Article Figures & Data
Figures
- Figure 1
Casting technique.
- Figure 2
Casting technique, cont.
- Figure 3
Casting technique, cont.
- Figure 4
Comparison between the precast Cobb angle and final Cobb angle.
- Figure 5
Scatter diagram showing correlation between 24-item early-onset scoliosis questionnaire (EOSQ-24) total score and the final Cobb angle.
Tables
Demographic and Radiological Data Mean ± SD Median (Range) Age at initial cast, mo 23.8 ± 9.88 24 (11–39) Age at final cast, mo 66.13 ± 7.03 67 (53–75) Follow-up period, mo 42.33 ± 6.37 42 (32–55) Precast Cobb angle, ° 56.8 ± 12.01a 61 (40–73) Final Cobb angle, ° 26.4 ± 19.12a 22 (8–75) % of correction 54.68 ± 28.37 61.40 (−20.97 to 83.82) ↵a The difference between the precast Cobb and final Cobb angle was statistically significant (P = 0.0008).
- Table 2
EOSQ-24 score of each domain and correlation with the final Cobb angle arranged in ascending manner according to the strength of correlation.
EOSQ-24 Score EOSQ-24 Domain Mean ± SD Median (Range) Correlation Coefficient With Final Cobb Angle P Value Financial impact 75.00 ± 23.15 75 (25–100) −0.36 0.19 Fatigue /energy level 74.17 ± 19.17 75 (37.5–100) −0.57 0.03 Transfer 75.00 ± 18.90 75 (50–100) −0.58 0.02 Parental impact 74.00 ± 20.55 75 (35–95) −0.65 0.008 Physical function 75.56 ± 19.79 75 (25–100) −0.67 0.006 Daily living 75.00 ± 20.59 75 (37.5–100) −0.70 0.004 Satisfaction 60.83 ± 24.03 75 (12.5–87.5) −0.76 0.0009 Pulmonary function 75.83 ± 23.84 75 (37.5–100) −0.78 0.0006 General health 65.0 ± 19.02 62.5 (37.5–87.5) −0.80 0.0003 Pain/discomfort 73.33 ± 17.59 75 (50–100) −0.82 0.0002 Emotion 72.5 ± 29.20 75 (12.5–100) −0.92 < 0.0001 EOSQ-24, 24-item early-onset scoliosis questionnaire.
In this issue
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- No citing articles found.