Techniques
  • A Spine Surgeon’s Learning Curve With the Minimally Invasive L5 to S1 Lateral ALIF Surgical Approach: Perioperative Outcomes and Technical Considerations
Show more Minimally Invasive Surgery

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • MIS spinal fusion
  • neuro-navigation
  • K-wireless
  • percutaneous pedicle placement accuracy

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Content
  • Archive

More Information

  • About IJSS
  • About ISASS
  • Privacy Policy

More

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Feedback

Other Services

  • Author Instructions
  • Join ISASS
  • Reprints & Permissions

© 2025 International Journal of Spine Surgery

International Journal of Spine Surgery Online ISSN: 2211-4599

Powered by HighWire