Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Other Publications
    • ijss

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
International Journal of Spine Surgery
  • My alerts
International Journal of Spine Surgery

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Follow ijss on Twitter
  • Visit ijss on Facebook
Research ArticleMinimally Invasive Surgery

Unipedicular-Screw Index Vertebra Manipulation Technique for Minimally Invasive Short-Segment Thoracolumbar Fracture Fixation

Naresh Kumar, Brian Zhaojie Chin, Chen Xi Kasia Chua, Karthigesh Palanichami, Pradnya Nishant Mohite, Shen Liang, Arnaldo Songcayaon Favila and Jiong Hao Jonathan Tan
International Journal of Spine Surgery October 2023, 17 (5) 652-660; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/8524
Naresh Kumar
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
MBBS, MS (Oʀᴛʜ), DNB (Oʀᴛʜ), FRCS Eᴅ, FRCS (Oʀᴛʜ & Tʀᴀᴜᴍᴀ), DM
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: dosksn@nus.edu.sg
Brian Zhaojie Chin
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
BMᴇᴅ, MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chen Xi Kasia Chua
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
MBBS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karthigesh Palanichami
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pradnya Nishant Mohite
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shen Liang
2 Biostatistics Unit, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
PʜD (Sᴛᴀᴛɪsᴛɪᴄs)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arnaldo Songcayaon Favila Jr
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jiong Hao Jonathan Tan
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
MBBS, MRCS Eᴅ, MMED(Oʀᴛʜ), FRCS Eᴅ(Oʀᴛʜ)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    (A) Pictorial representation of radiological parameters—vertebral wedge angle vs regional kyphosis angle. (B) Graphical representation of short-segment minimally invasive surgery fixation of thoracolumbar fractures with burst elements highlighting procedural nuances A: α, regional kyphosis angle; β, vertebral wedge angle; AVBH, anterior vertebral body height; and PVBH, posterior vertebral body height. B-i: Thoracolumbar fracture with burst elements. B-ii: Placement of bilateral pedicle screws into adjacent vertebrae, with one shorter pedicle screw inserted proud into fractured vertebra. B-iii: Fixation of contoured convex rod on intermediate short pedicle screw. B-iv: Fixation of contoured convex rod on screws in the adjacent vertebrae. B-v: Postoperative healed fracture maintaining correction.

  • Figure 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2

    Force diagram of pedicle screw-rod construct implanted with our technique. (A) Increased sagittal and anterior directed forces as a result of concave rod with shorter, proud intermediate pedicle screw placement. (B) Anterior directed forces from screw-rod construct with reactive posterior directed forces from anterior ligamentous complex and periosteal sleeve, reducing the burst fragments and intact bone close. (C) Interfragmentary motions of burst fragments.

  • Figure 3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3

    Pre-, intra-, and post-operative radiographs of a patient with flexion distraction injury with burst elements. (A) Preoperative computed tomography (CT), sagittal view. (B) Intraoperative correction sagittal radiograph. (C) Immediate postoperative CT sagittal and coronal views. (D) 6-month follow-up anteroposterior and lateral views. (E) 2-year follow-up anteroposterior and lateral views.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Inclusion and exclusion criteria.

    Inclusion CriteriaExclusion CriteriaRationale
    Age 17–74 yAge <16 or >75 yMinimum age of 16 yto reflect age of consent; maximum age of 75 y to exclude senile burst fractures.
    Thoracolumbar burst fracture T8-L4Multiple burst fracturesShort-segment fixation technique is aimed at single burst fractures.
    Fractured vertebral wedge angle ≤25°Fractured vertebral wedge angle >25°A significant wedge kyphosis indicates that severe loss of anterior vertebral body height may warrant direct decompression and/or corpectomy for vertebral reconstruction and sagittal correction.
    TLICS ≥4–TLICS ≥4 is the minimum score warranting surgery.
    No, milda to moderateb neurological deficitSevere neurological deficitc Severe neurological deficit may have significant burst fragment retropulsion causing canal compromise that is likely to require direct decompression and fixation. Mild to moderate neurological deficit may have burst fragments retropulsion causing canal compromise that is amenable to indirect reduction.
    • Abbreviations: MRC, Medical Research Council Scale for Muscle Strength; TLICS, Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score.

    • ↵a Dermatomal or nondermatomal sensory deficits in the lower limbs involving 1 nerve root and/or motor deficit involving 1 nerve root (2 ≤ MRC Grade ≤ 4).

    • ↵b Dermatomal or nondermatomal sensory deficits in the lower limbs involving 1 to 3 nerve roots and/or motor deficit involving1 to 3 nerve roots (2 ≤ MRC Grade ≤ 4).

