Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Other Publications
    • ijss

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
International Journal of Spine Surgery
  • My alerts
International Journal of Spine Surgery

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Follow ijss on Twitter
  • Visit ijss on Facebook
Research ArticleOther and Special Categories

Comparing 30-Day Outcomes After Emergent Spine Procedures Performed “During Hours” vs “After Hours”

Gabrielle Santangelo, Nathaniel Ellens, Aman Singh, Ricky Hoang, Stephen Susa, Robert Molinari and Thomas Mattingly
International Journal of Spine Surgery July 2023, 8480; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/8480
Gabrielle Santangelo
1 Department of Neurosurgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: gabrielle.santangelo@urmc.rochester.edu
Nathaniel Ellens
1 Department of Neurosurgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aman Singh
1 Department of Neurosurgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ricky Hoang
2 Department of Anesthesiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephen Susa
1 Department of Neurosurgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert Molinari
1 Department of Neurosurgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas Mattingly
1 Department of Neurosurgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
MD, MSᴄ
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1

    Patient demographics for during hours vs after hours groups.

    DemographicDuring Hours GroupAfter Hours Group P Value
    Age, y, mean ± SD (range)55.7 ± 19.8 (16–87)55.2 ± 20.1 (2–95)0.89
    Sex, men, n (%)34 (69.4%)119 (62.0%)0.34
    Comorbidity, n (%)
     Malignancy10 (20.4%)32 (16.7%)0.54
     Congestive heart failure2 (4.1%)16 (8.3%)0.31
     Coronary artery disease8 (16.3%)23 (12.0%)0.42
     Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease3 (6.12%)14 (7.29%)0.775
     Hypertension22 (44.90%)91 (47.40%)0.756
     Hyperlipidemia14 (28.57%)45 (23.44%)0.456
     Diabetes mellitus14 (28.57%)35 (18.23%)0.108
     Liver disease3 (6.12%)6 (3.13%)0.323
     Chronic kidney disease6 (12.24%)15 (7.81%)0.326
    Alcohol abuse, n (%)3 (6.12%)23 (11.98%)0.238
    Drug abuse, n (%)2 (4.08%)18 (9.38%)0.231
    Anticoagulant use, n (%)7 (14.29%)21 (10.94%)0.514
    Antiplatelet use, n (%)12 (24.49%)21 (10.94%)0.014
    Prior site surgery, n (%)11 (22.45%)48 (25.00%)0.711
    Neurological deficit, n (%)24 (50.00%)84 (44.27%)0.476
    American Spinal Injury Association impairment scale, n (%)0.083
     A4 (8.51%)20 (11.05%)
     B3 (6.12%)26 (14.36%)
     C8 (17.02%)28 (15.47%)
     D24 (51.06%)56 (30.94%)
     E8 (17.02%)51 (28.18%)
    American Society of Anesthesiologists class, n (%)0.062
     1 or 210 (20.41%)43 (22.40%)
     325 (51.02%)68 (33.42%)
     4 or 514 (28.57%)81 (42.19%)
    • View popup
    Table 2

    Surgical characteristics of during hours vs after hours groups.

    CharacteristicDuring Hours GroupAfter Hours Group P Value
    Spinal level, n (%)0.5
     Cervical21 (42.9%)74 (38.5%)
     Thoracic14 (28.67%)71 (37.0%)
     Lumbar14 (28.6%)47 (24.5%)
    Spinal pathology, n (%)0.2
     Degenerative19 (38.8%)58 (30.2%)
     Infection7 (14.3%)36 (18.8%)
     Oncology7 (14.3%)13 (6.8%)
     Trauma16 (32.7%)85 (44.3%)
    Urgency of surgery, n (%)
     Blue immediate6 (12.2%)8 (4.2%)0.03
     Blue within 1 h11 (22.5%)78 (40.6%)0.02
     Blue within 3 h23 (47.0%)75 (39.1%)0.32
     Blue within 6 h9 (18.4%)31 (16.2%)0.71
    Length of surgery, min, mean ± SD145.3 ± 92.4129.8 ± 83.90.29
    Spinal fusion, n (%)28 (57.1%)99 (51.9%)0.49
    C-arm, n (%)34 (69.4%)138 (71.9%)0.73
    O-arm, n (%)1 (2.0%)5 (2.6%)>0.99
    Estimated blood loss, mL, mean ± SD303.9 ± 379.5274.4 ± 273.50.61
    • View popup
    Table 3

    Surgical outcomes for during hours vs after hours groups.

    OutcomesDuring Hours GroupAfter Hours Group P Value
    Improvement in American Spinal Injury Association, mean ± SD0.3 ± 0.60.3 ± 0.80.854
    Intensive care unit length of stay, d, mean ± SD4.6 ± 8.76.313 ± 12.1420.272
    Hospital length of stay, d, mean ± SD13.5 ± 11.014.2 ± 16.10.724
    30-day return to operating room, n (%)7 (14.3%)13 (6.8%)0.089
    30-day readmission, n (%)1 (2.0%)12 (6.3%)0.244
    30-day mortality, n (%)2 (4.1%)14 (7.3%)0.420
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

International Journal of Spine Surgery: 19 (S2)
International Journal of Spine Surgery
Vol. 19, Issue S2
1 Apr 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on International Journal of Spine Surgery.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparing 30-Day Outcomes After Emergent Spine Procedures Performed “During Hours” vs “After Hours”
(Your Name) has sent you a message from International Journal of Spine Surgery
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the International Journal of Spine Surgery web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Comparing 30-Day Outcomes After Emergent Spine Procedures Performed “During Hours” vs “After Hours”
Gabrielle Santangelo, Nathaniel Ellens, Aman Singh, Ricky Hoang, Stephen Susa, Robert Molinari, Thomas Mattingly
International Journal of Spine Surgery Jul 2023, 8480; DOI: 10.14444/8480

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Comparing 30-Day Outcomes After Emergent Spine Procedures Performed “During Hours” vs “After Hours”
Gabrielle Santangelo, Nathaniel Ellens, Aman Singh, Ricky Hoang, Stephen Susa, Robert Molinari, Thomas Mattingly
International Journal of Spine Surgery Jul 2023, 8480; DOI: 10.14444/8480
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Patient Satisfaction Following Lumbar Fusion Is Associated With Functional Status and Pain More Than the Attainment of Minimal Clinically Important Difference: Implications for Value-Based Medicine
  • Posttraumatic Spinal Cord Tethering and Syringomyelia: A Retrospective Investigation of Patients With Progressive Disease and Surgical Revisions
  • Prone Position for Preoperative Planning in Lumbar Endoscopic and Minimally Invasive Fusion Procedures: Insights From a Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study
Show more Other and Special Categories

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • After hours
  • spine
  • emergency surgery
  • mortality
  • length of stay
  • readmission

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Content
  • Archive

More Information

  • About IJSS
  • About ISASS
  • Privacy Policy

More

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Feedback

Other Services

  • Author Instructions
  • Join ISASS
  • Reprints & Permissions

© 2025 International Journal of Spine Surgery

International Journal of Spine Surgery Online ISSN: 2211-4599

Powered by HighWire