Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Other Publications
    • ijss

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
International Journal of Spine Surgery
  • My alerts
International Journal of Spine Surgery

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Follow ijss on Twitter
  • Visit ijss on Facebook
Research ArticleCervical Spine

Impact of Gender on Postsurgical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

Madhav R. Patel, Kevin C. Jacob, Alexander W. Parsons, Nisheka N. Vanjani, Michael C. Prabhu, Hanna Pawlowski and Kern Singh
International Journal of Spine Surgery December 2022, 16 (6) 991-1000; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/8366
Madhav R. Patel
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kevin C. Jacob
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexander W. Parsons
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nisheka N. Vanjani
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael C. Prabhu
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hanna Pawlowski
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kern Singh
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: kern.singh@rushortho.com
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1

    Patient demographics.

    CharacteristicWomen
    (n = 134)
    Men
    (n = 179)
    P Valuea
    Age, y, mean ± SD47.7 ± 10.346.7 ± 10.10.373
    Body mass index, kg/m2, mean ± SD28.9 ± 6.629.6 ± 5.00.287
    Obesity status, % (n)0.269
     Nonobese60.5% (81)54.2% (97)
     Obese39.6% (53)45.8% (82)
    Ethnicity, % (n)0.505
     African-American14.9% (20)14.5% (26)
     Asian3.0% (4)0.6% (1)
     Hispanic5.2% (7)6.7% (12)
     White73.9% (99)76.0% (136)
     Other3.0% (4)2.2% (4)
    Diabetic status, % (n)0.169
     Nondiabetic91.0% (122)95.0% (170)
     Diabetic9.0% (12)5.0% (9)
    Smoking status, % (n)0.667
     Nonsmoker79.4% (104)81.4% (144)
     Smoker20.6% (27)18.6% (33)
    Blood pressure, % (n)0.874
     Normotensive74.8% (98)74.0% (131)
     Hypertensive25.2% (33)26.0% (46)
    American Society of Anesthesiologists score, % (n)0.719
     ≤289.6% (112)88.2% (135)
     >210.4% (13)11.8% (18)
    Charlson Comorbidity Index score, mean ± SD2.0 ± 1.61.7 ± 1.60.101
    Insurance type, % (n) 0.005
     Medicare/Medicaid9.0% (12)5.0% (9)
     Workers’ compensation25.4% (34)42.5% (76)
     Private65.7% (88)52.5% (94)
    • Note: Boldface indicates significance.

    • ↵a P value calculated using χ 2 analysis or paired sample t test.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Perioperative characteristics.

    CharacteristicWomen
    (n = 134)
    Men
    (n = 179)
    P Valuea
    Spinal pathology, % (n)
     Degenerative spondylolisthesis0.8% (1)1.1% (2)0.739
     Recurrent herniated nucleus pulposus95.5% (128)91.1% (163)0.127
     Central stenosis18.7% (25)29.1% (52) 0.035
     Foraminal stenosis6.7% (9)5.0% (9)0.525
    Operative time, min, mean ± SD55.1 ± 14.157.7 ± 14.50.120
    Estimated blood loss, mL, mean ± SD41.6 ± 19.841.1 ± 21.10.811
    Length of stay, h, mean ± SD24.9 ± 13.519.4 ± 12.6 <0.001
    Postoperative narcotic consumption, mean ± SD
     POD 047.0 ± 36.447.2 ± 45.20.975
     POD 118.9 ± 18.820.5 ± 30.60.603
    Day of discharge, % (n) 0.017
     POD 026.3% (35)42.9% (75)
     POD 163.9% (85)52.0% (91)
     POD 29.0% (12)4.6% (8)
     POD 30.8% (1)0.0% (0)
     POD 40.0% (0)0.6% (0)
    • Abbreviation: POD, postoperative day of discharge.

    • Note: Boldface indicates statistical significance.

    • ↵a P value calculated using χ 2 analysis or paired sample t test.

