Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Other Publications
    • ijss

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
International Journal of Spine Surgery
  • My alerts
International Journal of Spine Surgery

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Follow ijss on Twitter
  • Visit ijss on Facebook
Research ArticleNUCLEUS REPLACEMENT
Open Access

Mechanical and Biomechanical Characterization of a Polyurethane Nucleus Replacement Device Injected and Cured In Situ Within a Balloon

Anthony Tsantrizos, Nathaniel R. Ordway, Khin Myint, Erik Martz and Hansen A. Yuan
International Journal of Spine Surgery January 2008, 2 (1) 28-39; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/SASJ-2007-0113-RR
Anthony Tsantrizos
aDisc Dynamics, Inc., Eden Prairie, Minnesota
MSc, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nathaniel R. Ordway
bDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York
MS, PE
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Khin Myint
aDisc Dynamics, Inc., Eden Prairie, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erik Martz
aDisc Dynamics, Inc., Eden Prairie, Minnesota
MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hansen A. Yuan
bDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    The DASCOR device (A) is formed by inserting a balloon catheter into the prepared nuclectomy space (B) and injecting liquid polyurethane under pressure which cures in situ (C) within minutes to form the final device.

  • Figure 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2

    The software-controlled and tablet PC-monitored injection system used to implant the DASCOR device.

  • Figure 3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3

    The six-station custom wear testing apparatus used to conduct all the fatigue testing reported in this study. (A) The main load cell used to measure the total compressive load across all six stations. (B) The load cell used to measure the loads in each test station. (C) The bottom test station assembly used to mount a lower platen as well as the heater used to maintain test station fluids at 37°C. (D) The lower platform of the testing machine, which has the capability to rotate about its longitudinal axis. (E) The upper platform, which is attached to the actuator of the servo-pneumatic material testing machine. (F) The frame of the servo-pneumatic materials testing machine (Smart Test series SP 12600, Bose Corporation, Eden Prairie, Minnesota).

  • Figure 4
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4

    A typical example illustrating the placement of the stress sensor transducer (K-Scan System, Tekscan Inc, Boston, MA) between the DASCOR device and adjacent endplate (stress sensor is retracted backwards to show the device). Quantitative stress measurements are obtained from the array of sensing elements by assigning a color gradient with a small range of stress magnitudes. Stress uniformity is therefore measured by examining the variation of color gradients.

  • Figure 5
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5

    Compression and Shear Properties

    Mean compression and shear moduli at different compressive strains obtained using the secant and tangent methods of modulus calculation. Values between bars denote the averaged value of modulus for a particular strain level. Values in parentheses and error bars denote one standard deviation.

  • Figure 6
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6

    A plot of stress versus the number of cycles to failure (S/N) depicts the axial compressive fatigue strength of the DASCOR device (ie, ability to withstand 10 million cycles without failure). The mean axial compressive stress applied and the resulting number of cycles to failure for each tested sample is tabulated. The legend within the plot describes the axial compressive load (in newtons) of each sample tested.

    Note: FF: Samples that experienced a functional failure, defined as the first appearance of a crack in the polyurethane core; CF: Samples that experienced a clinical failure, defined as the detachment of the balloon from the polyurethane core, without exhibiting the characteristics of a functional failure; Runout: Samples able to withstand 10 million cycles without failure.

  • Figure 7
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7

    A plot illustrating the mean sample height loss (also normalized to intact height) experienced during the fatigue testing conducted to characterize the wear and durability of DASCOR samples. Residual height loss after sample recovery was defined as the permanent set.

  • Figure 8
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8

    The mean compression modulus measured for DASCOR samples that underwent mechanical durability and wear assessment. Each compression modulus reported is a mean value obtained between the tangent and secant modulus measured for each strain level reported.

  • Figure 9
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 9

    A depiction of the wear location that occurred on the DASCOR balloon on samples tested for mechanical durability and wear assessment. The small yellow arrows denote the direction of the sample's maximal radial expansion during cyclic flexion and extension movements. A magnified view of the peripheral sample area most radial with respect to the center of the DASCOR samples showed evidence of minor wear line scratches, minor pitting, and deposition of wear particles, all consistent with the direction of radial expansion during wear testing. The latter sample location also experienced the highest total stress when compared to central sample locations (ie, bending stresses were highest most distally to the major diameter and nearly zero along the major diameter).

  • Figure 10
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 10

    A plot of the mean mass change versus the number of flexion/ extension cycles for all DASCOR samples that underwent mechanical durability and wear assessment. The y axis on the right also provides a scale which normalizes the mass change as a function of the mean initial sample mass. Error bars reflect one standard deviation.

