Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Other Publications
    • ijss

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
International Journal of Spine Surgery
  • My alerts
International Journal of Spine Surgery

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Follow ijss on Twitter
  • Visit ijss on Facebook
Research ArticleLumbar arthroplasty
Open Access

Preclinical and clinical experience with a viscoelastic total disc replacement

Burkhard Rischke, Raymond S. Ross, Boris A. Jollenbeck, Kari B. Zimmers and Neal D. Defibaugh
International Journal of Spine Surgery January 2011, 5 (4) 97-107; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esas.2011.08.001
Burkhard Rischke
aCenter of Orthopaedic and Spine Surgery, Zurich, Switzerland
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Raymond S. Ross
bHope Hospital, Manchester, UK
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Boris A. Jollenbeck
cMagdeburg Hospital, Magdeburg, Germany
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kari B. Zimmers
dAxioMed Spine Corporation, Garfield Heights, OH
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: kzimmers@axiomed.com
Neal D. Defibaugh
dAxioMed Spine Corporation, Garfield Heights, OH
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig. 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1

    Viscoelastic total disc replacement.

  • Fig. 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2

    Mean ODI and VAS low back pain scores.

  • Fig. 3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3

    Median ODI and VAS low back pain scores.

  • Fig. 4
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4

    Exemplar radiographs of a study patient.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Clinical study follow-up intervals

    AssessmentPreoperativelyDischarge6 wk3 mo6 mo1 y2 y
    Range−6 mo± 2 wk± 2 wk± 2 wk± 1 mo± 2 mo± 2 mo
    • View popup
    Table 2

    Clinical study inclusion and exclusion criteria

    Inclusion criteriaExclusion criteria
    Symptomatic degenerative disc unresponsive to nonoperative management for a minimum of 6 mo with imaging studies (eg, radiography, CT, and MRI) verifying L4-L5 or L5-S1 structural abnormalities (eg, disc space collapse, grade 1 degenerative spondylolisthesis, desiccated disc, annular tears, or endplate morphologic changes)Abnormal pain profile as suggested by 1 or more of the following: nonanatomic pain diagram, ODI >80, and surgeon assessment
    Aged 20–60 y (inclusive)ODI <30
    Mentally, emotionally, and physically able to understand the procedure; to comply with postoperative care instructions; and to adhere to 2-y follow-up scheduleProvocative discography with non-concordant pain at the operative level
    Sagittal translation >5 mm at the operative level or above
    Symptoms associated with >1 lumbar level
    Evidence of grade 2 degenerative spondylolisthesis or greater, any isthmic spondylolisthesis, or arachnoiditis
    Radiographic findings of end-stage disc resorption and collapse, prior fracture of lower lumbar spine (eg, endplate sclerosis, endplate irregularities, bone-on-bone collapse, or peripheral rim osteophytes), or degenerative collapse of >3 levels, which—in the opinion of the investigator—prevents the patient from participating in the study
    Congenital or acquired structural defect (eg, scoliosis) at the operative level or above
    Acute disc herniation with radiculopathy
    Clinically significant facet arthrosis or other posterior element lysis or loss at the operative level
    Significant leg pain of a radicular or neurogenic claudication nature
    Spinal stenosis
    Symptoms associated with any neurologic signs
    Prior fusion at any lumbar level or laminectomy or discectomy at the operative level
    History of any invasive malignancy (except nonmelanoma skin cancer) unless treated with curative intent and there had been no clinical signs or symptoms or malignancy for at least 5 y
    Prior radiation to the spine
    Systemic disease affecting the spine, including rheumatoid arthritis, autoimmune disease, AIDS, HIV, and hepatitis
    Acute or chronic infection (local or systemic)
    Using medications or drugs known to potentially interfere with bone or soft-tissue healing (eg, steroids)
    Primary osteoporosis or osteopenia (DEXA T score <1.0) or metabolic bone disease
    Overweight as indicated by a body mass index ≥30
    Pregnant or interested in becoming pregnant in the next 3 y
    Known or suspected allergy to titanium, polyethylene, cobalt, chromium, or molybdenum
    Evidence of drug or alcohol abuse
    Participation in another clinical trial within 8 wk of the baseline visit and for the duration of this trial
    Diabetic patients and patients with a history of implant rejection
    • Abbreviations: CT, computed tomography; DEXA, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.