    • View popup
    Table 3

    Impact of gender on PROMs.

    PROMWomen
    (Mean ± SD)
    P Valuea Men
    (Mean ± SD)
    P Valueb
    VAS neck
     Preoperative6.4 ± 2.4-6.0 ± 2.2-
     6 wk4.0 ± 2.5 <0.001 3.3 ± 2.6 <0.001
     12 wk2.9 ± 2.8 <0.001 2.9 ± 2.4 <0.001
     6 mo3.0 ± 2.8 <0.001 2.7 ± 2.5 <0.001
     1 y3.2 ± 3.1 0.006 3.5 ± 2.7 <0.001
     2 y4.2 ± 2.6 0.002 4.3 ± 2.9 0.042
    VAS arm
     Preoperative6.5 ± 2.7-5.7 ± 2.5-
     6 wk2.2 ± 2.7 <0.001 2.7 ± 2.5 <0.001
     12 wk3.1 ± 3.5 <0.001 2.5 ± 2.4 <0.001
     6 mo2.9 ± 3.3 <0.001 2.4 ± 2.5 <0.001
     1 y3.0 ± 2.7 0.011 4.0 ± 3.4 0.028
     2 y3.3 ± 2.8 0.005 3.9 ± 3.30.235
    NDI
     Preoperative42.9 ± 19.6-40.9 ± 17.8-
     6 wk30.5 ± 20.2 <0.001 32.5 ± 19.8 <0.001
     12 wk25.0 ± 19.7 <0.001 28.1 ± 20.4 <0.001
     6 mo25.4 ± 21.1 <0.001 22.0 ± 20.5 <0.001
     1 y23.9 ± 20.0 0.010 26.1 ± 23.6 <0.001
     2 y22.6 ± 16.0 0.004 33.7 ± 23.9 0.023
    SF-12 PCS
     Preoperative37.6 ± 7.4-37.9 ± 10.5-
     6 wk39.1 ± 9.40.01938.0 ± 10.00.393
     12 wk44.5 ± 9.1 <0.001 43.8 ± 11.5 <0.001
     6 mo40.5 ± 10.0 0.003 43.4 ± 9.6 <0.001
     1 y44.3 ± 8.4 0.002 43.1 ± 12.2 0.007
     2 y46.1 ± 8.4 0.013 37.6 ± 13.10.218
    PROMIS-PF
     Preoperative39.1 ± 6.6-40.8 ± 7.8-
     6 wk42.4 ± 6.90.14139.3 ± 7.30.550
     12 wk46.2 ± 11.2 0.003 45.4 ± 10.4 0.004
     6 mo45.9 ± 9.2 <0.001 47.4 ± 10.9 <0.001
     1 y47.1 ± 7.9 0.049 48.0 ± 9.4 0.002
     2 y48.3 ± 11.0 0.019 46.0 ± 9.6 0.004
    VR-12 PCS
     Preoperative36.5 ± 7.5-36.4 ± 10.0-
     6 wk40.2 ± 8.5 0.024 36.3 ± 10.10.928
     12 wk42.9 ± 10.1 0.012 40.7 ± 11.6 0.031
     6 mo42.9 ± 9.8 0.001 45.9 ± 9.3 <0.001
     1 y45.7 ± 8.5 0.006 44.7 ± 11.6 0.001
     2 y47.5 ± 7.9 0.011 38.7 ± 13.50.343
    • Abbreviations: NDI, Neck Disability Index; PCS, physical composite score; PROM, patient-reported outcome measure; PROMIS-PF, PROM information system physical function; SF-12 PCS, 12-item short form survey PCS; VAS, visual analog scale; VR-12 PCS, veterans RAND 12-item health survey PCS.

    • Note: Boldface indicates statistical significance.

    • ↵a P values calculated using paired sample t test for improvement from preoperative to postoperative PROMs among women.

