Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Other Publications
    • ijss

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
International Journal of Spine Surgery
  • My alerts
International Journal of Spine Surgery

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Follow ijss on Twitter
  • Visit ijss on Facebook
Research ArticleArticles

Comparison of Single-Level and Multiple-Level Outcomes of Total Disc Arthroplasty: 24-Month Results

Christoph Schätz, Karsten Ritter-Lang, Lutz Gössel and Nadine Dreßler
International Journal of Spine Surgery January 2015, 9 14; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/2014
Christoph Schätz
1Orthopädische Klinik Markgröningen gGmbH, Markgröningen, Germany
Dr. med.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karsten Ritter-Lang
2Spezialpraxis für Wirbelsäulenchirurgie, Potsdam, Germany
Dr. med.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lutz Gössel
1Orthopädische Klinik Markgröningen gGmbH, Markgröningen, Germany
Dr. med.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nadine Dreßler
2Spezialpraxis für Wirbelsäulenchirurgie, Potsdam, Germany
Dr. med.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig. 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1

    M6-L Components & Finished Device.

  • Fig. 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2

    Mean Oswestry Disability Index. *p < 0.001. There was a significant difference between the SL and ML groups at both Pre-Op and 24 months (p < 0.05).

  • Fig. 3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3

    Disability Level at baseline and 24 Months for the Single Level patients.

  • Fig. 4
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4

    Disability Level at baseline and 24 Months for the Multi-Level Patients.

  • Fig. 5
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5

    Back Pain VAS at Baseline and 24 Months for the Single Level (SL), Multi Level (ML), and Combined (C) datasets. *p < 0.001. There was no significant difference between the two cohorts at either pre-op or 24 months.

  • Fig. 6
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6

    Lateral radiographs of the lumbar spine including the index level, for single level disc replacement at L5/S1.

  • Fig. 7
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7

    Lateral radiographs of the lumbar spine including the index level, for two level disc replacement at L4/L5 and L5/S1.

  • Fig. 8
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 8

    Disc Angle for the single level and multi-level cases at L4-L5 and L5-S1. * p < 0.05.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Key Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria

    Key Inclusion Criteria:
    • Between 18 and 75 years of age

    • Treatment at one or two adjacent levels between L3 and S

    • Have not responded to at least 6 months of non-operative, conservative management

    • Have symptomatic degenerative disc disease (DDD) demonstrated by signs and/or symptoms of disc herniation, osteophyte formation, or loss of disc height

    Key Exclusion Criteria:
    • Osteopenia or osteoporosis

    • Have a history of endocrine or metabolic disorders. Have rheumatoid arthritis or other autoimmune disease or a systemic disorder such as HIV or active hepatitis.

    • Prior intra-abdominal or retroperitoneal surgery that would make the approach prohibitively dangerous, or prior anterior surgery at the same level

    • Have uncontrolled insulin dependent type 1 or type 2 diabetes

    • Require a treatment (e.g., posterior element decompression) that destabilizes the spine.

    • Isolated radicular compression syndromes, especially due to disc herniation

    • Bony lumbar stenosis, pars defect, increased segmental instability, spinal deformities, spondylolisthesis above 3mm at the involved level(s)

    • Radiological confirmation of severe facet joint disease or degeneration

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Baseline and Operative Characteristics

    All patientsSingle LevelMultiple Levels
    Gender: Female
    Male
    48 (58%)
    35 (42%)
    31 (63%)
    18 (37%)
    17 (50%)
    17 (50%)
    Age in years (Mean ± SD)42.1 ± 8.243.6 ± 7.540.1 ± 8.8
    Height in cm (Mean ± SD)172.0 ± 9.6171.0 ± 9.4173.3 ± 9.9
    Weight in kg (Mean ± SD)76.5 ± 17.476.2 ± 17.777.0 ± 17.1
    BMI (Mean ± SD)25.7 ± 4.525.9 ± 4..625.4 ± 4.4
    Surgery Time in min (Mean ± SD)79.4 ± 30.6127.5 ± 52.9
    Blood loss (cc) (Mean)180.3359.4
    Mean Hospital Stay in days (Mean)5.76.4 (6.0)
    • Note: Age, height, weight, BMI and surgery time were available for 98% of patients. Blood loss and hospital stay were available for 89% of patients.

    • View popup
    Table 3

    Surgery Levels.

    All patients
    Index Level(s)n (%) of pts
    L4/L512 (14.5%)
    L5/S137 (44.6%)
    L2/L3; L3/L4*1 (1.2%)
    L3/L4; L4/L55 (6.0 %)
    L3/L4; L5/S11(1.2%)
    L4/L5; L5/S123 (27.7%)
    L3/L4; L4/L5; L5/S1*4 (4.8%)
    • ↵* Although the IFU for the M6-L device indicates implantation of the device at 1 or 2 levels from L3 – S1, the decision to implant the device at L2/3 was made for 1 patient and the decision to implant at 3 levels was made for 4 patients.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

International Journal of Spine Surgery
Vol. 9
1 Jan 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on International Journal of Spine Surgery.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of Single-Level and Multiple-Level Outcomes of Total Disc Arthroplasty: 24-Month Results
(Your Name) has sent you a message from International Journal of Spine Surgery
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the International Journal of Spine Surgery web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Comparison of Single-Level and Multiple-Level Outcomes of Total Disc Arthroplasty: 24-Month Results
Christoph Schätz, Karsten Ritter-Lang, Lutz Gössel, Nadine Dreßler
International Journal of Spine Surgery Jan 2015, 9 14; DOI: 10.14444/2014

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Comparison of Single-Level and Multiple-Level Outcomes of Total Disc Arthroplasty: 24-Month Results
Christoph Schätz, Karsten Ritter-Lang, Lutz Gössel, Nadine Dreßler
International Journal of Spine Surgery Jan 2015, 9 14; DOI: 10.14444/2014
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Disclosures
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • We Need to Talk about Lumbar Total Disc Replacement
  • Elastomeric Lumbar Total Disc Replacement: Clinical and Radiological Results With Minimum 84 Months Follow-Up
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Computer Assisted Cobb Angle Measurements: A novel algorithm
  • Long-term Evaluation of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty with the Mobi-C© Cervical Disc: A Randomized, Prospective, Multicenter Clinical Trial with Seven-Year Follow-up
  • A Comparison of Three Different Methods of Fixation in the Management of Thoracolumbar Fractures
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • total disc replacement
  • lumbar disc disease
  • low back pain

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Content
  • Archive

More Information

  • About IJSS
  • About ISASS
  • Privacy Policy

More

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Feedback

Other Services

  • Author Instructions
  • Join ISASS
  • Reprints & Permissions

© 2025 International Journal of Spine Surgery

International Journal of Spine Surgery Online ISSN: 2211-4599

Powered by HighWire