Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Other Publications
    • ijss

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
International Journal of Spine Surgery
  • My alerts
International Journal of Spine Surgery

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Follow ijss on Twitter
  • Visit ijss on Facebook
Research ArticleMinimally Invasive Surgery

Epidemiological Relevance of Elevated Preoperative Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Scores on Clinical Improvement Following Lumbar Decompression

James M. Parrish, Nathaniel W. Jenkins, Elliot D.K. Cha, Conor P. Lynch, Cara E. Geoghegan, Caroline N. Jadczak, Shruthi Mohan and Kern Singh
International Journal of Spine Surgery February 2022, 16 (1) 159-167; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/8184
James M. Parrish
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nathaniel W. Jenkins
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elliot D.K. Cha
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Conor P. Lynch
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cara E. Geoghegan
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Caroline N. Jadczak
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shruthi Mohan
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kern Singh
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1

    Patient demographics by PHQ-9 score.

    CharacteristicTotal (n = 351)PHQ-9<5 (n = 186)PHQ-95–10 (n = 94)PHQ-9>10 (n = 71) P valueb
    Age, y, mean ± SD46.8 ± 14.348.6 ± 14.946.4 ± 13.642.5 ± 12.40.008
    Gender0.605
     Female29.6% (104)27.4% (51)33.0% (31)31.0% (22)
     Male70.4% (247)72.6% (135)67.0% (63)69.0% (49)
    Body mass index0.041
     Nonobese (<30 kg/m2)57.0% (200)62.9% (117)53.2% (50)46.5% (33)
     Obese (≥30 kg/m2)43.0% (151)37.1% (69)46.8% (44)53.5% (71)
    Smoking status0.085
     Nonsmoker88.9% (312)91.4% (170)89.4% (84)81.7% (58)
     Smoker11.1% (39)8.6% (16)10.5% (10)18.3% (13)
    Insurance coverage0.334
     Private or workers compensation97.4% (338)96.2% (179)98.9% (92)98.5% (67)
     Medicare/Medicaid2.6% (9)3.8% (7)1.1% (1)1.5% (1)
     Ageless CCI, mean ± SD0.63 ± 0.90.65 ± 0.90.69 ± 0.90.51 ± 0.80.432
     Duration of symptoms, mo, mean ± SD34.0 ± 57.030.0 ± 64.420.0 ± 59.616.4 ± 31.20.144
    Preoperative diagnosesa
     Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease0.8% (1)1.8% (1)1.8% (1)0% (0)0.
     Myocardial infarction2.3% (8)2.7% (5)1.1% (1)2.8% (2)0.652
     Diabetes5.4% (21)3.2% (6)12.8% (12)4.2% (3)0.005
     Congestive heart failure0.6% (2)0.5% (1)1.1% (1)0% (0)0.665
     Hypertension23.4% (82)23.1% (43)29.8% (28)15.5% (11)0.099
     Neurologic disease0.6% (2)1.1% (2)0.0% (0)0% (0)0.410
     Arthritis8.6% (30)9.7% (18)6.4% (6)8.5% (6)0.648
     Renal failure0.3% (1)0.5% (1)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.648
     Malignancy4.6% (16)7.0% (13)3.2% (3)0.0 % (0)0.042
    • Data presented as % (n) unless otherwise indicated.

    • aThere were no patients in our study with a recorded medical history of AIDS, paraplegia, congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, metastatic disease, liver disease, renal failure, or gastrointestinal bleeds.

    • bP value was calculated using Student’s t test (continuous), χ 2 (categorical), or Fisher’s exact test (categorical).

    • CCI, Charlson Comorbidity Index; PHQ-9, Patient Health Questionnaire-9.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Operative characteristics by PHQ-9 score.