  • Figure 11
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 11

    A scanning electron micrograph of typical particles observed in sample solutions used for particle characterization.

  • Figure 12
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 12

    A figure depicting the multidirectional flexibility results comparing the intact, nuclectomy, and nucleus replacement device segmental constructs. The graph on top presents the results obtained for neutral zone (crossed line bars within solid shaded bars) and range of motion. The bottom graph presents results obtained for segmental stiffness. Error bars reflect one standard deviation.

  • Figure 13
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 13

    A figure depicting the multidirectional flexibility results comparing the intact, water balloon and nucleus replacement device segmental constructs. The graph on top presents the results obtained for neutral zone (crossed line bars within solid shaded bars) and range of motion. The bottom graph presents results obtained for segmental stiffness. Error bars reflect one standard deviation.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1
    Particle Shape DescriptorCycles (Millions)
    00.52.556.257.5†10†
    Equivalent Circle Diameter(µm)1.22 (0.74)1.34 (0.92)1.55 (1.51)1.36 (0.89)1.17 (1.21)1.69 (3.62)1.04 (1.75)
    Aspect Ratio1.45 (0.32)1.45 (0.34)1.54 (0.46)1.51 (0.43)1.42 (0.45)1.33 (0.22)1.35 (0.26)
    Elongation1.74 (0.61)1.73 (0.63)1.93 (0.81)1.85 (0.88)1.63 (0.78)1.51 (0.45)1.51 (0.51)
    Roundness0.74 (0.13)0.75 (0.13)0.71 (0.15)0.72 (0.14)0.82 (0.16)0.83 (0.13)0.83 (0.13)
    Form Factor0.88 (0.07)0.88 (0.08)0.85 (0.10)0.87 (0.09)0.92 (0.09)0.93 (0.07)0.93 (0.08)
    • Mean particle shape characteristics as defined by ASTM F1877 using SEM visual inspection. Particle shape descriptors in cycle time points denoted with an “†” were significantly different than the rest (P < .05). Values in parentheses denote one standard deviation.

    • View popup
    Table 2
    Loading ConditionContact Stress (MPa)
    Water BalloonDASCOR®Difference
    Compression0.94 (0.19)0.80 (0.06) 0.16 (0.19)
    Axial Rotation0.32 (0.09)0.21 (0.02) 0.10 (0.08)
    Flexion0.71 (0.28)0.56 (0.14) 0.10 (0.16)
    Extension0.51 (0.23)0.44 (0.08) 0.12 (0.16)
    Lateral Bending0.49 (0.26)0.39 (0.09) 0.15 (0.15)
    • The mean contact stress measured at the interface between the implant and the lower endplate during multi-directional segmental flexibility testing. The mean difference in contact stress between the two implant constructs tested is denoted in italics. Values in parentheses denote one standard deviation.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

International Journal of Spine Surgery
Vol. 2, Issue 1
1 Jan 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on International Journal of Spine Surgery.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Mechanical and Biomechanical Characterization of a Polyurethane Nucleus Replacement Device Injected and Cured In Situ Within a Balloon
(Your Name) has sent you a message from International Journal of Spine Surgery
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the International Journal of Spine Surgery web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Mechanical and Biomechanical Characterization of a Polyurethane Nucleus Replacement Device Injected and Cured In Situ Within a Balloon
Anthony Tsantrizos, Nathaniel R. Ordway, Khin Myint, Erik Martz, Hansen A. Yuan
International Journal of Spine Surgery Jan 2008, 2 (1) 28-39; DOI: 10.1016/SASJ-2007-0113-RR

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Mechanical and Biomechanical Characterization of a Polyurethane Nucleus Replacement Device Injected and Cured In Situ Within a Balloon
Anthony Tsantrizos, Nathaniel R. Ordway, Khin Myint, Erik Martz, Hansen A. Yuan
International Journal of Spine Surgery Jan 2008, 2 (1) 28-39; DOI: 10.1016/SASJ-2007-0113-RR
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • BIOMECHANICAL TESTING
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Screening for Nuclear Replacement Candidates in Patients With Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease
Show more NUCLEUS REPLACEMENT

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Nucleus replacement implant
  • lumbar intervertebral disc
  • Biomechanics

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Content
  • Archive

More Information

  • About IJSS
  • About ISASS
  • Privacy Policy

More

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Feedback

Other Services

  • Author Instructions
  • Join ISASS
  • Reprints & Permissions

© 2025 International Journal of Spine Surgery

International Journal of Spine Surgery Online ISSN: 2211-4599

Powered by HighWire