Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Other Publications
    • ijss

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
International Journal of Spine Surgery
  • My alerts
International Journal of Spine Surgery

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Follow ijss on Twitter
  • Visit ijss on Facebook
Research ArticleMinimally Invasive Surgery

A Spine Surgeon’s Learning Curve With the Minimally Invasive L5 to S1 Lateral ALIF Surgical Approach: Perioperative Outcomes and Technical Considerations

Martin H. Pham, Alexander J. Schupper, Brian R. Hirshman and Timothy Y. Kim
International Journal of Spine Surgery April 2025, 8754; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/8754
Martin H. Pham
1 Department of Neurosurgery, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, CA, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexander J. Schupper
2 Department of Neurosurgery, Mount Sinai Icahn School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brian R. Hirshman
1 Department of Neurosurgery, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, CA, USA
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Timothy Y. Kim
1 Department of Neurosurgery, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, CA, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: tyk004@health.ucsd.edu
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    (A) View of pertinent anatomy during the initial stages of the lateral anterior lumbar interbody fusion approach with noted psoas muscle, left common iliac artery, and left common iliac vein. (B) Further medial dissection will reveal the anterior annulus of the L5 to S1 disc space.

  • Figure 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2

    (A) Left common iliac vein (LCIV) type 1 of a patient in group A showing wide bifurcation of the iliac veins with the yellow arrow noting lateralization of the LCIV with a generous fat plane. (B) LCIV type 2 of a patient in group B with the yellow arrow showing medialization of the LCIV and a thin fat plane with anticipation of further dissection required for an appropriate anterior corridor in anterior lumbar interbody fusion.

  • Figure 3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3

    Anteroposterior and lateral lumbar x-ray images of patients who underwent single-position surgeries at (A) 1 level with L5 to S1 and (B) 2 levels with L4 to S1.

  • Figure 4
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4

    Box and whisker plots showing overall improvements in L5 to S1 segmental lordosis and disc angle after lateral anterior lumbar interbody fusion (minimum, maximum, first quartile, third quartile, median, and mean).

  • Figure 5
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5

    Operative incision-to-closure minutes of 1- and 2-level single-position surgeries that involved concurrent placement of posterior pedicle screws in lateral decubitus position with robotic assistance.

  • Figure 6
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6

    Box and whisker plots showing overall improvements in Oswestry Disability Index, numerical rating scale (NRS) back, and NRS leg scores after lateral anterior lumbar interbody fusion (minimum, maximum first quartile, third quartile, median, and mean).

  • Figure 7
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7

    Operative setup with the patient in lateral decubitus with the left side up as seen anteriorly. Note the retractor arms to the anterior surgeon’s left. K-wires have been placed with navigated assistance in the L3 to L4 and L4 to L5 levels at a separate incision, and the exposure has been performed at L5 to S1 with the retractor blades in place through the Alexis wound protector. The posterior surgeon (background) is completing the placement of L3 to S1 pedicle screws with robotic assistance.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Summary of baseline characteristics.

    Characteristic N = 50
    Sex, n
     Men24
     Women26
    Age, y, mean (range)59.7 (28–80)
    Body mass index, mean (range)28.7 (18.2–42.6)
    Diagnosis, n
     Deformity14
     Degenerative disc disease36
    Fusion extent, n
     1 Interbody level (L5–S1)14
     2 Interbody levels (L4–S1)21
     3–6 Interbody levels (L3–S1 to T12–S1)15
    • View popup
    Table 2

    Mean pre- and postoperative radiographic values.

    GroupL5–S1 Lordosis (°)L5–S1 Disc Angle (°)Disc Height, mm
    PreopPostopPreopPostopPreopPostop
    Cohort15.725.38.119.74.07.6
    A16.025.67.919.24.27.1
    B15.425.08.320.23.88.1
    • Abbreviations: postop, postoperative; preop, preoperative.

    • Note: Cohort = all patients. 1–50; A = patients 1–25. B = patients 26–50.

    • View popup
    Table 3

    Mean pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcome measures.

    TimepointODINRS BackNRS Leg
    Preoperative50.86.55.4
    Postoperative31.53.33.0
    P <0.01<0.01<0.01
    • Abbreviations: NRS, numerical rating scale; ODI, Oswestry Disability Index.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

International Journal of Spine Surgery: 19 (S2)
International Journal of Spine Surgery
Vol. 19, Issue S2
1 Apr 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on International Journal of Spine Surgery.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Spine Surgeon’s Learning Curve With the Minimally Invasive L5 to S1 Lateral ALIF Surgical Approach: Perioperative Outcomes and Technical Considerations
(Your Name) has sent you a message from International Journal of Spine Surgery
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the International Journal of Spine Surgery web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
A Spine Surgeon’s Learning Curve With the Minimally Invasive L5 to S1 Lateral ALIF Surgical Approach: Perioperative Outcomes and Technical Considerations
Martin H. Pham, Alexander J. Schupper, Brian R. Hirshman, Timothy Y. Kim
International Journal of Spine Surgery Apr 2025, 8754; DOI: 10.14444/8754

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
A Spine Surgeon’s Learning Curve With the Minimally Invasive L5 to S1 Lateral ALIF Surgical Approach: Perioperative Outcomes and Technical Considerations
Martin H. Pham, Alexander J. Schupper, Brian R. Hirshman, Timothy Y. Kim
International Journal of Spine Surgery Apr 2025, 8754; DOI: 10.14444/8754
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Comparative Review of Lateral and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technique, Outcomes, and Complications
  • Key Considerations in Surgical Decision-Making on the Side of Approach for Lumbar Lateral Transpsoas Interbody Fusion Techniques
Show more Minimally Invasive Surgery

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • minimally invasive spine surgery
  • lateral ALIF
  • OLIF
  • L5-S1 interbody fusion
  • surgical technique

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Content
  • Archive

More Information

  • About IJSS
  • About ISASS
  • Privacy Policy

More

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Feedback

Other Services

  • Author Instructions
  • Join ISASS
  • Reprints & Permissions

© 2025 International Journal of Spine Surgery

International Journal of Spine Surgery Online ISSN: 2211-4599

Powered by HighWire