    CharacteristicPHQ-9<5 (n = 186)PHQ-95–10 (n = 94)PHQ-9>10 (n = 71) P valueb
    Operative time,a min, mean ± SD49.8 ± 24.746.4 ± 20.250.8 ± 24.50.4160
    Estimated blood loss, mL, mean ± SD27.5 ± 11.528.9 ± 13.934.1 ± 57.50.239
    Length of hospital stay, h, mean ± SD9.4 ± 21.65.4 ± 23.98.5 ± 14.70.320
    Discharge day, % (n)0.183
     POD 083.9% (156)86.2% (81)87.3% (62)
     POD 114.5% (27)8.5% (8)8.5% (6)
     POD 20.0% (0)3.2% (3)1.4% (1)
     POD 31.6% (3)2.1% (2)2.8% (2)
    • aOperative time was measured from skin incision to skin closure.

    • bP value was calculated using Student’s t test (continuous), χ 2 analysis (categorical), or Fisher’s exact test (categorical).

    • PHQ-9, Patient Health Questionnaire-9; POD, postoperative day.

    • View popup
    Table 3

    Postoperative mental health over predetermined time periods.

    PROMPHQ-9<5 (n = 186)PHQ-95–10 (n = 94)PHQ-9>10 (n = 71) P valuea
    PHQ-9
     Preoperative1.9 ± 1.6 (186)6.8 ± 1.4 (94)15.4 ± 4.2 (71)<0.001
     6 wk1.7 ± 2.6 (132)3.3 ± 4.3 (73)8.2 ± 6.0 (53)<0.001
     12 wk1.8 ± 3.4 (72)5.2 ± 6.8 (44)8.5 ± 7.2 (31)<0.001
     6 mo1.3 ± 1.8 (55)5.2 ± 5.6 (36)8.8 ± 6.4 (25)<0.001
     1 y1.3 ± 2.2 (32)4.0 ± 4.8 (21)7.8 ± 7.4 (19)<0.001
    Short Form 12-item MCS
     Preoperative54.9 ± 8.8 (178)46.0 ± 10.8 (89)37.7 ± 9.4 (69)<0.001
     6 wk57.5 ± 7.4 (123)52.7 ± 10.3 (64)45.6 ± 10.8 (55)<0.001
     12 wk58.3 ± 6.4 (71)50.4 ± 13.1 (39)46.1 ± 11.5 (23)<0.001
     6 mo58.0 ± 6.2 (52)51.3 ± 8.6 (30)48.5 ± 11.3 (22)<0.001
     1 y56.8 ± 7.7 (30)51.7 ± 10.4 (21)48.1 ± 12.3 (18)0.013
    Veterans RAND 12-item MCS
     Preoperative56.9 ± 7.7 (178)48.3 ± 9.6 (89)39.4 ± 9.5 (69)<0.001
     6 wk60.2 ± 7.4 (124)55.4 ± 10.2 (64)47.6 ± 11.5 (55)<0.001
     12 wk61.0 ± 6.8 (72)53.4 ± 13.3 (39)49.5 ± 12.5 (23)<0.001
     6 mo60.4 ± 6.1 (52)54.8 ± 8.5 (30)50.6 ± 13.4 (22)<0.001
     1 y59.9 ± 8.4 (30)54.7 ± 11.4 (21)50.1 ± 13.9 (18)0.013
    • Data presented as mean ± SD (n).

    • aP value was calculated using linear regression.

    • MCS, Mental Health Composite Score; PHQ-9, Patient Health Questionnaire-9.

    • View popup
    Table 4

    Postoperative improvement (Delta) over predetermined time periods.

