Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Other Publications
    • ijss

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
International Journal of Spine Surgery
  • My alerts
International Journal of Spine Surgery

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Follow ijss on Twitter
  • Visit ijss on Facebook
Research ArticleLumbar Spine

Failure to Normalize Risk Profile of Spine Fusion Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Previously Treated With Percutaneous Stent Revascularization

Waleed Ahmad, Joshua Bell, Oscar Krol, Lara Passfall, Pramod Kamalapathy, Bailey Imbo, Peter Tretiakov, Tyler Williamson, Rachel Joujon-Roche, Kevin Moattari, Nicholas Kummer, Shaleen Vira, Virginie Lafage, Carl Paulino, Andrew J. Schoenfeld, Bassel Diebo, Hamid Hassanzadeh and Peter Passias
International Journal of Spine Surgery February 2023, 8392; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/8392
Waleed Ahmad
1 Departments of Orthopedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joshua Bell
2 Department of Orthopedics,, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Oscar Krol
1 Departments of Orthopedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
BA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lara Passfall
1 Departments of Orthopedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pramod Kamalapathy
2 Department of Orthopedics,, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bailey Imbo
1 Departments of Orthopedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
BA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Tretiakov
1 Departments of Orthopedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tyler Williamson
1 Departments of Orthopedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rachel Joujon-Roche
1 Departments of Orthopedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kevin Moattari
1 Departments of Orthopedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicholas Kummer
1 Departments of Orthopedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shaleen Vira
3 Department of Orthopedics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Virginie Lafage
4 Department of Orthopaedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA
PHD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carl Paulino
5 Department of Orthopedics, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York, NY, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew J. Schoenfeld
6 Department of Orthopedics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
MDMSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bassel Diebo
5 Department of Orthopedics, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York, NY, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hamid Hassanzadeh
2 Department of Orthopedics,, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Passias
1 Departments of Orthopedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Peter.Passias@nyumc.org
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

  • Supplementary Materials
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Patient demographics.

    Demographic1–2 Stents
    n = 17,087
    3–4 Stents
    n = 1578
    Control (No Stents)
    n = 707,396
    P Value
    Age, y
     <653087 (18.1%)263 (16.7%)198,451 (28.1%)<0.001
     65–693464 (20.3%)322 (20.4%)204,913 (29.0%)
     70–744809 (28.1%)452 (28.6%)149,913 (21.2%)
     75–793796 (22.2%)360 (22.8%)103,084 (14.6%)
     80–841931 (11.3%)181 (11.5%)51,035 (7.2%)
    Sex
     Male10,365 (60.7%)1031 (65.3%)297,591 (42.1%)<0.001
     Female6722 (39.3%)547 (34.7%)409,805 (57.9%)
    Home discharge4524 (26.5%)408 (25.9%)172,938 (24.4%)<0.001
    Comorbidities
     Morbid obesity
     (BMI >30)
    3876 (22.7%)322 (20.4%)72,924 (10.3%)<0.001
     PVD4877 (28.5%)459 (29.1%)44,211 (6.2%)<0.001
     Chronic kidney disease3604 (21.1%)315 (20.0%)42,801 (6.1%)<0.001
     CHF4989 (29.2%)413 (26.2%)50,449 (7.1%)<0.001
     COPD7476 (43.8%)597 (37.8%)164,959 (23.3%)<0.001
     Diabetes mellitus8641 (50.6%)783 (49.6%)184,501 (26.1%)<0.001
     Hypertension16,381 (95.9%)1512 (95.8%)439,450 (62.1%)<0.001
     Hyperlipidemia16,019 (93.7%)1483 (94.0%)359,138 (50.8%)<0.001
    Substance Use
     Alcohol755 (4.4%)65 (4.1%)22,456 (3.2%)<0.001
     Smoking8718 (51.0%)790 (50.1%)171,370 (24.2%)<0.001
    Surgical variables
     1–2 Levels fusion13,143 (76.9%)1195 (75.7%)550,669 (77.8%)0.002
     3–7 Levels fusion3312 (19.4%)316 (20.0%)126,737 (17.9%)<0.001
     8+ Levels fusion84 (0.5%)10 (0.6%)5262 (0.7%)0.001
     Decompression2078 (12.2%)220 (13.9%)87,318 (12.3%)0.120
     Osteotomy10 (0.1%)0 (0.0%)320 (0.0%)0.505
     Anterior cervical5069 (29.7%)459 (29.1%)213,455 (30.2%)0.233
     Posterior cervical1134 (6.6%)107 (6.8%)41,787 (5.9%)<0.001
     Combined cervical236 (1.4%)27 (1.7%)9031 (1.3%)0.152
     Anterior thoracolumbar30 (0.2%)3 (0.2%)2196 (0.3%)0.005
     Posterior thoracolumbar458 (2.7%)52 (3.3%)22,169 (3.1%)0.003
     Combined thoracolumbar18 (0.1%)3 (0.2%)1588 (0.2%)0.005
     Anterior lumbosacral512 (3.0%)42 (2.7%)24,080 (3.4%)0.004
     Posterior lumbosacral9208 (53.9%)845 (53.5%)374,636 (53.0%)0.050
     Combined lumbosacral537 (3.1%)56 (3.5%)27,110 (3.8%)<0.001
    • Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CHF, congestive heart failure; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; PVD, peripheral vascular disease.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Length of stay, reimbursement, and hospital cost between patients with 1 to 2 stents and controls.

