Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Other Publications
    • ijss

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
International Journal of Spine Surgery
  • My alerts
International Journal of Spine Surgery

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Follow ijss on Twitter
  • Visit ijss on Facebook
Research ArticleMinimally Invasive Surgery

Clinical Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion With Decortication: The EVoluSIon Clinical Study

Donald Kucharzyk, Kyle Colle, Christopher Boone and Ali Araghi
International Journal of Spine Surgery February 2022, 16 (1) 168-175; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/8185
Donald Kucharzyk
1 DK Orthopedics, Crown Point, IN, USA
DO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kyle Colle
2 Regional Brain and Spine, Cape Girardeau, MO, USA
DO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher Boone
3 Proliance Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine, Bellevue, WA, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ali Araghi
4 The CORE Institute, Sun City West, AZ, USA
DO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    (A) Minimally invasive lateral access of the sacroiliac joint; (B) decortication of the joint (inset: user-interface of decorticator instrument); (C) delivery of bone graft into the actively bleeding fusion bed (inset: fluoroscopic image during decortication); and (D) final placement of the threaded implant through the area of decortication and a secondary device for stability.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Examples of bridging bone categories.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Classification of fusion based on radiographic evidence.

    Fusion CategoryDescription
    FusionPresence of bridging across the treated joint
    No fusionNo bridging bone visible or images were reported as “Indeterminate” or “Unable to Assess”
    • View popup
    Table 2

    Baseline characteristics of study participants.

    Demographics N Summary
    Age at procedure, mean ± SD (range)249 60.5 ± 12.8 (21–87)
    Female, % (n)250 70.8% (177)
    BMI (kg/m2), mean ± SD (range)250 30.1 ± 6.8 (17–56)
    Duration of SI joint pain, % (n)250
     6 months to 1 year 18.0% (45)
     1–2 years 26.0% (65)
     >2 years 56.0% (140)
    Taking narcotics/opioids, % (n)250 62.0% (155)
    Prior SI joint treatment, % (n)250
     Acupuncture 8.8% (22)
     Biofeedback 0%
     Bracing 30.0% (75)
     Chiropractic care 27.6% (69)
     Physical therapy 88.0% (220)
     Prior SI joint Fusion 8.0% (20)
     SI joint steroid injection 93.2% (233)
     Sacral nerve ablation 10.0% (25)
     TENS unit 22.4% (56)
    Prior lumbar spine procedures, % (n)250
     Lumbar total disc replacement 0%
     Lumbar decompression 13.2% (33)
     Lumbar discectomy 11.2% (28)
     Lumbar laminectomy 17.2% (43)
     Lumbar fusion 36.8% (92)
    VAS pain score, mean ± SD (range)249 76.6 ± 11.9 (30–100)
    Oswestry Disability Index, mean ± SD (range)249 54.5 ± 13.1 (18–92)
    EQ-5D, mean ± SD (range)246
     EQ-5D preference weights (formerly “time trade-off”) 0.52 ± 0.17 (−0.11–0.83)
     EQ-5D VAS (scale of 0 to 100) 60.22 ± 23.03 (0.00–100.00)
    • SI, sacroiliac; VAS, visual analog scale.

    • View popup
    Table 3

    Perioperative data.

    Procedure Measure N Mean ± SDRange
    Procedure duration, min24854.2 ± 24.815–158
    Total contrast used, cc2352.0 ± 8.00–100
    Estimated blood loss, cc24953.9 ± 107.50–1500
    Length of hospital stay, d2480.8 ± 0.70–4
    • View popup
    Table 4

    Fusion rates for minimally invasive sacroiliac joint using SImmetry device.

    Study N Fusion RateFollow-UpNotes
    Current study20168.7%12 moPresence of bony fusion based on independent evaluation of CT imaging at 12 mo
    Cross et al21 1978.9%12 moCT imaging; independently assessed and adjudicated for presence of bridging bone. Threaded implant fixation with decortication and graft placement
    Kube et al3 1788.2%12 moThin-slice (<2 mm) CT imaging assessment of bony bridging across the sacroiliac joint and absence of lucency. Threaded implant fixation with decortication and graft placement
    Abassi et al6 1973.7%12 moCT imaging; independent assessment of solid bridging bone. Threaded implant fixation with decortication and graft placement
    • CT, computed tomography.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

International Journal of Spine Surgery
Vol. 16, Issue 1
1 Feb 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on International Journal of Spine Surgery.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Clinical Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion With Decortication: The EVoluSIon Clinical Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from International Journal of Spine Surgery
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the International Journal of Spine Surgery web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Clinical Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion With Decortication: The EVoluSIon Clinical Study
Donald Kucharzyk, Kyle Colle, Christopher Boone, Ali Araghi
International Journal of Spine Surgery Feb 2022, 16 (1) 168-175; DOI: 10.14444/8185

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Clinical Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion With Decortication: The EVoluSIon Clinical Study
Donald Kucharzyk, Kyle Colle, Christopher Boone, Ali Araghi
International Journal of Spine Surgery Feb 2022, 16 (1) 168-175; DOI: 10.14444/8185
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Minimally Invasive SI Joint Fusion Procedures for Chronic SI Joint Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Safety and Efficacy
  • Patient-Reported and Radiographic Outcomes After Revision Sacroiliac Joint Fusion
  • Patient-Reported and Radiographic Outcomes After Revision Sacroiliac Joint Fusion
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Key Considerations in Surgical Decision-Making on the Side of Approach for Lumbar Lateral Transpsoas Interbody Fusion Techniques
  • Comparative Review of Lateral and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technique, Outcomes, and Complications
  • A Spine Surgeon’s Learning Curve With the Minimally Invasive L5 to S1 Lateral ALIF Surgical Approach: Perioperative Outcomes and Technical Considerations
Show more Minimally Invasive Surgery

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • sacroiliac joint dysfunction
  • sacroiliac joint fusion
  • SI joint
  • SI joint arthrodesis
  • minimally invasive surgery
  • sacroiliac
  • fusion
  • arthrodesis

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Content
  • Archive

More Information

  • About IJSS
  • About ISASS
  • Privacy Policy

More

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Feedback

Other Services

  • Author Instructions
  • Join ISASS
  • Reprints & Permissions

© 2025 International Journal of Spine Surgery

International Journal of Spine Surgery Online ISSN: 2211-4599

Powered by HighWire