Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Other Publications
    • ijss

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
International Journal of Spine Surgery
  • My alerts
International Journal of Spine Surgery

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Follow ijss on Twitter
  • Visit ijss on Facebook
Research ArticleFusion
Open Access

Cost comparison of patients with 3-level artificial total lumbar disc replacements versus 360° fusion at 3 contiguous lumbar vertebral levels: an analysis of compassionate use at 1 site of the US investigational device exemption clinical trial

Frank A. Buttacavoli, Rick B. Delamarter and Linda E.A. Kanim
International Journal of Spine Surgery January 2010, 4 (4) 107-114; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esas.2010.07.002
Frank A. Buttacavoli
Cedars-Sinai Spine Center and The Spine Institute, Los Angeles, CA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rick B. Delamarter
Cedars-Sinai Spine Center and The Spine Institute, Los Angeles, CA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: rdelamar@msn.com
Linda E.A. Kanim
Cedars-Sinai Spine Center and The Spine Institute, Los Angeles, CA
MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig. 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1

    Scatter plot comparing in-hospital costs in US dollars (USD) for fusion and ADR treatment groups including instrumentation costs. The total cost for fusion-treated patients was statistically higher than that for ADR patients (P < .0001).

  • Fig. 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2

    Scatter plot comparing in-hospital costs in US dollars (USD) for fusion and ADR treatment groups excluding instrumentation costs. The total cost for fusion-treated patients was statistically higher than that for ADR patients (P < .0001).

  • Fig. 3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3

    Comparison of hospital service costs in US dollars (USD) between fusion and ADR treatment groups.

  • Fig. 4
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4

    One-year postoperative lateral radiograph of 3-level ADR.

  • Fig. 5
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5

    One-year postoperative lateral radiograph of 3-level circumferential fusion via described operative technique.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Subject characteristics related to hospital care/treatment

    ADRFusion
    Subject characteristics(n = 22)(n = 21)Significance
    Mean age (range) (y)40.30 (19-59)42.19 (26-59)
    Workers' compensation50,865.56107,022.10 P < .002
    Non-workers'55,306.50107,313.86
    compensation
    Vertebral levels treated66/2263/21 P < .0001
    (3-level surgeries)
     L2-5(0/22) 0%(7/21) 32%
     L3-L5,S1(22/22) 100%(14/21) 68%
    In-hospital physical P < .05
    therapy visits
     1(1/22) 4%(0/21) 0%
     3(5/22) 23%(0/21) 0%
     4(7/22) 32%(1/21) 5%
     5(2/22) 9%(5/21) 24%
     6(3/22) 14%(5/21) 24%
     7(3/22) 14%(3/21) 14%
     8(1/22) 4%(3/21) 14%
     9(0/22) 0%(4/21) 19%
    Days before ambulation P < .05
     1(17/22) 77%(5/21) 24%
     2(4/22) 18%(7/21) 33%
     3(1/22) 4%(5/24) 24%
     5(0/22) 0%(1/21) 5%
     Unknown(0/22) 0%(3/21) 14%
    • View popup
    Table 2

    Subject characteristics

    ContinuousADRFusionSignificance
    Age (mean ± SD) (y)45.98 ± 9.1653.12 ± 9.71 P < .01
    Body mass index (mean ± SD)28.28 ± 4.8529.32 ± 8.00NS
    Currently smoking [n (%)]5/22 (22.73%)2/21 (9.52%)NS
    Workers' compensation [n (%)]4/22 (18.18%)13/21 (61.90%) P < .01
    Male [n (%)]15/22(68.18%)15/21 (71.43%)NS
    Previous lumbar surgery [n (%)]4/22 (18.18%)4/21 (19.05%)NS
    Previous chronic condition [n (%)]18/22 (81.82%)16/21 (76.19%)NS
    Previous surgery—non-orthopaedic [n (%)]2/22 (9.09%)3/21 (14.29%)NS
    Previous surgery—spine [n (%)]5/22 (22.73%)4/21 (19.05%)NS
    Previous surgery—other orthopaedic [n (%)]4/22 (18.18%)2/21 (9.52%)NS
    • View popup
    Table 3