    Variable1–2 Stents
    (n = 17,087)
    Control
    (n = 707,396)
    P Value1–2 Stents vs Control,
    Adjusted β (95% CI)
    P Value
    LOS, d 4.19 ± 5.01 3.63 ± 4.30 <0.001 −0.16 (−0.22 ≤ β ≤ −0.10) <0.001
    Total reimbursement $23,346.41 ± $15,645.75 $21,534.89 ± $15,880.22 <0.001 −$723.34 (−959.22 ≤ β ≤ −487.46) <0.001
    Total hospital cost$93,496.48 ± $81,354.38$87,427.30 ± $77,287.80<0.001$178.9 (−968.08 ≤ β ≤ 1325.88)0.760
    • Abbreviations: LOS, length of stay; β, standardized beta coefficient.

    • Note: Values in bold denote statistical significance determined by P < 0.05.

    • View popup
    Table 4

    The 90-d postoperative outcomes between patients with 1 to 2 stents and controls.

    90-d Medical Complications1–2 Stents
    (n = 17,087)
    Control
    (n = 707,396)
    P Value1–2 Stents vs Control,
    Adjusted OR (95% CI)
    P Value
    Major
     Pulmonary embolus 124 (0.7%) 4599 (0.7%) 0.244 0.77 (0.63–0.91) 0.004
     Pneumonia469 (2.7%)10,617 (1.5%)<0.0010.95 (0.86–1.04)0.267
     CVA136 (0.8%)3160 (0.4%)<0.0010.87 (0.73–1.04)0.125
     MI 232 (1.4%) 2518 (0.4%) <0.001 1.87 (1.62–2.15) <0.001
     Sepsis297 (1.7%)6664 (0.9%)<0.0010.96 (0.85–1.09)0.564
     Death105 (0.6%)2112 (0.3%)<0.0011.00 (0.81–1.22)0.984
    Minor
     AKI528 (3.1%)10,036 (1.4%)<0.0010.97 (0.88–1.06)0.533
     UTI 1095 (6.4%) 32,952 (4.7%) <0.001 0.90 (0.84–0.96) 0.001
     Wound complications667 (3.9%)20,181 (2.9%)<0.0010.99 (0.91–1.07)0.826
     Transfusion482 (2.8%)10,904 (1.5%)<0.0011.08 (0.98–1.19)0.098
     DVT 210 (1.2%) 7484 (1.1%) 0.034 0.76 (0.66–0.88) <0.001
    90-d Readmission 2605 (15.2%) 67,366 (9.5%) <0.001 1.11 (1.06–1.16) <0.001
    • Abbreviations: AKI, acute kidney injury; CVA, cerebrovascular accident; DVT, deep vein thrombosis; MI, myocardial infarction; UTI, urinary tract infection.

    • Note: Values in bold denote statistical significance determined by P < 0.05.

    • View popup
    Table 3

    The 30-d postoperative outcomes between patients with 1 to 2 stents and controls.

