Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Other Publications
    • ijss

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
International Journal of Spine Surgery
  • My alerts
International Journal of Spine Surgery

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Follow ijss on Twitter
  • Visit ijss on Facebook
Research ArticleCervical Spine

Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Results in Clinically Significant Improvements in Patients With Preoperative Sleep Difficulties

Conor P. Lynch, Elliot D.K. Cha, Madhav R. Patel, Kevin C. Jacob, Shruthi Mohan, Cara E. Geoghegan, Caroline N. Jadczak and Kern Singh
International Journal of Spine Surgery December 2022, 16 (6) 1046-1053; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/8333
Conor P. Lynch
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elliot D.K. Cha
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Madhav R. Patel
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kevin C. Jacob
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shruthi Mohan
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cara E. Geoghegan
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Caroline N. Jadczak
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kern Singh
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: kern.singh@rushortho.com
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1

    The Patient Health Questionnaire-9.

    Over the past 2 weeks, how often have you been bothered by any of the following roblems?Not At AllSeveral DaysMore Than Half the DaysNearly Every Day
    1. Little interest or pleasure in doing things0123
    2. Feeling down, depressed, or hopeless0123
    3. Trouble falling asleep, staying asleep, or sleeping too much0123
    4. Feeling tired or having little energy0123
    5. Poor appetite or overeating0123
    6. Feeling bad about yourself—or that you’re a failure or have let yourself or your family down0123
    7. Trouble concentrating on things, such as reading the newspaper or watching television0123
    8. Moving or speaking so slowly that other people could have noticed. Or, the opposite—being so fidgety or restless that you have been moving around a lot more than usual0123
    9. Thoughts that you would be better off dead or of hurting yourself in some way0123
    10. If you checked off any problems, how difficult have those problems made it for you to do your work, take care of things at home, or get along with other people?Not difficult at allSomewhat difficultVery difficultExtremely difficult
    • View popup
    Table 2

    Patient demographics.

    DemographicsTotal (n = 66)
    Age, y, mean ± SD47.2 ± 10.1
    Gender
     Female42.4% (28)
     Male57.6% (38)
    Body mass index
     <30 kg/m2 53.0% (35)
     ≥30 kg/m2 47.0% (31)
    Smoking status
     Nonsmoker84.9% (56)
     Smoker15.2% (10)
    Diabetes
     Nondiabetic86.4% (57)
     Diabetic13.6% (9)
    American Society of Anesthesiologists classification1.9 ± 0.6
    Charlson Comorbidity Index score1.4 ± 2.0
    Ethnicity
     White71.2% (47)
     African American12.1% (8)
     Hispanic10.6% (7)
     Asian3.0% (2)
    Insurance
     Medicare/Medicaid1.5% (1)
     Workers’ compensation27.3% (18)
     Private71.2% (47)
    • Note: Data presented as (%) n unless otherwise indicated.

    • View popup
    Table 3

    Perioperative characteristics.

    CharacteristicsTotal (n = 66)
    Spinal pathology
     Central stenosis42.4% (28)
     Herniated nucleus pulposus95.5% (63)
     Myeloradiculopathy87.9% (58)
    Operative time,a min, mean ± SD50.3 ± 10.6
    Estimated blood loss, mL, mean ± SD27.5 ± 10.1
    Length of stay, h, mean ± SD10.1 ± 7.6
    Day of discharge
     POD081.8% (54)
     POD118.2% (12)
    • Abbreviation: POD, postoperative day.

    • Note: Data presented as (%) n unless otherwise indicated.

    • ↵a From skin incision to closure.

    • View popup
    Table 4

    Postoperative outcomes.

    OutcomesMean ± SD
    VAS neck
     Preoperative6.1 ± 2.4
     6 wk3.3 ± 2.7
     12 wk2.8 ± 2.4
     6 mo2.5 ± 2.3
     1 y3.1 ± 2.7
     2 y5.0 ± 2.7
     MCID achievement, % (n)75.8% (47)
    VAS arm
     Preoperative6.0 ± 2.8
     6 wk2.4 ± 2.6
     12 wk3.0 ± 3.2
     6 mo2.8 ± 3.0
     1 y4.0 ± 3.4
     2 y3.9 ± 2.9
     MCID achievement, % (n)58.1% (36)
    Neck Disability Index
     Preoperative37.2 ± 16.0
     6 wk30.1 ± 19.1
     12 wk26.4 ± 19.3
     6 mo21.0 ± 18.9
     1 y20.2 ± 19.0
     2 y24.1 ± 18.2
     MCID achievement, % (n)70.5% (43)
    12-Item Short Form physical component score
     Preoperative36.1 ± 8.1
     6 wk35.3 ± 8.1
     12 wk38.5 ± 10.4
     6 mo42.1 ± 8.7
     1 y43.3 ± 11.3
     2 y43.5 ± 10.9
     MCID achievement, % (n)47.4% (27)
    Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function
     Preoperative39.6 ± 7.2
     6 wk40.7 ± 6.7
     12 wk44.8 ± 9.4
     6 mo45.5 ± 7.8
     1 y47.9 ± 7.7
     2 y45.5 ± 8.8
     MCID achievement, % (n)66.0% (31)
    • Abbreviations: MCID, minimum clinically important difference; VAS, visual analog scale.

    • Note: Data presented as mean ± SD unless otherwise indicated.

    • View popup
    Table 5

    PHQ-9 items as predictors of pain and disability MCID achievement.

