Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Other Publications
    • ijss

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
International Journal of Spine Surgery
  • My alerts
International Journal of Spine Surgery

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Follow ijss on Twitter
  • Visit ijss on Facebook
Research ArticleCervical Spine

Biomechanical Motion Changes in Adjacent and Noncontiguous Segments Following Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Computed Tomography–Based 3D Motion Capture Study

Darren R. Lebl, Kathleen N. Meyers, Franziska C.S. Altorfer, Hamidreza Jahandar, Theresa J.C. Pazionis, Joseph Nguyen, Patrick F. O’Leary and Timothy M. Wright
International Journal of Spine Surgery June 2024, 18 (3) 249-257; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/8605
Darren R. Lebl
1 Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
MD, MBA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: research@leblspinemd.com
Kathleen N. Meyers
2 Department of Biomechanics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Franziska C.S. Altorfer
1 Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hamidreza Jahandar
2 Department of Biomechanics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Theresa J.C. Pazionis
2 Department of Biomechanics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joseph Nguyen
3 Department of Biostatistics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patrick F. O’Leary
2 Department of Biomechanics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Timothy M. Wright
2 Department of Biomechanics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
PʜD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    (A) Schema of the test set-up showing the cervical spine specimen and motion capture markers (in blue). (B) Computed tomography reconstruction of a spine showing vertebrae.

  • Figure 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2

    Photographs of the testing apparatus with servo-hydraulic loading frame demonstrating hydraulic actuator mounted on crosshead connected to the mounting fixture in a lateral (A) and anterior (B) view.

  • Figure 3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3

    (A) Preoperative range of motion (ROM) of each segment per specimen. (B) Postoperative ROM after fusion of C5-C6 of each segment per specimen. (C) Characteristic changes in motion in all 6 specimens after C5-C6 anterior cervical discectomy and fusion at each motion segment.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Absolute average change in motion per segment after cervical fusion of C5–C6.

    Motion SegmentAverage Change in Motion (°) P Value
    C2–C3+1.00.28
    C3–C4+0.20.80
    C4–C5+1.40.07
    C5–C6 −6.8 0.002
    C6–C7+2.00.15
    C7–T1+3.00.04
    • Boldface indicates statistically significant differences of P < 0.05.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Segmental total motion for each specimen (C2–T1) in the intact state and fused state after anterior cervical discectomy with cage placement and plate fixation at C5–C6.a

    Motion SegmentSpecimen 1Specimen 2Specimen 3Specimen 4Specimen 5Specimen 6
    IntactFusedDeltaIntactFusedDeltaIntactFusedDeltaIntactFusedDeltaIntactFusedDeltaIntactFusedDelta
    C2–C3 (°)1015499081011516113130108−2
    C3–C4 (°)128−41617189199011122108−2
    C4–C5 (°)14184131631110−19901113212131
    C5–C6 (°)41−391−8101−9113−8102−885−3
    C6–C7 (°)1110−1111211518391231010012197
    C7–T1 (°)88034181246713857136
    • ↵a Gray shading indicates motion that exceeded the error of the testing system.

    • View popup
    Table 3

    Cumulative scores of radiographic grading (Rydman et al) of the extent of degeneration of cervical spine cadaveric specimens at each motion segment from C2 to T1.

    Motion SegmentSpecimen 1Specimen 2Specimen 3Specimen 4Specimen 5Specimen 6
    DiscFacetDiscFacetDiscFacetDiscFacetDiscFacetDiscFacet
    C2–C3100200000100
    C3–C4104100000100
    C4–C5303203001300
    C6–C7514100002301
    C7–T1301000000000
    • Note: Disc degeneration: Height loss 0–4 points, anterior osteophytes 0–3 points, and endplate sclerosis 0–2 points. Total score: 0 = no degeneration, 1–3 = mild degeneration, 4–6 = moderate degeneration, and 7–9 = severe degeneration. Facet degeneration: Joint space narrowing (0–1 points), osteophytes (0–1 points), and irregularity of articular surface (0–1 point). Total score: 0 = no degeneration, 1 = mild degeneration, 2 = moderate degeneration, and 3 = severe degeneration.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

International Journal of Spine Surgery
Vol. 18, Issue 3
1 Jun 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on International Journal of Spine Surgery.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Biomechanical Motion Changes in Adjacent and Noncontiguous Segments Following Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Computed Tomography–Based 3D Motion Capture Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from International Journal of Spine Surgery
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the International Journal of Spine Surgery web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Biomechanical Motion Changes in Adjacent and Noncontiguous Segments Following Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Computed Tomography–Based 3D Motion Capture Study
Darren R. Lebl, Kathleen N. Meyers, Franziska C.S. Altorfer, Hamidreza Jahandar, Theresa J.C. Pazionis, Joseph Nguyen, Patrick F. O’Leary, Timothy M. Wright
International Journal of Spine Surgery Jun 2024, 18 (3) 249-257; DOI: 10.14444/8605

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Biomechanical Motion Changes in Adjacent and Noncontiguous Segments Following Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Computed Tomography–Based 3D Motion Capture Study
Darren R. Lebl, Kathleen N. Meyers, Franziska C.S. Altorfer, Hamidreza Jahandar, Theresa J.C. Pazionis, Joseph Nguyen, Patrick F. O’Leary, Timothy M. Wright
International Journal of Spine Surgery Jun 2024, 18 (3) 249-257; DOI: 10.14444/8605
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Cervical Myelopathy Secondary to Bilateral Atlantoaxial Pseudoarticulations in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Case Report
  • Innovation and Adversity in Spine Surgery: A Retrospective
Show more Cervical Spine

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • ACDF
  • Segmental Motion
  • Nonadjacent segment
  • Noncontinuous segment
  • Biomechanics
  • cervical spine
  • Single-level

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Content
  • Archive

More Information

  • About IJSS
  • About ISASS
  • Privacy Policy

More

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Feedback

Other Services

  • Author Instructions
  • Join ISASS
  • Reprints & Permissions

© 2025 International Journal of Spine Surgery

International Journal of Spine Surgery Online ISSN: 2211-4599

Powered by HighWire