Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Other Publications
    • ijss

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
International Journal of Spine Surgery
  • My alerts
International Journal of Spine Surgery

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Follow ijss on Twitter
  • Visit ijss on Facebook
Research ArticleCervical Spine

Poorer Preoperative Function Leads to Delayed Return to Work After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy

Graham S. Goh, Ming Han Lincoln Liow, Zhixing Marcus Ling, Chang-Ming Guo, Wai-Mun Yue, Seang-Beng Tan, John Li-Tat Chen and Reuben Chee Cheong Soh
International Journal of Spine Surgery December 2021, 15 (6) 1184-1191; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/8150
Graham S. Goh
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ming Han Lincoln Liow
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zhixing Marcus Ling
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chang-Ming Guo
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wai-Mun Yue
2 The Orthopaedic Centre, Mount Elizabeth Medical Centre, Singapore, Singapore
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Seang-Beng Tan
3 Orthopaedic and Spine Clinic, Mount Elizabeth Medical Centre, Singapore, Singapore
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John Li-Tat Chen
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Reuben Chee Cheong Soh
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure

    Patient-reported outcome measures at different time intervals.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Evaluation of patient satisfaction and expectation fulfillment.

    ScorePatient Satisfactiona Stratification
    1ExcellentSatisfied
    2Very good
    3Good
    4FairDissatisfied
    5Poor
    6Terrible
    Score Patient Expectation Fulfillmentb Stratification
    1Yes, totallyFulfilled
    2Yes, almost totally
    3Yes, quite a bit
    4More or lessNot fulfilled
    5No, not quite
    6No, far from it
    7No, not at all
    • aQuestion adapted from Q53 North American Spine Society Low Back Pain Instrument.

    • bQuestion adapted from Q48 North American Spine Society Low Back Pain Instrument.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Patient demographics and preoperative clinical scores (n = 103).

    Early (n = 42)Late (n = 61)
    MeanSDMeanSD P Value
    Age, y53.07.753.010.30.975
    Gender, %
     Male64.370.50.507
     Female35.729.5
    BMI24.94.525.34.30.632
    Smoking status, %
     Never69.057.4
     Former16.713.10.198
     Current14.329.5
    Comorbidities, %
     Diabetes14.316.40.772
     Hypertension26.241.00.122
     Hyperlipidemia14.332.80.039
     Heart disease7.14.90.636
     Stroke0.01.60.404
     Kidney disease0.01.60.404
     Asthma2.43.30.790
     Osteoarthritis14.34.90.098
     Depression0.00.01.000
     No comorbidities45.234.40.269
    No. of levels, %
     152.442.60.329
     247.657.4
    Length of Op, mins127.830.1135.244.00.392
    Length of stay, d2.91.63.32.40.397
    Time taken to RTW, d34.715.1134.9123.9 <0.001
    Preop VAS NPa 2.93.24.03.20.089
    Preop VAS APa 2.63.32.93.30.678
    Preop JOA12.82.411.43.1 0.015
    Preop NSa 44.323.348.027.30.469
    Preop NPDa 24.817.536.621.6 0.004
    Preop NDIa 21.216.233.419.9 0.001
    Preop PCS40.211.235.713.10.071
    Preop MCS47.711.346.112.40.499
    • aA lower score is better.

    • BMI, body mass index; JOA, Japanese Orthopaedic Association; MCS, Mental Component Summary; NDI, Neck Disability Index; NPD, neck pain and disability; NS, neurogenic symptoms; PCS, Physical Component Summary; RTW, return to work; VAS AM, visual analog scale arm pain; VAS NP, visual analog scale neck pain.

    • View popup
    Table 3

    Comparison of clinical outcomes between groups at different time intervals (n = 103).

    Early (n = 42)Late (n = 61)
    MeanSDMeanSD P Valuea
    6-mo VAS NP b 1.01.91.52.6 0.023
    6-mo VAS AP b 0.31.20.91.9 0.027
    6-mo JOA15.21.914.12.6 0.022
    6-mo NS b 14.915.124.924.1 0.044
    6-mo NPD b 10.112.917.115.5 0.042
    6-mo NDI b 8.412.015.813.20.074
    6-mo PCS51.38.545.710.80.059
    6-mo MCS51.710.650.611.7 0.015
    2-y VAS NP b 0.61.91.12.30.325
    2-y VAS AP b 0.31.01.22.60.060
    2-y JOA15.31.514.72.3 0.007
    2-y NS b 13.514.322.020.6 0.046
    2-y NPD b 6.910.013.013.7 0.042
    2-y NDI b 6.810.211.713.8 0.036
    2-y PCS52.16.949.49.8 0.008
    2-y MCS53.19.848.713.50.057
    • Boldface indicates statistical significance.

