Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Other Publications
    • ijss

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
International Journal of Spine Surgery
  • My alerts
  • Log out
International Journal of Spine Surgery

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Follow ijss on Twitter
  • Visit ijss on Facebook
Research ArticleLumbar Spine

The Effect of Preoperative, Low-Dose Intrathecal Morphine on Patient Outcomes Following Lumbar Fusion Surgery: Can We Teach an Old Dog New Tricks?

Samantha N. Baxter, Jane C. Brennan, Andrea H. Johnson, Laura Stock, Regan King, Jake Gelfand, Kristina Andersen, Karen M. Pipkin, Justin Turcotte and Chad M. Patton
International Journal of Spine Surgery October 2023, 8532; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/8532
Samantha N. Baxter
1Department of Orthopedics, Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, MD, USA
DO, MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jane C. Brennan
1Department of Orthopedics, Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, MD, USA
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrea H. Johnson
1Department of Orthopedics, Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, MD, USA
MSN, CRNP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laura Stock
1Department of Orthopedics, Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, MD, USA
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Regan King
1Department of Orthopedics, Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, MD, USA
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jake Gelfand
1Department of Orthopedics, Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, MD, USA
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kristina Andersen
1Department of Orthopedics, Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, MD, USA
RN, BSN, ONC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karen M. Pipkin
1Department of Orthopedics, Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, MD, USA
MS, ACNP-C, FNP-C
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Justin Turcotte
1Department of Orthopedics, Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, MD, USA
PʜD, MBA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jturcotte@aahs.org
Chad M. Patton
1Department of Orthopedics, Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, MD, USA
MD, MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1

    Patient demographics.

    DemographicsNo ITM
    (n = 115)
    ITM
    (n = 65)
    P
    Age, y64.18 ± 12.4563.88 ± 11.440.872
    Body mass index31.72 ± 6.2631.14 ± 6.250.559
    Sex>0.99
     Man67 (58.3)38 (58.5)
     Woman48 (41.7)27 (41.5)
    ASA score 3+68 (59.1)35 (53.8)0.595
    Fusion of 3+ levels36 (31.3)26 (40.0)0.309
    • Abbreviations: ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists; ITM, intrathecal morphine.

    • Note: Data are expressed as mean ± SD or n (%).

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Medication details.

    MedicationNo ITM
    (n = 115)
    ITM
    (n = 65)
    P
    Intraoperative medication   
     Total intraoperative MME54.23 ± 35.6790.29 ± 22.93<0.001
     IV MME (excluding ITM)54.23 ± 35.6737.41 ± 19.92<0.001
     ITMN/A65 (100)N/A
     ITM, µgN/A214.84 ± 35.27N/A
     ITM MMEN/A53.71 ± 8.82N/A
     Fentanyl107 (93.0)60 (92.3)1
     Fentanyl, µg191.36 ± 130.14132.50 ± 63.50<0.001
     Morphine1 (0.9)17 (26.2)<0.001
     Morphine, mg2.00 ± 05.83 ± 2.73<0.001
     Hydromorphone83 (72.2)20 (30.8)<0.001
     Hydromorphone, mg 1.32 ± 0.85 0.91 ± 0.610.015
     Fluid received, mL 2547.2 ± 1415.8 2349.2 ± 1107.50.302
    Postoperative medication   
     Total PACU MME21.83 ± 21.079.7 ± 31.230.006
     Total floor MME110.24 ± 139.9288.0 ± 84.510.186
     Total floor + PACU MME132.07 ± 144.1897.73 ± 91.040.052
     Postoperative day 0 floor MME13.64 ± 15.638.86 ± 13.550.033
     Postoperative day 0 floor + PACU MME35.47 ± 28.5118.60 ± 35.470.001
     Postoperative day 1 floor MME35.19 ± 30.8833.05 ± 28.330.638
     Postoperative day 2 floor MME21.41 ± 34.7423.89 ± 27.540.599
    • Abbreviations: ITM, intrathecal morphine; IV, intravenous; ML, milliliter; MME, milligram morphine equivalent; PACU, postanesthesia care unit.

    • Note: P values < 0.05 in bold. Data are expressed as mean ± SD or n (%).

    • View popup
    Table 3

    Maximum Pain scores.

    PainNo ITM
    (n = 115)
    ITM
    (n = 65)
    P
    In PACU6.78 ± 2.465.25 ± 3.620.004
    On POD 06.65 ± 2.814.58 ± 3.33<0.001
    On POD 0 ≥761 (53.0)23 (35.4)0.034
    On POD 17.48 ± 2.226.98 ± 2.670.212
    On POD 1 ≥784 (73.0)38 (58.5)0.066
    On POD 27.39 ± 2.277.44 ± 2.620.917
    On POD 2 ≥748 (41.7)33 (50.8)0.311
    On POD 37.71 ± 2.088.50 ± 1.770.107
    On POD 48.29 ± 2.037.36 ± 1.950.171
    During hospital stay8.68 ± 1.758.17 ± 2.230.120
    • Abbreviations: ITM, intrathecal morphine; PACU, postanesthesia care unit; POD, postoperative day.