    • ↵c Motor deficit involves >3 nerve roots with MRC Grade <2 or paraplegia/paraparesis.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Individual clinical characteristics.

    Case
    No.
    Age, ySexBurst Fracture LevelPreoperative ASIA ScoreRadiographic ResultsIndividual Operative Details
    TLIC ScoreDenis
    Classification
    AO Spine
    Classification
    PLC DestructionASA ScoreInstrumented LevelsIntraoperative ComplicationsPostoperative Complications
    121ML3E7BB1Y1L2, L3, and L4NN
    247ML2E4AB2N2L1, L2, and L3NN
    322MT12E7BB1Y2T11, T12, and L1NN
    421FL3E4AA3N2L2, L3, and L4NN
    560FL1D7AB1Y3T12, L1, and L2NYb
    627ML3E7AB1Y2L2, L3, and L4NN
    719FL1E5AA3Y2T12, L1, and L2NN
    830ML4E4AB2Y1L3, L4, and L5NN
    937ML2E4BB2Y2L1, L2, and L3NN
    1043MT12E4BB2Y3T11, T12, and L1NN
    1124ML1NAa 7AA2Y3T12, L1, and L2NN
    1273ML3E5AB2Y2L2, L3, and L4NN
    1338ML2E4AA3N2L1, L2, and L3NN
    1438ML4E4AA3N2L3, L4, and L5NN
    1521FL1E7AB1Y2T12 and L2NN
    1618FL4E4BB2Y3L3, L4, and L5NN
    1764ML1E2BA3N3T12, L1, and L2NN
    1843FL1E5AB2Y2T12, L1, and L2NN
    1919ML2E7AB1Y2L1, L2, and L3NN
    2024ML4E2BA3N2L3, L4, and L5NN
    • Abbreviations: ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists; F, female; M, male; N, no; NA, not available; PLC, posterior ligamentous complex; TLIC, Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score; Y, yes.

    • ↵a Uncommunicative at the time of preoperative assessment.

    • ↵b Developed postoperative ileus, which was subsequently resolved.

    • View popup
    Table 3

    Baseline characteristics.

    Characteristics N = 20
    Patient characteristics
     Age, y34.5 ± 16.4
     Sex, men, n (%)14 (73.6)
    Admission and operative details
     Time to admission, h4.7 ± 2.4
     Time to operating room, h69.5 ± 44.4
     Operative duration, min108.6 ± 48
     Intraoperative blood loss, mL55 (10–1300)
     Total volume of blood transfused, mL500 (250–750)
    Postoperative Course
     Length of hospital stay, d11.5 (6–162)
    • View popup
    Table 4

    Radiological outcomes and clinical outcomes.

    OutcomesPreoperativeIntraoperative (After Positioning)Postoperative
    (2 d)
    Follow-up
    3 m6 m1 y2-y
    Radiologic
     Vertebral wedge angle (°)16.8
    (−12.2 to 30.0)
    5.0
    (−3.2 to 18.0)
    1.8
    (−7.4 to 17.9)
    5.4
    (−5.9 to 14)
    5.9
    (−4.4 to 16.9)
    4.5
    (−5.4 to 15.3)
    5.2
    (−5.1 to 16.0)
     Regional kyphosis angle (°)10.2
    (−27.9 to 28.6)
    −4.0
    (−29.0 to 19.2)
    −7.5
    (−31.0 to 11.1)
    −6.3
    (−25.5 to 18.4)
    −6.0
    (−22.9 to 14.9)
    0.2
    (−16.8 to 15.6)
    0.5
    (−16 to 15.2)
     Coronal Cobb angle (°)2.8
    (−5.0 to 13.7)
    1.9
    (−1.0 to 5.0)
    1.1
    (0.0–5.0)
    1.0
    (0.0–6.1)
    1.4
    (0.4–5.6)
    1.7
    (0.3–5.5)
    1.0
    (0.3–5.8)
     AVBH, mm20.3
    (1.4–29.1)
    N/A26.8
    (15.6–39.1)
    25.5
    (13.1–31.4)
    23.1
    (12.6–31.2)
    23.1
    (12.0–31.9)
    19.3
    (12.2–29.1)
     PVBH, mm28.4
    (1.7–34.1)
    N/A31.8
    (18.2–35.9)
    31.4
    (16.7–34.6)
    29.3
    (16.5–35.1)
    27.7
    (15.9–36.1)
    25.1
    (16.0–35.0)
     Evidence of fracture healing, n (%)--0 (0)12 (63)15 (100)15 (100)15 (100)
     Implant Failure, n (%)--0 (0)1 (5.9)1 (5.9)1 (5.9)1 (5.9)
    Clinical
     Visual analog score76 (4.8)-48.5 (3.4)31.2 (4.6)25 (4.4)20.3 (4.5)11.5 (4.8)
     Oswestry Disability Index84.5 (3.4)-78.4 (3.3)44.7 (5.5)23.8 (4.0)17.7 (5.1)9.9 (4.5)
    • Abbreviations: AVBH, anterior vertebral body height; PVBH, posterior vertebral body height.

