Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Other Publications
    • ijss

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
International Journal of Spine Surgery
  • My alerts
International Journal of Spine Surgery

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Follow ijss on Twitter
  • Visit ijss on Facebook
Research ArticleMinimally Invasive Surgery

Early Clinical Outcomes of the Prone Transpsoas Lumbar Interbody Fusion Technique

Ian J. Wellington, Christopher L. Antonacci, Chirag Chaudhary, Ergin Coskun, Mark P. Cote, Hardeep Singh, Scott S. Mallozzi and Isaac L. Moss
International Journal of Spine Surgery February 2023, 17 (1) 112-121; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/8390
Ian J. Wellington
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher L. Antonacci
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chirag Chaudhary
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ergin Coskun
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark P. Cote
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA
DPT, MSCTR
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hardeep Singh
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Scott S. Mallozzi
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Isaac L. Moss
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA
MD, CM, MASC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Imoss@uchc.edu
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    Intraoperative images depicting standard prone patient positioning. Pads placed below the axillae and around the hip induce a convex bend in the patient’s abdomen, opening up the near side of the disc space.

  • Figure 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2

    Illustration of sagittal radiographic parameters collected.

  • Figure 3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3

    Function global rating of change (GROC) scores at 2 wk, 6 wk, and 3 mo from surgery.

  • Figure 4
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4

    Pain global rating of change (GROC) scores at 2 wk, 6 wk, and 3 mo from surgery.

  • Figure 5
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5

    Patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) scores at 2 wk, 6 wk, and 3 mo from surgery.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Demographics of patients undergoing the PTP approach to lateral lumbar interbody fusion (N = 82).

    Demographics n (%)
    No. of levels133
    No. of PTP
     146 (56)
     226 (32)
     35 (6)
     45 (6)
    Total no. of levels fused
     135 (43)
     2 23 (28)
     313 (16)
     48 (10)
     52 (2)
    Level of PTP
     L1-L211 (8)
     L2-L330 (23)
     L3-L444 (33)
     L4-L545 (34)
    Gender, % women56
    Age, y, mean (SD)63 (12)
    • Abbreviation: PTP, prone transpsoas.

    • Note: Data presented as n (%) except where otherwise noted.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Radiographic measurements.

    Radiographic Measure N Mean (SD) Change Compared With Preoperative P Value
    Lumbar lordosis, °
     Initial postoperative804.5 (8.6) <0.001
     3 mo postoperative574.4 (7.2) <0.001
    Segmental lordosis, °
     Initial postoperative1236.8 (4.8) <0.001
     3 mo postoperative856.7 (4.4) <0.001
    Anterior disc height, mm
     Initial postoperative1238.0 (3.6) <0.001
     3 mo postoperative857.4 (3.6) <0.001
    Posterior disc height, mm
     Initial postoperative1233.3 (2.4) <0.001
     3 mo postoperative853.1 (2.5) <0.001
    • Note: Boldface indicates statistically significant findings with P value <0.05

    • View popup
    Table 3

    Patient-reported outcomes.

    Measure N Mean (SD) Change Compared With Preoperative P Value
    ODI
     2 wk postoperative326.4 (23.2)0.129
     6 wk postoperative38−7.7 (20) 0.023
     3 mo postoperative29−18.3 (17.4) <0.001
    Pain EQ5D
     2 wk postoperative33−0.4 (1) 0.017
     6 wk postoperative40−1.0 (1.1) <0.001
     3 mo postoperative5−0.8 (0.4) 0.016
    VAS EQ5D
     2 wk postoperative33−2.8 (26.2)0.541
     6 wk postoperative406.6 (15.8) 0.012
     3 mo postoperative516.4 (20.2)0.145
    Leg VAS
     2 wk postoperative39−2.3 (4.1) <0.001
     6 wk postoperative42−3.3 (3.6) <0.001
     3 mo postoperative32−3.8 (3.4) <0.001
    Back VAS
     2 wk postoperative38−1.6 (2.5) <0.001
     6 wk postoperative43−3.3 (3.1) <0.001
     3 mo postoperative31−3.9 (3.2) <0.001
    • Abbreviations: ODI, Oswestry Disability Index; VAS, visual analog scale.

    • Note: Boldface indicates statistically significant findings.

    • View popup
    Table 4

    Postoperative complications.

    Complication n (%)
    Ipsilateral hip flexor pain37 (45.1)
    Ipsilateral hip flexor weakness32 (39.0)
    Ipsilateral thigh numbness6 (7.3)
    Contralateral hip flexor pain12 (14.6)
    Contralateral hip flexor weakness3 (3.7)
    Anterior longitudinal ligament rupture3 (3.7)
    Urinary retention6 (7.3)
    Aborted prone transpsoas level4 (4.9)
    Pseudohernia1 (1.2)
    Deep vein thrombosis1 (1.2)
    Femoral nerve palsy2 (2.4)
    Pneumonia1 (1.2)
    Altered mental status1 (1.2)
    Urosepsis1 (1.2)
    Subsidence on 3-month radiographs1 (1.2)
    Foot drop1 (1.2)
    Bradycardia1 (1.2)
    Adjacent segment spondylolisthesis1 (1.2)
    ST depression on electrocardiogram1 (1.2)
    Psoas bleeding during retractor removal1 (1.2)
    Death2 (2.4)
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

International Journal of Spine Surgery
Vol. 17, Issue 1
1 Feb 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on International Journal of Spine Surgery.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Early Clinical Outcomes of the Prone Transpsoas Lumbar Interbody Fusion Technique
(Your Name) has sent you a message from International Journal of Spine Surgery
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the International Journal of Spine Surgery web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Early Clinical Outcomes of the Prone Transpsoas Lumbar Interbody Fusion Technique
Ian J. Wellington, Christopher L. Antonacci, Chirag Chaudhary, Ergin Coskun, Mark P. Cote, Hardeep Singh, Scott S. Mallozzi, Isaac L. Moss
International Journal of Spine Surgery Feb 2023, 17 (1) 112-121; DOI: 10.14444/8390

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Early Clinical Outcomes of the Prone Transpsoas Lumbar Interbody Fusion Technique
Ian J. Wellington, Christopher L. Antonacci, Chirag Chaudhary, Ergin Coskun, Mark P. Cote, Hardeep Singh, Scott S. Mallozzi, Isaac L. Moss
International Journal of Spine Surgery Feb 2023, 17 (1) 112-121; DOI: 10.14444/8390
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Prone Lateral Transpsoas Approach to the Spine: A Technical Guide for Mastery
  • Clinical Outcomes of Prone Transpsoas Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A 1-Year Follow-Up
  • Prone Single Position Approach to Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Key Considerations in Surgical Decision-Making on the Side of Approach for Lumbar Lateral Transpsoas Interbody Fusion Techniques
  • Comparative Review of Lateral and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technique, Outcomes, and Complications
  • A Spine Surgeon’s Learning Curve With the Minimally Invasive L5 to S1 Lateral ALIF Surgical Approach: Perioperative Outcomes and Technical Considerations
Show more Minimally Invasive Surgery

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • prone
  • lateral
  • psoas
  • lumbar
  • outcomes
  • complications

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Content
  • Archive

More Information

  • About IJSS
  • About ISASS
  • Privacy Policy

More

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Feedback

Other Services

  • Author Instructions
  • Join ISASS
  • Reprints & Permissions

© 2025 International Journal of Spine Surgery

International Journal of Spine Surgery Online ISSN: 2211-4599

Powered by HighWire