Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Other Publications
    • ijss

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
International Journal of Spine Surgery
  • My alerts
International Journal of Spine Surgery

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Follow ijss on Twitter
  • Visit ijss on Facebook
Research ArticleLumbar Spine

Impact of Lower Extremity Arthroplasty on Improvement of Quality-of-Life Outcomes Following Lumbar Fusion

T. Barrett Sullivan, Conor P. Lynch, Elliot D.K. Cha, Cara E. Geoghegan, Caroline N. Jadczak, Shruthi Mohan and Kern Singh
International Journal of Spine Surgery July 2022, 8335; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/8335
T. Barrett Sullivan
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Conor P. Lynch
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elliot D.K. Cha
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cara E. Geoghegan
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Caroline N. Jadczak
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shruthi Mohan
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kern Singh
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1

    Patient demographics.

    CharacteristicTotal
    (n = 335)
    No Arthroplasty
    (n = 310)
    Arthroplasty
    (n = 25)
    P Valuea
    Age, y, mean ± SD53.1 ± 10.952.5 ± 10.961.4 ± 7.4 0.001
    Body mass index, mean ± SD30.8 ± 6.330.7 ± 6.331.9 ± 5.90.340
    Gender0.251
     Female37.3% (125)36.5% (113)48.0% (12)
     Male62.7% (210)63.5% (197)52.0% (13)
    Diabetic status0.645
     Nondiabetic89.3% (299)89.0% (276)92.0% (23)
     Diabetic10.7% (36)11.0% (34)8.0% (2)
    Smoking status-
     Nonsmoker100% (335)100% (310)100% (25)
     Smoker0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)
    American Society of Anesthesiologists score0.535
     <283.6% (280)85.2% (258)88.0% (22)
     ≥216.4% (55)16.8% (52)12.0% (3)
    Charlson Comorbidity Index score 0.003
     <129.9% (100)31.9% (99)4.0% (1)
     ≥170.1% (235)68.1% (211)96.0% (24)
    Insurance 0.025
     Medicare/Medicaid4.2% (14)4.2% (19)4.0% (1)
     Workers’ compensation26.9% (90)28.7% (89)4.0% (1)
     Private68.9% (231)67.1% (208)92.0% (23)
    Comorbid diagnoses
     Myocardial infarction2.7% (9)2.6% (8)4.0% (1)0.673
     Hypertension30.7% (103)31.0% (96)28.0% (7)0.757
     Chronic lung disease1.8% (6)1.3% (4)8.0% (2)0.015
    • Note: Boldface indicates significance.

    • ↵a P values calculated using χ 2 or t test.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Perioperative characteristics.

    CharacteristicTotal
    (n = 335)
    No Arthroplasty
    (n = 310)
    Arthroplasty
    (n = 25)
    P Valuea
    Spinal pathology
     Recurrent herniated nucleus pulposus12.8% (43)13.5% (42)4.0% (1)0.110
     Degenerative spondylolisthesis51.6% (148)49.8% (131)70.8% (17) 0.049
     Isthmic spondylolisthesis33.8% (96)34.6% (90)25.0% (6)0.341
     Degenerative scoliosis10.8% (36)10.0% (31)20.0% (5)0.120
    Number of levels0.283
     Single90.1% (302)90.7% (281)84.0% (21)
     Multilevel9.9% (33)9.3% (29)16.0% (4)
    Operative time, min, mean ± SD142.6 ± 49.4142.6 ± 48.9142.3 ± 57.40.978
    Estimated blood loss, mL, mean ± SD55.8 ± 35.955.0 ± 33.866.7 ± 56.90.126
    Length of stay, h, mean ± SD38.1 ± 26.238.1 ± 26.338.3 ± 24.70.981
    • Note: Boldface indicates significance.

    • ↵a P values calculated using χ 2 test or t test.

    • View popup
    Table 3

    Differences in mean patient-reported outcome measures by arthroplasty group.

