Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Other Publications
    • ijss

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
International Journal of Spine Surgery
  • My alerts
International Journal of Spine Surgery

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Follow ijss on Twitter
  • Visit ijss on Facebook
Research ArticleComplications

Clinical Outcomes of Coccygectomy for Coccydynia: A Single Institution Series With Mean 5-Year Follow-Up

Neha Mulpuri, Nisha Reddy, Kylan Larsen, Ankit Patel, Bassel G. Diebo, Peter Passias, Lori Tappen, Kevin Gill and Shaleen Vira
International Journal of Spine Surgery February 2022, 16 (1) 11-19; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/8171
Neha Mulpuri
1 University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, TX, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nisha Reddy
1 University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, TX, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kylan Larsen
1 University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, TX, USA
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ankit Patel
2 Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bassel G. Diebo
3 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Passias
4 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lori Tappen
5 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
PA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kevin Gill
5 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shaleen Vira
5 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    A 1-inch incision lateral to midline.

  • Figure 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2

    Excised coccyx.

  • Figure 3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3

    Skin closure.

  • Figure 4
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4

    Incision dressing.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Patient characteristics and conservative management.

    Demographics N = 173
    Age at the time of surgery, y
     Mean46.6 ± 14.1
     Range17–83
    Gender, female, n (%)134 (77%)
    Mechanism of injury, n (%)
     Chronic/spontaneous pain (unknown)73 (42.2%)
     Fall/motor vehicle crash/other accident71 (41%)
     Previous back surgery3 (1.7%)
     Vaginal delivery12 (6.9%)
     Sports4 (2.3%)
     Rapid weight loss3 (1.7%)
     Other (eg, osteophyte on coccyx, achondroplasia, spina bifida occulta)7 (4%)
    History of prior spine surgery, n (%)
     Yes23 (13.3%)
     No139 (80.3%)
     Unknown11 (6.4%)
    Mean duration of symptoms, y6
    Mean time to follow up following surgery, y5.6
    Conservative therapy, n (%) (n = 166)
     Medications85 (51.2%)
     Heat/Cold85 (51.2%)
     Physical therapy70 (42.2%)
     Rest74 (44.6%)
     Exercise60 (36.1%)
     Manipulation61 (36.7%)
     TENS (transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation)35 (21.1%)
     Acupuncture18 (10.8%)
     Injections (eg, steroid)110 (66.3%)
     Ganglion impar injection23 (13.9%)
     Radiofrequency ablation8 (4.8%)
    Coccyx morphology,a n (%) (n = 110)
     Type I35 (20.2%)
     Type II26 (15%)
     Type III28 (16.2%)
     Type IV21 (12.1%)
    • aBased on the Postacchini and Massobio classification system.18

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Postoperative EQ-5D scores reported by dimension and level (N = 48).

    LevelMobilitySelf-CareUsual ActivitiesPain/DiscomfortAnxiety/Depression
    1 (No problems)3540291534
    2 (Slight problems)748144
    3 (Moderate problems)326139
    4 (Severe problems)11320
    5 (Extreme problems)21201
    • Mean (SD) health self-score (possible range, 0–100) = 71.44 ± 19.26.

    • View popup
    Table 3

    One-way analysis of variance of age and duration of symptoms among 4 groups of coccyx morphologies.

    Source of VariationSum of Squares df Mean Square F P value
    Age
     Between groups1816.2483605.4163.2850.024
     Within groups19533.242106184.276
     Total21349.491109
    Duration of symptoms
     Between groups44.599314.8660.2950.829
     Within groups5339.46910650.372
     Total5384.068109
    • View popup
    Table 4

    Patient quality-of-life questionnaire responses.

    Quality of Life MeasurePreoperativePostoperative
    N Mean (SD) N Mean (SD) P value (paired t test)
    Oswestry Disability Index (0–100)1262.67 (29.16)4922.90 (22.47)0.001
    Visual analog scale (0–10)586.97 (1.99)513.49 (3.24)0.000
    Physical functiona 1541.40 (8.79)5046.61 (11.04)0.069
    Depressiona 1552.35 (10.43)5047.94 (9.69)0.134
    Anxietya 1544.51 (11.53)5049.74 (11.76)0.105
    Fatiguea 1559.49 (9.06)5050.27 (10.50)0.008
    Sleep disturbancea 1555.55 (9.33)5048.29 (10.97)0.024
    Satisfaction with social rolea 1543.85 (14.28)5052.47 (10.98)0.016
    Pain interferencea 1564.91 (6.39)5054.75 (11.63)0.000
    Pain intensityb 155.80 (2.11)503.86 (2.96)0.021
    • aPatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 domain T score (mean = 50, SD = 10).

    • bPatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 score (0–10).

    • View popup
    Table 5

    Wilcoxon signed-rank test (preoperative vs postoperative ODI, VAS, PROMIS-29).

    Quality of life measure Z P Value
    PROMIS-29
     Pain intensity−2.4140.016
     Pain interference−2.4140.016
     Social role−1.0510.293
     Fatigue−1.8590.063
     Sleep disturbance−1.8590.063
     Depression−1.6040.109
     Anxiety−0.9440.345
     Physical function−0.8410.400
    ODI−1.3630.173
    VAS−1.9800.048
    • ODI, Oswestry Disability Index; PROMIS-29, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29; VAS, visual analog scale.

    • View popup
    Table 6

    Fisher exact tests: patient characteristics associated with meeting MCID.

    Variable P value (2-Sided)
    PROMIS-29 pain interference (n = 7)
     SexNAa
     Trauma0.486
     Ganglion impar injection0.429
     Steroid injection0.429
     Physical therapy1.000
     Back surgery1.000
     Delivery1.000
     Age >65 y0.429
    PROMIS-29 physical function (n = 7)
     SexNAa
     Trauma0.486
     Ganglion impar injection0.429
     Steroid injection0.429
     Physical therapy1.000
     Back surgery1.000
     Delivery1.000
     Age >65 y0.429
    ODI (n = 6)
     SexNAa
     Trauma0.400
     Ganglion impar injection1.000
     Steroid injection1.000
     Physical therapy0.400
     Back surgeryNAb
     Delivery0.467
     Age >65 y1.000
    • aNo statistics computed because sex was constant.

    • bNo statistics computed because back surgery was constant.

    • NA, not applicable; ODI, Oswestry Disability Index; PROMIS-29, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29; VAS, visual analog scale.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

International Journal of Spine Surgery
Vol. 16, Issue 1
1 Feb 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on International Journal of Spine Surgery.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Clinical Outcomes of Coccygectomy for Coccydynia: A Single Institution Series With Mean 5-Year Follow-Up
(Your Name) has sent you a message from International Journal of Spine Surgery
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the International Journal of Spine Surgery web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Clinical Outcomes of Coccygectomy for Coccydynia: A Single Institution Series With Mean 5-Year Follow-Up
Neha Mulpuri, Nisha Reddy, Kylan Larsen, Ankit Patel, Bassel G. Diebo, Peter Passias, Lori Tappen, Kevin Gill, Shaleen Vira
International Journal of Spine Surgery Feb 2022, 16 (1) 11-19; DOI: 10.14444/8171

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Clinical Outcomes of Coccygectomy for Coccydynia: A Single Institution Series With Mean 5-Year Follow-Up
Neha Mulpuri, Nisha Reddy, Kylan Larsen, Ankit Patel, Bassel G. Diebo, Peter Passias, Lori Tappen, Kevin Gill, Shaleen Vira
International Journal of Spine Surgery Feb 2022, 16 (1) 11-19; DOI: 10.14444/8171
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • PATIENTS AND METHODS
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Non-neurodestructive ganglion impar blocks for coccydynia and related disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Postmyelography Acute Paraplegia in Patients With Spinal Cord Stimulators: Case Series and Review of Literature
  • Spinopelvic Fixation Using an Osseointegrative Implant: Analysis of Postmarket Surveillance to Determine the Failure Rate
  • Association of Elevated Perioperative Blood Glucose With Complications and Postoperative Outcomes Following Traumatic Spine Surgery
Show more Complications

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • coccyx
  • coccydynia
  • coccygectomy
  • spine

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Content
  • Archive

More Information

  • About IJSS
  • About ISASS
  • Privacy Policy

More

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Feedback

Other Services

  • Author Instructions
  • Join ISASS
  • Reprints & Permissions

© 2025 International Journal of Spine Surgery

International Journal of Spine Surgery Online ISSN: 2211-4599

Powered by HighWire