Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Other Publications
    • ijss

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
International Journal of Spine Surgery
  • My alerts
International Journal of Spine Surgery

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Follow ijss on Twitter
  • Visit ijss on Facebook
Research ArticleBiologics

Demineralized Bone Matrix and Fibers in Spinal Fusion

Joshua L. Wang, Ryan G. Eaton, Markus E. Harrigan, Vikas Munjal, Katelyn N. Sette, Seth B. Wilson and Andrew J. Grossbach
International Journal of Spine Surgery December 2023, 17 (S3) S28-S34; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/8558
Joshua L. Wang
1 Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Joshua.Wang@osumc.edu
Ryan G. Eaton
1 Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Markus E. Harrigan
1 Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
PHD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vikas Munjal
1 Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Katelyn N. Sette
1 Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Seth B. Wilson
1 Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew J. Grossbach
1 Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1

    Review of studies comparing DBM to other bone grafts or implants in cervical spine.

    StudyDesignPatient PopulationGroups (No. of Patients)Follow-Up, moFusion RatesOther OutcomesNotes
    Yi et al, 201537 Prospective and randomizedACDFPEEK and HA-DBM (43) vs HA-BTP (42)1287% HA-DBM vs 72% HA-BTP (P = 0.16)No difference in neck disability score or infectionBonion
    Xie et al, 201538 Prospective and randomizedACDFPEEK and calcium sulfate and DBM (35) vs autologous ICBG (33)2494% DBM vs 100% ICBG (P not reported)OsteoSet2 DBM
    An et al, 199535 ProspectiveUninstrumented anterior cervical fusionDBM with freeze- dried allograft (39) vs autologous ICBG (38)12Higher rates of pseudoarthrosis with DBM/allograft and higher rates of graft collapseGrafton DBM Gel
    Lee et al, 201936 RetrospectiveInstrumented ACDFDBM (24) vs autologous ICBG (17)2494% DBM vs 96% ICBG (P = 0.66)Orthoblast II
    • Abbreviations: ACDF, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; BTP, β-tricalcium phosphate; DBM, demineralized bone matrix; HA, hydroxyapatite; ICBG, iliac crest bone graft; PEEK, polyetheretherketone.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Review of studies comparing DBM to other bone grafts or implants in thoracolumbar spine.

    StudyDesignPatient PopulationGroups (No. of Patients)Follow-Up, moFusion RatesOther OutcomesNotes
    Kang et al, 201240 Prospective and randomizedSingle-level posterolateral fusionDBM (30) vs autologous ICBG (16)2486% DBM vs 92% ICBG (P > 0.99)No difference in ODI or physical functioning scores; increased operative blood loss with ICBG (P < 0.0031).Grafton DBM matrix
    Schizas et al, 200842 ProspectivePosterolateral fusionDBM (33) vs ICBG or LA (26)1270% DBM vs 77% autograft (P = 0.77)No difference in ODIAccell Connexus
    Vaccaro et al, 200743 ProspectivePosterolateral fusionDBM with bone marrow (19) vs DBM with ICBG (27 patients) vs ICBG (27 patients)2463% DBM-bone marrow vs 70% DBM-ICBG vs 67% ICBG (P = 0.88)Grafton DBM
    Cammisa et al, 200444 Prospective intrapatient controlPosterolateral fusion120 patients in total, DBM on one side, ICBG on the other2452% DBM vs 54% ICBGGrafton DBM
    Sassard et al, 200045 Prospective case controlPosterolateral fusionDBM (56) vs autologous ICBG (52)2460% DBM vs 56% ICBG (P = 0.83)15 ICBG patients reported donor site painGrafton DBM
    Ricart et al, 201846 RetrospectivePosterolateral fusionDBM (21) vs BTP (20)1290% DBM vs 70% BTP (P = 0.09)No difference in revision rates or visual analog scoresGrafton DBM
    Fu et al, 201641 Retrospective consecutivePosterolateral fusion >3 levelsDBM (26) vs autologous ICBG (21)81% DBM vs 86% ICBG (P = 0.72)Increased operative blood loss with ICBG (P = 0.02)Allomatrix DBM putty
    Nam & Yi, 201647 Retrospective consecutivePosterolateral fusionDBM (38) vs HA (41)1273% DBM vs 58% HA (P = 0.15)No difference in ODI or infectionBonfuse DBM
    Baumann et al, 201548 RetrospectiveThoracolumbar fracturesDBM (16) vs autologous ICBG (46)94% DBM vs 100% ICBG (P = 0.26)Synthes DBM
    Thalgott et al, 200149 RetrospectivePosterolateral fusionDBM (28) vs LA (12)92.5% DBM vs 100% LA (P not reported)Grafton DBM with coralline HA
    Interbody Fusions
    Ko et al, 202250 RetrospectiveSingle-level PLIFDBM (20) vs LA (20)12Brantigan-Steffee score 4.4 DBM vs 3.7 LA (P = 0.001)No difference in ODISurFuse
    Kim et al, 201651 RetrospectiveALIF, PLIF, and TLIFHA-DBM (65) vs LA (65)1252% HA-DBM vs 62% LA (P = 0.21)Improvement in ODI in both groups when fusion was achieved; lower rates of fusion with older age and decreased bone mineral densityBonfuse HA-DBM
    Ahn et al, 201452 RetrospectivePLIFDBM (44) vs LA (70)24Not reportedNo difference in degree of bone formation or ODIAllomatrix DBM
    • Abbreviations: ALIF, anterior lumbar interbody fusion; BTP, β-tricalcium phosphate; DBM, demineralized bone matrix; HA, hydroxyapatite; ICBG, iliac crest bone graft; LA, local autograft; ODI, Oswestry Disability Index; PLIF, posterior lumbar interbody fusion; TLIF, transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

International Journal of Spine Surgery: 17 (S3)
International Journal of Spine Surgery
Vol. 17, Issue S3
1 Dec 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on International Journal of Spine Surgery.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Demineralized Bone Matrix and Fibers in Spinal Fusion
(Your Name) has sent you a message from International Journal of Spine Surgery
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the International Journal of Spine Surgery web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Demineralized Bone Matrix and Fibers in Spinal Fusion
Joshua L. Wang, Ryan G. Eaton, Markus E. Harrigan, Vikas Munjal, Katelyn N. Sette, Seth B. Wilson, Andrew J. Grossbach
International Journal of Spine Surgery Dec 2023, 17 (S3) S28-S34; DOI: 10.14444/8558

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Demineralized Bone Matrix and Fibers in Spinal Fusion
Joshua L. Wang, Ryan G. Eaton, Markus E. Harrigan, Vikas Munjal, Katelyn N. Sette, Seth B. Wilson, Andrew J. Grossbach
International Journal of Spine Surgery Dec 2023, 17 (S3) S28-S34; DOI: 10.14444/8558
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • History
    • Technical Details of Demineralized Bone Matrix and Fibers
    • Use in Spinal Fusion
    • Indications for Spinal Fusion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Stem Cells Therapy as a Treatment for Discogenic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review
  • Does Bone Morphogenetic Protein Use Reduce Pseudarthrosis Rates in Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgeries?
Show more Biologics

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • spinal fusion
  • demineralized bone matrix
  • demineralized bone fibers
  • allograft
  • autograft
  • implants

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Content
  • Archive

More Information

  • About IJSS
  • About ISASS
  • Privacy Policy

More

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Feedback

Other Services

  • Author Instructions
  • Join ISASS
  • Reprints & Permissions

© 2025 International Journal of Spine Surgery

International Journal of Spine Surgery Online ISSN: 2211-4599

Powered by HighWire