Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Other Publications
    • ijss

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
International Journal of Spine Surgery
  • My alerts
International Journal of Spine Surgery

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Follow ijss on Twitter
  • Visit ijss on Facebook
Research ArticleTDR

REPRINT: Surgical Treatment for Discogenic Low-Back Pain: Lumbar Arthroplasty Results in Superior Pain Reduction and Disability Level Improvement Compared With Lumbar Fusion

Fred H. Geisler
International Journal of Spine Surgery April 2025, 19 (S2) S38-S44; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/8744
Fred H. Geisler
1 The Illinois Neuro-Spine Center at Rush-Copley Medical Center, Aurora
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: fgeisler@concentric.net
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    Distribution of VAS pain scores and ODI disability scores for all subjects (i.e., both treatment and control groups). A reasonable approximation of a normal distribution of scores is evident at baseline. However, at 2-year follow-up the distributions are not normal but skew towards the low cut-off end of both scales, indicating a favorable clinical response.

  • Figure 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2

    Mean ODI disability scores at baseline and at each protocol-specified follow-up time point through 2 years. The dotted line indicates the ODI score necessary for minimum clinical improvement, 10 points.14 (a) Mean scores for 276 subjects in the Charité artificial disc treatment group. There was a significant difference in level of disability at all time points compared to baseline (P< .001), Wilcoxon rank sum test. (b) Mean scores for subjects in the treatment group compared to 99 enrolled subjects in the control group. There was a significant difference in the treatment group with respect to disability, compared to the control group at all postoperative time points (P< .05), Wilcoxon rank sum test.

  • Figure 3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3

    Mean VAS pain scores at baseline and at each protocol-specified follow-up time point through 2 years. The dotted line indicates the VAS score necessary for minimum clinical improvement, 19 points.14 (a) Mean scores for 276 subjects in the Charité artificial disc treatment group. There was a significant difference in pain at all time points compared to baseline (P< .001), Wilcoxon rank sum test. (b) Mean scores for subjects in the treatment group compared to the 99 enrolled subjects in the control group. There was a significant difference in the treatment group with respect to pain, compared to the control group at all postoperative points (P< .05), Wilcoxon rank sum test.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

International Journal of Spine Surgery: 19 (S2)
International Journal of Spine Surgery
Vol. 19, Issue S2
1 Apr 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on International Journal of Spine Surgery.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
REPRINT: Surgical Treatment for Discogenic Low-Back Pain: Lumbar Arthroplasty Results in Superior Pain Reduction and Disability Level Improvement Compared With Lumbar Fusion
(Your Name) has sent you a message from International Journal of Spine Surgery
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the International Journal of Spine Surgery web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
REPRINT: Surgical Treatment for Discogenic Low-Back Pain: Lumbar Arthroplasty Results in Superior Pain Reduction and Disability Level Improvement Compared With Lumbar Fusion
Fred H. Geisler
International Journal of Spine Surgery Apr 2025, 19 (S2) S38-S44; DOI: 10.14444/8744

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
REPRINT: Surgical Treatment for Discogenic Low-Back Pain: Lumbar Arthroplasty Results in Superior Pain Reduction and Disability Level Improvement Compared With Lumbar Fusion
Fred H. Geisler
International Journal of Spine Surgery Apr 2025, 19 (S2) S38-S44; DOI: 10.14444/8744
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Statistical Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Surgical Treatment for Discogenic Low-Back Pain: Lumbar Arthroplasty Results in Superior Pain Reduction and Disability Level Improvement Compared With Lumbar Fusion
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Total Joint Replacement of the Lumbar Spine: The Future of Motion Preservation
  • Long-Term Results of Charité Lumbar Disc Replacement: A 17-Year Follow-Up in a Workers’ Compensation Cohort
Show more TDR

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • lumbar arthroplasty
  • total disc replacement
  • clinical trial
  • statistical analysis

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Content
  • Archive

More Information

  • About IJSS
  • About ISASS
  • Privacy Policy

More

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Feedback

Other Services

  • Author Instructions
  • Join ISASS
  • Reprints & Permissions

© 2025 International Journal of Spine Surgery

International Journal of Spine Surgery Online ISSN: 2211-4599

Powered by HighWire