    30-d Medical Complications1–2 Stents
    (n = 17,087)
    Control
    (n = 707,396)
    P Value1–2 Stents vs Control,
    Adjusted OR (95% CI)
    P Value
    Major
     Pulmonary embolus64 (0.4%)1968 (0.3%)0.0230.84 (0.65–1.08)0.189
     Pneumonia190 (1.1%)3775 (0.5%)<0.0010.97 (0.83–1.12)0.671
     CVA38 (0.2%)874 (0.1%)<0.0010.76 (0.54–1.04)0.105
     MI 93 (0.5%) 776 (0.1%) <0.001 2.15 (1.70–2.69) <0.001
     Sepsis128 (0.7%)2760 (0.4%)<0.0010.91 (0.75–1.09)0.299
     Death33 (0.2%)601 (0.1%)<0.0010.94 (0.64–1.33)0.752
    Minor
     AKI235 (1.4%)4192 (0.6%)<0.0010.95 (0.83–1.09)0.495
     UTI446 (2.6%)11,275 (1.6%)<0.0010.94 (0.85–1.03)0.194
     Wound complications383 (2.2%)11,031 (1.6%)<0.0010.95 (0.86–1.06)0.381
     Transfusion 221 (1.3%) 3776 (0.5%) <0.001 1.25 (1.08–1.44) 0.002
     DVT 83 (0.5%) 2962 (0.4%) 0.201 0.74 (0.58–0.91) 0.007
    30-d Readmission 1279 (7.5%) 29,761 (4.2%) <0.001 1.09 (1.02–1.16) 0.006
    • Abbreviations: AKI, acute kidney injury; CVA, cerebrovascular accident; DVT, deep vein thrombosis; MI, myocardial infarction; UTI, urinary tract infection.

    • Note: Values in bold denote statistical significance determined by P < 0.05.

    • View popup
    Table 5

    The 30-d postoperative outcomes between patients with 3 to 4 stents and controls.

    30-d Medical Complications3–4 Stents
    (n = 1578)
    Control
    (n = 707,396)
    P Value3-4 Stents vs Control,
    Adjusted OR (95% CI)
    P Value
    Major
     Pulmonary embolus5 (0.3%)1968 (0.3%)0.9590.71 (0.25–1.53)0.439
     Pneumonia16 (1.0%)3775 (0.5%)0.0150.90 (0.52–1.43)0.680
     CVA3 (0.2%)874 (0.1%)0.6940.66 (0.16–1.72)0.472
     MI 9 (0.6%) 776 (0.1%) <0.001 2.26 (1.08–4.14) 0.016
     Sepsis17 (1.1%)2760 (0.4%)<0.0011.33 (0.79–2.09)0.242
     Death2 (0.1%)601 (0.1%)0.8910.62 (0.10–1.93)0.497
    Minor
     AKI15 (1.0%)4192 (0.6%)0.0920.67 (0.38–1.07)0.123
     UTI42 (2.7%)11,275 (1.6%)0.0011.00 (0.72–1.34)0.979
     Wound complications36 (2.3%)11,031 (1.6%)0.0270.99 (0.70–1.37)0.975
     Transfusion23 (1.5%)3776 (0.5%)<0.0011.46 (0.94–2.16)0.075
     DVT7 (0.4%)2962 (0.4%)10.67 (0.29–1.31)0.300
    30-d Readmission108 (6.8%)29,761 (4.2%)<0.0011.00 (0.82–1.22)0.985
    • Abbreviations: AKI, acute kidney injury; CVA, cerebrovascular accident; DVT, deep vein thrombosis; MI, myocardial infarction; UTI, urinary tract infection.

    • Note: Values in bold denote statistical significance determined by P < 0.05.

    • View popup
    Table 6

    The 90-d postoperative outcomes between patients with 3 to 4 stents and controls.

    90-d Medical Complications3–4 Stents
    (n = 1578)
    Control
    (n = 707,396)
    P Value3–4 Stents vs Control,
    Adjusted OR (95% CI)
    P Value
    Major
     Pulmonary embolus12 (0.8%)4599 (0.7%)0.6980.81 (0.43–1.36)0.460
     Pneumonia44 (2.8%)10,617 (1.5%)<0.0010.99 (0.72–1.33)0.953
     CVA11 (0.7%)3160 (0.4%)0.1940.77 (0.40–1.33)0.392
     MI 26 (1.6%) 2518 (0.4%) <0.001 2.26 (1.49–3.28) <0.001
     Sepsis35 (2.2%)6664 (0.9%)<0.0011.25 (0.87–1.73)0.195
     Death 18 (1.1%) 2112 (0.3%) <0.001 1.88 (1.13–2.93) 0.009
    Minor
     AKI50 (3.2%)10,036 (1.4%)<0.0011.02 (0.76–1.35)0.868
     UTI107 (6.8%)32,952 (4.7%)<0.0011.00 (0.81–1.22)0.997
     Wound complications55 (3.5%)20,181 (2.9%)0.1520.90 (0.68–1.17)0.456
     Transfusion48 (3.0%)10,904 (1.5%)<0.0011.20 (0.89–1.59)0.215
     DVT18 (1.1%)7484 (1.1%)0.8430.71 (0.43–1.10)0.151
    90-d Readmission220 (13.9%)67,366 (9.5%)<0.0011.01 (0.87–1.17)0.889
    • Abbreviations: AKI, acute kidney injury; CVA, cerebrovascular accident; DVT, deep vein thrombosis; MI, myocardial infarction; UTI, urinary tract infection.

