Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Other Publications
    • ijss

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
International Journal of Spine Surgery
  • My alerts
International Journal of Spine Surgery

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Follow ijss on Twitter
  • Visit ijss on Facebook
Research ArticleDYNAMIC STABILIZATION
Open Access

In Vitro Assessment of Serum-Saline Ratios for Fluid Simulator Testing of Highly Modular Spinal Implants With Articulating Surfaces

Nadim Hallab, Ashutosh Khandha, George Malcolmson and JP Timm
International Journal of Spine Surgery January 2008, 2 (4) 171-183; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/SASJ-2008-0013-RR
Nadim Hallab
aDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ashutosh Khandha
bApplied Spine Technologies, New Haven, Connecticut
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
George Malcolmson
bApplied Spine Technologies, New Haven, Connecticut
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JP Timm
bApplied Spine Technologies, New Haven, Connecticut
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    (A) The dynamic stabilization spinal implant used for testing in this study is shown. Two titanium alloy screws fix the implant to the spine. (B) Two cobalt alloy ball and socket end connectors are fixed to a cobalt alloy rod imposed with a cobalt alloy spring housed in a PTFE accordion flexible sheath. (C) This design is meant to (1) provide maximum stability with minimal impact on overall Range of Motion, (2) enable a non-linear load-displacement curve with higher stiffness around neutral posture, and (3) allow for pedicle screw attachment (a well-established surgical technique).

  • Figure 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2

    Saline: Post-simulator testing images of the implant are shown, indicating wear of the CoCrMo/CoCrMo articulating surface(s) after being tested in saline at 37°C, after 10 million cycles. Significant wear marks were evident in the form of scratches and/or abrasions. Visual inspection of the other contact surfaces in the device, namely the PTFE sheath connection mechanism, the PTFE sheath itself, and the cable ferrule sliding contact, did not show any evidence of wear.

  • Figure 3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3

    Serum: Post-simulator testing images of the implant are shown, indicating wear of the CoCrMo/CoCrMo articulating surface(s) after being tested in 20% serum at 37°C, after 10 million cycles. Visual inspection of the surface showed very little wear, when compared to implants tested in saline. A highly polished mirror-finish was observed. At high magnification, the most significant wear marks were circumferential scratches associated with implant placement and removal from the polyethylene fixture pucks 10 times over 10 million cycles (at 1 million cycles intervals), for cleaning/weighing purposes. SEM analysis (1000x magnification) revealed isolated patches of thin, discontinuous surface deposits and random scratches. The other contact surfaces appeared similar to those observed in specimens tested in saline.

  • Figure 4
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4

    Protein deposits were demonstrated within the protective sheath around the spring assembly during initial pilot testing and necessitated the removal of sheath during subsequent testing in serum.

  • Figure 5
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5

    Gravimetric analysis of implant weight shows the weight loss (and gain) of the implants when tested in 100% saline and 20%-serum saline, with an average of > 20-fold increase (P < .05) in the weight loss of the dynamic stabilization implant when tested in saline only when compared to 20% serum-supplemented conditions (after 10 million cycles).

  • Figure 6
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6

    The particle size distributions of a single sample are shown. Particle size analysis using laser diffraction analysis (LALLS) can generate a number-based and a volume-based distribution, because of the millions of particles analyzed. Average size data provided by LALLS analysis was based on an equivalent spherical diameter of millions of sampled particles passing in front of a laser and detector. The number distribution represents the size distribution as a percentage of the total number of particles and the volume-based analysis/distribution represent the size distribution and a percentage of the cumulative (total) volume of particles. The percentage of particles within each size range is represented by the bars (right axis) and the cumulative percentage of total particles below any size is indicated by the line (left axis).

  • Figure 7
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7

    The volume-based distributions of LALLS particle analysis, shown here, demonstrate the different distribution patterns of saline and 20% serum fluids. The particles produced in saline were relatively consistent in size and distribution, and extended from 0.1 to 100 µm in size. The particle distributions the debris produced in 20% serum demonstrated a change in the distribution pattern of debris after 3 million cycles, where a wide bell-shaped distribution was followed by a more discontinuous distribution indicative of less debris after a wear-in period. These graphs are meant to highlight the general shape changes in the distributions over the course of testing from 1 to 5 million cycles.

  • Figure 8
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8

    The average volume and number particle size distributions are shown, where the difference in the average size of the particles were 0.2 µm and 4 µm (mn) in in 100% saline and 20%-serum saline, respectively, are illustrated. The volume-based distributions (analyses) show a similar difference between the saline and the 20% serum, ie, 16µm vs. 39µm, respectively.

  • Figure 9
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 9

    The graphical analysis of volume and number based representations of particle size showed relatively constant average particle size for both saline and 20% serum simulator fluids, over the course of 0 to 10 million cycles. The size of the generated particles in saline remained relatively constant at 20 microns mv and 0.1-0.2 microns mn (saline) and 48 microns mv and 3 microns mn (20% serum). The non-significant increase in the size of the particles over the course of testing indicates that the mechanism of wear debris generation remains relatively constant over the course of 10 million cycles of load.

