Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Other Publications
    • ijss

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
International Journal of Spine Surgery
  • My alerts
International Journal of Spine Surgery

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Follow ijss on Twitter
  • Visit ijss on Facebook
LetterLetter

Letter to the Editor: “Outpatient Minimally Invasive Lumbar Fusion Using Multimodal Analgesic Management in the Ambulatory Surgery Setting”

Ellen M. Soffin, Alexander P. Hughes, James D. Beckman, Andrew A. Sama and Frank P. Cammisa
International Journal of Spine Surgery October 2021, 15 (5) 848-849; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/8109
Ellen M. Soffin
Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care & Pain Management, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: soffine@hss.edu
Alexander P. Hughes
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Spine Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James D. Beckman
Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care & Pain Management, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew A. Sama
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Spine Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frank P. Cammisa
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Spine Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

To the editor,

We read with great interest the work by Dr Parrish and colleagues describing their package of multimodal analgesia (MMA) for lumbar surgery in the ambulatory setting.1 We applaud their efforts to highlight the importance of adequate analgesia on rapid recovery after spine surgery.

We appreciate that the optimal selection, timing, doses, and combinations of analgesics have not yet been defined in the surgical/anesthetic literature, and institutional preferences will guide the final choices; however, several safety and efficacy questions are raised by the inclusion of some of elements of care in the described work.

Chief among these is the routine administration of preoperative (day of surgery) controlled release oxycodone. Oxycodone controlled release is not approved for preemptive analgesia or for the management of acute postoperative pain unless patients were previously taking the drug.2 This prescribing advice was updated during the study period under investigation. Did the authors have a compelling reason to use the drug in an off-label fashion? By reference to Table 1, it does not appear the cohort included patients with chronic pain conditions or with opioid tolerance; indeed, these patients would be less than ideal candidates for surgery in an ambulatory setting. Compounding the risks presented by oxycodone controlled release in opioid-naive patients is the inclusion of pregabalin in the MMA regimen. Longstanding beliefs about the efficacy of gabapentinoids for acute pain reduction and opioid sparing benefits have recently been called into question.3 At the same time, evidence of harm from routine perioperative administration has increased. In response to these concerns, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a warning label update and call for clinical trials on the elevated risk of respiratory depression when gabapentinoids are used in isolation and risk of overdose death when used in combination with opioids.4 Given the short length of stay reported in the work, the risk for respiratory depression/overdose death may well peak after the patient has been discharged to home.

Could the authors explain the rationale for coprescribing multiple opioid analgesics in the postoperative period? If we have interpreted Appendix 1 correctly, in addition to preoperative continuous release oxycodone, the MMA package includes tramadol plus oxycodone on the day of surgery, which is transitioned to hydrocodone/paracetamol on postoperative day 1. Guidelines from the FDA as well as the major Pain and Anesthetic Societies continue to recommend against combining opioid medications and against opioids as the basis of MMA.5 In our practice, and in several spine care pathways described in the peer-reviewed literature, acetaminophen (± nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories) is administered “around-the-clock”, and a single opioid is prescribed on an as needed basis, with the dose adjusted by the patient according to their pain scores.6–8 The authors' comments regarding patient selection are well received and perhaps account for this choice. However, the generalizability of the MMA described here may be limited, and certainly merits prospective study, compared with more conventional MMA regimens.

These questions highlight the dynamic nature of care pathways and the mandate to update elements as evidence accumulates. Indeed, our group reported favorable outcomes after lumbar fusion when gabapentinoids were included in an enhanced recovery after surgery pathway; however, based on recent risk-benefit analyses, we have now omitted their routine administration.8

We hope the authors will comment on any ongoing use of these agents in their MMA. Provocatively, in the 50 patients described here, none suffered serious complications. We thank the authors for this work and look forward to seeing more reports that elevate the care of spine surgery patients.

