Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Other Publications
    • ijss

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
International Journal of Spine Surgery
  • My alerts
International Journal of Spine Surgery

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Follow ijss on Twitter
  • Visit ijss on Facebook
Research ArticleEndoscopic Minimally Invasive Surgery

Full-Endoscopic Ventral Facetectomy vs Open Laminectomy for Lumbar Lateral Recess Stenosis: A Comparative Study and Brief Literature Review

Stylianos Kapetanakis, Nikolaos Gkantsinikoudis and Georgios Charitoudis
International Journal of Spine Surgery April 2022, 16 (2) 361-372; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/8218
Stylianos Kapetanakis
1 Spine Department and Deformities, Interbalkan European Medical Center, Thessaloniki, Greece
2 Department of Minimally Invasive and Endoscopic Spine Surgery, Athens Medical Center, Athens, Greece
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nikolaos Gkantsinikoudis
1 Spine Department and Deformities, Interbalkan European Medical Center, Thessaloniki, Greece
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Georgios Charitoudis
1 Spine Department and Deformities, Interbalkan European Medical Center, Thessaloniki, Greece
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    Fluoroscopic corroboration of needle position (lateral view).

  • Figure 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2

    Sequential implementation of increasing diameter reamers and foraminotomy.

  • Figure 3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3

    Schematic representation of studied indices course during various follow-up intervals (Group A). Abbreviations: BP, bodily pain; GH, general health; MH, mental health; PF, physical function; PreOP, preoperative; RE, role-emotional; RP, role-physical; SF, social function; V, energy, fatigue, and vitality; VAS-BP, visual analog scale for low back pain; VAS-LP, visual analog scale for lower limb pain.

  • Figure 4
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4

    Schematic representation of studied indices course during various follow-up intervals (Group B). Abbreviations: BP, bodily pain; GH, general health; MH, mental health; PF, physical function; PreOP, preoperative; RE, role-emotional; RP, role-physical; SF, social function; V, energy, fatigue, and vitality; VAS-BP, visual analog scale low back pain; VAS-LP, visual analog scale lower limb pain.

  • Figure 5
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5

    Presentation of visual analog scale for low back pain (VAS-BP) values change in studied follow-up intervals. Abbreviation: PreOP, preoperative.

  • Figure 6
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6

    Role-emotional (RE) parameter assessment in the determined follow-up intervals. Abbreviation: PreOP = preoperative.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Demographic data of enrolled individuals.

    CharacteristicTotal(N = 90)Group A(n = 48)Group B(n = 42)
    Sex n (%)
     Men46 (51.1)26 (54.2)20 (47.6)
     Women44 (48.9)22 (45.8)22 (52.4)
    Age, y, mean ± SD73.0 ± 7.273.8 ± 6.172.0 ± 8.2
    Operated level, n (%)
     L3-L420 (22.2)12 (25.0)8 (19.0)
     L4-L549 (54.4)25 (52.1)24 (57.1)
     L5-S121 (23.3)11 (22.9)10 (23.8)
    • View popup
    Table 2

    Recorded values of each outcome measure in all studied indexes during before surgery and at various follow-up visits.