  • Figure 10
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 10

    Particles produced in saline and analyzed by SEM and chemical analysis were flake-like and granular in shape and primarily chromium oxide. Particles greater than 5µm were generally flake-like in morphology while the smaller particles < 5 µm were generally granular. Less than < 1% of the particles in saline were polymeric (from the polymeric sheath or fixation blocks). Due to the lack of particles in the 20% serum solutions, polymeric contamination from fixation grips was estimated to be increased to < 60% in 20% serum. Using a SEM analysis of the number of particles within 5 similar fields, there was approximately > 1000x more particles generated in saline than in 20% serum.

  • Figure 11
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 11

    Scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis using X-ray (EDAX) microprobe analysis of implant debris particles produced in saline simulator fluids demonstrated the prevalence of particles consisting of Cr, Co, P, and O in composition (orthophosphate-like oxides). The Cr-O composition of the debris was characteristic of fretting corrosion-like products, where smaller particles (< 5 microns) tended to contain more Cr than larger particles which contained more surface Co.

  • Figure 12
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 12

    Scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis using X-ray (EDAX) microprobe analysis of implant debris particles produced in 20% serum simulator fluid demonstrated the prevalence of particles consisting of Co-Cr in similar proportion to the bulk alloy. The metallic particles identified in the 20% serum were cobalt and chromium in composition indicative of abrasive wear of the implant surface and bulk alloy.

  • Figure 13
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 13

    A graphical comparison of data showing the amount of wear debris generated in the current study (Metal-Metal DS) of a dynamic stabilization implant tested in saline (without the corrosion/wear reduction of serum protein) to wear rates of past investigations of other spine and total joint arthroplasties. This comparison demonstrates the similar range of wear to other TDA implants and the 10-fold decrease in debris compared to metal-on-polymer THA articulation.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Variety of Testing Conditions Used in Hip and Disc Simulator Studies and Differing Amounts of Wear2–5

    ImplantLubricantAdditiveWear (mm3/106 cycles)
    Meta-Metal Hip2 (CoCr)70 mg/ml
    Bovine Serum,
    90%
    20mM
    EDTA
    0.1%
    NaN3
    0.119 steady state
    Meta-Metal Hip2 (CoCr)40 mg/ml
    Alpha Calf
    Serum, 50%
    20mM
    EDTA
    0.1%
    NaN3
    0.977 steady state
    Metal-PE Hip3 (Co-Cr-PE)65 mg/ml
    Bovine serum,
    4-23% 40 ml
    volume
    20mM
    EDTA
    55.6 average
    Metal-PE Hip3 (Co-Cr-PE)65 mg/ml
    Bovine serum,
    4-23% 160 ml
    volume
    20mM
    EDTA
    88.4 average
    Metal-Metal Hip5 (CoCr w/ varying Carbon content)25% Calf
    serum
    0.1%
    NaN3
    0.023-0.322 steady state
    Metal-Metal Disc4150 ml Bovine
    Serum (100%)
    0.1%
    NaN3
    0.093 average
    • View popup
    Table 2

    Gravimetric Weight Loss and Wear Debris Particle Sizes (Over 10 Million Cycles of Simulated Loading)

    Average Volume Percent of Small (Phagocytosable) Particles
    FluidWeight Loss (mg)Type of Debris (EDAX)Average Diameter (Volume)Average Diameter (Number)<1µm<2µm<5µm
    Saline/SerumNot detectableCo-Cr alloy48.4µm3.2µm2.6%6.2%17.6%
    Saline200Cr-Co-Oxide16.2µm0.2µm17.8%28.7%44.0%
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

International Journal of Spine Surgery
Vol. 2, Issue 4
1 Jan 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on International Journal of Spine Surgery.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
In Vitro Assessment of Serum-Saline Ratios for Fluid Simulator Testing of Highly Modular Spinal Implants With Articulating Surfaces
(Your Name) has sent you a message from International Journal of Spine Surgery
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the International Journal of Spine Surgery web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
In Vitro Assessment of Serum-Saline Ratios for Fluid Simulator Testing of Highly Modular Spinal Implants With Articulating Surfaces
Nadim Hallab, Ashutosh Khandha, George Malcolmson, JP Timm
International Journal of Spine Surgery Jan 2008, 2 (4) 171-183; DOI: 10.1016/SASJ-2008-0013-RR

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
In Vitro Assessment of Serum-Saline Ratios for Fluid Simulator Testing of Highly Modular Spinal Implants With Articulating Surfaces
Nadim Hallab, Ashutosh Khandha, George Malcolmson, JP Timm
International Journal of Spine Surgery Jan 2008, 2 (4) 171-183; DOI: 10.1016/SASJ-2008-0013-RR
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Surgical results of dynamic nonfusion stabilization with the Segmental Spinal Correction System for degenerative lumbar spinal diseases with instability: Minimum 2-year follow-up
  • Hybrid dynamic stabilization with posterior spinal fusion in the lumbar spine
  • Clinical outcomes after posterior dynamic transpedicular stabilization with limited lumbar discectomy: Carragee classification system for lumbar disc herniations
Show more Dynamic stabilization

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • wear
  • spine
  • implant
  • saline
  • serum
  • debris
  • metal

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Content
  • Archive

More Information

  • About IJSS
  • About ISASS
  • Privacy Policy

More

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Feedback

Other Services

  • Author Instructions
  • Join ISASS
  • Reprints & Permissions

© 2025 International Journal of Spine Surgery

International Journal of Spine Surgery Online ISSN: 2211-4599

Powered by HighWire