    • View popup
    Table 5

    Comparison of radiological and clinical outcomes to preoperative values.b

    OutcomeIntraoperative (After Positioning)PostoperativeFollow-up
    3 m6 m1 y2 y
    Vertebral wedge angle (°)0.006 a
    (−2.736)
    0.001 a
    (−3.461)
    0.002 a
    (−3.125)
    0.004 a
    (−2.864)
    0.011 a
    (−2.556)
    0.016 a
    (−2.413)
    Regional kyphosis angle (°)0.000a
    (−3.823)
    0.000a
    (−3.582)
    0.031a
    (−2.154)
    0.039 a
    (−2.059)
    0.191
    (−1.306)
    0.208
    (−1.258)
    Coronal Cobb angle (°)0.124
    (−1.538)
    0.050
    (−1.960)
    0.088 (−1.705)0.093
    (−1.681)
    0.140
    (−1.477)
    0.196
    (−1.294)
    AVBH, mmN/A0.001 a
    (−3.375)
    0.010 a
    (−2.586)
    0.020 a
    (−2.328)
    0.158
    (−1.413)
    0.937
    (−0.078)
    PVBH, mmN/A0.112
    (−1.590)
    0.171
    (−1.371)
    0.569
    (−0.569)
    0.875
    (−0.157)
    0.556
    (−0.589)
    Visual Analog Score-0.000 a
    (−3.742)
    0.000 a
    (−3.635)
    0.000 a
    (−3.631)
    0.001 a
    (−3.412)
    0.001 a
    (−3.190)
    Oswestry Disability Index-0.000 a
    (−3.736)
    0.000 a
    (−3.624)
    0.000 a
    (−3.627)
    0.001 a
    (−3.411)
    0.001 a
    (−3.184)
    • Abbreviations: AVBH, anterior vertebral body height; PVBH, posterior vertebral body height.

    • ↵a Statistically significant difference (P < 0.05).

    • ↵b Expressed as 2-tailed significance with Z score.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

International Journal of Spine Surgery
Vol. 17, Issue 5
1 Oct 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on International Journal of Spine Surgery.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Unipedicular-Screw Index Vertebra Manipulation Technique for Minimally Invasive Short-Segment Thoracolumbar Fracture Fixation
(Your Name) has sent you a message from International Journal of Spine Surgery
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the International Journal of Spine Surgery web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Unipedicular-Screw Index Vertebra Manipulation Technique for Minimally Invasive Short-Segment Thoracolumbar Fracture Fixation
Naresh Kumar, Brian Zhaojie Chin, Chen Xi Kasia Chua, Karthigesh Palanichami, Pradnya Nishant Mohite, Shen Liang, Arnaldo Songcayaon Favila, Jiong Hao Jonathan Tan
International Journal of Spine Surgery Oct 2023, 17 (5) 652-660; DOI: 10.14444/8524

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Unipedicular-Screw Index Vertebra Manipulation Technique for Minimally Invasive Short-Segment Thoracolumbar Fracture Fixation
Naresh Kumar, Brian Zhaojie Chin, Chen Xi Kasia Chua, Karthigesh Palanichami, Pradnya Nishant Mohite, Shen Liang, Arnaldo Songcayaon Favila, Jiong Hao Jonathan Tan
International Journal of Spine Surgery Oct 2023, 17 (5) 652-660; DOI: 10.14444/8524
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Comparative Review of Lateral and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technique, Outcomes, and Complications
  • A Spine Surgeon’s Learning Curve With the Minimally Invasive L5 to S1 Lateral ALIF Surgical Approach: Perioperative Outcomes and Technical Considerations
  • Fully Navigated Single-Position Prone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Detailed Technical Report and Description of 15 Cases
Show more Minimally Invasive Surgery

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • thoracolumbar
  • burst fracture
  • flexion-distraction, indirect reduction
  • minimally invasive surgery
  • short-segment instrumentation

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Content
  • Archive

More Information

  • About IJSS
  • About ISASS
  • Privacy Policy

More

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Feedback

Other Services

  • Author Instructions
  • Join ISASS
  • Reprints & Permissions

© 2025 International Journal of Spine Surgery

International Journal of Spine Surgery Online ISSN: 2211-4599

Powered by HighWire