Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Other Publications
    • ijss

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
International Journal of Spine Surgery
  • My alerts
International Journal of Spine Surgery

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Follow ijss on Twitter
  • Visit ijss on Facebook
Research ArticleLumbar Spine

Comparison of Nonneurological Structures at Risk During Anterior-to-Psoas Versus Transpsoas Surgical Approaches Using Abdominal CT Imaging From L1 to S1

Jacob Razzouk, Omar Ramos, Gideon Harianja, Mei Carter, Shaurya Mehta, Nathaniel Wycliffe, Olumide Danisa and Wayne Cheng
International Journal of Spine Surgery September 2023, 8542; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/8542
Jacob Razzouk
1 School of Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Omar Ramos
2 Twin Cities Spine Center, Minneapolis, MN, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gideon Harianja
1 School of Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mei Carter
1 School of Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shaurya Mehta
3 University of California Riverside, Riverside, CA, USA
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nathaniel Wycliffe
4 Department of Radiology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Olumide Danisa
5 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wayne Cheng
6 Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Jerry L. Pettis Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: md4spine@yahoo.com
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    Transpsoas approach characterization by division of the psoas major into four zones. The psoas major was divided anterior-to-posterior into four equally sized zones using IMPAX6 measurement software.

  • Figure 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2

    Anterior-to-psoas (ATP) approach characterization. The ATP approach was measured as the distance between the anteromedial aspect of the psoas major and the posterolateral aspect of the vasculature (line segments AB and CD).

  • Figure 3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3

    Measuring technique for structures at risk within anterior-to-psoas (ATP) and transpsoas (TP) approaches. The presence of obstruction by a given anatomical structure was recorded if the structure was within ATP and TP borders. Degree of obstruction was calculated as the quotient of the structure measurement within the ATP or TP approach (solid arrows) divided by the entire corridor length at the point of obstruction (hatched lines). If a structure occupied an entire zone (eg, kidney in TP zone #1 as shown above), this was recorded as 100% obstruction.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Patient characteristics, mean (SD).

    CharacteristicMale
    n = 50
    Female
    n = 50
    Age, y53.4 (18.4)53.9 (12.9)
    Body mass index30.2 (7.1)29.7 (6.9)
    Height, cm174.0 (8.3)162.5 (8.5)
    Weight, kg91.5 (23.1)78.3 (18.8)
    • View popup
    Table 2

    Presence of kidneys, spleen, liver, and ribs in ATP approach.

    Disc LevelRight SideLeft Side
    KidneyLiverRibKidneySpleenRib
    Percentage of Time the Kidneys, Spleen, Liver, and Ribs Are Present in ATP Approach
    L1 to L237%56%33%44%22%41%
    L2 to L343%30%10%26%10%11%
    L3 to L411%9%0%5%3%0%
    L4 to L50%0%0%0%0%0%
    L5 to S10%0%0%0%0%0%
    Percentage of Obstruction Caused by Kidneys, Spleen, Liver, and Ribs When Present in ATP Approach
    L1 to L267.9%92.5%30.1%42%54%37%
    L2 to L366.3%92.2%20.0%44.9%50.0%26.6%
    L3 to L478.9%100%NA53.9%57.1%NA
    L4 to L5NANANANANANA
    L5 to S1NANANANANANA
    • Abbreviations: ATP, anterior-to-psoas; NA, not applicable.

    • View popup
    Table 3

    Kidney presence and obstruction of TP approach per side and zone.

    Disc LevelRight SideLeft Side
    Zone #1Zone #2Zone #3Zone #4Zone #1Zone #2Zone #3Zone #4
    Percentage of Time Kidneys are Present in TP Approach
    L1 to L282%80%76%74%91%91%89%83%
    L2 to L375%75%68%64%80%80%74%62%
    L3 to L421%21%16%12%21%20%19%14%
    L4 to L52%2%3%4%0%1%2%2%
    L5 to S10%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%
    Percentage of Obstruction Caused by Kidneys When Present in TP Approach
    L1 to L299.8%98.3%97.7%95.5%99.9%98.7%96.2%96.4%
    L2 to L398.6%93.8%97.4%93.2%93.0%96.1%88.5%96.2%
    L3 to L495.3%85.7%84.0%95.7%87.9%88.5%77.0%87.9%
    L4 to L5100%100%88.3%88.2%NA58.5%67%100%
    L5 to S1NANANANANANANANA
    • Abbreviations: NA, not applicable; TP, transpsoas.