    Patient-Reported Outcome MeasureNo Arthroplasty
    (Mean ± SD)
    P Valuea Arthroplasty
    (Mean ± SD)
    P Valuea P Valueb
    Oswestry Disability Index
     Preoperative42.5 ± 16.8-39.8 ± 13.9-0.424
     6 wk35.8 ± 19.3 <0.001 35.4 ± 19.80.1450.928
     12 wk29.6 ± 18.4 <0.001 25.2 ± 22.6 0.002 0.323
     6 mo24.9 ± 19.6 <0.001 19.2 ± 18.7 <0.001 0.226
     1 y23.3 ± 21.7 <0.001 25.4 ± 23.8 0.005 0.736
     2 y23.4 ± 22.0 <0.001 34.9 ± 33.80.1770.167
    12-Item Short Form Physical Component Summary
     Preoperative30.8 ± 8.9-30.4 ± 8.0-0.850
     6 wk31.6 ± 8.70.07934.1 ± 9.70.1490.238
     12 wk35.4 ± 10.1 <0.001 40.0 ± 11.0 0.005 0.063
     6 mo39.3 ± 11.7 <0.001 39.9 ± 11.3 <0.001 0.831
     1 y40.5 ± 12.0 <0.001 42.6 ± 12.0 0.001 0.484
     2 y41.6 ± 11.7 <0.001 37.0 ± 13.80.2610.245
    Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function
     Preoperative35.1 ± 6.4-37.7 ± 6.5-0.171
     6 wk37.2 ± 6.4 0.001 40.1 ± 6.0 0.031 0.141
     12 wk40.8 ± 6.8 <0.001 42.8 ± 8.9 0.020 0.297
     6 mo44.3 ± 7.2 <0.001 41.7 ± 9.70.0640.271
     1 y44.7 ± 9.1 <0.001 47.5 ± 11.7 0.009 0.302
     2 y45.0 ± 9.3 <0.001 47.7 ± 9.2 0.018 0.374
    VAS back
     Preoperative6.6 ± 2.4-5.5 ± 2.5- 0.029
     6 wk4.0 ± 2.5 <0.001 3.1 ± 2.2 0.003 0.132
     12 wk3.6 ± 2.6 <0.001 3.6 ± 3.00.1720.991
     6 mo3.4 ± 2.7 <0.001 2.5 ± 2.7 0.001 0.133
     1 y3.2 ± 2.9 <0.001 2.6 ± 2.8 0.009 0.933
     2 y3.4 ± 2.8 <0.001 3.9 ± 3.50.0990.781
    VAS leg
     Preoperative5.8 ± 2.8-5.7 ± 2.1-0.780
     6 wk3.2 ± 2.9 <0.001 3.5 ± 2.8 0.003 0.706
     12 wk2.8 ± 2.7 <0.001 3.0 ± 3.2 0.002 0.703
     6 mo2.7 ± 2.8 <0.001 2.7 ± 2.9 0.001 0.992
     1 y2.7 ± 3.0 <0.001 3.4 ± 3.1 0.009 0.390
     2 y2.4 ± 2.8 <0.001 3.6 ± 3.60.1040.262
    • Abbreviation: VAS, visual analog scale.

    • Note: Boldface indicates statistical significance.

    • ↵a P values calculated using paired t test.

    • ↵b P values calculated using linear regression.

    • View popup
    Table 4

    Rates of minimum clinically important difference achievement by arthroplasty group.

    Outcome Measure6 wk12 wk6 mo1 y2 yOverall
    Oswestry Disability Index
     No arthroplasty36.6%44.2%55.1%60.6%62.7%65.1%
     Arthroplasty42.9%52.6%78.9%78.6%44.4%72.0%
     P valuea 0.5730.479 0.035 0.1720.2960.477
    12-Item Short Form Physical Component Summary
     No arthroplasty30.4%48.1%57.1%68.0%64.0%69.4%
     Arthroplasty33.3%55.6%47.1 %66.7%44.4%69.6%
     P valuea 0.7960.5860.4340.9170.2560.987
    Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function
     No arthroplasty15.8%29.1%48.2%51.1%56.0%59.3%
     Arthroplasty20.0%30.0%33.3%30.0%42.9%63.6%
     P valuea 0.7350.9500.3860.1990.5050.774
    VAS back
     No arthroplasty67.7%70.9%73.1%75.4%71.6%84.1%
     Arthroplasty65.0%55.6%66.7%76.9%62.5%79.2%
     P valuea 0.7990.1830.5610.9020.5980.539
    VAS leg
     No arthroplasty62.5%65.5%63.6%64.6%59.9%79.6%
     Arthroplasty38.1%47.4%57.9%57.1%55.6%72.0%
     P valuea 0.029 0.1190.6260.5870.3950.389
    • Abbreviation: VAS, visual analog scale.

    • Note: Boldface indicates statistical significance.

    • ↵a P values calculated using logistic regression.

Next
Back to top

In this issue

International Journal of Spine Surgery: 19 (S2)
International Journal of Spine Surgery
Vol. 19, Issue S2
1 Apr 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on International Journal of Spine Surgery.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Impact of Lower Extremity Arthroplasty on Improvement of Quality-of-Life Outcomes Following Lumbar Fusion
(Your Name) has sent you a message from International Journal of Spine Surgery
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the International Journal of Spine Surgery web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Impact of Lower Extremity Arthroplasty on Improvement of Quality-of-Life Outcomes Following Lumbar Fusion
T. Barrett Sullivan, Conor P. Lynch, Elliot D.K. Cha, Cara E. Geoghegan, Caroline N. Jadczak, Shruthi Mohan, Kern Singh
International Journal of Spine Surgery Jul 2022, 8335; DOI: 10.14444/8335

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Impact of Lower Extremity Arthroplasty on Improvement of Quality-of-Life Outcomes Following Lumbar Fusion
T. Barrett Sullivan, Conor P. Lynch, Elliot D.K. Cha, Cara E. Geoghegan, Caroline N. Jadczak, Shruthi Mohan, Kern Singh
International Journal of Spine Surgery Jul 2022, 8335; DOI: 10.14444/8335
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Recovery Trajectories After Lumbar Fusion Stratified by Baseline Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Disability Levels
  • Safety and Viability of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Complex Revision Lumbar Spine Surgeries: Insights From a Case Series of 135 Patients on Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion/Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cage Removal
  • Effects of Body Mass Index on Spondylolisthesis Surgery and Associated Patient-Reported Outcomes: A Retrospective Review
Show more Lumbar Spine

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • lumbar fusion
  • arthroplasty
  • knee
  • hip
  • outcome measures
  • minimum clinically important difference

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Content
  • Archive

More Information

  • About IJSS
  • About ISASS
  • Privacy Policy

More

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Feedback

Other Services

  • Author Instructions
  • Join ISASS
  • Reprints & Permissions

© 2025 International Journal of Spine Surgery

International Journal of Spine Surgery Online ISSN: 2211-4599

Powered by HighWire