    • Note: Values in bold denote statistical significance determined by P < 0.05.

    • View popup
    Table 7

    Length of stay, reimbursement, and hospital cost between patients with 3 to 4 stents and controls.

    Variable3–4 Stents
    (n = 1578)
    Control
    (n = 707,396)
    P Value3–4 Stents vs Control,
    Adjusted β (95% CI)
    P Value
    LOS, d4.41 ± 4.803.63 ± 4.30<0.0010.09 (−0.12 ≤ β ≤ 0.29)0.404
    Total reimbursement$24,482.56 ± $16,592.60$21,534.89 ± $15,880.22<0.001$449.88 (−301.56 ≤ β ≤ 1201.32)0.241
    Total hospital cost$93,435.13 ± $79,140.99$87,427.30 ± $77,287.800.003$18.82 (−3629.25 ≤ β ≤ 3666.89)0.992
    • Abbreviations: LOS, length of stay; β, standardized beta coefficient.

    • Note: Values in bold denote statistical significance determined by P < 0.05.

    • View popup
    Table 8

    The 30-d postoperative outcomes between patients with 3 to 4 stents and 1 to 2 stents.

    30-d Medical Complications3–4 Stent
    (n = 1578)
    1–2 Stent
    (n = 17,087)
    P Value3–4 Stents vs 1–2 Stents,
    Adjusted OR (95% CI)
    P Value
    Major
     Pulmonary embolus5 (0.3%)64 (0.4%)0.8850.81 (0.28–1.84)0.662
     Pneumonia16 (1.0%)190 (1.1%)0.8180.93 (0.53–1.51)0.787
     CVA3 (0.2%)38 (0.2%)10.86 (0.21–2.39)0.803
     MI9 (0.6%)93 (0.5%)11.06 (0.50–2.00)0.863
     Sepsis17 (1.1%)128 (0.7%)0.2041.48 (0.86–2.40)0.131
     Death2 (0.1%)33 (0.2%)0.7800.68 (0.11–2.23)0.592
    Minor
     AKI15 (1.0%)235 (1.4%)0.1970.71 (0.40–1.15)0.194
     UTI42 (2.7%)446 (2.6%)0.9681.07 (0.77–1.46)0.672
     Wound complications36 (2.3%)383 (2.2%)0.9891.05 (0.72–1.45)0.816
     Transfusion23 (1.5%)221 (1.3%)0.6651.16 (0.73–1.76)0.500
     DVT7 (0.4%)83 (0.5%)0.9670.90 (0.38–1.81)0.784
     30-d Readmission108 (6.8%)1279 (7.5%)0.3790.93 (0.75–1.14)0.496
    • Abbreviations: AKI, acute kidney injury; CVA, cerebrovascular accident; DVT, deep vein thrombosis; MI, myocardial infarction; UTI, urinary tract infection.

    • Note: Values in bold denote statistical significance determined by P < 0.05.

    • View popup
    Table 9

    The 90-d postoperative outcomes between patients with 3 to 4 stents and 1 to 2 stents.

    90-d Medical Complications3–4 Stents
    (n = 1578)
    1–2 Stents
    (n = 17,087)
    P Value3–4 Stents vs 1–2 Stents,
    Adjusted OR (95% CI)
    P Value
    Major
     Pulmonary embolus12 (0.8%)4599 (0.7%)11.06 (0.55–1.85)0.843
     Pneumonia44 (2.8%)10,617 (1.5%)0.9831.05 (0.76–1.43)0.752
     CVA11 (0.7%)3160 (0.4%)0.7820.89 (0.45–1.58)0.717
     MI26 (1.6%)2518 (0.4%)0.4061.23 (0.80–1.82)0.324
     Sepsis35 (2.2%)6664 (0.9%)0.2011.31 (0.90–1.85)0.137
     Death 18 (1.1%) 2112 (0.3%) 0.021 1.94 (1.13–3.13) 0.010
    Minor
     AKI50 (3.2%)10,036 (1.4%)0.9231.07 (0.79–1.43)0.650
     UTI107 (6.8%)32,952 (4.7%)0.6011.13 (0.91–1.38)0.266
     Wound complications55 (3.5%)20,181 (2.9%)0.4500.91 (0.68–1.20)0.518
     Transfusion48 (3.0%)10,904 (1.5%)0.6701.12 (0.82–1.50)0.467
     DVT18 (1.1%)7484 (1.1%)0.8530.93 (0.55–1.47)0.768
    90-d Readmission220 (13.9%)67,366 (9.5%)0.1780.92 (0.79–1.07)0.289
    • Abbreviations: AKI, acute kidney injury; CVA, cerebrovascular accident; DVT, deep vein thrombosis; MI, myocardial infarction; UTI, urinary tract infection.

