Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Other Publications
    • ijss

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
International Journal of Spine Surgery
  • My alerts
International Journal of Spine Surgery

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Follow ijss on Twitter
  • Visit ijss on Facebook
Research ArticleSpecial Issue (Invited)

Patient-Specific Rods in Adolescent and Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Narrative Review

Anson G. Bautista, Justin L. Reyes, Nathan J. Lee, Michael W. Fields, Zeeshan M. Sardar, Lawrence G. Lenke, Joseph M. Lombardi and Ronald A. Lehman
International Journal of Spine Surgery August 2024, 18 (S1) S57-S63; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/8642
Anson G. Bautista
1 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Eisenhower Army Medical Center, Fort Eisenhower, GA, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Justin L. Reyes
2 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, NewYork-Presbyterian Och Spine Hospital, New York, NY, USA
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nathan J. Lee
2 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, NewYork-Presbyterian Och Spine Hospital, New York, NY, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael W. Fields
2 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, NewYork-Presbyterian Och Spine Hospital, New York, NY, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zeeshan M. Sardar
2 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, NewYork-Presbyterian Och Spine Hospital, New York, NY, USA
MDMSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lawrence G. Lenke
2 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, NewYork-Presbyterian Och Spine Hospital, New York, NY, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joseph M. Lombardi
2 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, NewYork-Presbyterian Och Spine Hospital, New York, NY, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ronald A. Lehman
2 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, NewYork-Presbyterian Och Spine Hospital, New York, NY, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: rl2781@cumc.columbia.edu
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table

    Radiological and clinical outcomes of ASD and AIS with patient-specific rod instrumentation.

    StudyDesignSample SizeMajor Takeaways
    Barton et al10 Retrospective case seriesASD (N = 18)
    • Reduction in SVA, PT, and PI−LL postoperatively

      • SVA: Preoperative: 96.8 ± 56.8 mm; postoperative: 21.8 ± 37.1 mm (P < 0.001)

      • PT: Preoperative: 32° ± 10.9°; postoperative: 17.7° ± 8.0° (P < 0.0001).

      • PI−LL: Preoperative: 29.2° ± 16.7°; postoperative: −4.1° ± 7.5° (P < 0.001)

    Prost et al11 Prospective observational studyASD (N = 86)
    • Improvement in sagittal balance at 1-year follow-up in patients with a high preoperative SVA

      • SVA: Preoperative: 53 ± 63 mm; postoperative: 30 ± 41 mm, (P = 0.007)

    • Improvement in PI−LL at 1-year follow-up for patients with a preoperative PI−LL mismatch

      • PI−LL: Preoperative: 15° ± 20°; postoperative: 8° ± 14° (P = 0.006)

    • 18% of patients developed mechanical complications at 1-year follow-up

    Prost et al7 Retrospective case seriesASD and AIS
    Total (N = 77)
    ASD (N = 43)
    AIS (N = 24)
    • Improvement in PI−LL and SVA at 3-month follow-up for ASD patients

      • PI−LL: Preoperative: 20.8° ± 17.8°; postoperative: 8.3° ± 12.8° (P < 0.0001)

      • SVA: Preoperative: 77.3 ± 60.6 mm; postoperative: 41.9 ± 38.0 mm (P < 0.0001)

    • No significant improvements in PT for ASD patients

    • No significant improvements in PI−LL, SVA, and PT for AIS patients

    Sadrameli et al12 Retrospective case seriesASD (N = 17)
    • No significant difference observed between planned SVA and achieved postoperative SVA

    • Significant improvements in PT, SS, LL, and SVA

      • PT: Preoperative: 24.82° ± 9.6°; postoperative: 18.00° ± 8.6° (P < 0.01)

      • SS: Preoperative: 28.65° ± 9.84°; postoperative: 36.53° ± 7.97° (P < 0.01)

    Ferrero et al16 Retrospective case seriesAIS
    • Reduction in mean coronal Cobb angle in Lenke Type 1 and Type 2 AIS patients

      • Preoperative: 59° ± 13°; postoperative: 18° ± 11° (P = 0.01)

    • Increase in postoperative thoracic kyphosis

      • Preoperative: 34° ± 14°; postoperative: 45° ± 12° (P = 0.001)

    Mayra et al17 Retrospective case seriesAIS (N = 61)
    • Reduction in proximal thoracic, main thoracic, and thoracolumbar curves in AIS patients

      • Proximal thoracic: 30.5° ± 10.2° to 15.6° ± 7.1° (P < 0.001)

