Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Other Publications
    • ijss

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
International Journal of Spine Surgery
  • My alerts
International Journal of Spine Surgery

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Follow ijss on Twitter
  • Visit ijss on Facebook
Research ArticleLumbar Spine

Patients Undergoing 3-Level-or-Greater Decompression-Only Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Have Similar Outcomes to Those Undergoing Single-Level Surgery at 2 Years

Michael T. Nolte, Philip K. Louie, Bryce A. Basques, Arya G. Varthi, Justin C. Paul, Krishn Khanna, Tarush Khurana, Arshan Chaudhri, Dino Samartzis, Edward J. Goldberg and Howard S. An
International Journal of Spine Surgery September 2021, 8124; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/8124
Michael T. Nolte
1Rush University Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chicago, Illinois
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Philip K. Louie
2Hospital for Special Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York, New York
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bryce A. Basques
1Rush University Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chicago, Illinois
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arya G. Varthi
3Yale School of Medicine, Orthopaedics, and Rehabilitation, New Haven, Connecticut
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Justin C. Paul
4OrthoConnecticut, Danbury, Connecticut
MD, PHD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Krishn Khanna
1Rush University Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chicago, Illinois
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tarush Khurana
1Rush University Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chicago, Illinois
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arshan Chaudhri
1Rush University Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chicago, Illinois
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dino Samartzis
1Rush University Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chicago, Illinois
DSC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Edward J. Goldberg
1Rush University Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chicago, Illinois
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Howard S. An
1Rush University Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chicago, Illinois
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Background Stability following multilevel decompressive laminectomy without fusion has been debated using in vitro biomechanical and radiographic models. However, there is a lack of information regarding clinical outcomes for these patients. The aim of the present study was to determine the association between clinical outcomes and number of levels decompressed via laminectomy for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Methods We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of patients who underwent a primary lumbar laminectomy between 2009 and 2015 by senior orthopedic spine surgeons for lumbar spinal stenosis. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the number of decompression levels: single level or 3 or more levels. Patient-reported outcomes were obtained in the form of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores, visual analog scale (VAS) scores for the back and leg, 12-Item Short Form Mental and Physical Survey scores, and Veterans Rand 12-Item Health Mental and Physical Survey scores.

Results Overall, 138 consecutive patients were assessed, of which 106 underwent a single-level and 32 underwent a 3-or-more-level laminectomy. Average follow-up was 24.2 months. There were no significant differences in the preoperative VAS back, VAS leg, or ODI scores between the single-level laminectomy and 3-or-more-level laminectomy groups. Both groups of patients experienced significant improvements in these clinical outcomes postoperatively with no clinically significant difference in the degree of improvement. Reoperation rates were low and similar between the 2 groups.

Conclusions Patients undergoing decompression of 3 or more levels present with similar postoperative outcomes to those who undergo a single-level decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. Under specific clinical and radiographic criteria, a multilevel decompression of 3 or more levels may be a safe and effective procedure with acceptable outcomes at 2 years after surgery.

Level of Evidence 3.

  • lumbar spinal stenosis
  • multilevel laminectomy without fusion
  • decompression-only laminectomy
  • stability-preserving laminectomy

Footnotes

  • Disclosures and COI: The authors did not receive any funding or financial support for this project. None of the authors received payments, benefits, or services, either directly or indirectly, from a third party in support of any aspect of this work.

  • This manuscript is generously published free of charge by ISASS, the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery. Copyright © 2021 ISASS
Next
Back to top

In this issue

International Journal of Spine Surgery: 19 (S2)
International Journal of Spine Surgery
Vol. 19, Issue S2
1 Apr 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on International Journal of Spine Surgery.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Patients Undergoing 3-Level-or-Greater Decompression-Only Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Have Similar Outcomes to Those Undergoing Single-Level Surgery at 2 Years
(Your Name) has sent you a message from International Journal of Spine Surgery
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the International Journal of Spine Surgery web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Patients Undergoing 3-Level-or-Greater Decompression-Only Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Have Similar Outcomes to Those Undergoing Single-Level Surgery at 2 Years
Michael T. Nolte, Philip K. Louie, Bryce A. Basques, Arya G. Varthi, Justin C. Paul, Krishn Khanna, Tarush Khurana, Arshan Chaudhri, Dino Samartzis, Edward J. Goldberg, Howard S. An
International Journal of Spine Surgery Sep 2021, 8124; DOI: 10.14444/8124

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Patients Undergoing 3-Level-or-Greater Decompression-Only Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Have Similar Outcomes to Those Undergoing Single-Level Surgery at 2 Years
Michael T. Nolte, Philip K. Louie, Bryce A. Basques, Arya G. Varthi, Justin C. Paul, Krishn Khanna, Tarush Khurana, Arshan Chaudhri, Dino Samartzis, Edward J. Goldberg, Howard S. An
International Journal of Spine Surgery Sep 2021, 8124; DOI: 10.14444/8124
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • The Influence of Spinous Process Union on Clinical Outcomes After Spinous Process Osteotomy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis After 2 Years: A Secondary Analysis From the NORDSTEN-Study
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Recovery Trajectories After Lumbar Fusion Stratified by Baseline Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Disability Levels
  • Safety and Viability of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Complex Revision Lumbar Spine Surgeries: Insights From a Case Series of 135 Patients on Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion/Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cage Removal
  • Effects of Body Mass Index on Spondylolisthesis Surgery and Associated Patient-Reported Outcomes: A Retrospective Review
Show more Lumbar Spine

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • lumbar spinal stenosis
  • multilevel laminectomy without fusion
  • decompression-only laminectomy
  • stability-preserving laminectomy

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Content
  • Archive

More Information

  • About IJSS
  • About ISASS
  • Privacy Policy

More

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Feedback

Other Services

  • Author Instructions
  • Join ISASS
  • Reprints & Permissions

© 2025 International Journal of Spine Surgery

International Journal of Spine Surgery Online ISSN: 2211-4599

Powered by HighWire