    • Note: P values < 0.05 in bold. Data are expressed as mean ± SD or n (%).

    • View popup
    Table 4

    Adverse events.

    Adverse EventNo ITM
    (n = 115)
    ITM
    (n = 65)
    P
    Urinary retention11 (9.6)9 (13.8)0.528
    Respiratory depression33 (28.7)21 (32.3)0.715
    Oversedation1 (0.9)3 (4.6)0.267
    Itching8 (7.0)16 (24.6)0.002
    Nausea44 (38.3)28 (43.1)0.635
    • Abbreviation: ITM, intrathecal morphine.

    • Note: P values < 0.05 in bold. Data are expressed as mean ± SD or n (%).

    • View popup
    Table 5

    Postoperative outcomes.

    Outcome MeasureNo ITM
    (n = 115)
    ITM
    (n = 65)
    P
    Length of stay, h96.77 ± 194.7671.27 ± 45.080.182
    Length of stay, d3.70 ± 8.152.60 ± 1.880.170
    0- or 1-d length of stay50 (43.5)20 (30.8)0.128
    Discharge home99 (86.1)61 (93.8)0.179
    90-d ED return18 (15.7)6 (9.2)0.302
    90-d readmission19 (16.5)10 (15.4)0.989
    90-d ED/readmission reason  0.889
     DVT1 (0.9)1 (1.5) 
     Medical14 (12.2)6 (9.2) 
     Surgery related3 (2.6)1 (1.5) 
     Surgery-related pain9 (7.8)5 (7.7) 
     Wound infection5 (4.3)1 (1.5) 
    90-d complication14 (12.2)7 (10.7)0.952
    90-d complication type  0.892
     DVT1 (0.9)1 (1.5) 
     Medical4 (3.5)3 (4.6) 
     Revision surgery3 (2.6)1 (1.5) 
     Surgery related2 (1.7)0 (0) 
     Surgery-related pain2 (1.7)1 (1.5) 
     Wound healing/infection5 (4.3)3 (4.6) 
    • Abbreviations: DVT, deep vein thrombosis; ED, emergency department; ITM, intrathecal morphine; OR, operating room.

    • Note: P values < 0.05 in bold. Data are expressed as mean ± SD or n (%).

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

International Journal of Spine Surgery: 19 (S2)
International Journal of Spine Surgery
Vol. 19, Issue S2
1 Apr 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on International Journal of Spine Surgery.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Effect of Preoperative, Low-Dose Intrathecal Morphine on Patient Outcomes Following Lumbar Fusion Surgery: Can We Teach an Old Dog New Tricks?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from International Journal of Spine Surgery
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the International Journal of Spine Surgery web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The Effect of Preoperative, Low-Dose Intrathecal Morphine on Patient Outcomes Following Lumbar Fusion Surgery: Can We Teach an Old Dog New Tricks?
Samantha N. Baxter, Jane C. Brennan, Andrea H. Johnson, Laura Stock, Regan King, Jake Gelfand, Kristina Andersen, Karen M. Pipkin, Justin Turcotte, Chad M. Patton
International Journal of Spine Surgery Oct 2023, 8532; DOI: 10.14444/8532

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The Effect of Preoperative, Low-Dose Intrathecal Morphine on Patient Outcomes Following Lumbar Fusion Surgery: Can We Teach an Old Dog New Tricks?
Samantha N. Baxter, Jane C. Brennan, Andrea H. Johnson, Laura Stock, Regan King, Jake Gelfand, Kristina Andersen, Karen M. Pipkin, Justin Turcotte, Chad M. Patton
International Journal of Spine Surgery Oct 2023, 8532; DOI: 10.14444/8532
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Comparison of Stand-Alone Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion, 360° Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion, and Arthroplasty for Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation: Focus on Nerve Decompression and Painful Spinal Instability Resolution
  • Segmental Lordosis and Disc Height Discrepancies in Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Expandable Cages
  • Recovery Trajectories After Lumbar Fusion Stratified by Baseline Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Disability Levels
Show more Lumbar Spine

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • intrathecal morphine
  • lumbar fusion
  • narcotics
  • outcomes
  • pain control

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Content
  • Archive

More Information

  • About IJSS
  • About ISASS
  • Privacy Policy

More

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Feedback

Other Services

  • Author Instructions
  • Join ISASS
  • Reprints & Permissions

© 2025 International Journal of Spine Surgery

International Journal of Spine Surgery Online ISSN: 2211-4599

Powered by HighWire