    PROMPHQ-9<5Δ ± SD (n)PHQ-95–10Δ ± SD (n)PHQ-9>10Δ ± SD (n) P valuea
    PHQ-9    
     Preoperative----
     6 wk–0.1 ± 2.7 (132)–3.3 ± 4.5 (73)–7.4 ± 5.8 (53)<0.001
     12 wk–0.3 ± 3.5 (72)–1.5 ± 6.7 (44)–6.3 ± 6.2 (31)<0.001
     6 mo–1.1 ± 2.1 (55)–1.6 ± 5.5 (36)–6.3 ± 7.2 (25)<0.001
     1 yr–0.2 ± 2.4 (32)–3.1 ± 4.4 (21)–7.9 ± 8.1 (19)<0.001
    Short Form 12-item MCS    
     Preoperative----
     6 wk2.4 ± 9.1 (123)5.9 ± 11.2 (62)7.5 ± 10.3 (55)0.004
     12 wk3.9 ± 9.0 (70)4.4 ± 11.4 (37)8.6 ± 12.3 (23)0.167
     6 mo4.3 ± 10.8 (52)4.6 ± 9.9 (29)10.9 ± 11.9 (22)0.053
     1 y0.3 ± 10.2 (29)7.8 ± 13.5 (21)11.4 ± 10.6 (18)0.005
    Veterans RAND 12-item MCS    
     Preoperative----
     6 wk3.4 ± 8.1 (121)6.5 ± 10.2 (62)7.9 ± 9.9 (55)0.005
     12 wk4.5 ± 8.2 (71)5.5 ± 12.1 (37)9.7 ± 12.7 (23)0.108
     6 mo4.3 ± 9.2 (52)5.9 ± 9.6 (29)11.5 ± 12.8 (22)0.023
     1 y1.8 ± 10.6 (29)8.4 ± 13.7 (21)12.2 ± 11.7 (18)0.014
    • Data presented as mean ± SD (n).

    • aP value was calculated using linear regression.

    • MCS, Mental Health Composite Score; PHQ-9, Patient Health Questionnaire-9.

    • View popup
    Table 5

    Postoperative physical function and pain over predetermined time periods.

    PROMPHQ-9 <5 (n = 186)PHQ-95–10 (n = 94)PHQ-9>10 (n = 71) P valuea
    PROMIS-PF
     Preoperative38.8 ± 7.1 (149)35.6 ± 6.9 (67)33.3 ± 5.9 (51)<0.001
     6 wk44.4 ± 8.3 (112)41.2 ± 8.1 (52)38.9 ± 8.7 (36)0.001
     12 wk47.8 ± 9.7 (69)43.5 ± 8.3 (39)42.5 ± 9.7 (21)0.018
     6 mo46.3 ± 8.6 (56)42.3 ±10.0 (32)40.2 ± 12.7 (20)0.036
     1 y45.3 ± 10.0 (38)44.9 ± 12.9 (22)43.4 ± 11.3 (18)0.836
    VAS back
     Preoperative5.7 ± 2.6 (170)6.6 ± 2.7 (86)7.0 ± 2.0 (65)<0.001
     6 wk2.5 ± 2.4 (131)2.8 ± 2.7 (63)3.6 ± 2.9 (55)0.024
     12 wk2.2 ± 2.4 (56)3.1 ± 2.7 (42)4.1 ± 2.7 (29)0.009
     6 mo2.7 ± 2.5 (40)4.2 ± 3.4 (32)5.0 ± 3.1 (22)0.011
     1 y3.8 ± 3.2 (17)3.4 ± 3.3 (16)5.0 ± 2.6 (12)0.412
    VAS leg
     Preoperative5.7 ± 2.6 (170)6.3 ± 2.9 (86)6.8 ± 2.4 (65)0.009
     6 wk2.3 ± 2.5 (131)2.7 ± 2.8 (63)3.7 ± 2.9 (55)0.009
     12 wk2.5 ± 2.6 (57)2.7 ± 2.8 (42)3.8 ± 3.2 (29)0.110
     6 mo2.4 ± 2.5 (40)3.3 ± 3.0 (32)4.7 ± 3.3 (22)0.017
     1 y2.4 ± 3.0 (17)2.8 ± 2.8 (16)4.5 ± 3.6 (12)0.180
    • Data presented as mean ± SD (n).

    • aP value was calculated using linear regression.

    • PHQ-9, Patient Health Questionnaire-9; PROMIS-PF, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function; VAS, visual analog scale.

    • View popup
    Table 6

    Postoperative physical function and pain over predetermined time periods.

