Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Other Publications
    • ijss

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
International Journal of Spine Surgery
  • My alerts
  • Log out
International Journal of Spine Surgery

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Follow ijss on Twitter
  • Visit ijss on Facebook
Research ArticleLumbar arthroplasty
Open Access

Motion-preserving technologies for degenerative lumbar spine: The past, present, and future horizons

Hassan Serhan, Devdatt Mhatre, Henri Defossez and Christopher M. Bono
International Journal of Spine Surgery January 2011, 5 (3) 75-89; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esas.2011.05.001
Hassan Serhan
aDePuy Spine, Raynham, MA
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: hserhan@its.jnj.com
Devdatt Mhatre
aDePuy Spine, Raynham, MA
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Henri Defossez
aDePuy Spine, Raynham, MA
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher M. Bono
bHarvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Fig. 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1

    Lumbar disc replacement: a, InMotion; b, Charité III; and c, ProDisc II.

  • Fig. 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2

    Lumbar disc replacement: a, Maverick; b, FlexiCore; c, Kineflex; d, Mobidisc; e, XL TDR; f, Freedom; g, Activ-L; and h, Triumph.

  • Fig. 3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3

    Nucleus pulposus supports: a, PDN; and b, DASCOR.

  • Fig. 4
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4

    Nucleus pulposus alternatives: a, NuCore; b, NeuDisc; c, NUBAC; and d, PDN.

  • Fig. 5
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5

    Interspinous spacers: a, Wallis system; b, DIAM system; c, X-stop; and d, CoFlex.

  • Fig. 6
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6

    Other interspinous spacer alternatives: a, Promise; b, Rocker; c, Biolig; d, HeliFix; e, Superion; f, In-Space; g, Aperius; h, InSWing; i, BacJac; j, I-MAXX; k, Viking; l, Flexus; m, Spinos; and n, Wellex (Eden Spine).

  • Fig. 7
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7

    Posterior dynamic stabilization: a, Graf system; b, Dynesys; c, IsoBar; d, AccuFlex; e, Stabilimax; f, Percudyn; and g, Transition.

  • Fig. 8
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 8

    Total facet replacement devices: a, TFAS; b, ACADIA; and c, TOPS.

  • Fig. 9
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 9

    Full functional spinal unit replacement device: Flexuspine FSU.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

International Journal of Spine Surgery
Vol. 5, Issue 3
1 Jan 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on International Journal of Spine Surgery.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Motion-preserving technologies for degenerative lumbar spine: The past, present, and future horizons
(Your Name) has sent you a message from International Journal of Spine Surgery
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the International Journal of Spine Surgery web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Motion-preserving technologies for degenerative lumbar spine: The past, present, and future horizons
Hassan Serhan, Devdatt Mhatre, Henri Defossez, Christopher M. Bono
International Journal of Spine Surgery Jan 2011, 5 (3) 75-89; DOI: 10.1016/j.esas.2011.05.001

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Motion-preserving technologies for degenerative lumbar spine: The past, present, and future horizons
Hassan Serhan, Devdatt Mhatre, Henri Defossez, Christopher M. Bono
International Journal of Spine Surgery Jan 2011, 5 (3) 75-89; DOI: 10.1016/j.esas.2011.05.001
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Categorizing current lumbar motion-preserving devices
    • Conclusions
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Preclinical and clinical experience with a viscoelastic total disc replacement
  • Results from a randomized controlled study between total disc replacement and fusion compared with results from a spine register
Show more Lumbar arthroplasty

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • dynamic stabilization
  • Disc prosthesis
  • Facet replacement
  • Interspinous devices
  • motion preservation

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Content
  • Archive

More Information

  • About IJSS
  • About ISASS
  • Privacy Policy

More

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Feedback

Other Services

  • Author Instructions
  • Join ISASS
  • Reprints & Permissions

© 2025 International Journal of Spine Surgery

International Journal of Spine Surgery Online ISSN: 2211-4599

Powered by HighWire