    Operative results

    ADR (n = 22) (mean ± SD)Fusion (n = 21) (mean ± SD)Significance
    Length of surgery (min)156.32 ± 58.282359.2 ± 72.136 P <.0001
    Length of anesthesia (min)219.73 ± 68.523384.32 ± 88.947 P <.0001
    Days in hospital4.77 ± 1.118.00 ± 1.82 P <.0001
    Estimated blood loss (mL)451.36 ± 291.542,085.7 ± 845.01 P <.0001
    Postoperative Hemovac blood (mL)9.53 ± 43.65224 ± 380.26 P <.05
    Cell saver return (mL)138.86 ± 224.83783.57 ± 366.26 P <.0001
    Banked blood return (mL)22.73 ± 106.60148.1 ± 287.71NS
    Autologous blood return (mL)34.09 ± 116.89363.57 ± 345.32 P <.01
    • Abbreviation: NS, not significant.

    • View popup
    Table 4

    Comparison of ADR patient versus fusion patient hospital service costs from surgery through discharge

    ADR (USD) (mean ± SD)Fusion (USD) (mean ± SD)Significance
    Surgical
     * Implant costs27,000 ± 000.0070,460.00 ± 18,663.00 P < .0001
     Surgery costs13,618 ± 5,947.6039,995 ± 6,030.80 P < .0001
     Anesthesia costs4,980.70 ± 1,275.509,738.00 ± 1,804.70 P < .0001
     Radiology costs5,220.80 ± 4,035.904,044.90 ± 2,244.10NS
     Blood bank costs944.17 ± 325.222,946.3 ± 1,661.90 P < .0001
    Hospital stay
     Room and board8,038.60 ± 3,306.8016,237.00 ± 8,324.40 P < .01
     Pharmacy9,440.20 ± 3,828.2017,464.00 ± 5,343.00 P < .0001
     Central supply6,118.90 ± 2,518.409067.30 ± 1,868.60 P < .0001
    Laboratory costs2,467.00 ± 2,136.903,279.60 ± 1,254.60NS
    In-hospital physical therapy costs875.79 ± 1,180.501,318.00 ± 270.25 P < .05
    Other consult costs2,353.20 ± 2,430.402,167.80 ± 1,741.90NS
    Total surgical and hospital costs without implant54,499.00 ± 15,402.00107,133.00 ± 20,479 P < .0001
    Total surgical and hospital costs with implant (estimated ADR)81,499.00 ± 15,402.00177,593.00 ± 24,145.00 P < .0001
    • Abbreviations: USD, United States dollars; NS, not significant.

    • ↵* Estimated, not commercially available at time of surgery.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

International Journal of Spine Surgery
Vol. 4, Issue 4
1 Jan 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on International Journal of Spine Surgery.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cost comparison of patients with 3-level artificial total lumbar disc replacements versus 360° fusion at 3 contiguous lumbar vertebral levels: an analysis of compassionate use at 1 site of the US investigational device exemption clinical trial
(Your Name) has sent you a message from International Journal of Spine Surgery
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the International Journal of Spine Surgery web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Cost comparison of patients with 3-level artificial total lumbar disc replacements versus 360° fusion at 3 contiguous lumbar vertebral levels: an analysis of compassionate use at 1 site of the US investigational device exemption clinical trial
Frank A. Buttacavoli, Rick B. Delamarter, Linda E.A. Kanim
International Journal of Spine Surgery Jan 2010, 4 (4) 107-114; DOI: 10.1016/j.esas.2010.07.002

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Cost comparison of patients with 3-level artificial total lumbar disc replacements versus 360° fusion at 3 contiguous lumbar vertebral levels: an analysis of compassionate use at 1 site of the US investigational device exemption clinical trial
Frank A. Buttacavoli, Rick B. Delamarter, Linda E.A. Kanim
International Journal of Spine Surgery Jan 2010, 4 (4) 107-114; DOI: 10.1016/j.esas.2010.07.002
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Complications with axial presacral lumbar interbody fusion: A 5-year postmarketing surveillance experience
  • Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion Accelerates Degenerative Disease at Adjacent Vertebral Segments
Show more Fusion

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • fusion
  • Artificial disc replacement (ADR)
  • cost

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Content
  • Archive

More Information

  • About IJSS
  • About ISASS
  • Privacy Policy

More

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Feedback

Other Services

  • Author Instructions
  • Join ISASS
  • Reprints & Permissions

© 2025 International Journal of Spine Surgery

International Journal of Spine Surgery Online ISSN: 2211-4599

Powered by HighWire