    • View popup
    Table 4

    Rib presence and obstruction of TP approach per side and zone.

    Disc LevelRight SideLeft Side
    Zone #1Zone #2Zone #3Zone #4Zone #1Zone #2Zone #3Zone #4
    Percentage of Time Ribs Are Present in TP Approach
    L1 to L267%62%64%68%76%81%78%84%
    L2 to L359%53%56%58%27%23%21%24%
    L3 to L40%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%
    L4 to L50%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%
    L5 to S10%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%
    Percentage of Obstruction Caused by Ribs When Present in TP Approach
    L1 to L282.6%68.3%69.4%83.4%82.5%81.9%74.8%93.9%
    L2 to L375.8%63.3%67.7%76.5%100%54%41%93%
    L3 to L4NANANANANANANANA
    L4 to L5NANANANANANANANA
    L5 to S1NANANANANANANANA
    • Abbreviation: NA, not applicable.

    • View popup
    Table 5

    Iliac crest presence and obstruction of TP approach per side and zone.

    Disc LevelRight SideLeft Side
    Zone #1Zone #2Zone #3Zone #4Zone #1Zone #2Zone #3Zone #4
    Percentage of Time Iliac Crest Is Present in TP Approach
    L1 to L20%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%
    L2 to L30%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%
    L3 to L40%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%
    L4 to L532%40%50%50%29%45%54%55%
    L5 to S188%89%89%89%87%88%89%89%
    Percentage of Obstruction Caused by Iliac Crest When Present in TP Approach
    L1 to L2NANANANANANANANA
    L2 to L3NANANANANANANANA
    L3 to L4NANANANANANANANA
    L4 to L582.0%87.1%90.0%99.8%81.9%76.1%93.2%97.1%
    L5 to S198.9%99.0%100%100%98.1%99.2%99.1%100%
    • Abbreviation: NA, not applicable.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

International Journal of Spine Surgery: 19 (S2)
International Journal of Spine Surgery
Vol. 19, Issue S2
1 Apr 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on International Journal of Spine Surgery.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of Nonneurological Structures at Risk During Anterior-to-Psoas Versus Transpsoas Surgical Approaches Using Abdominal CT Imaging From L1 to S1
(Your Name) has sent you a message from International Journal of Spine Surgery
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the International Journal of Spine Surgery web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Comparison of Nonneurological Structures at Risk During Anterior-to-Psoas Versus Transpsoas Surgical Approaches Using Abdominal CT Imaging From L1 to S1
Jacob Razzouk, Omar Ramos, Gideon Harianja, Mei Carter, Shaurya Mehta, Nathaniel Wycliffe, Olumide Danisa, Wayne Cheng
International Journal of Spine Surgery Sep 2023, 8542; DOI: 10.14444/8542

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Comparison of Nonneurological Structures at Risk During Anterior-to-Psoas Versus Transpsoas Surgical Approaches Using Abdominal CT Imaging From L1 to S1
Jacob Razzouk, Omar Ramos, Gideon Harianja, Mei Carter, Shaurya Mehta, Nathaniel Wycliffe, Olumide Danisa, Wayne Cheng
International Journal of Spine Surgery Sep 2023, 8542; DOI: 10.14444/8542
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Comparison of Stand-Alone Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion, 360° Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion, and Arthroplasty for Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation: Focus on Nerve Decompression and Painful Spinal Instability Resolution
  • Segmental Lordosis and Disc Height Discrepancies in Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Expandable Cages
  • Recovery Trajectories After Lumbar Fusion Stratified by Baseline Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Disability Levels
Show more Lumbar Spine

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • transpsoas
  • anterior-to-psoas
  • computed tomography
  • oblique lateral interbody fusion
  • structures at risk

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Content
  • Archive

More Information

  • About IJSS
  • About ISASS
  • Privacy Policy

More

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Feedback

Other Services

  • Author Instructions
  • Join ISASS
  • Reprints & Permissions

© 2025 International Journal of Spine Surgery

International Journal of Spine Surgery Online ISSN: 2211-4599

Powered by HighWire