Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Other Publications
    • ijss

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
International Journal of Spine Surgery
  • My alerts
International Journal of Spine Surgery

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Follow ijss on Twitter
  • Visit ijss on Facebook
Research ArticleMinimally Invasive Surgery

Narcotic Consumption Following Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression: A Comparison Between Hospital and Ambulatory-Based Surgery Centers

Benjamin Khechen, Brittany E. Haws, Mundeep S. Bawa, Dil V. Patel, Harmeet S. Bawa, Dustin H. Massel, Benjamin C. Mayo, Kaitlyn L. Cardinal, Jordan A. Guntin and Kern Singh
International Journal of Spine Surgery April 2019, 6022; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/6022
Benjamin Khechen
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
BA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brittany E. Haws
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mundeep S. Bawa
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
BA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dil V. Patel
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Harmeet S. Bawa
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
BA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dustin H. Massel
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Benjamin C. Mayo
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kaitlyn L. Cardinal
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
BA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jordan A. Guntin
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kern Singh
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Background Several studies have compared outcomes between hospital-based centers (HBCs) and ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) following minimally invasive lumbar decompression (MIS LD). However, the association between narcotic consumption and pain in the immediate postoperative period has not been well characterized. As such, this study aims to examine pain, narcotic consumption, and length of stay (LOS) among patients discharged on postoperative day 0 following a 1-level MIS LD between HBCs or ASCs.

Methods Patients who underwent a primary, 1-level MIS LD were retrospectively reviewed and stratified by operative location. Differences between groups in patient demographics were assessed using independent-sample t tests for continuous variables and χ2 analysis for categoric variables. The operative location and its effect on perioperative characteristics, inpatient pain scores, and narcotics consumption were analyzed using multivariate linear regression adjusted for significant patient characteristics.

Results There were 235 patients identified, of whom 90 and 145 underwent surgery at an HBC or ASC, respectively. The HBC cohort exhibited an increased comorbidity burden and had a greater percentage of privately insured patients. The HBC cohort recorded shorter operative time and greater total estimated blood loss. Patients in the HBC cohort experienced prolonged LOS, and consumed greater total oral morphine equivalents compared with the ASC cohort. No differences were observed in the remaining outcomes.

Conclusions The results of the current study suggest that patients who underwent MIS LD at an ASC received fewer narcotics than patients treated at an HBC, which may contribute to shortened LOS. Additionally, there was no difference in patient-reported pain between cohorts despite the differences in narcotic use. As such, postoperative narcotics administration varied, indicating HBC patients perhaps required more narcotic pain medications to achieve the same pain scores that were sufficient enough to allow patient discharge, thus prolonging LOS.

Level of Evidence III

  • lumbar decompression
  • narcotic consumption
  • inpatient pain
  • same-day discharge
  • hospital
  • ambulatory surgery center

Footnotes

  • Disclosures and COI: No funds were received in support of this work. No benefits in any form have been or will be received from any commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this manuscript.

  • ©International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery
Next
Back to top

In this issue

International Journal of Spine Surgery
Vol. 19, Issue 3
1 Jun 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on International Journal of Spine Surgery.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Narcotic Consumption Following Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression: A Comparison Between Hospital and Ambulatory-Based Surgery Centers
(Your Name) has sent you a message from International Journal of Spine Surgery
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the International Journal of Spine Surgery web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Narcotic Consumption Following Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression: A Comparison Between Hospital and Ambulatory-Based Surgery Centers
Benjamin Khechen, Brittany E. Haws, Mundeep S. Bawa, Dil V. Patel, Harmeet S. Bawa, Dustin H. Massel, Benjamin C. Mayo, Kaitlyn L. Cardinal, Jordan A. Guntin, Kern Singh
International Journal of Spine Surgery Apr 2019, 6022; DOI: 10.14444/6022

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Narcotic Consumption Following Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression: A Comparison Between Hospital and Ambulatory-Based Surgery Centers
Benjamin Khechen, Brittany E. Haws, Mundeep S. Bawa, Dil V. Patel, Harmeet S. Bawa, Dustin H. Massel, Benjamin C. Mayo, Kaitlyn L. Cardinal, Jordan A. Guntin, Kern Singh
International Journal of Spine Surgery Apr 2019, 6022; DOI: 10.14444/6022
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Comparative Review of Lateral and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technique, Outcomes, and Complications
  • Key Considerations in Surgical Decision-Making on the Side of Approach for Lumbar Lateral Transpsoas Interbody Fusion Techniques
  • A Spine Surgeon’s Learning Curve With the Minimally Invasive L5 to S1 Lateral ALIF Surgical Approach: Perioperative Outcomes and Technical Considerations
Show more Minimally Invasive Surgery

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • lumbar decompression
  • narcotic consumption
  • inpatient pain
  • same-day discharge
  • hospital
  • ambulatory surgery center

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Content
  • Archive

More Information

  • About IJSS
  • About ISASS
  • Privacy Policy

More

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Feedback

Other Services

  • Author Instructions
  • Join ISASS
  • Reprints & Permissions

© 2025 International Journal of Spine Surgery

International Journal of Spine Surgery Online ISSN: 2211-4599

Powered by HighWire