    • Note: Values in bold denote statistical significance determined by P < 0.05.

    • View popup
    Table 10

    Length of stay, reimbursement, and hospital cost between patients with 3 to 4 stents and 1 to 2 stents.

    Variable3–4 Stents
    n = 1578
    1–2 Stents
    n = 17,087
    P Value3–4 Stents vs 1–2 Stents,
    Adjusted β (95% CI)
    P Value
    LOS, d 4.41 ± 4.80 4.19 ± 5.01 0.081 0.27 (0.03 ≤ β ≤ 0.52) 0.031
    Total reimbursement $24,482.56 ± $16,592.60 $23,346.41 ± $15,645.75 0.009 $1182.80 (405.47 ≤ β ≤ 1960.13) 0.003
    Total hospital cost$93,435.13 ± $79,140.99$93,496.48 ± $81,354.380.977−$211.60 (−4218.99 ≤ β ≤ 3795.79)0.918
    • Abbreviations: LOS, length of stay; β, standardized beta coefficient.

    • Note: Values in bold denote statistical significance determined by P < 0.05.

Supplementary Materials

  • Tables
  • online supplementary file 1.

    [8392supp001.docx]

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

International Journal of Spine Surgery: 19 (S2)
International Journal of Spine Surgery
Vol. 19, Issue S2
1 Apr 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on International Journal of Spine Surgery.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Failure to Normalize Risk Profile of Spine Fusion Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Previously Treated With Percutaneous Stent Revascularization
(Your Name) has sent you a message from International Journal of Spine Surgery
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the International Journal of Spine Surgery web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Failure to Normalize Risk Profile of Spine Fusion Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Previously Treated With Percutaneous Stent Revascularization
Waleed Ahmad, Joshua Bell, Oscar Krol, Lara Passfall, Pramod Kamalapathy, Bailey Imbo, Peter Tretiakov, Tyler Williamson, Rachel Joujon-Roche, Kevin Moattari, Nicholas Kummer, Shaleen Vira, Virginie Lafage, Carl Paulino, Andrew J. Schoenfeld, Bassel Diebo, Hamid Hassanzadeh, Peter Passias
International Journal of Spine Surgery Feb 2023, 8392; DOI: 10.14444/8392

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Failure to Normalize Risk Profile of Spine Fusion Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Previously Treated With Percutaneous Stent Revascularization
Waleed Ahmad, Joshua Bell, Oscar Krol, Lara Passfall, Pramod Kamalapathy, Bailey Imbo, Peter Tretiakov, Tyler Williamson, Rachel Joujon-Roche, Kevin Moattari, Nicholas Kummer, Shaleen Vira, Virginie Lafage, Carl Paulino, Andrew J. Schoenfeld, Bassel Diebo, Hamid Hassanzadeh, Peter Passias
International Journal of Spine Surgery Feb 2023, 8392; DOI: 10.14444/8392
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Comparison of Stand-Alone Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion, 360° Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion, and Arthroplasty for Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation: Focus on Nerve Decompression and Painful Spinal Instability Resolution
  • Segmental Lordosis and Disc Height Discrepancies in Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Expandable Cages
  • Recovery Trajectories After Lumbar Fusion Stratified by Baseline Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Disability Levels
Show more Lumbar Spine

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • stent
  • cardiac
  • risk
  • spine surgery
  • spine deformity

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Content
  • Archive

More Information

  • About IJSS
  • About ISASS
  • Privacy Policy

More

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Feedback

Other Services

  • Author Instructions
  • Join ISASS
  • Reprints & Permissions

© 2025 International Journal of Spine Surgery

International Journal of Spine Surgery Online ISSN: 2211-4599

Powered by HighWire