Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Other Publications
    • ijss

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
International Journal of Spine Surgery
  • My alerts
International Journal of Spine Surgery

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Follow ijss on Twitter
  • Visit ijss on Facebook
Research ArticleCervical Spine

2-Level Anterior Cervical Arthrodesis With Integrated Spacer and Plate vs Traditional Anterior Spacer and Plate System

Harjot Thind, Angela Beliveau Aura, Paul Lee, Peter Shen, Chin-Shang Li, Eric O. Klineberg, Kee D. Kim and Ripul R. Panchal
International Journal of Spine Surgery April 2022, 16 (2) 215-221; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/8206
Harjot Thind
1 Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Angela Beliveau Aura
1 Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California, USA
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul Lee
2 Department of Neuroradiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Shen
2 Department of Neuroradiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chin-Shang Li
3 Department of Public Health Sciences, Division of Biostatistics, University of California Davis, Davis, California, USA
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eric O. Klineberg
4 Department of Orthopedics, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kee D. Kim
1 Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ripul R. Panchal
5 American Neurospine Institute, PLLC, Plano, Texas, USA
DO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure

    Lateral radiographs of the cervical spine implanted with (A) integrated spacer and plate and (B) traditional anterior spacer and plate system.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Baseline characteristics of patients by study group.

    CharacteristicIntegrated Spacer and Plate, n (%)Anterior Spacer and Plate System, n (%)P
    n 4341
    Age in years, mean ± SD54.8 ± 8.858.1 ± 11.50.337
    Sex0.521
     Male21 (48.8)23 (56.1)
     Female22 (51.2)18 (43.9)
    Clinical scores, mean ± SD
     Visual analog scale5.6 ± 2.56.3 ± 2.30.144
     Neck Disability Index26.9 ± 8.627.7 ± 9.10.733
    Clinical presentation frequency
     Neck pain42 (97.7)39 (95.1)0.611
     Suboccipital headaches16 (37.2)8 (19.5)0.098
    Diagnosis0.100
     Myelopathy3 (7.0)7 (17.1)
     Radiculopathy22 (51.2)25 (61.0)
     Myeloradiculopathy18 (41.9)9 (22.0)
    Clinical comorbidity frequency
     Smoker18 (41.9)12 (29.3)0.261
     Diabetes7 (16.3)14 (34.2)0.079
     Chronic oral steroid use10 (23.3)6 (14.6)0.408
     Osteoporosis/osteopenia4 (9.3)8 (19.5)0.222
     Rheumatologic disorder9 (20.9)9 (22.0)1.000
    • Data presented as n (%) unless otherwise indicated.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Intraoperative summary by study group.

    Surgery DetailsIntegrated Spacer and Plate, n (%)Anterior Spacer and Plate System, n (%)P
    Surgical levels0.316
     C3-C55 (11.6)4 (9.8)
     C4-C614 (32.6)8 (19.5)
     C5-C723 (53.5)29 (70.7)
     C6-T11 (2.3)0 (0.0)
    Cage height, mm, mean ± SD
     Proximal segment6.3 ± 0.46.2 ± 1.10.766
     Distal segment6.3 ± 0.66.2 ± 1.30.858
    Graft type
     Autograft41 (95.4)0 (0.0)< 0.0001
     Allograft0 (0.0)40 (97.6)< 0.0001
     Both2 (4.7)1 (2.4)1.000
    Estimated blood loss, mL, mean ± SD125.6 ± 129.9101.7 ± 63.00.969
    Surgery time, min, mean ± SD199.6 ± 38.6178.9 ± 34.70.014
    • Data presented as n (%) unless otherwise indicated.

    • View popup
    Table 3

    Clinical and radiographic outcomes by study group.