  • This manuscript is generously published free of charge by ISASS, the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery. Copyright © 2021 ISASS

REFERENCES

  1. 1 .↵
    1. Parrish JM,
    2. Jenkins NW,
    3. Brundage TS, et al.
    Outpatient minimally invasive lumbar fusion using multimodal analgesic management in the ambulatory surgery setting. Int J Spine Surg. 2020;14(6):970–981.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. 2 .↵
    US FDA. OXYCONTIN® (oxycodone hydrochloride) extended-release tablets, for oral use. Highlights of prescribing information https://www.fda.gov/media/131026/download. Accessed February 6, 2020.
  3. 3 .↵
    1. Kharasch ED,
    2. Clark D,
    3. Kheterpal S.
    Perioperative gabapentinoids: deflating the bubble. Anesthesiology 2020;133(2):251–254.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4 .↵
    1. Arnold N.
    FDA in brief. FDA requires new warning for gabapentinoids about risk of respiratory depression. December 19, 2019. https://www.fda.gov/news-events/fda-brief/fda-brief-fda-requires-new-warnings-gabapentinoids-about-risk-respiratory-depression. Accessed February 26, 2021.
  5. 5 .↵
    1. Chou R,
    2. Gordon DB,
    3. de Leon-Casasola O, et al.
    Management of postoperative pain: a clinical practice guideline from the American Pain Society, the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists' Committee on Regional Anesthesia, Executive Committee, and Administrative Council. J Pain 2016;17(2):131–157.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6 .↵
    1. Soffin EM,
    2. Vaishnav A,
    3. Wetmore D,
    4. Gang C,
    5. Barber L,
    6. Beckman JD, et al.
    Design and implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program for minimally invasive lumbar decompression spine surgery: initial experience. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2019;44(9):E561–E570.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7 .
    1. Soffin EM,
    2. Freeman C,
    3. Hughes AP,
    4. Wetmore DS,
    5. Memtsoudis SG,
    6. Girardi FP, et al.
    Effects of a multimodal analgesic pathway with transversus abdominis plane block for lumbar spine fusion: a prospective feasibility trial. Eur Spine J. 2019;28(9):2077–2086.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8 .↵
    1. Soffin EM,
    2. Beckman JD,
    3. Tseng A,
    4. Zhong H,
    5. Huang RC,
    6. Urban M, et al.
    Enhanced recovery after lumbar spine fusion: a randomized controlled trial to assess the quality of patient recovery. Anesthesiology 2020;133(2):350–63.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

International Journal of Spine Surgery
Vol. 15, Issue 5
1 Oct 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on International Journal of Spine Surgery.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Letter to the Editor: “Outpatient Minimally Invasive Lumbar Fusion Using Multimodal Analgesic Management in the Ambulatory Surgery Setting”
(Your Name) has sent you a message from International Journal of Spine Surgery
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the International Journal of Spine Surgery web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Letter to the Editor: “Outpatient Minimally Invasive Lumbar Fusion Using Multimodal Analgesic Management in the Ambulatory Surgery Setting”
Ellen M. Soffin, Alexander P. Hughes, James D. Beckman, Andrew A. Sama, Frank P. Cammisa
International Journal of Spine Surgery Oct 2021, 15 (5) 848-849; DOI: 10.14444/8109

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Letter to the Editor: “Outpatient Minimally Invasive Lumbar Fusion Using Multimodal Analgesic Management in the Ambulatory Surgery Setting”
Ellen M. Soffin, Alexander P. Hughes, James D. Beckman, Andrew A. Sama, Frank P. Cammisa
International Journal of Spine Surgery Oct 2021, 15 (5) 848-849; DOI: 10.14444/8109
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Letter to the Editor: Postoperative Complications Following Orthopedic Spine Surgery: Is There a Difference Between Men and Women?
Show more Letter

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Content
  • Archive

More Information

  • About IJSS
  • About ISASS
  • Privacy Policy

More

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Feedback

Other Services

  • Author Instructions
  • Join ISASS
  • Reprints & Permissions

© 2023 International Journal of Spine Surgery

International Journal of Spine Surgery Online ISSN: 2211-4599

Powered by HighWire