    ParameterPreoperative6 wk3 mo6 mo12 mo2 y
    Group AGroup BGroup AGroup BGroup AGroup BGroup AGroup BGroup AGroup BGroup AGroup B
    PF35.0 ± 3.534.5 ± 3.160.2 ± 3.859.4 ± 3.371.9 ± 4.270.0 ± 3.677.4 ± 4.675.5 ± 3.680.5 ± 4.778.8 ± 3.681.5 ± 4.880.5 ± 3.6
    P = 0.396P = 0.286 P = 0.018 P = 0.018 P = 0.041 P = 0.163
    RP35.5 ± 2.635.4 ± 4.360.4 ± 2.961.7 ± 4.171.5 ± 2.973.6 ± 4.176.2 ± 3.278.2 ± 4.279.0 ± 3.380.3 ± 4.380.5 ± 3.380.7 ± 4.3
    P = 0.661P = 0.188 P = 0.014 P = 0.023 P = 0.164P = 0.926
    BP36.3 ± 3.835.0 ± 4.165.0 ± 3.948.9 ± 4.178.2 ± 4.356.0 ± 4.184.2 ± 4.459.1 ± 4.388.5 ± 4.361.1 ± 4.490.1 ± 4.361.6 ± 4.6
    P = 0.104 P < 0.001 P < 0.001 P < 0.001 P < 0.001 P < 0.001
    GH37.1 ± 2.936.8 ± 4.062.1 ± 3.259.7 ± 4.174.5 ± 3.571.4 ± 4.378.6 ± 3.676.4 ± 4.480.7 ± 4.078.2 ± 4.781.2 ± 4.079.4 ± 4.9
    P = 0.829 P = 0.006 P = 0.001 P = 0.021 P = 0.011 P = 0.084
    V35.3 ± 2.835.0 ± 3.359.8 ± 3.061.5 ± 3.771.8 ± 3.174.1 ± 4.076.9 ± 3.478.2 ± 4.279.0 ± 3.579.7 ± 4.280.4 ± 3.680.2 ± 4.4
    P = 0.626P = 0.310 P = 0.005 P = 0.121P = 0.412P = 0.729
    SF36.6 ± 3.235.8 ± 4.662.2 ± 3.859.1 ± 4.673.7 ± 3.970.1 ± 4.678.3 ± 4.275.1 ± 4.581.4 ± 4.278.7 ± 4.683.1 ± 4.280.2 ± 4.7
    P = 0.503 P = 0.001 P < 0.001 P = 0.003 P = 0.008 P = 0.005
    RE38.1 ± 3.237.1 ± 4.466.1 ± 3.850.2 ± 4.480.6 ± 3.856.2 ± 4.687.6 ± 3.759.3 ± 4.992.6 ± 3.760.9 ± 5.094.1 ± 3.861.4 ± 4.9
    P = 0.209 P < 0.001 P < 0.001 P < 0.001 P < 0.001 P < 0.001
    MH34.9 ± 3.236.1 ± 4.158.8 ± 3.562.2 ± 4.270.4 ± 3.774.2 ± 4.474.4 ± 3.677.5 ± 4.576.2 ± 3.878.9 ± 4.676.8 ± 3.979.4 ± 4.5
    P = 0.158 P < 0.001 P < 0.001 P = 0.001 P = 0.004 P = 0.005
    VAS-LP88.3 ± 8.190.5 ± 7.637.5 ± 6.736.7 ± 6.522.9 ± 9.021.9 ± 5.912.1 ± 8.210.5 ± 7.610.4 ± 6.87.9 ± 7.510.2 ± 7.07.1 ± 7.7
    P = 0.191P = 0.555P = 0.523P = 0.318P = 0.086 P = 0.043
    VAS-BP89.2 ± 8.792.6 ± 8.030.4 ± 8.262.4 ± 6.916.5 ± 9.156.2 ± 5.810.2 ± 7.352.4 ± 7.39.2 ± 7.151.0 ± 7.69.2 ± 7.150.5 ± 7.3
    P = 0.058 P < 0.001 P < 0.001 P < 0.001 P < 0.001 P < 0.001
    • P value indicates statistical comparison of recorded values between the 2 groups in the given interval. Statistically significant P values are in boldface.

    • Values of SF-36 indexes represent percentages, whereas recorded VAS values constitute millimeters.

    • BP, bodily pain; GH, general health; MH, mental health; PF, physical function; RE, role-emotional; RP, role-physical; SF, social function; V, energy, fatigue, and vitality; VAS-BP, visual analog scale for low back pain; VAS-LP, visual analog scale for lower limb pain.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

International Journal of Spine Surgery
Vol. 16, Issue 2
1 Apr 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on International Journal of Spine Surgery.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Full-Endoscopic Ventral Facetectomy vs Open Laminectomy for Lumbar Lateral Recess Stenosis: A Comparative Study and Brief Literature Review
(Your Name) has sent you a message from International Journal of Spine Surgery
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the International Journal of Spine Surgery web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Full-Endoscopic Ventral Facetectomy vs Open Laminectomy for Lumbar Lateral Recess Stenosis: A Comparative Study and Brief Literature Review
Stylianos Kapetanakis, Nikolaos Gkantsinikoudis, Georgios Charitoudis
International Journal of Spine Surgery Apr 2022, 16 (2) 361-372; DOI: 10.14444/8218

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Full-Endoscopic Ventral Facetectomy vs Open Laminectomy for Lumbar Lateral Recess Stenosis: A Comparative Study and Brief Literature Review
Stylianos Kapetanakis, Nikolaos Gkantsinikoudis, Georgios Charitoudis
International Journal of Spine Surgery Apr 2022, 16 (2) 361-372; DOI: 10.14444/8218
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Patient Perspectives on Awake Transforaminal Endoscopic Decompression Surgery Outcomes
  • Endoscopic Spine Surgery: A French National Survey on Practices, Motivations, and Challenges
  • Effective Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery Technique With Better Facet Joint Preserving for Lumbar Lateral Recess Stenosis
Show more Endoscopic Minimally Invasive Surgery

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • lumbar spinal stenosis
  • lateral recess stenosis
  • laminectomy
  • percutaneous endoscopic ventral facetectomy
  • percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic surgery

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Content
  • Archive

More Information

  • About IJSS
  • About ISASS
  • Privacy Policy

More

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Feedback

Other Services

  • Author Instructions
  • Join ISASS
  • Reprints & Permissions

© 2025 International Journal of Spine Surgery

International Journal of Spine Surgery Online ISSN: 2211-4599

Powered by HighWire