    • aUsing multivariate regression to control for age, gender, body mass index, comorbidities and baseline JOA and NDI scores.

    • bA lower score is better.

    • JOA, Japanese Orthopaedic Association; MCS, Mental Component Summary; NDI, Neck Disability Index; NPD, neck pain and disability; NS, neurogenic symptoms; PCS, Physical Component Summary; RTW, return to work; VAS AM, visual analog scale arm pain; VAS NP, visual analog scale neck pain.

    • View popup
    Table 4

    Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) attainment, expectation fulfillment, and satisfaction at different time intervals (n = 103).

    VariableEarly RTW (n = 42)Late RTW (n = 61) P Value
    Comparison at 6 months, %
     Attained MCID for NP31.044.30.173
     Attained MCID for AP40.531.10.329
     Attained MCID for JOA71.470.50.918
     Attained MCID for NDI50.068.90.054
     Attained MCID for PCS61.963.90.834
     Expectation fulfilled85.773.80.146
     Satisfied88.183.60.526
    Comparison at 2 years, %
     Attained MCID for NP40.542.60.828
     Attained MCID for AP40.527.90.181
     Attained MCID for JOA64.378.70.106
     Attained MCID for NDI54.872.10.069
     Attained MCID for PCS66.768.90.815
     Expectation fulfilled88.175.40.110
     Satisfied85.777.00.275
    • JOA, Japanese Orthopaedic Association; MCS, Mental Component Summary; NDI, Neck Disability Index; NPD, neck pain and disability; NS, neurogenic symptoms; PCS, Physical Component Summary; RTW, return to work.

    • View popup
    Table 5

    Return to work and return to function at different time intervals (n = 103).

    VariableEarly RTW (n = 42)Late RTW (n = 61) P value
    Comparison at 6 months, %
     Return to work 0.001
      No08.2
      Yes, with limitations14.341.8
      Yes, with no limitations85.750.0
     Return to function64.344.3 0.046
    Comparison at 2 years, %
     Return to work0.414
      No01.6
      Yes, with limitations23.736.0
      Yes, with no limitations76.364.0
     Return to Function71.465.60.531
    • Boldface indicates statistical significance.

    • RTW, return to work.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

International Journal of Spine Surgery
Vol. 15, Issue 6
1 Dec 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on International Journal of Spine Surgery.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Poorer Preoperative Function Leads to Delayed Return to Work After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from International Journal of Spine Surgery
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the International Journal of Spine Surgery web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Poorer Preoperative Function Leads to Delayed Return to Work After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy
Graham S. Goh, Ming Han Lincoln Liow, Zhixing Marcus Ling, Chang-Ming Guo, Wai-Mun Yue, Seang-Beng Tan, John Li-Tat Chen, Reuben Chee Cheong Soh
International Journal of Spine Surgery Dec 2021, 15 (6) 1184-1191; DOI: 10.14444/8150

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Poorer Preoperative Function Leads to Delayed Return to Work After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy
Graham S. Goh, Ming Han Lincoln Liow, Zhixing Marcus Ling, Chang-Ming Guo, Wai-Mun Yue, Seang-Beng Tan, John Li-Tat Chen, Reuben Chee Cheong Soh
International Journal of Spine Surgery Dec 2021, 15 (6) 1184-1191; DOI: 10.14444/8150
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Innovation and Adversity in Spine Surgery: A Retrospective
  • Cervical Myelopathy Secondary to Bilateral Atlantoaxial Pseudoarticulations in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Case Report
  • Incidence of Traumatic Spinal Injury Following Public Policy Update on Moped Usage in South Carolina
Show more Cervical Spine

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
  • cervical fusion
  • myelopathy
  • return to work
  • outcomes
  • satisfaction
  • cervical spine

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Content
  • Archive

More Information

  • About IJSS
  • About ISASS
  • Privacy Policy

More

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Feedback

Other Services

  • Author Instructions
  • Join ISASS
  • Reprints & Permissions

© 2025 International Journal of Spine Surgery

International Journal of Spine Surgery Online ISSN: 2211-4599

Powered by HighWire