Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Other Publications
    • ijss

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
International Journal of Spine Surgery
  • My alerts
International Journal of Spine Surgery

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Follow ijss on Twitter
  • Visit ijss on Facebook
Research ArticleCervical Spine

Assessment of the Quality of Information of YouTube Videos Regarding Cervical Disc Replacement

Tanushk Luke Brito Martyn and Joseph Frederick Baker
International Journal of Spine Surgery April 2022, 16 (2) 272-277; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/8214
Tanushk Luke Brito Martyn
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Waikato Hospital, Hamilton, New Zealand
MBChB
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joseph Frederick Baker
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Waikato Hospital, Hamilton, New Zealand
2 Department of Surgery, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
MCh, FRCSI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1

    Cervical disc replacement-specific score (CDRSS).

    CategoryVariablePoints
    Causes and presentationDisc diseaseCervical myelopathyCervical radiculopathy3
    IndicationsUnresponsive to conservative treatmentSingle-level or 2-level diseaseAge >18 y3
    ContraindicationsAxial neck pain as only ailmentSpondylosisDisc height <3 mmKyphotic deformity >15°Active infectionKnown malignancyInflammatory spondyloarthropathyAllergy to implant materialMetabolic bone disease9
    BenefitsMaintenance of spinal motionRapid recoveryShorter hospital stayDecreased risk of ASD4
    ComplicationsInfectionBleeding/hematomaDysphagiaDysphoniaEsophageal/tracheal injuryDural tearRecurrent laryngeal nerve injurySpinal nerve injurySpinal cord injuryASDImplant-related failuresHeterotopic ossification12
    Treatment optionsConservative managementAnterior cervical discectomy and fusionPosterior laminoforaminotomyLaminoplastyLaminectomy with fusion5
    Surgical techniqueApproachDiscectomyDecompressionInsertion of cervical disc replacement4
    40 points total
    • ASD, adjacent segmental disease.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    JAMA benchmark criteria.

    CriteriaDescription
    AuthorshipAuthor and contributor credentials and their affiliations should be provided.
    AttributionClearly lists all copyright information and states references and sources for content.
    CurrencyInitial date of posted content and subsequent updates to content should be provided.
    DisclosureConflicts of interest, funding, sponsorship, advertising, support, and video ownership should be fully disclosed.
    • View popup
    Table 3

    The Global Quality Score criteria.

    GradingDescription of Quality
    1Poor quality; is unlikely of be to use for patient education.
    2Poor quality; is of limited use to patients because only some information is present.
    3Suboptimal quality and flow; is somewhat useful to patients; important topics are missing, some information is present.
    4Good quality and flow; useful to patients because most important topics are covered.
    5Excellent quality and flow; is highly useful to patients.
    • View popup
    Table 4

    All 50 YouTube URLs (web addresses) included in this study.

    RankYouTube URL
    1 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q6IXuwewdRY
    2 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0elU7dz2VEM
    3 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JZy4M22MckU
    4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fybwGPU-Tag
    5 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bNqrD1VItkk
    6 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7RKJg0agjb4
    7 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ZJX_NqsrB4
    8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ca6pCcFT6D4
    9 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nPhKA8V8NpM
    10 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32CUEDquinc
    11 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uWignI-e2zI
    12 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DS80r7Vlek
    13 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DP6OUfD4NP0
    14 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qy3iTp894iw
    15 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7O98Bx5UFzs
    16 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VIVYjrkLVxI
    17 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=enkaJaeMQa4
    18 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CtaUCtNGi5k
    19 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-0pPCC9bbbg
    20 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9y27BJWLT9Q
    21 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oVlSgfWnufA
    22 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L07eFeUCELA
    23 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ZV9u0gcmlI
    24 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PhgXmnUPBPg
    25 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRCVx-OKAms
    26 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ePR2DnQ-694
    27 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pcld_1B3f0I
    28 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=osD-_v18hho
    29 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z4JRC3gelcg
    30 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nmkkp-PY5bc
    31 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y7KfB1nXP8Y
    32 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OucZmsresiI
    33 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rFEAqINLRCo
    34 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v7WGIum3-oU
    35 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1PG3221Z5MM
    36 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sZyN-vK--A
    37 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mox6aNKRGXo
    38 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_35A1pa9kI
    39 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dNy1J5Y42o8
    40 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aiRfUfXJQJQ
    41 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RSRD1ks5WhQ
    42 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGey2s5ZPfY
    43 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OrxcPUBvqLk
    44 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a-S-_B6h0BI
    45 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MJibe4D9uwk
    46 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lmRhn5L_ETU
    47 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ee0tVxXnSpA
    48 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=75gcdBEe3eU
    49 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g_4VjlymjeY
    50 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1K6ZPoqTLgY
    • View popup
    Table 5

    Video characteristics of the YouTube videos included in this study.

    VariableMeanSDMinimumMaximum
    Video duration, min5.95.91.129
    Views73,785.3391,662.73232,781,849
    Days since upload1475.51177.62324413
    View ratio31.0105.30.3747
    Comments11.621.60108
    Likes252.21136.908084
    Dislikes30.5172.301222
    Like ratio87.423.60100
    Video Power Index27.691.70649.6
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

International Journal of Spine Surgery
Vol. 16, Issue 2
1 Apr 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on International Journal of Spine Surgery.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Assessment of the Quality of Information of YouTube Videos Regarding Cervical Disc Replacement
(Your Name) has sent you a message from International Journal of Spine Surgery
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the International Journal of Spine Surgery web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Assessment of the Quality of Information of YouTube Videos Regarding Cervical Disc Replacement
Tanushk Luke Brito Martyn, Joseph Frederick Baker
International Journal of Spine Surgery Apr 2022, 16 (2) 272-277; DOI: 10.14444/8214

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Assessment of the Quality of Information of YouTube Videos Regarding Cervical Disc Replacement
Tanushk Luke Brito Martyn, Joseph Frederick Baker
International Journal of Spine Surgery Apr 2022, 16 (2) 272-277; DOI: 10.14444/8214
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • Results
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Quality Assessment of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy Information on the Internet
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Innovation and Adversity in Spine Surgery: A Retrospective
  • Cervical Myelopathy Secondary to Bilateral Atlantoaxial Pseudoarticulations in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Case Report
  • Incidence of Traumatic Spinal Injury Following Public Policy Update on Moped Usage in South Carolina
Show more Cervical Spine

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • cervical disc replacement
  • cervical spine
  • patient education as topic

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Content
  • Archive

More Information

  • About IJSS
  • About ISASS
  • Privacy Policy

More

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Feedback

Other Services

  • Author Instructions
  • Join ISASS
  • Reprints & Permissions

© 2025 International Journal of Spine Surgery

International Journal of Spine Surgery Online ISSN: 2211-4599

Powered by HighWire