    • View popup
    Table 3

    Clinical study baseline demographics (overall)

    VariableResult (N = 50)
    Mean age (y)39.7 ± 8.3
    Gender
    Female22 (44.0%)
     Male28 (56.0%)
    Weight (kg)75.0 ± 12.3
    Height (m)1.7 ± 0.09
    Mean body mass index (kg/m2)25.3 ± 3.0
    Race
     Asian1 (2%)
     White49 (98%)
    Significant systemic/concurrent disease10 (20%)
    Prior lumbar procedures1 (2%)
    Smoking history
     None or none in past 10 y27 (54%)
     In past 10 y but none currently7 (14%)
     Currently <1 pack/day12 (24%)
     Currently >1 pack/day4 (8%)
    Work status
     Not working22 (44%)
     Working full time21 (42%)
     Working part time4 (8%)
     Not applicable* 3 (6%)
    Currently receiving disability benefits
     No30 (60%)
     Yes, back only20 (40%)
     Yes, other than back0 (0.0%)
     Yes, back and other reasons0 (0.0%)
    Workers’ compensation in past year†
     Yes6 (12%)
     No44 (88%)
    Duration of back pain history
     Mean (mo)85.8 ± 61.0
     Median (mo)60
    • ↵* Housewife, retired, student, disabled, or wealthy.

    • ↵† Workers’ compensation status was determined in response to the question “Received in past year working compensation for back problems?”

    • View popup
    Table 4

    Intraoperative data

    VariableResult (N = 50)
    Index level implanted
     L4-L513 (26%)
     L5-S137 (74%)
    Operative time: skin to skin (min)
     Mean127.6 ± 33.0
     Median120
    Mean estimated blood loss (mL)
     Mean206.4 ± 259.0
     Median150
    Mean hospital length of stay (d)
     Mean5.1 ± 1.7
     Median5
    • View popup
    Table 5

    Patient satisfaction response

    Interval
    6 mo12 mo24 mo
    Question 1: Would you choose to have the same treatment for your back condition?
     Definitely yes68%71.4%66.7%
     Probably yes20%14.3%12.8%
     Not sure12%10.2%15.4%
     Probably not or definitely not0%4.1%5.1%
    Question 2: Would you recommend this procedure to a family member or friend with the same back condition?
     Definitely yes63%69.4%71.8%
     Probably yes29%16.3%7.7%
     Not sure8%12.2%12.8%
     Probably not or definitely not0%2%7.7%
    • View popup
    Table 6

    Patient work status by interval compared with baseline

    6 mo12 mo24 mo
    Worse from baseline (95% confidence interval)2.1% (0.1%–11.3%)4.4% (0.5%–15.2%)7.1% (1.5%–19.5%)
    No change or improved from baseline (95% confidence interval)97.9% (88.7%–100.0%)95.6% (84.9%–99.5%)92.9% (80.5%–98.5%)
    • View popup
    Table 7

    Mean ROM for patients with each osteophyte rating by interval

    Osteophyte ratingMean ROM
    Preoperatively6 mo12 mo24 mo
    None8.6°5.3°4.2°4.7°
    Mild7.9°5.3°4.5°4.8°
    Moderate5.9°3.9°3.6°4.1°
    Severe12.2°5.4°2.9°3.9°
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

International Journal of Spine Surgery
Vol. 5, Issue 4
1 Jan 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on International Journal of Spine Surgery.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Preclinical and clinical experience with a viscoelastic total disc replacement
(Your Name) has sent you a message from International Journal of Spine Surgery
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the International Journal of Spine Surgery web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Preclinical and clinical experience with a viscoelastic total disc replacement
Burkhard Rischke, Raymond S. Ross, Boris A. Jollenbeck, Kari B. Zimmers, Neal D. Defibaugh
International Journal of Spine Surgery Jan 2011, 5 (4) 97-107; DOI: 10.1016/j.esas.2011.08.001

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Preclinical and clinical experience with a viscoelastic total disc replacement
Burkhard Rischke, Raymond S. Ross, Boris A. Jollenbeck, Kari B. Zimmers, Neal D. Defibaugh
International Journal of Spine Surgery Jan 2011, 5 (4) 97-107; DOI: 10.1016/j.esas.2011.08.001
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Motion-preserving technologies for degenerative lumbar spine: The past, present, and future horizons
  • Results from a randomized controlled study between total disc replacement and fusion compared with results from a spine register
Show more Lumbar arthroplasty

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • lumbar
  • Viscoelastic Total Disc Replacement

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Content
  • Archive

More Information

  • About IJSS
  • About ISASS
  • Privacy Policy

More

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Feedback

Other Services

  • Author Instructions
  • Join ISASS
  • Reprints & Permissions

© 2025 International Journal of Spine Surgery

International Journal of Spine Surgery Online ISSN: 2211-4599

Powered by HighWire