    PROMPHQ-9<5Δ ± SD (n)PHQ-95–10Δ ± SD (n)PHQ-9>10Δ ± SD (n) P valuea
    PROMIS-SF
     Preoperative----
     6 wk4.9 ± 8.6 (103)6.9 ± 8.4 (45)5.5 ± 9.2 (33)0.425
     12 wk7.8 ± 9.2 (63)8.9 ± 7.8 (33)10.1 ± 10.1 (16)0.617
     6 mo7.8 ± 8.3 (49)6.5 ± 11.3 (27)9.0 ± 12.7 (19)0.703
     1 y6.6 ± 10.4 (34)9.6 ± 15.8 (17)12.5 ± 11.9 (14)0.306
    VAS back
     Preoperative----
     6 wk–3.1 ± 3.0 (129)–4.1 ± 2.5 (61)–3.6 ± 3.1 (53)0.071
     12 wk–3.4 ± 3.0 (55)–3.5 ± 3.4 (41)–3.1 ± 2.7 (28)0.898
     6 mo–3.5 ± 3.2 (40)–3.1 ± 3.5 (31)–2.1 ± 2.4 (21)0.254
     1 y–2.5 ± 3.9 (17)–3.8 ± 3.0 (16)–2.4 ± 3.1 (12)0.469
    VAS leg
     Preoperative----
     6 wk–3.3 ± 3.1 (129)–3.7 ± 3.5 (61)–3.3 ± 3.5 (53)0.685
     12 wk–3.3 ± 3.1 (56)–3.1 ± 3.3 (41)–2.8 ± 4.0 (28)0.838
     6 mo–3.6 ± 3.3 (40)–2.4 ± 2.7 (31)–1.4 ± 3.6 (21)0.036
     1 y–3.2 ± 3.7 (17)–2.2 ± 3.4 (16)–1.8 ± 2.7 (12)0.507
    • Data presented as mean ± SD (n).

    • aP value was calculated using linear regression.

    • PHQ-9, Patient Health Questionnaire-9; PROMIS-PF, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function; VAS, visual analog scale.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

International Journal of Spine Surgery
Vol. 16, Issue 1
1 Feb 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on International Journal of Spine Surgery.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Epidemiological Relevance of Elevated Preoperative Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Scores on Clinical Improvement Following Lumbar Decompression
(Your Name) has sent you a message from International Journal of Spine Surgery
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the International Journal of Spine Surgery web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Epidemiological Relevance of Elevated Preoperative Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Scores on Clinical Improvement Following Lumbar Decompression
James M. Parrish, Nathaniel W. Jenkins, Elliot D.K. Cha, Conor P. Lynch, Cara E. Geoghegan, Caroline N. Jadczak, Shruthi Mohan, Kern Singh
International Journal of Spine Surgery Feb 2022, 16 (1) 159-167; DOI: 10.14444/8184

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Epidemiological Relevance of Elevated Preoperative Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Scores on Clinical Improvement Following Lumbar Decompression
James M. Parrish, Nathaniel W. Jenkins, Elliot D.K. Cha, Conor P. Lynch, Cara E. Geoghegan, Caroline N. Jadczak, Shruthi Mohan, Kern Singh
International Journal of Spine Surgery Feb 2022, 16 (1) 159-167; DOI: 10.14444/8184
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Comparative Review of Lateral and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technique, Outcomes, and Complications
  • A Spine Surgeon’s Learning Curve With the Minimally Invasive L5 to S1 Lateral ALIF Surgical Approach: Perioperative Outcomes and Technical Considerations
  • Fully Navigated Single-Position Prone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Detailed Technical Report and Description of 15 Cases
Show more Minimally Invasive Surgery

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • patient health questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)
  • major depressive disorder (MDD)
  • lumbar decompression
  • risk factors
  • Short Form-12 (SF-12)
  • Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey (VR-12)

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Content
  • Archive

More Information

  • About IJSS
  • About ISASS
  • Privacy Policy

More

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Feedback

Other Services

  • Author Instructions
  • Join ISASS
  • Reprints & Permissions

© 2025 International Journal of Spine Surgery

International Journal of Spine Surgery Online ISSN: 2211-4599

Powered by HighWire