Article Figures & Data
Figures
- Figure 1
Illustration of a titanium interbody cervical spacer; length: 10 mm, wide: 5.5 mm, height: 2.5 mm (Fa. Stoeckli Medical; Oberkirch, Switzerland; graphics by Stoeckli medical).
- Figure 2
Preoperative computed tomographic image of an odontoid fracture (blue arrow) Anderson/D'Alonzo type 2, Eysel/Roosen type B with significant posterior dislocation.
- Figure 3
Lateral cervical x-ray images of a C1/C2 fusion with implanted titanium interbody cervical spacer (blue arrows) and posterior fusion; (A) first postoperative day and (B) 8 mo after surgery.
- Figure 4
Axial computed tomographic image of C1/C2 fusion with titanium interbody cervical spacer (right side highlighted with blue arrow; left-sided implant not visible) and posterior fusion. The metal artifacts decrease the imaging quality.
- Figure 5
Sagittal computed tomographic image of C1/C2 fusion with titanium interbody cervical spacer (left side highlighted with blue arrow) and posterior fusion. The metal artifacts decrease the imaging quality.
- Figure 6
Coronar computed tomographic image of C1/C2 fusion with titanium interbody cervical spacer (highlighted with blue arrows) and posterior fusion. The metal artifacts decrease the imaging quality.
Tables
- Table 1
Cohort composition of fracture type and American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classification.
Case No. Anderson D’Alonzo Eysel/Roosen ASA Score 1 2 B 4 2 2 A 3 3 2 B 3 4 3 NA 3 5 2 B 3 NA, not available.
- Table 2
Cohort composition by fracture type according to Anderson D’Alonzo classification, fusion levels, blood loss, procedure time, and hospital stay.
Case Anderson D’Alonzo Fusion Levels Blood Loss, mL Procedure Time, min Hospital Stay, d 1 2 C1/C2 200 204 3 2 2 C1/C2 800 231 4 3 2 C1-C3 100 129 4 4 3 C1/C2 300 196 8 5 2 C1/C2 300 175 11
In this issue
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- No citing articles found.