    PHQ-9 ItemsOR95% CI P Valuea,b
    VAS neck MCID
     Question 11.2(0.7, 2.2)0.550
     Question 21.2(0.6, 2.3)0.667
     Question 3 2.0 (1.0, 3.9) 0.045
     Question 41.2(0.6, 2.3)0.594
     Question 50.8(0.4, 1.6)0.489
     Question 60.9(0.4, 1.8)0.741
     Question 70.9(0.5, 1.7)0.758
     Question 80.6(0.3, 1.4)0.271
     Question 9b ---
     Question 101.1(0.5, 2.2)0.843
     Overall PHQ-9 score1.0(0.9, 1.1)0.971
    VAS arm MCID
     Question 11.2(0.7, 2.1)0.434
     Question 21.0(0.6, 1.7)0.949
     Question 3 1.7 (1.0, 2.9) 0.049
     Question 41.0(0.6, 1.7)0.975
     Question 50.6(0.3, 1.2)0.180
     Question 60.7(0.3, 1.3)0.240
     Question 70.9(0.5, 1.6)0.699
     Question 80.8(0.4, 1.7)0.560
     Question 9b ---
     Question 100.8(0.4, 1.4)0.396
     Overall PHQ-9 score1.0(0.9, 1.1)0.683
    Neck Disability Index MCID
     Question 11.9(0.9, 3.7)0.060
     Question 21.3(0.7, 2.5)0.415
     Question 3 1.6 (0.9, 2.8) 0.110
     Question 41.6(0.8, 3.0)0.153
     Question 51.2(0.6, 2.3)0.694
     Question 61.5(0.6, 3.4)0.348
     Question 71.4(0.7, 2.9)0.322
     Question 81.1(0.5, 2.5)0.825
     Question 9b ---
     Question 102.0(0.8, 4.6)0.117
     Overall PHQ-9 score1.1(0.9, 1.2)0.291
    • Abbreviations: MCID, minimum clinically important difference; PHQ, Patient Health Questionnaire; VAS, visual analog scale.

    • Note: Boldface indicates statistical significance.

    • ↵a P values calculated using logistic regression to assess each question as a predictor of MCID achievement.

    • ↵b Unable to assess question 9 due to the limited number of patients with affirmative responses.

    • View popup
    Table 6

    PHQ-9 items as predictors of physical function MCID achievement.

    PHQ-9 ItemsOR95% CI P Valuea b
    12-Item Short Form physical component score MCID
     Question 11.6(0.9, 2.7)0.092
     Question 21.2(0.7, 2.0)0.624
     Question 3 1.7 (1.0, 2.9) 0.037
     Question 41.5(0.8, 2.6)0.167
     Question 51.4(0.7, 2.5)0.355
     Question 61.2(0.6, 2.3)0.632
     Question 71.2(0.7, 2.2)0.460
     Question 81.6(0.7, 3.5)0.253
     Question 9b ---
     Question 101.4(0.7, 2.7)0.309
     Overall PHQ-9 score1.1(0.9, 1.2)0.205
    Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function MCID
     Question 11.6(0.9, 2.9)0.137
     Question 21.1(0.6, 2.1)0.724
     Question 31.1(0.6, 1.9)0.828
     Question 41.3(0.7, 2.4)0.456
     Question 50.8(0.4, 1.5)0.503
     Question 60.9(0.5, 1.9)0.870
     Question 71.3(0.7, 2.6)0.388
     Question 81.3(0.5, 3.0)0.576
     Question 9b ---
     Question 101.3(0.6, 2.7)0.473
     Overall PHQ-9 score1.1(0.9, 1.2)0.263
    • Abbreviations: MCID, minimum clinically important difference; PHQ, Patient Health Questionnaire.

    • Note: Boldface indicates statistical significance.

    • ↵a P values calculated using logistic regression to assess each question as a predictor of MCID achievement.

    • ↵b Unable to assess question 9 due to the limited number of patients with affirmative responses.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

International Journal of Spine Surgery
Vol. 16, Issue 6
1 Dec 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on International Journal of Spine Surgery.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Results in Clinically Significant Improvements in Patients With Preoperative Sleep Difficulties
(Your Name) has sent you a message from International Journal of Spine Surgery
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the International Journal of Spine Surgery web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Results in Clinically Significant Improvements in Patients With Preoperative Sleep Difficulties
Conor P. Lynch, Elliot D.K. Cha, Madhav R. Patel, Kevin C. Jacob, Shruthi Mohan, Cara E. Geoghegan, Caroline N. Jadczak, Kern Singh
International Journal of Spine Surgery Dec 2022, 16 (6) 1046-1053; DOI: 10.14444/8333

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Results in Clinically Significant Improvements in Patients With Preoperative Sleep Difficulties
Conor P. Lynch, Elliot D.K. Cha, Madhav R. Patel, Kevin C. Jacob, Shruthi Mohan, Cara E. Geoghegan, Caroline N. Jadczak, Kern Singh
International Journal of Spine Surgery Dec 2022, 16 (6) 1046-1053; DOI: 10.14444/8333
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Innovation and Adversity in Spine Surgery: A Retrospective
  • Cervical Myelopathy Secondary to Bilateral Atlantoaxial Pseudoarticulations in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Case Report
  • Incidence of Traumatic Spinal Injury Following Public Policy Update on Moped Usage in South Carolina
Show more Cervical Spine

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF)
  • patient health questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)
  • patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Content
  • Archive

More Information

  • About IJSS
  • About ISASS
  • Privacy Policy

More

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Feedback

Other Services

  • Author Instructions
  • Join ISASS
  • Reprints & Permissions

© 2025 International Journal of Spine Surgery

International Journal of Spine Surgery Online ISSN: 2211-4599

Powered by HighWire