    • ↵b P values calculated using paired sample t test for improvement from preoperative to postoperative PROMs among men.

    • View popup
    Table 4

    Impact of gender on PROMs.

    PROMWomen
    (Mean ± SD)
    Men
    (Mean ± SD)
    P Valuea P Valueb
    VAS neck
     Preoperative6.4 ± 2.46.0 ± 2.20.2780.364
     6 wk4.0 ± 2.53.3 ± 2.60.138 <0.001
     12 wk2.9 ± 2.82.9 ± 2.40.877 <0.001
     6 mo3.0 ± 2.82.7 ± 2.50.600 0.003
     1 y3.2 ± 3.13.5 ± 2.70.6470.357
     2 y4.2 ± 2.64.3 ± 2.90.8920.735
    VAS arm
     Preoperative6.5 ± 2.75.7 ± 2.50.0760.121
     6 wk2.2 ± 2.72.7 ± 2.50.317 0.005
     12 wk3.1 ± 3.52.5 ± 2.40.245 0.009
     6 mo2.9 ± 3.32.4 ± 2.50.407 0.013
     1 y3.0 ± 2.74.0 ± 3.40.2740.325
     2 y3.3 ± 2.83.9 ± 3.30.6720.685
    NDI
     Preoperative42.9 ± 19.640.9 ± 17.80.574 <0.001
     6 wk30.5 ± 20.232.5 ± 19.80.608 <0.001
     12 wk25.0 ± 19.728.1 ± 20.40.434 <0.001
     6 mo25.4 ± 21.122.0 ± 20.50.418 <0.001
     1 y23.9 ± 20.026.1 ± 23.60.7120.684
     2 y22.6 ± 16.033.7 ± 23.90.2170.457
    SF-12 PCS
     Preoperative37.6 ± 7.437.9 ± 10.50.799 0.004
     6 wk39.1 ± 9.438.0 ± 10.00.490 0.002
     12 wk44.5 ± 9.143.8 ± 11.50.722 0.011
     6 mo40.5 ± 10.043.4 ± 9.60.2140.166
     1 y44.3 ± 8.443.1 ± 12.20.6920.314
     2 y46.1 ± 8.437.6 ± 13.1 0.043 0.120
    PROMIS-PF
     Preoperative39.1 ± 6.640.8 ± 7.80.345 <0.001
     6 wk42.4 ± 6.939.3 ± 7.30.105 0.026
     12 wk46.2 ± 11.245.4 ± 10.40.7930.153
     6 mo45.9 ± 9.247.4 ± 10.90.634 0.031
     1 y47.1 ± 7.948.0 ± 9.40.8000.995
     2 y48.3 ± 11.046.0 ± 9.60.5280.844
    VR-12 PCS
     Preoperative36.5 ± 7.536.4 ± 10.00.923 0.003
     6 wk40.2 ± 8.536.3 ± 10.10.070 <0.001
     12 wk42.9 ± 10.140.7 ± 11.60.436 0.003
     6 mo42.9 ± 9.845.9 ± 9.30.2070.090
     1 y45.7 ± 8.544.7 ± 11.60.7350.803
     2 y47.5 ± 7.938.7 ± 13.5 0.035 0.093
    • Abbreviations: NDI, Neck Disability Index; PCS, physical composite score; PROM, patient-reported outcome measure; PROMIS-PF, PROM information system physical function; SF-12 PCS, 12-item short form survey PCS; VAS, visual analog scale; VR-12 PCS, veterans RAND 12-item health survey PCS.

    • Note: Boldface indicates statistical significance.

    • ↵a P values calculated using simple linear regression of PROMs by gender.

    • ↵b P values calculated using multiple regression of PROMs by gender and insurance type.

    • View popup
    Table 5

    Impact of gender on minimal clinically important difference achievement.