    OutcomesIntegrated Spacer and Plate, n (%)Anterior Spacer and Plate System, n (%)P
    Follow-up, mo, mean ± SD14.1 ± 6.220.4 ± 10.5
    Clinical scores, mean ± SD
     Visual analog scale0.432
      Baseline5.6 ± 2.56.3 ± 2.3
      1 mo4.8 ± 2.34.0 ± 3.1
      3 mo4.4 ± 2.13.2 ± 2.8
      6 mo4.6 ± 2.94.0 ± 3.1
      1 y5.0 ± 2.64.5 ± 2.9
      2 y5.3 ± 2.16.5 ± 2.4
     Neck Disability Index0.108
      Baseline26.9 ± 8.627.7 ± 9.1
      1 mo25.7 ± 8.120.0 ± 12.2
      3 mo23.5 ± 9.014.0 ± 13.5
      6 mo29.3 ± 7.518.5 ± 12.3
      1 y27.0 ± 10.420.9 ± 11.1
      2 y24.9 ± 11.124.3 ± 7.9
    Radiographic findings
     Proximal total fused28 (73.7%)33(84.6%)0.272
      Duration, mo, mean ± SD8.3 ± 5.56.8 ± 5.40.092
     Proximal (level 1)—total
      1 mo0 (0.)1 (2.6)
      3 mo5 (16.1)12 (33.3)
      6 mo14 (42.4)13 (46.4)
      1 y7 (25.9)5 (20.8)
      2 y2 (40.0)2 (11.8)
     Distal total fused28 (73.7%)33 (84.6%)0.272
      Duration, mo, mean ± SD8.1 ± 5.57.0 ± 6.20.120
     Distal (level 2)—total
      1 mo0 (0.0)1 (2.6)
      3 mo6 (19.4)13 (36.1)
      6 mo13 (39.4)12 (31.6)
      1 y7 (25.9)4 (16.7)
      2 y2 (40.0)3 (17.7)
     Proximal or distal duration, mo, mean ± SD8.2 ± 5.57.1 ± 6.10.138
    • Data presented as n (%) unless otherwise noted.

    • View popup
    Table 4

    Adverse events by study group.

    Adverse EventIntegrated Spacer and Plate, n Anterior Spacer and Plate System, n
    Dysphagia107
     Persistent (>3 mo)11
    Durotomy10
    Horner syndrome02
    Infection
     Superficial20
     Deep00
    Additional surgery31
    Pseudofusion01
    Neurapraxia01
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

International Journal of Spine Surgery
Vol. 16, Issue 2
1 Apr 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on International Journal of Spine Surgery.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
2-Level Anterior Cervical Arthrodesis With Integrated Spacer and Plate vs Traditional Anterior Spacer and Plate System
(Your Name) has sent you a message from International Journal of Spine Surgery
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the International Journal of Spine Surgery web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
2-Level Anterior Cervical Arthrodesis With Integrated Spacer and Plate vs Traditional Anterior Spacer and Plate System
Harjot Thind, Angela Beliveau Aura, Paul Lee, Peter Shen, Chin-Shang Li, Eric O. Klineberg, Kee D. Kim, Ripul R. Panchal
International Journal of Spine Surgery Apr 2022, 16 (2) 215-221; DOI: 10.14444/8206

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
2-Level Anterior Cervical Arthrodesis With Integrated Spacer and Plate vs Traditional Anterior Spacer and Plate System
Harjot Thind, Angela Beliveau Aura, Paul Lee, Peter Shen, Chin-Shang Li, Eric O. Klineberg, Kee D. Kim, Ripul R. Panchal
International Journal of Spine Surgery Apr 2022, 16 (2) 215-221; DOI: 10.14444/8206
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Innovation and Adversity in Spine Surgery: A Retrospective
  • Cervical Myelopathy Secondary to Bilateral Atlantoaxial Pseudoarticulations in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Case Report
  • Incidence of Traumatic Spinal Injury Following Public Policy Update on Moped Usage in South Carolina
Show more Cervical Spine

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • anterior cervical spine fusion
  • traditional anterior spacer and plate
  • zero-profile cage
  • integrated plate and spacer
  • fusion rate

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Content
  • Archive

More Information

  • About IJSS
  • About ISASS
  • Privacy Policy

More

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Feedback

Other Services

  • Author Instructions
  • Join ISASS
  • Reprints & Permissions

© 2025 International Journal of Spine Surgery

International Journal of Spine Surgery Online ISSN: 2211-4599

Powered by HighWire