      • Main thoracic: 68.5° ± 13.4° to 17.4° ± 9.0° (P < 0.001)

      • Thoracolumbar: 43.4° ± 14.2° to 15.5° ± 9.1° (P < 0.001)

    • Increase in thoracic kyphosis for hypokyphotic patients

      • Preoperative: 8.4° ± 9.5°; postoperative: 22° ± 3.7° (P = 0.0096)

    • Reduction in thoracic kyphosis for hyperkyphotic patients

      • Preoperative: 49.2° ± 7.7°; postoperative: 38.2° ± 9.5° (P = 0.001)

    Thomas et al19 Retrospective case seriesAIS (N = 48)
    • Reduction in median coronal thoracic curve at 2-year follow-up

      • Preoperative: 62.7°; postoperative 22.4° (P < 0.001)

    • Increase in median preoperative vs planned thoracic kyphosis

      • Preoperative: 26.5°; planned: 30.1° (P < 0.001)

    Faulks et al24 Prospective case seriesASD (N = 20)
    • Significant improvements in PROs: VAS, ODI, and SF-12 at 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months postoperatively

    • PSR instrumentation did not reduce junctional complications; however, a decreased rate of PJF was observed from previous studies (5% vs 35%)

    Kleck et al25 Retrospective case seriesASD (N = 34)
    • Improvement in majority difference for SVA, LL, and PI−LL at 2-year follow-up (P < 0.001)

    Ou-Yang et al27 Retrospective case seriesASD (N = 57)
    • Improvement in SVA and PI−LL postoperatively in PSR vs control but not statistically significant

    Solla et al28 Prospective case seriesASD (N = 60)
    • Improvement in PI−LL, decreased mechanical complications, and reduced OR time

    Solla et al32 Prospective case seriesAIS (N = 37)
    • Improvement in coronal Cobb angle in patients with a minimum of 1-year follow-up (P = 0.03)

    • Increase in thoracic kyphosis at follow-up

      • Preoperatively: 20°; postoperatively: 35° (P < 0.0001)

    • Abbreviations: AIS, adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; ASD, adult spinal deformity; ODI, Oswestry Disability Index; OR, operating room; PI−LL, pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis; PJF, proximal junctional failure; PRO, patient-reported outcome; PSR, patient-specific rod; PT, pelvic tilt; SF-12, 12-item Short Form Survey; SVA, sagittal vertical axis; VAS, visual analog scale.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

International Journal of Spine Surgery
Vol. 18, Issue S1
1 Aug 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on International Journal of Spine Surgery.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Patient-Specific Rods in Adolescent and Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Narrative Review
(Your Name) has sent you a message from International Journal of Spine Surgery
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the International Journal of Spine Surgery web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Patient-Specific Rods in Adolescent and Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Narrative Review
Anson G. Bautista, Justin L. Reyes, Nathan J. Lee, Michael W. Fields, Zeeshan M. Sardar, Lawrence G. Lenke, Joseph M. Lombardi, Ronald A. Lehman
International Journal of Spine Surgery Aug 2024, 18 (S1) S57-S63; DOI: 10.14444/8642

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Patient-Specific Rods in Adolescent and Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Narrative Review
Anson G. Bautista, Justin L. Reyes, Nathan J. Lee, Michael W. Fields, Zeeshan M. Sardar, Lawrence G. Lenke, Joseph M. Lombardi, Ronald A. Lehman
International Journal of Spine Surgery Aug 2024, 18 (S1) S57-S63; DOI: 10.14444/8642
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Rationale, Development, and Fabrication
    • Sagittal Vertical Axis in ASD
    • Sagittal Pelvic Parameters in ASD
    • Coronal Correction in AIS
    • Sagittal Correction in AIS
    • Patient-Reported Outcomes and Mechanical Complications
    • Future Directions
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Personalized Approaches to Spine Surgery
  • Advanced Visualization in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: The Ergonomics, Economics, and Evolution of Camera-Based Tubes and Retractors
Show more Special Issue (Invited)

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • patient-specific rods
  • adult spinal deformity
  • adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
  • adolescent spinal deformity
  • novel technology
  • spine surgery

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Content
  • Archive

More Information

  • About IJSS
  • About ISASS
  • Privacy Policy

More

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Feedback

Other Services

  • Author Instructions
  • Join ISASS
  • Reprints & Permissions

© 2025 International Journal of Spine Surgery

International Journal of Spine Surgery Online ISSN: 2211-4599

Powered by HighWire