    Minimal Clinically Important Difference6 wk12 wk6 mo1 y2 yOverall
    VAS arm n = 49 n = 42 n = 39 n = 15 n = 5 n = 71
     Women51.3% (20)44.7% (17)34.3% (12)29.4% (5)25.0% (2)64.4% (29)
     Men38.7% (29)37.9% (25)44.3% (27)25.0% (10)18.8% (3)51.9% (42)
     P valuea 0.1970.4920.3380.7290.7220.172
    VAS neck n = 58 n = 69 n = 61 n = 23 n = 9 n = 97
     Women43.2% (19)68.2% (30)64.1% (25)31.6% (6)33.3% (3)72.6% (37)
     Men49.4% (39)55.7% (39)55.4% (36)43.6% (17)35.3% (6)70.6% (60)
     P valuea 0.5100.1850.3820.3800.9200.807
    NDI n = 54 n = 63 n = 62 n = 28 n = 14 n = 91
     Women56.4% (22)71.1% (27)67.7% (23)58.8% (10)77.8% (7)75.0% (33)
     Men43.8% (32)56.3% (36)67.2% (39)48.7% (18)46.7% (7)71.8% (56)
     P valuea 0.2050.1370.9680.4870.1340.702
    SF-12 PCS n = 26 n = 42 n = 29 n = 16 n = 12 n = 76
     Women30.6% (11)39.1% (18)37.0% (10)35.3% (6)50.0% (7)50.8% (32)
     Men25.0% (15)34.3% (24)48.7% (19)35.7% (10)35.7% (5)47.8% (44)
     P valuea 0.5530.5950.3470.9770.4450.717
    PROMIS-PF n = 19 n = 22 n = 24 n = 15 n = 19 n = 42
     Women42.9% (9)60.0% (9)66.7% (10)50.0% (5)57.1% (8)72.0% (18)
     Men37.0% (10)48.2% (13)63.6% (14)58.8% (10)61.1% (11)66.7% (24)
     P valuea 0.6830.4610.8500.6560.8210.658
    • Abbreviations: NDI, Neck Disability Index; PROMIS-PF, patient-reported outcome measure information system physical function; SF-12 PCS, 12-item short form survey physical composite score; VAS, visual analog scale.

    • Note: Data presented as % (n). Boldface indicates statistical significance.

    • ↵a P values calculated using χ 2 analysis.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

International Journal of Spine Surgery
Vol. 16, Issue 6
1 Dec 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on International Journal of Spine Surgery.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Impact of Gender on Postsurgical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
(Your Name) has sent you a message from International Journal of Spine Surgery
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the International Journal of Spine Surgery web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Impact of Gender on Postsurgical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
Madhav R. Patel, Kevin C. Jacob, Alexander W. Parsons, Nisheka N. Vanjani, Michael C. Prabhu, Hanna Pawlowski, Kern Singh
International Journal of Spine Surgery Dec 2022, 16 (6) 991-1000; DOI: 10.14444/8366

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Impact of Gender on Postsurgical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
Madhav R. Patel, Kevin C. Jacob, Alexander W. Parsons, Nisheka N. Vanjani, Michael C. Prabhu, Hanna Pawlowski, Kern Singh
International Journal of Spine Surgery Dec 2022, 16 (6) 991-1000; DOI: 10.14444/8366
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Innovation and Adversity in Spine Surgery: A Retrospective
  • Cervical Myelopathy Secondary to Bilateral Atlantoaxial Pseudoarticulations in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Case Report
  • Incidence of Traumatic Spinal Injury Following Public Policy Update on Moped Usage in South Carolina
Show more Cervical Spine

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • gender
  • ACDF
  • PROM
  • MCID

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Content
  • Archive

More Information

  • About IJSS
  • About ISASS
  • Privacy Policy

More

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Feedback

Other Services

  • Author Instructions
  • Join ISASS
  • Reprints & Permissions

© 2025 International Journal of Spine Surgery

International Journal of Spine Surgery Online ISSN: 2211-4599

Powered by HighWire